(tomcat) branch 9.0.x updated: Allow users to add local scripts that will not be tracked by git

2024-06-14 Thread isapir
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. isapir pushed a commit to branch 9.0.x in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/9.0.x by this push: new 3dd2328edb Allow users to add local scripts

(tomcat) branch 10.1.x updated: Allow users to add local scripts that will not be tracked by git

2024-06-14 Thread isapir
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. isapir pushed a commit to branch 10.1.x in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/10.1.x by this push: new 08d00a4825 Allow users to add local scripts

(tomcat) branch main updated: Allow users to add local scripts that will not be tracked by git

2024-06-14 Thread isapir
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. isapir pushed a commit to branch main in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push: new 2b34da89e1 Allow users to add local scripts

(tomcat) 01/02: Set git branch correctly.

2024-02-02 Thread schultz
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. schultz pushed a commit to branch 10.1.x in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git commit a6c9c0f3157c04326794953062a63de1d8777331 Author: Christopher Schultz AuthorDate: Fri Feb 2 14:47:08 2024 -0500

[tomcat-native] 01/02: git apply requires a blank line at the end of the file

2023-09-27 Thread markt
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. markt pushed a commit to branch main in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat-native.git commit 89df072e7d4e7bd32440683b6971d20f63fe289d Author: Mark Thomas AuthorDate: Wed Sep 27 14:19:25 2023 +0100 git

[tomcat-native] branch main updated: Fix git command in comment

2022-06-06 Thread markt
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. markt pushed a commit to branch main in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat-native.git The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push: new ad9b4a3fb Fix git command in comment

[tomcat] branch 8.5.x updated: Update building page. Java 11 & svn -> git

2022-05-16 Thread markt
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. markt pushed a commit to branch 8.5.x in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/8.5.x by this push: new bb18cb686b Update building page. Java 11 &

[tomcat] branch 9.0.x updated: Update building page. Java 11 & svn -> git

2022-05-16 Thread markt
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. markt pushed a commit to branch 9.0.x in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/9.0.x by this push: new e74a357776 Update building page. Java 11 &

[tomcat] branch 10.0.x updated: Update building page. Java 11 & svn -> git

2022-05-16 Thread markt
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. markt pushed a commit to branch 10.0.x in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/10.0.x by this push: new cb24085098 Update building page. Java 11 &

[tomcat] branch main updated: Update building page. Java 11 & svn -> git

2022-05-16 Thread markt
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. markt pushed a commit to branch main in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push: new d4008c0b65 Update building page. Java 11 &

Re: git push ERROR wrt. CI

2022-04-21 Thread Rainer Jung
Am 21.04.2022 um 09:56 schrieb Mark Thomas: On 20/04/2022 22:52, Rainer Jung wrote: I currently see ERROR messages when doing git push. The push itself seems to work and triggers eg. travis, but the error seems related with CI. Example: Enumerating objects: 5, done. Counting objects: 100

Re: git push ERROR wrt. CI

2022-04-21 Thread Mark Thomas
On 20/04/2022 22:52, Rainer Jung wrote: I currently see ERROR messages when doing git push. The push itself seems to work and triggers eg. travis, but the error seems related with CI. Example: Enumerating objects: 5, done. Counting objects: 100% (5/5), done. Delta compression using up to 2

git push ERROR wrt. CI

2022-04-20 Thread Rainer Jung
I currently see ERROR messages when doing git push. The push itself seems to work and triggers eg. travis, but the error seems related with CI. Example: Enumerating objects: 5, done. Counting objects: 100% (5/5), done. Delta compression using up to 2 threads Compressing objects: 100% (3/3

[tomcat-native] branch main updated: Fix script so it works with current git layout

2022-03-16 Thread markt
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. markt pushed a commit to branch main in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat-native.git The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push: new 2133b43 Fix script so it works with current

