Re: Redeclaration of variables by tag handler (BZ 48616, 42390)

2010-02-16 Thread Mark Thomas
On 16/02/2010 03:36, Konstantin Kolinko wrote: The examples webapp appears to be working with this, and tests in trunk do pass, with exception of about 50% of cookie tests. You can't run the cookie tests in one go in Eclipse as each test needs to be run in a new JVM. If you run them one at a

svn commit: r910424 - /tomcat/jk/trunk/native/iis/jk_isapi_plugin.c

2010-02-16 Thread mturk
Author: mturk Date: Tue Feb 16 08:25:24 2010 New Revision: 910424 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=910424view=rev Log: Allow chunking compilation by default. User still needs to set the enable_chunked_encoding to enable the protocol. Modified:

svn commit: r910434 - /tomcat/jk/trunk/native/iis/jk_isapi_plugin.c

2010-02-16 Thread mturk
Author: mturk Date: Tue Feb 16 08:41:41 2010 New Revision: 910434 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=910434view=rev Log: Add few code comments. No functional change Modified: tomcat/jk/trunk/native/iis/jk_isapi_plugin.c Modified: tomcat/jk/trunk/native/iis/jk_isapi_plugin.c URL:

Re: jk/cluster - intelligent systems load

2010-02-16 Thread Mark Thomas
On 16/02/2010 07:01, Mladen Turk wrote: On 02/16/2010 12:24 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: On 15/02/2010 21:52, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: why not just a servlet filter? +1. I was going to suggest the same thing. Why not reusing the clustering code for that. It would allow to pre-redirect

Re: jk/cluster - intelligent systems load

2010-02-16 Thread Mladen Turk
On 02/16/2010 09:56 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: I don't see why the current set of valid cluster nodes could not be passed back via a header. Exactly. That raises the interesting question of if a node goes down, which component will notice first? The proxy or the cluster? With long timeouts in

Re: jk/cluster - intelligent systems load

2010-02-16 Thread Mark Thomas
On 16/02/2010 09:08, Mladen Turk wrote: On 02/16/2010 09:56 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: The other thing it potentially allows is the cluster to tell the proxy about which nodes are in the cluster, allowing a more dynamic configuration. Not sure I'd want to use that in production, but in dev that

svn commit: r910442 - /tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/jasper/security/SecurityClassLoad.java

2010-02-16 Thread markt
Author: markt Date: Tue Feb 16 09:27:49 2010 New Revision: 910442 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=910442view=rev Log: Fix https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48580 Prevent AccessControlException if first access is to a JSP that uses a FunctionMapper Modified:

svn commit: r910443 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt

2010-02-16 Thread markt
Author: markt Date: Tue Feb 16 09:29:36 2010 New Revision: 910443 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=910443view=rev Log: Proposal Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt URL:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48580] 6.0.24: AccessControlException in ProtectedFunctionMapper on first access to certain JSP

2010-02-16 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48580 --- Comment #4 from Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org 2010-02-16 09:29:49 UTC --- This has been fixed in 7.0.x and proposed for 6.0.x -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving

Re: jk/cluster - intelligent systems load

2010-02-16 Thread Mladen Turk
On 02/16/2010 10:21 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: On 16/02/2010 09:08, Mladen Turk wrote: On 02/16/2010 09:56 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: The other thing it potentially allows is the cluster to tell the proxy about which nodes are in the cluster, allowing a more dynamic configuration. Not sure I'd want to

svn commit: r910471 - /tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/jasper/servlet/JspServletWrapper.java

2010-02-16 Thread markt
Author: markt Date: Tue Feb 16 11:07:00 2010 New Revision: 910471 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=910471view=rev Log: Fix https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48582 Avoid NPE as config may be null but ctxt won't be Modified:

svn commit: r910473 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt

2010-02-16 Thread markt
Author: markt Date: Tue Feb 16 11:08:04 2010 New Revision: 910473 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=910473view=rev Log: Proposal Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt URL:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48582] JspServletWrapper.getServletContext() throws NullPointerException

