+1
Am Di., 16. Juli 2024 um 12:35 Uhr schrieb Markus Jung :
> +1 (non binding)
>
>
> I tested a couple of real applications (running on Linux, Java 17) using:
>
> - CDI
>
> - Faces
>
> - JPA (running hibernate 6.4)
>
> - Security (Both custom HttpAuthenticationMechanism and new
>
+1, like markus suggested
Am Mo., 8. Juli 2024 um 11:15 Uhr schrieb Markus Jung :
> Hey Richard,
>
>
> no strong opinion for (1) from my side, if there are no objections we
> should just merge it so we can push another milestone release IMO. +1 to
> downgrade Mojarra to 4.0.0 to make tomee-plume
+1
Am Do., 4. Juli 2024 um 11:28 Uhr schrieb Richard Zowalla <
rich...@zowalla.com>:
> Agreed.
>
> Am 4. Juli 2024 11:07:21 MESZ schrieb Markus Jung :
> >Hey all,
> >
> >
> >took a look at the Concurrency 3.0 spec - it states:
> >
> >The Jakarta EE Product Provider must provide a preconfigured,
i would like to see a M2, too
isnt there a way to get a M1 or RC1 from CXF guys?
Am Di., 18. Juni 2024 um 11:37 Uhr schrieb Richard Zowalla :
> Any other thoughts?
>
> @JL: Do you want the Geronimo mail implant release (ongoing vote) to be
> included in an M2?
>
> @Jon: Think it would be worth
Great work!
Markus Jung schrieb am So., 2. Juni 2024, 17:34:
> Hi all,
>
> small update after a long time of silence, my implementation now passes
> the (admittedly very few) openid tests in the TCK:
> [INFO] Reactor Summary for Jakarta Security TCK - main 3.0.1:
> [INFO]
> [INFO] Jakarta
+1
Alex The Rocker schrieb am Mi., 10. Apr. 2024, 07:23:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Successfully tested the TomEE 9.1.3 release candidate with TomEE+ with
> more than 10 different web applications, with both Java 17 and Java 21
> as the Java runtime (Java sources have been compiled with a JDK 17)
+1 for Java17
seems we have no other choice
maybe we can try to get certified on Java17 but we still need green TCKs
first anyway, which is not reachable without Java17 right now.
Am Fr., 5. Apr. 2024 um 16:00 Uhr schrieb Richard Zowalla :
> Hello everyone,
>
> We should discuss the following
+1
Am Di., 2. Apr. 2024 um 15:08 Uhr schrieb Markus Jung :
> +1 (non binding)
>
>
> Did some testing with our real apps (Java 17, GNU/Linux x86-64), including:
> - CDI
> - JSF
> - JPA (using hibernate 6.4)
> - Jakarta Security (custom HttpAuthenticationMechanism)
> - JSON-P/JSON-B
> -
If we are allowed to set baseline to +17, im ok with it.
New user can just use 17 and existing users can easily upgrade Java when
they already migrate their whole code to Jakarta.
Richard Zowalla schrieb am So., 31. März 2024, 11:31:
> Hi all,
>
> just looked into AMQ (classic) 6.1.0 (JMS 3.1),
+1 for 3)
Richard Zowalla schrieb am Fr., 29. März 2024, 12:38:
> Hi all,
>
> I want to bring to your attention, that we had recently some discussion
> around our current strategy of backporting cve related fixes to TomEE
> 9.1.x [1].
>
> We are in a situation, in which the Tomcat community
+1
Richard Zowalla schrieb am Fr., 29. März 2024, 12:50:
> Hi all,
>
> just to give a short additional note here:
>
> We are currently waiting for a Johnzon 2.0.1 vote to pass [1], which I
> expect to be the case after Eastern has passed.
>
> If no one objects, I would like to start the process
sion testing with real apps!
>
> Would it include an ActiveMQ 6 for JMS 2 compatibility in TomEE+ ?
