Hi,
Just wanted to say thanks. :-)
Regards,
Sebastiaan
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Ok, I think I'm done, just need to document the very messy way of
setting this up.
BTW, I published 6.0.13 to the staging and the main repository.
I built the extras from the trunk, as I don't think
Yoav Shapira wrote:
Hi,
On 5/22/07, William L. Thomson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If possible when new versions of Tomcat native be announced on list?
Seems Tomcat 6.0.13 requires 1.1.10. First I became aware of it, was
when user reported the problem. Granted I should have discovered it
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42494.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42494.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42494.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Mladen Turk wrote:
It is part of Tomcat release and that shouldn't change.
Each tomcat release has a detection of the Tomcat native, and
it prints out the suggested version compared with the one user is
running.
For 6.0.13 the required version is 1.1.8 and recommended
is 1.1.10 and that is
On 5/23/07, Sebastiaan van Erk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Just wanted to say thanks. :-)
+1 - this is great.
Niall
Regards,
Sebastiaan
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Ok, I think I'm done, just need to document the very messy way of
setting this up.
BTW, I published 6.0.13 to the
In general it is not very easy to even notice when new stable tcnative
versions become available.
For instance, discovering that 1.1.10 is out, what changed since 1.1.8,
and verifying that it is intended to work with 5.5.23 are not very
trivial from the web site currently...
Rainer Jung
On Wed, 2007-05-23 at 13:19 +0200, Mladen Turk wrote:
For 6.0.13 the required version is 1.1.8 and recommended
is 1.1.10 and that is clearly printed whenever Tomcat is started.
I'm not sure what more is needed.
According to the bug report, it required 1.1.10, and Tomcat failed to
start with
On Wed, 2007-05-23 at 15:18 +0200, Rainer Jung wrote:
I think he's trying to provide packages for a distro. So he wants to
provide 1.1.8, 1.1.9, 1.1.10, ... whenever they are released (available).
100% Correct :)
--
William L. Thomson Jr.
Gentoo/Java
signature.asc
Description: This is a
Author: remm
Date: Wed May 23 08:44:33 2007
New Revision: 540979
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=540979
Log:
- NPE check (when using JMX, if I remember correctly).
Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/core/StandardContext.java
Modified:
Author: remm
Date: Wed May 23 08:49:36 2007
New Revision: 540981
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=540981
Log:
- Revert the API changes in the 6.0.x branch.
Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/CometEvent.java
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42497.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Niall Pemberton wrote:
On 5/23/07, Sebastiaan van Erk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Just wanted to say thanks. :-)
+1 - this is great.
I think the ant tasks have different naming conventions, I believe the
jars get renamed on the way up.
just an fyi
Filip
I could have swarn this was brought up recently but could not find
mention of it in archives. Guess I should file a bug on it, but it's
kinda a moot issue.
It seems the sources for 6.0.x have not really been versioned. I have
noticed it myself on occasion, but never cared enough to comment or
hey William, what are you referring to? any specific .java files that
need a version number?
I was under the impression that we only tag each build, and then there
is a small sucker in a property file that we swap out.
ie, when you start 5.5.23 then you see
May 23, 2007 6:35:55 PM
William L. Thomson Jr. wrote:
On Wed, 2007-05-23 at 13:19 +0200, Mladen Turk wrote:
For 6.0.13 the required version is 1.1.8 and recommended
is 1.1.10 and that is clearly printed whenever Tomcat is started.
I'm not sure what more is needed.
According to the bug report, it required 1.1.10, and
Filip,
On Wed, 2007-05-23 at 18:37 +0200, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
hey William, what are you referring to? any specific .java files that
need a version number?
Sorry should have been more specific, the problem lies in
build.properties.default
I was under the impression that we only
aah, that makes sense.
Remember that the release manager is carrying his/her own
build.properties, and if you build from source, you should too.
in there you override any properties needed. That is why all binary
builds are correct, but your build isn't.
what you are asking for is that we
On Wed, 2007-05-23 at 19:46 +0200, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
aah, that makes sense.
Remember that the release manager is carrying his/her own
build.properties, and if you build from source, you should too.
in there you override any properties needed. That is why all binary
builds are
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
aah, that makes sense.
Remember that the release manager is carrying his/her own
build.properties, and if you build from source, you should too.
in there you override any properties needed. That is why all binary
builds are correct, but your build isn't.
what
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42503.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42503.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42503.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
24 matches
Mail list logo