svn commit: r502560 - /tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/apache-2.0/mod_jk.c

Author: jfclere Date: Fri Feb 2 02:07:49 2007 New Revision: 502560 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=502560 Log: Get it compile on httpd-dev (20060905.0). ap_get_server_version() has been replaced by ap_get_server_banner(). Modified: tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/apache-2.0/

Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.9 as alpha

Remy Maucherat wrote: > Candidate binaries are available here: > http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.9/ > > Votes ? alpha +1 Mark - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROT

Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.9 as alpha

Remy Maucherat wrote: Candidate binaries are available here: http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.9/ Votes ? +1 Tested on Linux, Solaris, HP-UX and WIN64 Regards, Mladen. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41527] New: - mod_jk statically compiled causes segmentation fault when php module is loaded

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41528] New: - old native library included with tomcat 5.5.20

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41527] - mod_jk statically compiled causes segmentation fault when php module is loaded

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41528] - old native library included with tomcat 5.5.20

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.9 as alpha

Hola, On 2/2/07, Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Remy Maucherat wrote: > Candidate binaries are available here: > http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.9/ > > Votes ? +1 for beta actually, looks good enough for me. Yoav --

Let's get 5.5.21 out the door...

... it's got a lot of good and important fixes in it. Filip, you up for cutting the release, say this weekend or early next week? Yoav - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: Let's get 5.5.21 out the door...

Yoav Shapira wrote: ... it's got a lot of good and important fixes in it. Filip, you up for cutting the release, say this weekend or early next week? ++1 -- Mladen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional

Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.9 as alpha

can we add in apache-tomcat-6.0.9-extras as an package as well to each release. That way I can publish to the maven repo directly from each build. thoughts Filip Remy Maucherat wrote: Candidate binaries are available here: http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.9/ Votes ? Rémy --

Re: Let's get 5.5.21 out the door...

yes, early next week, i'll email when I have a target time for the tag Mladen Turk wrote: Yoav Shapira wrote: ... it's got a lot of good and important fixes in it. Filip, you up for cutting the release, say this weekend or early next week? ++1 -- Mladen ---

Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.9 as alpha

Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: can we add in apache-tomcat-6.0.9-extras as an package as well to each release. That way I can publish to the maven repo directly from each build. As far as I am concerned, this was not the purpose of -extras. I don't know if I posted about it earlier, but I int

Re: Let's get 5.5.21 out the door...

Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: yes, early next week, i'll email when I have a target time for the tag Anyhow, a thing like Remy is doing for 6.0 would be nice to have. It offers a build before official tag Can we have that for 5.5.12 as well? The RM can put 'what will be released' in his priv

svn commit: r502639 - /tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/configure.in

Author: jim Date: Fri Feb 2 07:53:41 2007 New Revision: 502639 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=502639 Log: Allow for people to build for netscape/iPlanet/SunOne without requiring any Apache at all. Basically, we need to ensure that the ./configure script creates common/jk_types.h a

Re: Let's get 5.5.21 out the door...

Mladen Turk wrote: Anyhow, a thing like Remy is doing for 6.0 would be nice to have. It offers a build before official tag Yes, and it is useless, and it makes the release procedure days longer. Thanks to this nonsense the release procedure now takes over two weeks. Unfortunately, it seems I

svn commit: r502649 - /tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/common/jk_global.h

Author: jfclere Date: Fri Feb 2 08:27:53 2007 New Revision: 502649 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=502649 Log: Otherwise it doesn't compile with gcc on HPUX. Modified: tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/common/jk_global.h Modified: tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/common/jk_g

Re: Let's get 5.5.21 out the door...

Remy Maucherat wrote: Mladen Turk wrote: Anyhow, a thing like Remy is doing for 6.0 would be nice to have. It offers a build before official tag Yes, and it is useless, and it makes the release procedure days longer. Thanks to this nonsense the release procedure now takes over two weeks.

svn commit: r502650 - in /tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk: BUILD.txt native/BUILDING native/netscape/Makefile.solaris xdocs/miscellaneous/changelog.xml

Author: jim Date: Fri Feb 2 08:36:36 2007 New Revision: 502650 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=502650 Log: Might as well document lessons learning in doing a SunONE build... Modified: tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/BUILD.txt tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/BUILDING tomc

Re: svn commit: r502649 - /tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/common/jk_global.h

Hi Jean-Frederic, shouldn't we be able to find out about the necessity to include it via configure? At least HP-UX should be able to use the configure mechanism. I think we mostly use the hard coded defines for the platforms, where we can't use the configure mechanism. Regards, Rainer [EMA

Re: svn commit: r502649 - /tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/common/jk_global.h

Don't we also have a HPUX11 specific check like the 2nd line after this one? Seems consistent to me :/ On Feb 2, 2007, at 12:14 PM, Rainer Jung wrote: Hi Jean-Frederic, shouldn't we be able to find out about the necessity to include it via configure? At least HP-UX should be able to use the

Re: svn commit: r502649 - /tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/common/jk_global.h

I can't test on HP-UX, but maybe you (jfc) could try: Index: configure.in === --- configure.in(revision 502659) +++ configure.in(working copy) @@ -139,6 +139,10 @@ dnl check for filio.h used on Solaris to define FIONR

Re: svn commit: r502649 - /tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/common/jk_global.h