>
> Alex
>
> Le mar. 6 févr. 2024 à 12:40, Thomas Andraschko
> a écrit :
> >
> > +1 to release a M1 ASAP after (4)
> > As you already said, we need the signal for the
+1 to release a M1 ASAP after (4)
As you already said, we need the signal for the community
Richard Zowalla schrieb am Di., 6. Feb. 2024, 09:43:
> Hi all,
>
> if you monitored the GitHub repository in the last few weeks, you might
> have noticed, that we did some work in order to get EE10
Hi,
as you may know, i'm currently working on TomEE10. All our applications are
working fine now.
i currently have some timeslots to refactor some parts and the whole XML
parsing in container/openejb-* is quite weird. There is still JAXB and SXC.
All mappings are very old (EE6).
Should we
in my test env, so didn't encounter issues)
>
> - TCK still hangs but isn't a blocker for a milestone imho.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Gruß
> Richard
>
>
> Am 5. Januar 2024 10:40:05 MEZ schrieb Thomas Andraschko <
> andraschko.tho...@gmail.com>:
> >i would like
; Thanks Thomas for pointing this out.
> > --
> > Jean-Louis Monteiro
> > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
> > http://www.tomitribe.com
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 20, 2023 at 4:06 PM Richard Zowalla wrote:
> >
> > > Great news ;-)
> > >
>
under LGPL v2.1
> <https://opensource.org/licenses/LGPL-2.1>.
> Only some sub projects are ASL v2
> --
> Jean-Louis Monteiro
> http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
> http://www.tomitribe.com
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 7, 2023 at 4:12 PM Thomas Andraschko <
> andraschko.tho...
+1 to push a M1 ASAP, without fixing TCK
what shall we do with OpenJPA / BatchEE? Not sure about BatchEE but dont
think OpenJPA will implement all new spec features?
Am Mi., 8. Nov. 2023 um 11:14 Uhr schrieb Jean-Louis Monteiro <
jlmonte...@tomitribe.com>:
> Awesome
>
> Thank you Richard for
> > > > > > cross dependencies. At least the full build is green,
> > > > > > > > > so it is > > > > only > > the
> > > > > > > > > CDI TCK, which is currently failing.
> > > > > > > > >
gt; Am Freitag, dem 06.10.2023 um 10:04 +0200 schrieb Thomas Andraschko:
> > Hi Richard,
> >
> > about JSF:
> > in theory it should not even compile, there is no "import
> > jakarta.faces.bean.ManagedBean" anymore.
> > You can just delete this 3 tests a
Hi Richard,
about JSF:
in theory it should not even compile, there is no "import
jakarta.faces.bean.ManagedBean" anymore.
You can just delete this 3 tests as it tests old JSF managed beans, which
was completely removed. We just reuse CDI now.
Best regards,
Thomas
Am Fr., 6. Okt. 2023 um 09:18
+1
Am Fr., 29. Sept. 2023 um 15:40 Uhr schrieb Richard Zowalla :
> Hi all,
>
> since we have now dropped our cxf shade in favour of 4.0.3 and fixed
> some dependencies, etc. in the last weeks, what do you think about a
> TomEE 9.1.1 soon?
>
> We are still passing the TCK, so would be a good
great news!
Am Do., 31. Aug. 2023 um 20:41 Uhr schrieb Jean-Louis Monteiro <
jlmonte...@tomitribe.com>:
> Wow that is a great news. Very good job Richard
>
> Le jeu. 31 août 2023, 18:55, Richard Zowalla a écrit :
>
> > Hey ladies,
> >
> > some good news:
> >
> > We are now passing the JAX-RS
+1
Richard Zowalla schrieb am Mi., 26. Apr. 2023, 11:26:
> Hi all,
>
> We have a huge mess of open issues, which are very old and are
> targeting 1.7.x, 7.0.x or 7.1.x.
