> On Feb 20, 2024, at 8:08 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>
> Looking at the latest version of the Jakarta EE 11 release plan, the minimum
> Java version has been dropped to Java 17.
>
> https://jakartaee.github.io/platform/jakartaee11/JakartaEE11ReleasePlan
>
> On that basis I think we have no choice
> On Oct 21, 2022, at 12:12 PM, Christopher Schultz
> wrote:
>
> I'm wondering if I should migrate my applications to 9.0 or 10.x and start
> re-writing imports. The flexibility of Tomcat 10.x is just incredible. I'm
> kind of leaning toward skipping 9.x.
Do it! :)
-David
smime.p7s
Descr
> On Oct 7, 2022, at 2:27 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I don't think there is a need to make a decision on this quickly, but based
> on past experience and the current discussions about Jakarta EE 11 I think
> this is something we need to start thinking about.
>
> Some key facts:
>
> On May 19, 2022, at 5:16 PM, David Blevins wrote:
>
> - useSendfile
>
Quick correction. This one seems to be common between NIO, NIO2 and Apr and
has the same description in all three. Potentially it could go in the "Common
Attributes" section.
-David
smime.p
Hey All,
I was picking through the connector docs generating some code from the
descriptions and I noticed there are a handful of properties common between NIO
and NIO2.
- socket.appReadBufSize
- socket.appWriteBufSize
- socket.directBuffer
- socket.directSslBuffer
- useSendfile
These att
> On Mar 31, 2022, at 12:13 PM, Christopher Schultz
> wrote:
>
> Mark,
>
> On 3/29/22 19:40, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> I worry that putting much more than a simple link on the which version page
>> could cause confusion. Something like:
>> "For users wanting a Java EE / Jakarta EE container that s
> On Mar 28, 2022, at 10:12 AM, Christopher Schultz
> wrote:
>
> David,
>
> On 3/26/22 14:13, David Blevins wrote:
>> I've never had the bravery to ask
>
> Why the heck not?
Perhaps it's a Geronimo hangover, but I never wanted to risk creating
Hey All,
I've never had the bravery to ask, but would there be some willingness to
consider adding a mention of TomEE on the Tomcat website?
Any sign of pushback and I'll happily drop -- it's far more important to
maintain good will, respect boundaries and keep things friendly. If there was
s
> On Aug 31, 2020, at 12:27 PM, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 8:39 PM Mark Thomas wrote:
> >> On 31/08/2020 17:17, David Blevins wrote:
> >> Hey All,
> >>
> >> Curious if there would be any willingness to change the defa
Hey All,
Curious if there would be any willingness to change the default of this to true
for Tomcat 10 prior to final release.
-
https://github.com/apache/tomcat/blob/master/java/org/apache/catalina/core/StandardServer.java#L195
The current default prevents a JVM shutdown and effectively mean
> On Jun 12, 2019, at 6:35 AM, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 11:11 AM Mark Struberg
> wrote:
>
> Rémy's enhancements are great - the better and cleaner the integration, the
> better for all those projects.
> But Romain and David are also correct: it's very easy to become
> On Jun 11, 2019, at 12:02 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>
> On 11/06/2019 19:37, David Blevins wrote:
>>
>> At a high level, is there a desire to start supporting more "EE" like specs
>> such as CDI, JAX-RS, JPA, etc?
>
> Make it easier to integrate
erspective of "let's move a bunch of TomEE code into
Tomcat", but more of "let's write cleaner newer code in Tomcat and retire
equivalent TomEE code."
That's not a specific proposal, just curious if appetite has developed in
recent years to entertain tip-toeing
Vote is closed I'm just a lurker, but non-binding +1 from me :)
Great to see this!
-David
> On Feb 21, 2019, at 8:13 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>
> This is a VOTE to migrate the primary source code repository for Apache
> Tomcat 9.0.x, 8.5.x and 7.0.x from svn to git.
>
> The migration will be
Hi folks! Great to see this thread picking up steam.
On Jun 10, 2015, at 6:12 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 10/06/2015 13:34, Fjodor Vershinin wrote:
>
>> And what about code backward compatibility for Geronimo,
>> should code ported back, or new Geronimo release can use our
>> implementation?
>
Wonder what people's thoughts are about possibly including TomEE releases in
the Tomcat news feed on occasion?
Having some mention of TomEE on tomcat.apache.org would be nice -- most users
still do not know it exists. However, I've never mentioned it as I personally
couldn't think of a good wa
Hi All!
Whipped up a short little patch to allow for JDBC drivers and interceptors to
be loaded from the thread context class loader as well as the traditional way
using effectively the server/lib/ based classloader.
- https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55444
We were using Com
On Aug 15, 2013, at 1:07 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> If you wanted to roll up your sleeves, we'd be more than happy to see it
>> ported or reimplemented in TomEE.
>
> or Tomcat :)
Even better!
-David
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail
On Aug 14, 2013, at 2:25 AM, Arjan Tijms wrote:
> markt wrote
>> No-one said it would be difficult. TomEE has already done it. We'd just
>> need to lift the code. Difficulty really doesn't come into it. If there
>> is a demand for it, it will get implemented. If there isn't, it won't.
>
> Thank
On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 4:13 PM, wrote:
> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54361
Not sure how close I got on the deploy setup. If someone can tell me
the build commands I'd have to run prior to this, I'll give it a whirl
under a different groupid (something nexus will allow).
