Re: Suffocating development environment

o be accurate: this is not an angular website. > > > > > -- > View this message in context: http://tomee-openejb.979440. > n4.nabble.com/Suffocating-development-environment-tp4681969p4681985.html > Sent from the TomEE Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >

Re: Suffocating development environment

for a keeping the old (non-angular) website around until a new one is actually ready and a vote can be called -- View this message in context: http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/Suffocating-development-environment-tp4681969p4681985.html Sent from the TomEE Dev mailing list archive

Re: Suffocating development environment

On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 1:17 PM, Andy Gumbrecht wrote: > The subject of this thread is intended to cover the multiple incidents of > the past and address the increasing number of current and future concerns > coming from multiple contributors, that will remain anonymous

Re: Suffocating development environment

2017-06-28 14:17 GMT+02:00 Andy Gumbrecht : > The subject of this thread is intended to cover the multiple incidents of > the past and address the increasing number of current and future concerns > coming from multiple contributors, that will remain anonymous for obvious

Re: Suffocating development environment

2017-06-28 13:19 GMT+02:00 Jonathan Gallimore : > On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 11:35 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau < > rmannibu...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > 2017-06-28 11:39 GMT+02:00 Jonathan Gallimore < > > jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> > > : > > > > > Wow. > > > > > > Well,

Re: Suffocating development environment

The subject of this thread is intended to cover the multiple incidents of the past and address the increasing number of current and future concerns coming from multiple contributors, that will remain anonymous for obvious reasons. I am just being the voice with broad shoulders here. In this

Re: Suffocating development environment

On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 11:35 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > 2017-06-28 11:39 GMT+02:00 Jonathan Gallimore < > jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> > : > > > Wow. > > > > Well, thanks for writing the email, and starting the discussion. From > where > > I'm sitting, it looks like

Re: Suffocating development environment

2017-06-28 11:39 GMT+02:00 Jonathan Gallimore : > Wow. > > Well, thanks for writing the email, and starting the discussion. From where > I'm sitting, it looks like there are a few issues. I'll work in reverse-ish > order (in terms of your post). > > -- Reverting

Re: Suffocating development environment

Wow. Well, thanks for writing the email, and starting the discussion. From where I'm sitting, it looks like there are a few issues. I'll work in reverse-ish order (in terms of your post). -- Reverting commits. I've seen the reverts - I also note that other than on a JIRA ticket, there was zero

Re: Suffocating development environment

Hi all +1 >From my observation in this list and some couple of ASF projects, you are >absolutely right.  ASF projects long term success is heavily related with the >healthy project community and their consensus >(https://www.apache.org/foundation/how-it-works.html ). Projects must not be

Re: Suffocating development environment

2017-06-28 2:14 GMT+02:00 Andy Gumbrecht : > I'm writing this on the public dev list as there seems to be inaction on > the private list regarding the preservation and nurturing of contributions > to the TomEE project. I hope this serves as an entry into a public >

Suffocating development environment

I'm writing this on the public dev list as there seems to be inaction on the private list regarding the preservation and nurturing of contributions to the TomEE project. I hope this serves as an entry into a public discussion on how to improve or resolve the situation. This evening (and late into