>
> Some of these issues are already fixed (reporter didn't respond, issue
> was never closed), had no activity for years now
ome time. Il at DevNexus this week but I can
> definitely trigger a release for bval.
>
> Le dim. 2 avr. 2023, 11:11, Thomas Andraschko >
> a écrit :
>
> > I can try to help on implemeting johnzon stuff.
> >
> > MyFaces is done, yup. We even pass the TCK the first t
e
> > still some things to do for CDI (?) and Johnzon (?).
> >
> > Don't know the status of BatchEE, though.
> >
> > Gruß
> > Richard
> >
> > Am Donnerstag, dem 30.03.2023 um 22:21 +0200 schrieb Thomas Andraschko:
> > > Is there any further
Is there any further progress?
Are there depedencies still not ready?
Currently im spending time in porting DeltaSpike to EE10.
Jean-Louis Monteiro schrieb am Fr., 10. Feb.
2023, 10:33:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm sorry, but I have closed my big PR #1005 regain TomEE 10.x. It's
> getting too big to get
+1 to NOT maintain 9.x, most people will not use it anyway
Richard Zowalla schrieb am Di., 7. Feb. 2023, 19:59:
> Hi all,
>
> I wanted to bring this thing to the list, which appeared in a slack
> chat today.
>
> Back in October 2021 we had a discussion on how we want to handle our
> three
isnt hibernate licensed under Apache2.0?
Am Di., 7. Feb. 2023 um 16:10 Uhr schrieb Swell :
> Because of licenses we cannot ship with hibernate. Better be éclipselink to
> avoid license hell.
>
> On Tue 7 Feb 2023 at 16:08, Thomas Andraschko >
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
Hi,
AFAICS OpenJPA isnt in real active development and doenst even support all
JPA 2.2 features.
Whats your plan for it?
Can't we just use Hibernate as default?
Best regards,
Thomas
on't know about.
>
> --
> Jean-Louis Monteiro
> http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
> http://www.tomitribe.com
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 6, 2023 at 2:24 PM Thomas Andraschko <
> andraschko.tho...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Mojarra is final, in MyFaces we have already RC4 w
Louis Monteiro
> http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
> http://www.tomitribe.com
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 6, 2023 at 1:07 PM Thomas Andraschko <
> andraschko.tho...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > JFYI: I also created a PR for Faces4.0; both Mojarra and MyFaces are
> ready
> > actual
JFYI: I also created a PR for Faces4.0; both Mojarra and MyFaces are ready
actually
Am Mo., 6. Feb. 2023 um 13:00 Uhr schrieb Jean-Louis Monteiro <
jlmonte...@tomitribe.com>:
> Hi all,
>
> As you know, TomEE 9.0.0 reached final and we immediately switched to TomEE
> 10 actively.
>
> For TomEE,
+1 (non-binding)
our applications are working fine
Am Di., 17. Jan. 2023 um 14:49 Uhr schrieb Daniel Dias Dos Santos <
daniel.dias.analist...@gmail.com>:
> Hello,
>
> +1
>
> Thanks
>
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2023, 10:40 Richard Zowalla wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > this is a vote for a release of
I would take care of BVal and start a discussion on the ML
Am Mi., 4. Jan. 2023 um 21:50 Uhr schrieb Jean-Louis Monteiro <
jlmonte...@tomitribe.com>:
> We learned the hard way that using shade and a classifier version of a
> library is a pain because it breaks everything. So we should start
>
+1 (non-binding)
Am Mi., 4. Jan. 2023 um 12:17 Uhr schrieb Richard Zowalla :
> +1 (binding)
>
> Am Mittwoch, dem 04.01.2023 um 12:15 +0100 schrieb Jean-Louis Monteiro:
> > My own +1
> > --
> > Jean-Louis Monteiro
> > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
> > http://www.tomitribe.com
> >
> >
> > On
also created 2 issues for further dependency upgrades:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-4130
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-4129
is there a reason we dont have the github dependabot on master and 8.0x?