[tomcat-native] 02/03: Tweak patch so it can be applied with git apply

2021-05-27 Thread markt
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. markt pushed a commit to branch main in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat-native.git commit e3259817ba2b18fc69376f6734ba01a05175a7d7 Author: Mark Thomas AuthorDate: Thu May 27 16:35:35 2021 +0100 Tweak

[tomcat] branch 9.0.x updated: Correct Git branch used for 9.0.x

2021-04-08 Thread markt
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. markt pushed a commit to branch 9.0.x in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/9.0.x by this push: new 4e249e8 Correct Git branch used for 9.0.x 4e249e8

Re: Moving tomcat-maven-plugin from svn master to git master

2021-02-17 Thread Mark Thomas
On 17/02/2021 18:21, Konstantin Kolinko wrote: > ср, 17 февр. 2021 г. в 20:57, Konstantin Kolinko : >> >> ср, 17 февр. 2021 г. в 19:55, Mark Thomas : >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> If there are no objections, I plan to move the module to using gi

Re: Moving tomcat-maven-plugin from svn master to git master

2021-02-17 Thread Konstantin Kolinko
ср, 17 февр. 2021 г. в 20:57, Konstantin Kolinko : > > ср, 17 февр. 2021 г. в 19:55, Mark Thomas : > > > > Hi all, > > > > If there are no objections, I plan to move the module to using git as > > the master and updating the infrastructure accordingly. &g

Re: Moving tomcat-maven-plugin from svn master to git master

2021-02-17 Thread Konstantin Kolinko
iced that it is still > configured to use the now defunct svn->git mirroring service. > > If there are no objections, I plan to move the module to using git as > the master and updating the infrastructure accordingly. +1 to move to Git. IIRC we did not ask Infra to restore mirroring for this

Moving tomcat-maven-plugin from svn master to git master

2021-02-17 Thread Mark Thomas
Hi all, I was chatting with a potential contributor to the tomcat-maven-plugin project in the ASF-OGC-OSGeo code sprint. We wnet looking for the source and he found an old mirror on github. I noticed that it is still configured to use the now defunct svn->git mirroring serv

Re: svn/git for website

2020-10-29 Thread Mark Thomas
> >>>> On 10/26/20 20:47, Konstantin Kolinko wrote: >>>> пт, 2 окт. 2020 г. в 00:09, Mark Thomas : >>>>> >>>>> Hi all, >>>>> >>>>> The topic came up at the BoF session at the end of the Tomcat track of >>&

Re: svn/git for website

2020-10-29 Thread Igal Sapir
:47, Konstantin Kolinko wrote: > >> пт, 2 окт. 2020 г. в 00:09, Mark Thomas : > >>> > >>> Hi all, > >>> > >>> The topic came up at the BoF session at the end of the Tomcat track of > >>> migrating the website from svn to git. There we

Re: svn/git for website

2020-10-28 Thread Dave Fisher
пт, 2 окт. 2020 г. в 00:09, Mark Thomas : >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> The topic came up at the BoF session at the end of the Tomcat track of >>> migrating the website from svn to git. There were strong opinions both >>> for migrating and for sticking

Re: svn/git for website

2020-10-28 Thread Igal Sapir
came up at the BoF session at the end of the Tomcat track of > >> migrating the website from svn to git. There were strong opinions both > >> for migrating and for sticking with svn. > >> > >> As a middle ground I'd like to propose we ask Infra to create a g

Re: svn/git for website

2020-10-27 Thread Christopher Schultz
Konstantin, On 10/26/20 20:47, Konstantin Kolinko wrote: пт, 2 окт. 2020 г. в 00:09, Mark Thomas : Hi all, The topic came up at the BoF session at the end of the Tomcat track of migrating the website from svn to git. There were strong opinions both for migrating and for sticking with svn

Re: svn/git for website

2020-10-26 Thread Konstantin Kolinko
пт, 2 окт. 2020 г. в 00:09, Mark Thomas : > > Hi all, > > The topic came up at the BoF session at the end of the Tomcat track of > migrating the website from svn to git. There were strong opinions both > for migrating and for sticking with svn. > > As a middle ground I'

