Re: TomEE 7.1.x with Microprofile

2018-05-04 Thread Alex The Rocker
d acts >> > are >> >> not consistent :(. >> >> >> >> Le 1 mai 2018 21:24, "David Blevins" <david.blev...@gmail.com> a écrit >> : >> >> >> >> I've only ever seen feedback of the nature that if people were willing >> to

Re: TomEE 7.1.x with Microprofile

2018-05-04 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
t;>>>> 7+mp which doesnt work if we want to do a 7+some ee 8. MP not > driving > > >>>> tomee > > >>>>> by design (and it is good), it shouldnt imply any versioning to > stay > > >>>>> consistent for end users. >

Re: TomEE 7.1.x with Microprofile

2018-05-04 Thread Jonathan Gallimore
a mp distro on tomee 7.0 (using toolchain) > >>> and/or > >>>>> tomee 8.0 (natively). > >>>>> > >>>>> Keep in mind it is as minor for the project as the plume distro - we > >>> can > >>>

Re: TomEE 7.1.x with Microprofile

2018-05-04 Thread Mark Struberg
modify the project nature, goal or codebase. >>>>> >>>>> Once we know what we want to bring then we can go through the standard >>>>> process of a vote if people disagree or just move forward. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>

Re: TomEE 7.1.x with Microprofile

2018-05-04 Thread Jonathan Gallimore
r mail - > > for a > > >> 7.1. > > >> Either there are too much off list discussions or we should better > > handle > > >> thread outcomes cause ATM, if you follow the list, discussions and > acts > > > are > > >> not consis

Re: TomEE 7.1.x with Microprofile

2018-05-04 Thread Mark Struberg
quot; <david.blev...@gmail.com> a écrit > : > >> > >> I've only ever seen feedback of the nature that if people were willing > to > >> do the extra 7.1 work in addition to the TomEE 8 work, it wasn't a > > problem. > >> > >> Note, jus

Re: TomEE 7.1.x with Microprofile

2018-05-01 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
ail.com> a écrit > : > >> > >> I've only ever seen feedback of the nature that if people were willing > to > >> do the extra 7.1 work in addition to the TomEE 8 work, it wasn't a > > problem. > >> > >> Note, just got off the MicroProfile hang

Re: TomEE 7.1.x with Microprofile

2018-05-01 Thread David Blevins
roProfile 2.0 release on June 6th. >> The release contents would be the same with the exception of the minimum >> Java EE version; 1.4 will remain at Java EE 7 and MicroProfile 2.0 will be >> Java EE 8. Work would probably shift to MicroProfile 2.x afterwards, >&

Re: TomEE 7.1.x with Microprofile

2018-05-01 Thread David Blevins
ork would probably shift to MicroProfile 2.x afterwards, > though future MicroProfile 1.x releases could happen if component specs > want to continue to cater to Java EE 7 or don't have any Java EE dependency > at all. That means MicroProfile will officially have two streams: > > -

Re: TomEE 7.1.x with Microprofile

2018-05-01 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
ure MicroProfile 1.x releases could happen if component specs want to continue to cater to Java EE 7 or don't have any Java EE dependency at all. That means MicroProfile will officially have two streams: - MicroProfile 1.x, Java EE 7, (potential TomEE 7.1) - MicroProfile 2.x, Java EE 8/Jakar

Re: TomEE 7.1.x with Microprofile

2018-05-01 Thread David Blevins
to continue to cater to Java EE 7 or don't have any Java EE dependency at all. That means MicroProfile will officially have two streams: - MicroProfile 1.x, Java EE 7, (potential TomEE 7.1) - MicroProfile 2.x, Java EE 8/Jakarta EE 8, TomEE 8 -- David Blevins http://twitter.com/dblevins http

Re: TomEE 7.1.x with Microprofile

2018-04-30 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Hmm, can have missed something but didnt the outcome of the thread have been to work in tomee 8 branch (always better to avoid merges ;))? Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog |

TomEE 7.1.x with Microprofile

2018-04-30 Thread Jean-Louis Monteiro
Hi community, I have created a branch based on current master (aka TomEE 7.0.x) as discussed a while back. I have backported the microprofile JWT work from TomEE 8 branch. The branch is https://github.com/jeanouii/tomee/tree/microprofile_backport I have pushed what I have currently in there.