Am Do., 22. Dez. 2022 um 15:07 Uhr schrieb Thomas Andraschko
+1 for this as it will fix the new CXF CVE
Am Mi., 21. Dez. 2022 um 11:03 Uhr schrieb Richard Zowalla :
> To follow up on that:
>
> I had a quick conversation with Jon about that topic.
> We need to fix TOMEE-4014 (regarding the keep.version property, see
> [1]) before we can bring up a release
+1
Am Mi., 21. Dez. 2022 um 10:52 Uhr schrieb Zowalla, Richard <
richard.zowa...@hs-heilbronn.de>:
> No objections.
>
> Am Mittwoch, dem 21.12.2022 um 10:18 +0100 schrieb Jean-Louis Monteiro:
> > No objections. It was also on top of my head to do it before end of
> > the
> > year.
> >
> >
> > I
+1
Am Mi., 28. Sept. 2022 um 19:45 Uhr schrieb Alex The Rocker <
alex.m3...@gmail.com>:
> Hi there,
>
> +1 for a TomEE 8.013 ASAP provided it includes fix for:
>
> CVE-2021-43980 Apache Tomcat - Information Disclosure
>
> Kind regards,
> Alex
>
> Le mer. 28 sept. 2022 à 18:45, Zowalla, Richard
>
+1 (non-binding)
Am Do., 30. Juni 2022 um 09:19 Uhr schrieb Wiesner, Martin <
martin.wies...@hs-heilbronn.de>:
> +1
>
> Best
> Martin
> —
> https://twitter.com/mawiesne
>
> > Am 29.06.2022 um 22:07 schrieb Jean-Louis Monteiro <
> jlmonte...@tomitribe.com>:
> >
> > My own +1 (binding)
> > --
> >
yep, we probably dont have enough commiters to maintain it
but instead of freezing, shouldnt we maybe think about how to make it more
attractive and easier to get more contributors?
we have sooo many contributors in PrimeFaces as the project structure is
easier, everything in one repo, and so on
+1 in general
It would be great If we could also upgrade to the newest Myfaces Version
I would provide a PR but i have a lot of stress currently, will be more
active again in 2 months
Alex The Rocker schrieb am Di., 7. Juni 2022, 13:07:
> Okay sounds good, thank you very much for this quick
+1 to remove war distribution
AFAIR we shade Jakarta in BVal?
Otherwise i would also work on a bigbang change in BVal
Do we already use MyFaces 3.0 in master?
David Blevins schrieb am Do., 31. März 2022,
20:19:
> Thank you, Swell, for helping to get those versions aligned!
>
> Some high-level
Why do we need SXC?
Am Mi., 16. Feb. 2022 um 14:49 Uhr schrieb Jean-Louis Monteiro <
jlmonte...@tomitribe.com>:
> Hi,
>
> I'm still doing some upgrades with the view to have some jakarta compliant
> builds for TomEE 9.x.
>
> I did some Geronimo upgrades to Jakarta like Geronimo Transaction
Hi,
could anyone merge it?
I would also like to see Java17 images.
Best Regards,
Thomas
Am Do., 27. Jan. 2022 um 21:22 Uhr schrieb Jenkins, Rodney J (Rod) <
jenki...@nationwide.com>:
> Hello,
>
> I have created the PR for the OpenJDK.
>
> https://github.com/tomitribe/docker-tomee/pull/59
>
> I
+1 (nonbinding) - our applications are working fine
Am Di., 15. Feb. 2022 um 08:01 Uhr schrieb Zowalla, Richard <
richard.zowa...@hs-heilbronn.de>:
> Hi Alex,
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-3838 references:
>
> - https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-40110
>
> "In Apache
be a fine, as brought up by Thomas.
> > Maintenance branch for 8.x could be opened once these dep updates are
> > included.
> >
> > Is there anything else pending for inclusion into 8.0.10?