Re: svn/git for website

2020-10-02 Thread Martin Grigorov
On Fri, Oct 2, 2020 at 12:09 AM Mark Thomas wrote: > Hi all, > > The topic came up at the BoF session at the end of the Tomcat track of > migrating the website from svn to git. There were strong opinions both > for migrating and for sticking with svn. > > As a middle groun

svn/git for website

2020-10-01 Thread Mark Thomas
Hi all, The topic came up at the BoF session at the end of the Tomcat track of migrating the website from svn to git. There were strong opinions both for migrating and for sticking with svn. As a middle ground I'd like to propose we ask Infra to create a git mirror of the svn repo. For those

[tomcat] branch 7.0.x updated: Use a link to TestTomcat in Git instead of SVN

2020-09-30 Thread mgrigorov
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. mgrigorov pushed a commit to branch 7.0.x in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/7.0.x by this push: new e487719 Use a link to TestTomcat in Git

[tomcat] branch 8.5.x updated: Use a link to TestTomcat in Git instead of SVN

2020-09-30 Thread mgrigorov
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. mgrigorov pushed a commit to branch 8.5.x in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/8.5.x by this push: new c08d2d4 Use a link to TestTomcat in Git

[tomcat] branch 9.0.x updated: Use a link to TestTomcat in Git instead of SVN

2020-09-30 Thread mgrigorov
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. mgrigorov pushed a commit to branch 9.0.x in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/9.0.x by this push: new f95fcd2 Use a link to TestTomcat in Git

[tomcat] branch master updated: Use a link to TestTomcat in Git instead of SVN

2020-09-30 Thread mgrigorov
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. mgrigorov pushed a commit to branch master in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/master by this push: new 16181fc Use a link to TestTomcat in Git

Re: Changing the name of the default branch in our git repos

2020-07-21 Thread Violeta Georgieva
t;, I've always understood this >> > as the 'master record' (I know it might be historically wrong) and I >> > haven't seen evidences it has ever offended or deterred anyone from >> > co

Re: Changing the name of the default branch in our git repos

2020-06-26 Thread Rémy Maucherat
quot;master", I've always understood this > > as the 'master record' (I know it might be historically wrong) and I > > haven't seen evidences it has ever offended or deterred anyone from > > contributing. > > > > If there is a consensus to change I suggest waiting to see what GitHub > > p

Re: Changing the name of the default branch in our git repos

2020-06-26 Thread Christopher Schultz
homas a écrit : >> >>> Thoughts? >> >> I'd prefer the status-quo and keep "master", I've always >> understood this as the 'master record' (I know it might be >> historically wrong) and I haven't seen evidences it has ever >> offended or deterred anyo

Re: Changing the name of the default branch in our git repos

2020-06-26 Thread Mark Thomas
; > I'd prefer the status-quo and keep "master", I've always understood this > as the 'master record' (I know it might be historically wrong) and I > haven't seen evidences it has ever offended or deterred anyone from > contributing. > > If there is a consensus to chang

Re: Changing the name of the default branch in our git repos

2020-06-19 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
contributing. If there is a consensus to change I suggest waiting to see what GitHub plans to do. The "master" name is a de-facto standard for Git repositories, and I think we should remain consistent with the new name that will be popularized by GitHub. That said, I have a preference for

Re: Changing the name of the default branch in our git repos

2020-06-19 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Mark, On 6/16/20 04:02, Mark Thomas wrote: > All, > > You may have seen the recent discussions both inside and outside > the ASF about the user of "master" as the name of the default git > branch. If you haven't, the short

Re: Changing the name of the default branch in our git repos

2020-06-17 Thread Konstantin Kolinko
вт, 16 июн. 2020 г. в 11:02, Mark Thomas : > > All, > > You may have seen the recent discussions both inside and outside the ASF > about the user of "master" as the name of the default git branch. If you > haven't, the short version is that the name can be traced ba