2010-02-16 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48582 --- Comment #3 from Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org 2010-02-16 11:08:19 UTC --- Fixed in 7.0.x and proposed for 6.0.x -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail

svn commit: r910485 - /tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/realm/JNDIRealm.java

2010-02-16 Thread markt
Author: markt Date: Tue Feb 16 11:40:55 2010 New Revision: 910485 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=910485view=rev Log: Fix https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48589 Make JNDIRealm easier to extend by making the User class protected Based on a patch by Candid Dauth Modified:

svn commit: r910486 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt

2010-02-16 Thread markt
Author: markt Date: Tue Feb 16 11:42:14 2010 New Revision: 910486 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=910486view=rev Log: Proposal Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt URL:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48750] New: performance problems with JSF 1.2

2010-02-16 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48750 Summary: performance problems with JSF 1.2 Product: Tomcat 6 Version: 6.0.24 Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows XP Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P2

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48589] org.apache.catalina.realm.JNDIRealm User class should be accessible from sub-classes

2010-02-16 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48589 --- Comment #2 from Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org 2010-02-16 11:44:03 UTC --- Thanks for the patch. I didn't use it directly but used it as the basis for the fix I have applied to 7.0.x and proposed for 6.0.x For future reference, please

Timing for 6.0.25?

2010-02-16 Thread Mark Thomas
Mainly a question for Jean-Frederic, but what are the thoughts on aiming for a 6.0.25 release quite soon? There were a handful of regressions in 6.0.24 it would be good to fix. Also, if folks have a little time, there are a reasonable number of proposals in the STATUS file for review. While some

Re: svn commit: r910485 - /tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/realm/JNDIRealm.java

2010-02-16 Thread sebb
On 16/02/2010, ma...@apache.org ma...@apache.org wrote: Author: markt Date: Tue Feb 16 11:40:55 2010 New Revision: 910485 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=910485view=rev Log: Fix https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48589 Make JNDIRealm easier to extend by making

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48750] performance problems with JSF 1.2

2010-02-16 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48750 --- Comment #1 from Michael Heinen m...@recommind.com 2010-02-16 12:24:01 UTC --- Created an attachment (id=25001) -- (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25001) Jsps - source and java - Source jsp 1000hout.jsp - JSP

Re: Timing for 6.0.25?

2010-02-16 Thread Mark Thomas
On 16/02/2010 12:20, Jess Holle wrote: Is there a list of such regressions? Doing a search for bugs specifically against 6.0.24 and then looking for those labeled as regressions shows one bug: 48701 https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48701. 48616

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48750] performance problems with JSF 1.2

2010-02-16 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48750 Michael Heinen m...@recommind.com changed: What|Removed |Added Platform|PC |All ---

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48750] performance problems with JSF 1.2

2010-02-16 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48750 Michael Heinen m...@recommind.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48750] performance problems with JSF 1.2

2010-02-16 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48750 Remy Maucherat r...@apache.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48600] Performance issue with tags

2010-02-16 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48600 --- Comment #7 from Remy Maucherat r...@apache.org 2010-02-16 13:00:02 UTC --- *** Bug 48750 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48750] performance problems with JSF 1.2

2010-02-16 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48750 --- Comment #4 from Michael Heinen m...@recommind.com 2010-02-16 13:17:13 UTC --- Could anybody pls explain why this is a duplicate of bug #48600? I set metadata-complete=true in web.xml Moreover the patch attached in 48600 does not

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48600] Performance issue with tags

2010-02-16 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48600 --- Comment #8 from Remy Maucherat r...@apache.org 2010-02-16 13:44:56 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) JBoss use a DummpAnnotationProcessor to remove this capabilities. I think, now, JBoss can use this new version. Which version of

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48750] performance problems with JSF 1.2

2010-02-16 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48750 --- Comment #5 from Remy Maucherat r...@apache.org 2010-02-16 13:56:03 UTC --- The performance levels do not seem catastrophic, so the severity is very appropriate. -- Configure bugmail:

Re: Timing for 6.0.25?