> >
> > Best
> > Martin
> > —
> > https://twitter.com/m
> After that I don't see why we would not be able to release and switch
> > after
> > that to 9.x
> >
> > --
> > Jean-Louis Monteiro
> > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
> > http://www.tomitribe.com
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 8, 2022 at 3:44 PM
Hi,
Romain released new versions of those 3 libs - and i would need the upgrade
of Johnzon (polymorphic issues) and OpenJPA (@AttributeConverter support).
Would it be possible to upgrade those and release a new version? Would be
very great.
I can provide a PR for those updates.
Best regards,
+1 to move on
i would also like to get another 8.0.x release but i will send another mail
soon :)
Am Di., 8. Feb. 2022 um 08:07 Uhr schrieb Zowalla, Richard <
richard.zowa...@hs-heilbronn.de>:
> Hi all,
>
> I am strongly +1 for moving forward with it, i.e. time to move on with
> master.
>
>
omee-patch-plugin/commit/02619767c0b07eafe70f72ad316f06b2c025277e
>
>
> Gruß
> Richard
>
> Am Montag, dem 15.11.2021 um 11:23 +0100 schrieb Thomas Andraschko:
> > Hi,
> >
> > we currently have a bug where the TomEE 8.0.8-plus.zip contains a
> > MyFaces
> > JAR
Hi,
we currently have a bug where the TomEE 8.0.8-plus.zip contains a MyFaces
JAR with different size compared to the one in the Maven repo.
It seems that it shades the META-INF\resources\javax.faces to
META-INF\resources\jakarta.faces but this should not happen in 8.0.8.
It also weird that it
yep
i think we have to maintain 8.0.x anyway as its the last javax release and
we cant expect that everyone does a fast migration
IMO the following is the best way:
- branch 8.0.x
- make master 9.0 and rename javax -> jakarta
- branch 9.0 after everything is working fine
- working on 10.0 in
TBH we have to migrate to jakarta anyway. Targeting EE9 or EE10.
IMO the most people dont care about EE9, so i would branch/tag EE9 on the
road to EE10 but never maintain or release it.
Also not sure about the exact timeline, when we should start to migrate.
Am Fr., 1. Okt. 2021 um 13:25
Perhaps an
> > > > additiona step is needed?
> > > >
> > > > The related page update is available as a PR [1], which can be
> > > > merged,
> > > > after the files are available.
> > > >
> > > > Gruss
> > > > Richar
Hi,
is the release already done?
the download page still shows 8.0.6
Am Do., 9. Sept. 2021 um 11:29 Uhr schrieb Jean-Louis Monteiro <
jlmonte...@tomitribe.com>:
> Hi all,
>
> Closing the vote now.
> Vote passes with 11 +1 and no other vote.
>
> Richard, Daniel, Luis, Thomas, Alexandre, Martin:
+1 (non-binding)
I think we should work on java17 after that release
Alex The Rocker schrieb am Do., 2. Sept. 2021, 09:52:
> Hello,
>
> [-1] (non binding) if Java 16 compatibility matters
>
> Indeed, I have ran Arquillian tests with TomEE embedded 8.0.8 and:
> * Arquillian's Basket & Order
320
> > >
> > > Gruss
> > > Richard
> > >
> > > Am Dienstag, dem 31.08.2021 um 17:10 +0200 schrieb Jean-Louis
> > > Monteiro:
> > > > Ok looks like I got to stage a TomEE 8.0.8
> > > >
> > > >
/src/test/resources/arquillian.xml add > name="debug">true
> >
> > 5. In tck/cdi-tomee/ run "mvn clean test" -> should be possible to
> > attach a debugger
> >
> > Besides the failing tests, it would be neat to have the open fixes
> >
Any news? I really need a release soon.
Can i do something to help? Only the 3 failing tests are missing?
Am Di., 20. Juli 2021 um 10:44 Uhr schrieb Thomas Andraschko <
andraschko.tho...@gmail.com>:
> JFYI: i currently tested some of our applications and it seems
> 8.0.8-SNAP
ks Thomas.