Re: Changing the name of the default branch in our git repos

2020-06-16 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
at 11:02 AM Mark Thomas wrote: > >> All, >> >> You may have seen the recent discussions both inside and outside the ASF >> about the user of "master" as the name of the default git branch. If you >> haven't, the short version is that the name can be traced back

Re: Changing the name of the default branch in our git repos

2020-06-16 Thread Martin Grigorov
Hi, On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 11:02 AM Mark Thomas wrote: > All, > > You may have seen the recent discussions both inside and outside the ASF > about the user of "master" as the name of the default git branch. If you > haven't, the short version is that the name can b

Re: Changing the name of the default branch in our git repos

2020-06-16 Thread Raymond Auge
+1 for main On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 8:00 AM Coty Sutherland wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 4:02 AM Mark Thomas wrote: > >> All, >> >> You may have seen the recent discussions both inside and outside the ASF >> about the user of "master" as

Re: Changing the name of the default branch in our git repos

2020-06-16 Thread Coty Sutherland
On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 4:02 AM Mark Thomas wrote: > All, > > You may have seen the recent discussions both inside and outside the ASF > about the user of "master" as the name of the default git branch. If you > haven't, the short version is that the name can be trac

Re: Changing the name of the default branch in our git repos

2020-06-16 Thread Michael Osipov
Am 2020-06-16 um 12:09 schrieb Mark Thomas: On 16/06/2020 10:25, Michael Osipov wrote: Am 2020-06-16 um 10:02 schrieb Mark Thomas: All, You may have seen the recent discussions both inside and outside the ASF about the user of "master" as the name of the default git branch. If y

Re: Changing the name of the default branch in our git repos

2020-06-16 Thread Mark Thomas
On 16/06/2020 10:25, Michael Osipov wrote: > Am 2020-06-16 um 10:02 schrieb Mark Thomas: >> All, >> >> You may have seen the recent discussions both inside and outside the ASF >> about the user of "master" as the name of the default git branch. If you >>

Re: Changing the name of the default branch in our git repos

2020-06-16 Thread Michael Osipov
Am 2020-06-16 um 10:02 schrieb Mark Thomas: All, You may have seen the recent discussions both inside and outside the ASF about the user of "master" as the name of the default git branch. If you haven't, the short version is that the name can be traced back to master/slave and its as

Re: Changing the name of the default branch in our git repos

2020-06-16 Thread Violeta Georgieva
На вт, 16.06.2020 г. в 11:02 Mark Thomas написа: > > All, > > You may have seen the recent discussions both inside and outside the ASF > about the user of "master" as the name of the default git branch. If you > haven't, the short version is that the name can be t

Changing the name of the default branch in our git repos

2020-06-16 Thread Mark Thomas
All, You may have seen the recent discussions both inside and outside the ASF about the user of "master" as the name of the default git branch. If you haven't, the short version is that the name can be traced back to master/slave and its associations with human slavery. I'd like

[tomcat-connectors] branch master updated: Drop all that beta, rc, release bloatware from jk_version.h. We use git, and release should be as simple as clicking on the webpage

2020-06-13 Thread mturk
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. mturk pushed a commit to branch master in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat-connectors.git The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/master by this push: new 0ff7479 Drop all that beta,rc

Re: git-fu is (still) weak

2020-04-29 Thread Martin Grigorov
hristopherschultz.net> > >> <mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net > > <mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net>>> wrote: > > > >> All, > > > >> I tried again to commit to tc10 branch, got commit id > >> 8dddc11512fbd3b91ed9d737a42e4b8415458

Re: git-fu is (still) weak

2020-04-28 Thread Coty Sutherland
ltz.net> > >> <mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net > > <mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net>>> wrote: > > > >> All, > > > >> I tried again to commit to tc10 branch, got commit id > >> 8dddc11512fbd3b91ed9d737a42e4b8415458ddf.