On Feb 2, 2007, at 12:36 PM, Rainer Jung wrote: I can't test on HP-UX, but maybe you (jfc) could try: -#if !defined(_OSD_POSIX) && !defined(AS400) && !defined(CYGWIN) && !defined(HPUX11) +#if !defined(_OSD_POSIX) && !defined(AS400) && !defined(CYGWIN) && !defined(HAVE_SYS_SOCKETVAR_H) #in

svn commit: r502679 - /tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/xdocs/webserver_howto/nes.xml

Author: jim Date: Fri Feb 2 10:16:14 2007 New Revision: 502679 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=502679 Log: Add Solaris build instructions to online doccos Modified: tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/xdocs/webserver_howto/nes.xml Modified: tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/xdocs/webserver_h

Re: svn commit: r502649 - /tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/common/jk_global.h

Rainer Jung wrote: I can't test on HP-UX, but maybe you (jfc) could try: The problem is that sys/socketvar.h can't be compiled using gcc and I think we don't need it HP-UX (for example APR doesn't include it). I will test the modifications in configure.in later. Cheers Jean-Frederic Ind

Coyote POST body read; Exceptions not handled...

Hi. I'm experiencing some problems with POST data on tomcat 5.0.28 Looking at the code i find (Coyote): protected void parseRequestParameters() { requestParametersParsed = true; Parameters parameters = coyoteRequest.getParameters(); String enc = coyoteRequest.getCharac

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41530] New: - stopping a connector produces intermittent SocketException

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41530] - stopping a connector produces intermittent SocketException

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41531] New: - By default container managed security doesn't rewrite form action

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Let's get 5.5.21 out the door...

On Fri, 2007-02-02 at 17:09 +0100, Remy Maucherat wrote: > Mladen Turk wrote: > > Anyhow, a thing like Remy is doing for 6.0 would be nice to have. > > It offers a build before official tag Tagged sources are best here :) Tagged build does nothing for us, since we build from source. So if the buil

Re: Let's get 5.5.21 out the door...

William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: On Fri, 2007-02-02 at 17:09 +0100, Remy Maucherat wrote: Mladen Turk wrote: Anyhow, a thing like Remy is doing for 6.0 would be nice to have. It offers a build before official tag Tagged sources are best here :) Tagged build does nothing for us, sin

Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.9 as alpha

On Thu, 2007-02-01 at 15:35 +0100, Remy Maucherat wrote: > Candidate binaries are available here: > http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.9/ > Has been packaged and is available for anyone to install/test on Gentoo in ~arch. Will update the download url, once it's moved. I just committed

Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.9 as alpha

Hola, I'm liking this increased collaboration. Good stuff, thank you. Yoav On 2/2/07, William L. Thomson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Thu, 2007-02-01 at 15:35 +0100, Remy Maucherat wrote: > Candidate binaries are available here: > http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.9/ > Has bee

Re: Let's get 5.5.21 out the door...

> But IMHO, I am more interested in seeing a 6.0.x release than 5.5.21 :) > 5.5.21, could be a eternal beta like 5.0.30 for those sticking to that > version. Hi, May the user base have pity on you... Since 5.0.27 until 5.5.9 versions, tomcat had the classloader thread safety show stopper #33743

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41533] New: - ISAPI Redirector fails silently if init_ws_service or get endpoint fails

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41533] - ISAPI Redirector fails silently if init_ws_service or get endpoint fails

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Let's get 5.5.21 out the door...

Mladen Turk wrote: If you think its a PITA, don't do it. Apparently, it has to be done that way. I think it's a PITA because it does take a lot of time (every vote needs a few days, etc). Rémy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EM

Re: Let's get 5.5.21 out the door...

Remy Maucherat wrote: > Mladen Turk wrote: >> If you think its a PITA, don't do it. > > Apparently, it has to be done that way. I think it's a PITA because it > does take a lot of time (every vote needs a few days, etc). The bit that has to be done (ie is mandated by Apache rules) is a vote by th

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41531] - By default container managed security doesn't rewrite form action

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41493] - odd characters in admin webapp, inconfigurable connectors

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Let's get 5.5.21 out the door...

Mark Thomas wrote: The bit that has to be done (ie is mandated by Apache rules) is a vote by the PMC (three +1's required) to release a tarball. Given that a -1 vote is not valid for a release vote, as soon as we have 3 +1's from the PMC we can release. This means the release process can be: 1.

Re: Let's get 5.5.21 out the door...

Hi, On 2/2/07, Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Given that a -1 vote is not valid for a release vote, as soon as we Umm, why is a -1 not valid for a release? It can be overridden with a majority of and at least 3 +1 votes, but it's valid. It's also why the vote cannot be concluded in h

Re: Let's get 5.5.21 out the door...

Yoav Shapira wrote: > Hi, > > On 2/2/07, Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Given that a -1 vote is not valid for a release vote, as soon as we > > Umm, why is a -1 not valid for a release? Standard Apache procedure as per http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html Mark --

Re: Let's get 5.5.21 out the door...

Hi, On 2/2/07, Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Yoav Shapira wrote: > Hi, > > On 2/2/07, Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Given that a -1 vote is not valid for a release vote, as soon as we > > Umm, why is a -1 not valid for a release? Standard Apache procedure as per http://www.