2010-02-16 Thread jean-frederic clere
On 02/16/2010 12:52 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: Mainly a question for Jean-Frederic, but what are the thoughts on aiming for a 6.0.25 release quite soon? There were a handful of regressions in 6.0.24 it would be good to fix. +1 on my side :-) Cheers Jean-Frederic

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48600] Performance issue with tags

2010-02-16 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48600 Philippe Prados apa...@prados.fr changed: What|Removed |Added CC||apa...@prados.fr

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48608] welcome-file ignores filter mapping

2010-02-16 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48608 Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

Re: Timing for 6.0.25?

2010-02-16 Thread Jim Jagielski
On Feb 16, 2010, at 9:03 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote: On 02/16/2010 12:52 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: Mainly a question for Jean-Frederic, but what are the thoughts on aiming for a 6.0.25 release quite soon? There were a handful of regressions in 6.0.24 it would be good to fix. +1 on my

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat Native 1.1.20

2010-02-16 Thread Jim Jagielski
I'm +1 On Feb 15, 2010, at 2:57 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: Give me 24hrs... I'll be able to test tomorrow AM. On Feb 15, 2010, at 1:54 PM, Mladen Turk wrote: On 02/10/2010 11:19 AM, Mladen Turk wrote: Hi, Ping. Anyone? Regards -- ^TM

Re: Timing for 6.0.25?

2010-02-16 Thread Mark Thomas
On 16/02/2010 14:03, jean-frederic clere wrote: On 02/16/2010 12:52 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: Mainly a question for Jean-Frederic, but what are the thoughts on aiming for a 6.0.25 release quite soon? There were a handful of regressions in 6.0.24 it would be good to fix. +1 on my side :-)

Re: Timing for 6.0.25?

2010-02-16 Thread jean-frederic clere
On 02/16/2010 05:15 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: On 16/02/2010 14:03, jean-frederic clere wrote: On 02/16/2010 12:52 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: Mainly a question for Jean-Frederic, but what are the thoughts on aiming for a 6.0.25 release quite soon? There were a handful of regressions in 6.0.24 it

svn commit: r910604 - in /tomcat/trunk: build.xml res/META-INF/annotations-api.jar.manifest res/META-INF/bootstrap.jar.manifest res/META-INF/default.notice res/META-INF/el-api.jar.manifest

2010-02-16 Thread markt
Author: markt Date: Tue Feb 16 17:23:23 2010 New Revision: 910604 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=910604view=rev Log: Manifest improvements - automate copyright year - add manifests for el annotations - improve default NOTICE - add info to bootstrap manifest Added:

svn commit: r910612 - /tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/manager/ManagerServlet.java

2010-02-16 Thread kkolinko
Author: kkolinko Date: Tue Feb 16 17:29:57 2010 New Revision: 910612 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=910612view=rev Log: If the memory leak occured in the ROOT application, display / instead on an empty line It might be better to apply this fix to

Re: jk/cluster - intelligent systems load

2010-02-16 Thread Costin Manolache
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 1:38 AM, Mladen Turk mt...@apache.org wrote: On 02/16/2010 10:21 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: On 16/02/2010 09:08, Mladen Turk wrote: On 02/16/2010 09:56 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: The other thing it potentially allows is the cluster to tell the proxy about which nodes are

svn commit: r910643 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt

2010-02-16 Thread kkolinko
Author: kkolinko Date: Tue Feb 16 18:35:40 2010 New Revision: 910643 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=910643view=rev Log: vote and propose a corrected patch Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt URL:

svn commit: r910644 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt

2010-02-16 Thread markt
Author: markt Date: Tue Feb 16 18:39:08 2010 New Revision: 910644 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=910644view=rev Log: Proposal Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt URL:

Re: svn commit: r910644 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt

2010-02-16 Thread Konstantin Kolinko
2010/2/16 ma...@apache.org: Author: markt Date: Tue Feb 16 18:39:08 2010 New Revision: 910644 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=910644view=rev Log: Proposal Modified:    tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt + +* Various manifest improvements +  

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48611] Can't build extras in 6.0.24. default.manifest does not exist

2010-02-16 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48611 Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

svn commit: r910650 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt

2010-02-16 Thread markt
Author: markt Date: Tue Feb 16 18:59:48 2010 New Revision: 910650 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=910650view=rev Log: Withdraw proposal - it is included in a wider manifest proposal Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt URL:

svn commit: r910665 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt

2010-02-16 Thread markt
Author: markt Date: Tue Feb 16 19:56:41 2010 New Revision: 910665 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=910665view=rev Log: Respond to question Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt URL:

svn commit: r910666 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt

2010-02-16 Thread kkolinko
Author: kkolinko Date: Tue Feb 16 19:58:40 2010 New Revision: 910666 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=910666view=rev Log: add patch URL for BZ 48498 Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt URL:

svn commit: r910674 - in /tomcat: tc5.5.x/trunk/STATUS.txt tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt

2010-02-16 Thread kkolinko
Author: kkolinko Date: Tue Feb 16 20:27:20 2010 New Revision: 910674 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=910674view=rev Log: vote and propose for 5.5 Modified: tomcat/tc5.5.x/trunk/STATUS.txt tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt Modified: tomcat/tc5.5.x/trunk/STATUS.txt URL:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48616] Struts 1.2 and bean:define tag throws jsp 1.1 regression exception

2010-02-16 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48616 --- Comment #23 from Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org 2010-02-16 20:45:19 UTC --- Trunk patch looks good to me. Feel free to apply it (reverting my previous fix). -- Configure bugmail:

svn commit: r910683 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt

2010-02-16 Thread markt
Author: markt Date: Tue Feb 16 20:49:18 2010 New Revision: 910683 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=910683view=rev Log: Withdraw my proposal. Vote for Konstantin's. Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt URL:

svn commit: r910693 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt

2010-02-16 Thread markt
Author: markt Date: Tue Feb 16 21:13:18 2010 New Revision: 910693 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=910693view=rev Log: Withdraw patch. Bug has a better fix proposed. Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt URL:

svn commit: r910695 - /tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/realm/JNDIRealm.java

2010-02-16 Thread markt
Author: markt Date: Tue Feb 16 21:15:21 2010 New Revision: 910695 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=910695view=rev Log: Revert r904913. https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48629 now proposes a better solution Modified:

Re: svn commit: r910644 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt

2010-02-16 Thread Konstantin Kolinko
2010/2/16 Konstantin Kolinko knst.koli...@gmail.com: 2010/2/16  ma...@apache.org: Author: markt Date: Tue Feb 16 18:39:08 2010 New Revision: 910644 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=910644view=rev Log: Proposal Modified:    tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt + +* Various manifest

svn propchange: r910695 - svn:log

2010-02-16 Thread kkolinko
Author: kkolinko Revision: 910695 Modified property: svn:log Modified: svn:log at Tue Feb 16 21:30:56 2010 -- --- svn:log (original) +++ svn:log Tue Feb 16 21:30:56 2010 @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ -Revert r904913.