Re: git-fu is (still) weak

2020-04-28 Thread Christopher Schultz
t;> On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 12:21 AM Christopher Schultz >> > <mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net> >> <mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net > <mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net>>> wrote: > >> All, > >> I tried again to commit to tc10 branch,

Re: git-fu is (still) weak

2020-04-28 Thread Coty Sutherland
pher Schultz > > > <mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net>> > wrote: > > > > All, > > > > I tried again to commit to tc10 branch, got commit id > > 8dddc11512fbd3b91ed9d737a42e4b8415458ddf. > > > > Moving to tc9 branch: > > > > $ git cherry-pick -

Re: git-fu is (still) weak

2020-04-28 Thread Christopher Schultz
tc10 branch, got commit id > 8dddc11512fbd3b91ed9d737a42e4b8415458ddf. > > Moving to tc9 branch: > > $ git cherry-pick -n 8dddc11512fbd3b91ed9d737a42e4b8415458ddf > fatal: bad object 8dddc11512fbd3b91ed9d737a42e4b8415458ddf > > - From tc10: > > $ git remote -v origin https://github.com/apache/tomcat

Re: git-fu is (still) weak

2020-04-27 Thread Rémy Maucherat
On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 12:21 AM Christopher Schultz < ch...@christopherschultz.net> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > All, > > I tried again to commit to tc10 branch, got commit id > 8dddc11512fbd3b91ed9d737a42e4b8415458ddf. > > Movin

Re: git-fu is (still) weak

2020-04-27 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 All, I tried again to commit to tc10 branch, got commit id 8dddc11512fbd3b91ed9d737a42e4b8415458ddf. Moving to tc9 branch: $ git cherry-pick -n 8dddc11512fbd3b91ed9d737a42e4b8415458ddf fatal: bad object 8dddc11512fbd3b91ed9d737a42e4b8415458ddf

Re: git-fu is weak

2020-02-24 Thread Michael Osipov
. The commit went through github, merged a PR from a contributor into master. I'm trying to cherry-pick it back into the 9.0.x branch: $ git cherry-pick f124a9c7230227d3eaff9d2dc1c52f82ce10e03f error: commit f124a9c7230227d3eaff9d2dc1c52f82ce10e03f is a merge but no -m option was given. fatal: cherry

Re: git-fu is weak

2020-02-24 Thread Christopher Schultz
it went through >> github, merged a PR from a contributor into master. I'm trying to >> cherry-pick it back into the 9.0.x branch: >> >> $ git cherry-pick f124a9c7230227d3eaff9d2dc1c52f82ce10e03f error: >> commit f124a9c7230227d3eaff9d2dc1c52f82ce10e03f is a

Re: git-fu is weak

2020-02-24 Thread Michael Osipov
Am 2020-02-24 um 17:33 schrieb Christopher Schultz: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 All, I'm trying to cherry-pick a commit. The commit went through github, merged a PR from a contributor into master. I'm trying to cherry-pick it back into the 9.0.x branch: $ git cherry-pick

Re: git-fu is weak

2020-02-24 Thread Konstantin Kolinko
ub.com/apache/tomcat/commit/f124a9c7230227d3eaff9d2dc1c52f82ce10e03f says: "2 parents 03b2af7 + bf2447b" I guess that you want this commit: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/commit/bf2447b4bd9edda25e00c7aaab9fcce455c43f2f I am not fluent with command-line for this command, as I usually do it via GUI (provided by

Re: git-fu is weak

2020-02-24 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Le 24/02/2020 à 17:33, Christopher Schultz a écrit : > Any ideas? I guess you are cherry picking the merge commit, instead of the actual commit(s) from the PR branch. Emmanuel Bourg - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

git-fu is weak

2020-02-24 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 All, I'm trying to cherry-pick a commit. The commit went through github, merged a PR from a contributor into master. I'm trying to cherry-pick it back into the 9.0.x branch: $ git cherry-pick f124a9c7230227d3eaff9d2dc1c52f82ce10e03f error: commit

