Re: Old CVS repository of Tomcat

Mladen Turk wrote: Beat Fluri wrote: Hi, As a member of the Software Engineering group of the University Zurich, Switzerland, I'm investigating the evolution of software systems. For this, I'd like to use Tomcat as a case study. Unfortunately, our tools are limited to CVS and not yet fully a

svn commit: r573772 - in /tomcat: sandbox/gdev6x/ trunk/

Author: fhanik Date: Fri Sep 7 19:35:33 2007 New Revision: 573772 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=573772&view=rev Log: (empty) Added: tomcat/sandbox/gdev6x/ - copied from r573771, tomcat/trunk/ Removed: tomcat/trunk/ -

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42950] - ConcurrentModificationException on Shutdown

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [VOTE] Make released versions RTC

On Sep 6, 2007, at 1:39 PM, Mladen Turk wrote: If you read my post I was careful enough to not mention the RTC policy. All I was saying is that current CTR caused too many problems, because trunk was our stable branch, and disagreement on API caused drastic things like putting trunk to sand

Re: [VOTE] Make released versions RTC

Remy Maucherat wrote: Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: I get more and more provocations from you, for example on the Servlet expert group, where you could not resist alluding to this conflict in your introduction. huh? it was a mere reference that we are working on the same project, twist it any

svn commit: r573637 - in /tomcat/site/trunk: docs/download-55.html xdocs/download-55.xml

Author: fhanik Date: Fri Sep 7 10:38:45 2007 New Revision: 573637 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=573637&view=rev Log: In anticipation of the new release Modified: tomcat/site/trunk/docs/download-55.html tomcat/site/trunk/xdocs/download-55.xml Modified: tomcat/site/trunk/docs/down

Re: [VOTE] Make released versions RTC

2007/9/6, Mladen Turk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Henri Gomez wrote: > > Well what's the consensus on Java projects, like Xerces, Xalan or Lucene ? > > > > It doesn't mater how other project do things. It's irrelevant. Well all projects are ASF projects and it's not bad to see what others do, just to a

Re: [VOTE] Make released versions RTC

On Sep 6, 2007, at 1:22 PM, Remy Maucherat wrote: Most of the comments were that it was too annoying to do for casual bugfixing, and it's true it's not justified for all patches. Maybe a finer rule could be devised, something like using a RtisTC (tis = the important stuff) model. To gi

Re: [VOTE] Make released versions RTC

bottom line is that 1. moving trunk to sandbox 2. trying to implement a semi RTC both do nothing but hurt Tomcat moving forward, and falling further behind in the servlet container space. The whole debate that has risen up, is only based on conjured up supposed breakage of the CTR model tha

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43327] New: - Socket bind fails on tomcat startup when using apr

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Old CVS repository of Tomcat

Beat Fluri wrote: Hi, As a member of the Software Engineering group of the University Zurich, Switzerland, I'm investigating the evolution of software systems. For this, I'd like to use Tomcat as a case study. Unfortunately, our tools are limited to CVS and not yet fully adapted to Subversion

Old CVS repository of Tomcat

Hi, As a member of the Software Engineering group of the University Zurich, Switzerland, I'm investigating the evolution of software systems. For this, I'd like to use Tomcat as a case study. Unfortunately, our tools are limited to CVS and not yet fully adapted to Subversion. Is there a p