Re: svn commit: r910644 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt

2010-02-16 Thread Mark Thomas
On 16/02/2010 21:24, Konstantin Kolinko wrote: 2010/2/16 Konstantin Kolinko knst.koli...@gmail.com: 2010/2/16 ma...@apache.org: Author: markt Date: Tue Feb 16 18:39:08 2010 New Revision: 910644 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=910644view=rev Log: Proposal Modified:

Re: svn commit: r910644 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt

2010-02-16 Thread Konstantin Kolinko
2010/2/17 Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org: On 16/02/2010 21:24, Konstantin Kolinko wrote: 2010/2/16 Konstantin Kolinko knst.koli...@gmail.com: 2010/2/16  ma...@apache.org: Author: markt Date: Tue Feb 16 18:39:08 2010 New Revision: 910644 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=910644view=rev

Re: svn commit: r910644 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt

2010-02-16 Thread Mark Thomas
On 16/02/2010 21:33, Mark Thomas wrote: On 16/02/2010 21:24, Konstantin Kolinko wrote: 2. el-api.jar contains unfiltered @el.revision@ in its manifest I'll fix that. Fixed. It was a copy/paste error. 3. If you build extras after building tomcat, all files in extras

svn commit: r910792 - in /tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/jasper/compiler: Generator.java Node.java ScriptingVariabler.java

2010-02-16 Thread kkolinko
Author: kkolinko Date: Wed Feb 17 01:10:34 2010 New Revision: 910792 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=910792view=rev Log: Apply my patch from https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48616#c20 This patch - Reverts r905145, - Provides an alternative fix for bug 48616 and bug 42390,

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48616] Struts 1.2 and bean:define tag throws jsp 1.1 regression exception

2010-02-16 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48616 --- Comment #24 from Konstantin Kolinko knst.koli...@gmail.com 2010-02-17 01:11:59 UTC --- Applied to trunk (r910792), proposed for 6.0 and 5.5. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You

svn commit: r910796 - /tomcat/trunk/java/javax/servlet/jsp/el/ImplicitObjectELResolver.java

2010-02-16 Thread kkolinko
Author: kkolinko Date: Wed Feb 17 01:52:41 2010 New Revision: 910796 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=910796view=rev Log: Fix a bug in ImplicitObjectELResolver.ScopeMap intruduced when applying generics there: the get(String) and remove(String) methods were not overwriting the ones of

svn commit: r910803 - /tomcat/trunk/java/javax/servlet/jsp/el/ImplicitObjectELResolver.java

2010-02-16 Thread kkolinko
Author: kkolinko Date: Wed Feb 17 02:26:41 2010 New Revision: 910803 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=910803view=rev Log: Provide slightly more efficient implementations for ScopeMap.size() and ScopeMap.containsKey(). Modified:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat Native 1.1.20

2010-02-16 Thread Konstantin Kolinko
2010/2/10 Mladen Turk mt...@apache.org: Apache Tomcat Native 1.1.20 is: [x] Stable - no major issues, no regressions Tested win32 binaries only. Minor: *.md5 and *.sha1 files should have * between checksum and filename, because those files are binary. md5sum/sha1sum that I am using were

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48756] New: I am not finding commons-collections-3.1.jar in tomcat 5.5.28

2010-02-16 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48756 Summary: I am not finding commons-collections-3.1.jar in tomcat 5.5.28 Product: Tomcat 5 Version: 5.5.28 Platform: PC OS/Version: All Status: NEW

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat Native 1.1.20

2010-02-16 Thread Mladen Turk
On 02/17/2010 05:12 AM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote: 2010/2/10 Mladen Turkmt...@apache.org: Apache Tomcat Native 1.1.20 is: [x] Stable - no major issues, no regressions Tested win32 binaries only. Minor: *.md5 and *.sha1 files should have * between checksum and filename, because those files

[RESULTS] Was: [VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat Native 1.1.20

2010-02-16 Thread Mladen Turk
We have collected 4 binding votes, so I'll proceed with the release. Apache Tomcat Native 1.1.20 is: [X] Stable - no major issues, no regressions [ ] Beta - at least one significant issue -- tell us what it is [ ] Alpha - multiple significant issues -- tell us what they are Regards -- ^TM