[tomcat-connectors] 02/03: Git repo name changed

2020-02-19 Thread markt
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. markt pushed a commit to branch master in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat-connectors.git commit fd76777a421c18608f069432563db4ea71b45a8b Author: Mark Thomas AuthorDate: Wed Feb 19 11:40:26 2020 +

[tomcat-connectors] 03/03: Git tags retained svn format (for now)

2020-02-19 Thread markt
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. markt pushed a commit to branch master in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat-connectors.git commit 637edee00ca30b1d927f41d40748809c61ccb70e Author: Mark Thomas AuthorDate: Wed Feb 19 11:59:42 2020 +

[tomcat-connectors] 01/02: svn -> git updates

2020-02-17 Thread markt
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. markt pushed a commit to branch master in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat-connectors.git commit a8a7db6ce26c5d64fe974b9c8bb08681f6381313 Author: Mark Thomas AuthorDate: Mon Feb 17 15:59:02 2020 +

[tomcat-connectors] branch master updated: First pass at doc updates. Will re-check as I do first release from git

2020-01-29 Thread markt
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. markt pushed a commit to branch master in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat-connectors.git The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/master by this push: new fb5cce8 First pass at doc updates

[tomcat-native] branch master updated: Replace usage of 'svn' in the documentation with 'git'

2020-01-07 Thread mgrigorov
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. mgrigorov pushed a commit to branch master in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat-native.git The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/master by this push: new 66c8296 Replace usage of 'svn

Re: [tomcat] branch 8.5.x updated: Git typo

2019-12-11 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Mark, On 12/7/19 16:29, Mark Thomas wrote: > On 07/12/2019 21:28, ma...@apache.org wrote: >> This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git >> repository. >> >> markt pushed a commit to branch 8

Re: [tomcat] branch 8.5.x updated: Git typo

2019-12-07 Thread Mark Thomas
On 07/12/2019 21:28, ma...@apache.org wrote: > This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. > > markt pushed a commit to branch 8.5.x > in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git > > > The following commit(s) were added to refs/hea

[tomcat] branch 8.5.x updated: Git typo

2019-12-07 Thread markt
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. markt pushed a commit to branch 8.5.x in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/8.5.x by this push: new 18de249 Git typo 18de249 is described below

Re: [VOTE] Private branches in the official Tomcat git repository

2019-10-18 Thread Michael Osipov
in private branches directly in the official Tomcat repository, as an alternative to using forks and pull requests. Should private branches be allowed in the official Tomcat git repository ? [ ] Yes [ ] No Here is a recap of the voting. For the binding votes, we have: Yes: michaelo, ebourg

Re: [VOTE] Private branches in the official Tomcat git repository

2019-10-18 Thread Rémy Maucherat
anches directly in > the official Tomcat repository, as an alternative to using forks and pull > requests. > > Should private branches be allowed in the official Tomcat git repository ? > [ ] Yes > [ ] No > Here is a recap of the voting. For the binding votes, we have: Yes: michaelo

Re: [VOTE] Private branches in the official Tomcat git repository

2019-10-16 Thread Mark Thomas
ly in the official Tomcat repository, as an alternative to using > forks and pull requests. > > Should private branches be allowed in the official Tomcat git repository ? > [ ] Yes > [X] No Mark - To

Re: [VOTE] Private branches in the official Tomcat git repository

2019-10-12 Thread Michael Osipov
in private branches directly in the official Tomcat repository, as an alternative to using forks and pull requests. Should private branches be allowed in the official Tomcat git repository ? [x] Yes [ ] No Certainly Yes. We must be able to conduct our business without relying on GitHub and without

Re: [VOTE] Private branches in the official Tomcat git repository

2019-10-12 Thread Felix Schumacher
orks > and pull > > requests. > > > > Should private branches be allowed in the official Tomcat git > repository ? > > [ ] Yes > > [ ] No > > I don't like the term 'private' because everytihing I add to the > canonical repo