Was noticing that TomEE had gotten just a tad slower between the 1.0.0 (Tomcat
7.0.27) and the recently released 1.5.0 (Tomcat 7.0.30). I usually include a
pure Tomcat binary or two in my performance testing so I have control group.
The interesting thing is my control group seems to be my vari
On Feb 10, 2012, at 1:55 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 10/02/2012 21:51, David Blevins wrote:
>> I'd like to update this particular question of the wiki to make mention of
>> TomEE.
>>
>> http://wiki.apache.org/tomcat/FAQ/Miscellaneous#Q21
>>
>>
I'd like to update this particular question of the wiki to make mention of
TomEE.
http://wiki.apache.org/tomcat/FAQ/Miscellaneous#Q21
Is it possible to get write access or have someone make that update?
-David
-
To unsubs
On Oct 14, 2011, at 6:05 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> 2011/10/14 Mark Thomas :
>> On 14/10/2011 09:15, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
>>> 2011/10/14 David Blevins :
>>>> We've been using plain Tomcat zips for creating TomEE in the
>>>> OpenEJB maven build
On Oct 14, 2011, at 12:07 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
> On 10/14/2011 02:01 AM, David Blevins wrote:
>> We've been using plain Tomcat zips for creating TomEE in the OpenEJB maven
>> build for a while now. So far that has been done by publishing the Tomcat
>> z
We've been using plain Tomcat zips for creating TomEE in the OpenEJB maven
build for a while now. So far that has been done by publishing the Tomcat zips
to a maven repo in svn. Not the best idea to have them in svn, so we're trying
to get them in the actual maven repo.
It's pretty slick to b
It doesn't appear ExtensionValidator will look in parent classloaders for
extensions (e.g. tomcat.home/lib/).
Has this ever been discussed and what would you imagine might be the best way
to do it?
-David
-
To unsubscribe,
27;ll first try directly, if I get
confused
by the callback style I'll use xbean-finder or the tree model.
Costin
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 12:49 PM, David Blevins
wrote:
Cool. Feel free to ping me in freenode if you want; dblevins in
#openejb,
#geronimo and #asfinfra.
-David
On Aug 7, 200
Cool. Feel free to ping me in freenode if you want; dblevins in
#openejb, #geronimo and #asfinfra.
-David
On Aug 7, 2009, at 9:30 AM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
I'll take a look at this after I'm done with the async stuff
On 08/04/2009 03:28 PM, David Blevins wrote:
On A
On Aug 4, 2009, at 1:22 PM, Costin Manolache wrote:
Thanks - so objectweb instead of BCEL.
I'll try it out - it's a bit different from what I had in mind, it
looks
like xbean-finder first finds all classes and
than reads the files using the class loader ( but not Class.forName,
which
is g
No, it scans via ASM for security reasons and only loads classes (with
no initialization) once you ask for classes that have a specific
annotation.
Sample code:
ClassFinder finder = new ClassFinder(webapp.getClassLoader(),
webappLibUrls);
for (Class servlet : finder.findAnnotatedClas
add this one instead, restart" to the
setup instructions.
If it is cleared up, any idea what release it might show up in --
just looking for something to mention in the docs.
--
David Blevins
-
To unsubscribe, e-ma
On Aug 1, 2007, at 1:30 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
David Blevins wrote:
My personal opinion: java.util.logging very much lacks a good
formatter. The default 2 line formatting of messages, splitting
timestamps and message in separate lines, is not really useful in
production. Many ad hoc log
ention, but the Tomcat 6 log
files still seem to follow the one line per message format. How did
you pull that off?
-David
Regards,
Rainer
David Blevins wrote:
So another topic,
There's a thread going on in OpenEJB at the moment about possibly
switching away from log4j for the rea
So another topic,
There's a thread going on in OpenEJB at the moment about possibly
switching away from log4j for the reason that the logging config gets
easily messed up in embedded environments (maven, specificaly) and of
course to have one less dependency -- the 3.0 server is a bit beefi
On Jul 31, 2007, at 11:59 AM, Yoav Shapira wrote:
Hey,
On 7/31/07, David Blevins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Really curious on what approach you used to inline all your 3rd party
deps into org.apache.tomcat.util. Curious if you took them as is, or
trimmed them down to just what yo
Hi Guys,
Really curious on what approach you used to inline all your 3rd party
deps into org.apache.tomcat.util. Curious if you took them as is, or
trimmed them down to just what you need. Were any tools used to
help? Any disadvantages that you have noticed other than having to
port fi
On Apr 6, 2007, at 5:03 AM, Remy Maucherat wrote:
David Jencks wrote:
but I won't put it in the org.apache package.
There are not too many solutions to this problem, and
(unfortunately for you, apparently) I think it's the most
appropriate, or least inappropriate if you prefer.
Just as
On Mar 24, 2007, at 10:42 PM, David Jencks wrote:
On Mar 24, 2007, at 6:18 PM, Bill Barker wrote:
"Filip Hanik - Dev Lists" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
yo,
I've been in touch with the folks at Geronimo.
They use dependency injection, and have a suggestion on
I took a look through the tc6.0.x/trunk source and see the support
for java.annotation.Resource and related annotations. Didn't see
offhand support for the related xml tag. Is this
something you plan to implement or would want?
-David
--
40 matches
Mail list logo