>
> I'll see if I can do a release tomorrow.
> --
> Jean-Louis Monteiro
> http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
> http://www.tomitribe.com
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 3:12 PM Thomas Andraschko <
> andraschko.tho...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Richa
2565000a499c874eea24655ea83c%40hs-heilbronn.de%3E
>
>
> Gruß
> Richard
>
>
>
> Am Montag, den 19.07.2021, 13:26 +0200 schrieb Thomas Andraschko:
> > Hi Richard,
> >
> > all right, thanks!
> >
> > i just tried to build tomee with Java8 but it fails with
wo org.jboss.cdi.tck.* tests require a bisect session (I guess).
> According to our CI, the last working build was
> with 7396363d37c7e8006c6a84523d3c72354b358384
>
>
>
> Gruß
> Richard
>
>
>
> Am Montag, den 19.07.2021, 11:55 +0200 schrieb Thomas Andraschko:
> >
Hey guys,
how is the current status?
i'm asking because tomee-security throws a NPE in 8.0.6 and older, which
seems to work in 8.0.7 but JAXRS is broken in 8.0.7 AFAICS?
java.lang.NullPointerException
at org.apache.cxf.jaxrs.model.ProviderInfo.(ProviderInfo.java:74)
at
Congrats!
Am Mi., 13. Jan. 2021 um 11:40 Uhr schrieb Jonathan Gallimore <
jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com>:
> Congratulations Richard, and thank you for all your contributions!
>
> Jon
>
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 9:34 PM Jean-Louis Monteiro <
> jlmonte...@tomitribe.com> wrote:
>
> > The Project
<
jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com>:
> Is it a straight dependency update, or is there some code on the TomEE side
> needed to wire it in?
>
> Jon
>
> On Mon, Jan 4, 2021 at 8:56 AM Thomas Andraschko <
> andraschko.tho...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi David,
> >
. 2021 um 02:00 Uhr schrieb David Blevins <
dblev...@tomitribe.com>:
> > On Jan 3, 2021, at 8:24 AM, Thomas Andraschko <
> andraschko.tho...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Any News? We should also think about tomee embedded
>
> Any interest in working on this? I'd be
Any News? We should also think about tomee embedded
David Blevins schrieb am Mi., 30. Sept. 2020,
22:57:
> > On Sep 30, 2020, at 3:06 AM, Jonathan Gallimore <
> jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > If its a drop-in replacement, we can probably handle that in the Maven
> > build.
>
>
Not a showstopper but it would be great if it could contain MyFaces 2.3.7
(there is already a PR for it) but it's also ok for me to have it in 8.0.6.
Am Di., 17. Nov. 2020 um 23:11 Uhr schrieb Jonathan Gallimore <
jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com>:
> Hi All,
>
> This is a first attempt at a vote for
Already created a PR for MyFaces 2.3.7 ;)
Alex The Rocker schrieb am Di., 10. Nov. 2020, 15:38:
> Hello,
>
> Is this update fixing https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-2618 ?
>
> Alex
>
> Le lun. 19 oct. 2020 à 22:30, Mark Struberg
> a écrit :
> >
> > Hi ladies!
> >
> > I'd like to call
verywhere in content parameters and in xml files. That's
> the issue. So as far as I can understand if we move TomEE 8 to new myfaces
> then we'll break EE 8 apps
>
> Le mer. 30 sept. 2020 à 12:38, Thomas Andraschko <
> andraschko.tho...@gmail.com> a écrit :
>
> > Might w
Looks like it SHOULD still work with MF 3.0.
Will this string
https://github.com/apache/tomee/blob/master/tomee/tomee-myfaces/src/main/java/org/apache/tomee/myfaces/TomEEWebConfigProvider.java#L40
also be replaced with jakarta?