Re: [VOTE] Private branches in the official Tomcat git repository

2019-10-12 Thread Guoxiong Li
es that are approved by the community such as 8.5.x > and 7.0.x. It is possible to do development in private branches directly in > the official Tomcat repository, as an alternative to using forks and pull > requests. > > > > Should private branches be allowed in the official Tomcat git rep

Re: [VOTE] Private branches in the official Tomcat git repository

2019-10-12 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
nity such as 8.5.x > and 7.0.x. It is possible to do development in private branches directly in > the official Tomcat repository, as an alternative to using forks and pull > requests. > > > > Should private branches be allowed in the official Tomcat git repository > ? > > [x] Yes

Re: [VOTE] Private branches in the official Tomcat git repository

2019-10-12 Thread Konstantin Kolinko
branches directly in > the official Tomcat repository, as an alternative to using forks and pull > requests. > > Should private branches be allowed in the official Tomcat git repository ? > [x] Yes > [ ] No Certainly Yes. We must be able to conduct our business without relying on GitHub and

Re: [VOTE] Private branches in the official Tomcat git repository

2019-10-12 Thread Rainer Jung
repository, as an alternative to using forks and pull requests. Should private branches be allowed in the official Tomcat git repository ? [ ] Yes [X] No Regards, Rainer - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr

Re: [VOTE] Private branches in the official Tomcat git repository

2019-10-12 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
the official Tomcat repository, as an alternative > > to using forks and pull requests. > > > Should private branches be allowed in the official Tomcat git repository > ? > [ ] Yes > [x] No > > I’m not a committer, so my vote doesn’t really count, but I am a long-time &

Re: [VOTE] Private branches in the official Tomcat git repository

2019-10-11 Thread Chuck Caldarale
the official Tomcat repository, as an alternative > to using forks and pull requests. > Should private branches be allowed in the official Tomcat git repository ? [ ] Yes [x] No I’m not a committer, so my vote doesn’t really count, but I am a long-time Tomcat user and occasional contributer (l

Re: [VOTE] Private branches in the official Tomcat git repository

2019-10-11 Thread Christopher Schultz
do development > in private branches directly in the official Tomcat repository, as > an alternative to using forks and pull requests. > > Should private branches be allowed in the official Tomcat git > repository ? [ ] Yes [X] No I don't think it makes any sense to have non-stand

Re: [VOTE] Private branches in the official Tomcat git repository

2019-10-11 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Le 11/10/2019 à 16:20, Rémy Maucherat a écrit : > Should private branches be allowed in the official Tomcat git repository ? > [X] Yes > [ ] No +1 Emmanuel Bourg - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.a

Re: [VOTE] Private branches in the official Tomcat git repository

2019-10-11 Thread guo xiong li
ternative to using forks and pull > requests. > > Should private branches be allowed in the official Tomcat git repository ? > [ ] Yes > [X] No In my opinion, I think the branches in Tomcat repo should correspond to the current major maintenance version. Because this can be easily manag

Re: [VOTE] Private branches in the official Tomcat git repository

2019-10-11 Thread Rémy Maucherat
ch as > 8.5.x > > and 7.0.x. It is possible to do development in private branches directly > in > > the official Tomcat repository, as an alternative to using forks and pull > > requests. > > > > Should private branches be allowed in the official Tomcat git repository > ?

Re: [VOTE] Private branches in the official Tomcat git repository

2019-10-11 Thread Rémy Maucherat
anches directly in > the official Tomcat repository, as an alternative to using forks and pull > requests. > > Should private branches be allowed in the official Tomcat git repository ? > [ ] Yes > [X] No > > I found branches created a disproportionate amount of email traffic which is

Re: [VOTE] Private branches in the official Tomcat git repository

2019-10-11 Thread Michael Osipov
repository, as an alternative to using forks and pull requests. Should private branches be allowed in the official Tomcat git repository ? [ ] Yes [ ] No I don't like the term 'private' because everytihing I add to the canonical repo is intended to merged into upstream sooner or later. Purely

