The whole point of Geronimo is nowadays to provide common reusable EE parts for
other ASF projects.
This is important for many projects which do not depend on TomEE. E.g. all the
parts TomEE is actually using.
I do agree that those parts are moving a bit slower. But there is a very low
boundary
Additional note:
https://lists.apache.org/thread/m7y4fbygwdz1kyloh7z86r5042mtz9k4
Might be interesting to get Mark's opinion on this thread regarding
EE10 / CDI 4.0 :-)
Gruß
Richard
Am Dienstag, dem 22.11.2022 um 20:51 +0100 schrieb Richard Zowalla:
> Hi,
>
> I think it is better to have separ
Hi,
I think it is better to have separate repos, builds and release cycles,
if we are going to adopt these projects.
(1) Spec Jars
It is a valid point to discuss, if we want to keep the tradition of
doing our own ASF specific spec jars or if we want to stick with the
artifacts provided by the Ec
Hi everyone, and thank you Jean-Louis for opening this topic again,
i would be more than happy to make the API switch and yank the specs jars
in favor of Jakarta EE official jars (cf. my mail from 9/nov/22
https://lists.apache.org/thread/cpt4cfhkv068cnrx3g2tl0cpgkb6rzj6)
i would also be happy to
Hi all,
It's been a couple of months since it started. It never really landed but
it's getting more and more obvious that there is absolutely no desire to
keep the Geronimo project.
The goal of this email isn't really to discuss the reasons or argue if it
should or not disappear, but more to disc