Am Mi., 30. Sept. 2020 um 14:53 Uhr schrieb Thomas Andraschko
t; http://www.tomitribe.com
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 11:18 AM Thomas Andraschko <
> > andraschko.tho...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > oh, then it wont work.
> > > MyFaces 3.0 e.g. also changes context param an
ble binaries based on EE 8.
>
> If MyFaces 3 is EE 8 compatible, then I don't see any issue doing the
> upgrade.
>
> --
> Jean-Louis Monteiro
> http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
> http://www.tomitribe.com
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 11:12 AM Thomas Andraschko <
up
Am Mo., 21. Sept. 2020 um 10:37 Uhr schrieb Thomas Andraschko <
andraschko.tho...@gmail.com>:
> Hey Guys,
>
> We recently released MyFaces 3.0 RC1.
> I think we have to use it for 9.0?
>
Hey Guys,
We recently released MyFaces 3.0 RC1.
I think we have to use it for 9.0?
>From a user perspective i would really suggest to make TomEE8 = JakartaEE8,
TomEE9 = JakartaEE9,
I think its to much work to maintain 2 branches. Maybe it would be a good
idea to create a TomEE8 and TomEE9 from master?
Are there any news? the tomee-embedded-maven-plugin is still not useable.
Am Mi., 27. Mai 2020 um 17:01 Uhr schrieb Jonathan Gallimore <
jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com>:
> Just an FYI, something has gone badly wrong in the promotion of the Nexus
> staging repo. Some of the artifacts made it to the
+1 (nonbinding)
my applications are working fine
Am Mi., 6. Mai 2020 um 12:11 Uhr schrieb Jonathan Gallimore <
jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com>:
> Hi All,
>
> Here's a first attempt at releasing of TomEE 8.0.2. Please can you take a
> careful look, review, test and provide feedback.
>
> Maven Repo:
e.microprofile.openapi.tck.ModelReaderAppTest)
> >> Time elapsed: 1.312 s <<< FAILURE!
> >> [ERROR]
> >>
> testAvailabilityGetParameter(org.eclipse.microprofile.openapi.tck.ModelReaderAppTest)
> >> Time elapsed: 0.038 s <<< FAILURE
Please Jon, that would be great!
I created the ticket because of a Johnzon bug i see in my application.
The OWB upgrade isn't that important for me but Johnzon is :)
Am Do., 30. Apr. 2020 um 17:08 Uhr schrieb Jonathan Gallimore <
jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com>:
> I saw these 2 JIRAs come in:
>
>
JFYI: the release notes contains unresolved issues like: TOMEE-2270
Jonathan Gallimore schrieb am Do., 19. Dez.
2019, 08:20:
> Hi All,
>
> Here's a first attempt at roll of a TomEE 8.0.1. Please can you take a
> careful look, review, test and provide feedback.
>
> Maven Repo:
>
I think a good start would be to publish the testresults somewhere, so we
can check them.
I could e.g. handle JSF tests.
Am Di., 22. Okt. 2019 um 15:01 Uhr schrieb Richard Monson-Haefel <
monsonhae...@gmail.com>:
> Excellent question and response, guys!
>
> I think that we need to organize a
congrats!
Am Do., 5. Sept. 2019 um 09:53 Uhr schrieb Jean-Louis Monteiro <
jlmonte...@tomitribe.com>:
> The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache TomEE has invited Cesar
> to
> become a committer and we are pleased to announce that he has accepted.
>
> Cesar started contributing about a
PR here: https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/538
Am Di., 13. Aug. 2019 um 04:29 Uhr schrieb David Blevins <
david.blev...@gmail.com>:
> > On Aug 12, 2019, at 5:39 AM, Thomas Andraschko <
> andraschko.tho...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Started the release vot
Started the release vote today, will come back when it's released :)
Am Di., 6. Aug. 2019 um 10:27 Uhr schrieb Thomas Andraschko <
andraschko.tho...@gmail.com>:
> Im in Holiday this week, so If you can work on it Mark, it would be great
> :)
>
> Mark Struberg schrieb am Di.,
Im in Holiday this week, so If you can work on it Mark, it would be great :)
Mark Struberg schrieb am Di., 6. Aug. 2019,
08:41:
> I can probably help with that a bit. Just ping me if you need something.