[VOTE] Private branches in the official Tomcat git repository

2019-10-11 Thread Rémy Maucherat
requests. Should private branches be allowed in the official Tomcat git repository ? [ ] Yes [ ] No Rémy

Re: Migrating Tomcat Connectors to Git

2019-10-08 Thread Mark Thomas
activity on these over the last year or so so there has >>> been no reason to migrate the project to Git. >>> >>> I've recently fixed a mod_jk bug and I have a patch ready to fix a >>> second. These seems like a good time to migrate Tomcat Connectors to >>> git

Re: Migrating Tomcat Connectors to Git

2019-10-08 Thread Rainer Jung
Am 08.10.2019 um 13:39 schrieb Rainer Jung: Am 08.10.2019 um 13:09 schrieb Mark Thomas: Hi all, Tomcat Connectors (mod_jk, isapi_redirect) are currently in svn. There hasn't been much activity on these over the last year or so so there has been no reason to migrate the project to Git. I've

Re: Migrating Tomcat Connectors to Git

2019-10-08 Thread Rainer Jung
Am 08.10.2019 um 13:09 schrieb Mark Thomas: Hi all, Tomcat Connectors (mod_jk, isapi_redirect) are currently in svn. There hasn't been much activity on these over the last year or so so there has been no reason to migrate the project to Git. I've recently fixed a mod_jk bug and I have a patch

Migrating Tomcat Connectors to Git

2019-10-08 Thread Mark Thomas
Hi all, Tomcat Connectors (mod_jk, isapi_redirect) are currently in svn. There hasn't been much activity on these over the last year or so so there has been no reason to migrate the project to Git. I've recently fixed a mod_jk bug and I have a patch ready to fix a second. These seems like a good

[tomcat] branch 7.0.x updated: Back-port svn->git updates

2019-09-06 Thread markt
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. markt pushed a commit to branch 7.0.x in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/7.0.x by this push: new 4c5f5bb Back-port svn->git updates 4c5f

[tomcat] branch 8.5.x updated: back-port svn->git updates

2019-09-06 Thread markt
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. markt pushed a commit to branch 8.5.x in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/8.5.x by this push: new 13f4296 back-port svn->git updates 13f4

[tomcat] 01/03: Update for migration to git

2019-08-15 Thread markt
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. markt pushed a commit to branch 7.0.x in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git commit 229c6bf6ab37df7bb3bb98a8a6e36b24cbbc062b Author: Mark Thomas AuthorDate: Thu Aug 15 20:40:07 2019 +0100 Update

[tomcat] 03/03: Update source code links to point to Git

2019-08-15 Thread markt
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. markt pushed a commit to branch 7.0.x in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git commit d206509dabe5ea9f40aae1f0448716fd42470456 Author: Mark Thomas AuthorDate: Thu Aug 15 21:01:20 2019 +0100 Update

[tomcat] branch 8.5.x updated: Update source code links to point to Git

2019-08-15 Thread markt
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. markt pushed a commit to branch 8.5.x in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/8.5.x by this push: new abe9d37 Update source code links to point to Git

[tomcat] branch master updated: Update source code links to point to Git

2019-08-15 Thread markt
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. markt pushed a commit to branch master in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/master by this push: new 42971a3 Update source code links to point

[tomcat] 01/02: add .idea project directory to git ignores

2019-07-10 Thread violetagg
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. violetagg pushed a commit to branch 7.0.x in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git commit cd4cdca0ff68674a4d1af12a944705f6dc285596 Author: Jeremy Boynes AuthorDate: Sun Jan 26 21:23:55 2014 +0200 add

Re: Git repo for Tomcat Site

2019-07-09 Thread Igal Sapir
Mark, On 7/9/2019 1:45 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: On 09/07/2019 05:29, Igal Sapir wrote: Can we move the Tomcat site to Git? Yes. ASF infra supports both svnpubsub and gitpubsub for websites. There will need to be a little co-ordination with infra as we'd need to switch where the source

  1   2   3   4   5   >