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
> > Am 05.08.2019 um 20:16 s
have
> https://search.maven.org/search?q=g:org.apache.bval
> I believe it's 2.0.2 but wanted to double check
>
>
> --
> Jean-Louis Monteiro
> http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
> http://www.tomitribe.com
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 10:20 AM Thomas Andraschko <
I would really like to use the official bval but there is no feedback on my
mail
Romain Manni-Bucau schrieb am Fr., 2. Aug. 2019,
21:42:
> Hi everybody
>
> Last m3 depends on a phantom bval release breaking dependency management
> it seems.
>
> Was it identified/communicated?
>
Hi,
there were some "possible issues" with bval in the last months, especially:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BVAL-174
(also see https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@bval.apache.org/msg01042.html)
and
https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/BVAL/issues/BVAL-175
both are no issues from our
+1
Jonathan Gallimore schrieb am Do., 23. Mai
2019, 11:58:
> Big +1. I realize I'm guilty of building the creation of the zip files on
> top of that process, but after 8 years of the TomEE bundle being available,
> its time to retire these apps I think.
>
> On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 9:31 AM
-0
using the right bval version would improve my tomee boot-time up to 7 (!)
seconds.
Please also see Romains comment in BVal-175.
Am Fr., 17. Mai 2019 um 09:11 Uhr schrieb David Blevins <
david.blev...@gmail.com>:
> Ok, finally vote time!
>
> Maven Repo:
>
>
What version of BVal is now included in the M3 vote?
Am Do., 16. Mai 2019 um 17:45 Uhr schrieb David Blevins <
david.blev...@gmail.com>:
> > On May 17, 2019, at 12:24 AM, Thomas Andraschko <
> andraschko.tho...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > BVal release vote passed
BVal release vote passed :)
Am Fr., 10. Mai 2019 um 18:42 Uhr schrieb Jean-Louis Monteiro <
jlmonte...@tomitribe.com>:
> If it's available before and someone is ok to create the JIRA ticket and
> submit a PR I don't see why it would not.
> If it's not ready, then it will go to the M4 or final
ite huge.
>
>
>
> --
> Jean-Louis Monteiro
> http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
> http://www.tomitribe.com
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 2:39 PM Thomas Andraschko <
> andraschko.tho...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Its under vote today again with an big s
Its under vote today again with an big startup performance improvement
j4fm schrieb am Mo., 15. Apr. 2019, 14:02:
> openjpa and javaee-8 new versions are both in maven repository already.
> Not sure why bval is released but not yet in maven repository. Any ideas?
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from:
>
We should at least wait for the next BVal and OpenJPA version, they are
currently in the release vote :)
Am Di., 9. Apr. 2019 um 13:39 Uhr schrieb j4fm :
> Hey, sorry I've been out for 4 weeks due to an accident/surgery and didn't
> keep track of threads. Just starting up again. How far from an
AFAIK Arquillian itself is still not compatible with JUnit5?!
Am Mo., 11. März 2019 um 19:15 Uhr schrieb Bruno Baptista <
bruno...@gmail.com>:
> Hi Folks,
>
> Any idea if we can run tests using the Jupiter engine of JUnit 5 with
> Arquillian on TomEE?
>
> Has anyone tried it?
>
> Cheers
>
> --
>
I would like to see a bval release before a final.
And i would like to see a working embedded maven plugin with Java 11.
j4fm schrieb am Mi., 27. Feb. 2019, 19:37:
> Personally, (I'm not sure what the standard process is) I would love to see
> TomEE 8 final release with CXF 3.3.0/JAXB 2.3.2 and
1 - 100 of 126 matches
Mail list logo
