On 01/11/10 23:44, bjoern michaelsen - Sun Microsystems - Hamburg
Germany wrote:
Am Mon, 11 Jan 2010 18:04:21 +0100
schrieb Stephan Bergmann stephan.bergm...@sun.com:
Which, at least in its simplest form, would imply that it necessarily
modifies the source tree by adding files to it, something
bjoern michaelsen - Sun Microsystems - Hamburg Germany wrote:
But the actual information contained in the above lines is actually
this:
rscdep source files: tools/bootstrp/*
rscdep link libs: tl
Quoting a band from Hamburg: Jein (=Yes and No).
Of course, there is a lot of
On Mon, 11 Jan 2010 16:05:57 +0200
Jussi Pakkanen jpakk...@gmail.com wrote:
I would like to point out that what you are doing is generating your
own language and a build tool/generator based on that. There's nothing
wrong with it as such, but this is reinventing the wheel again (just
like
Hi list,
can somebody from the tools project clean up the webpage at
tools.openoffice.org? It is prominently linked from the page
http://contributing.openoffice.org/programming.html, where dev newbies
likely end up by the click path from the frontpage I want to
participate ... - Programming.
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 12:35 PM, bjoern michaelsen - Sun Microsystems
- Hamburg Germany bjoern.michael...@sun.com wrote:
What is the benefit you get from this instead of using something like
CMake that already has a mature implementation of this functionality?
One dependency less (because
On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 17:37:59 +0200
Jussi Pakkanen jpakk...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 12:35 PM, bjoern michaelsen - Sun Microsystems
- Hamburg Germany bjoern.michael...@sun.com wrote:
One dependency less (because you will need an additional native
build system like GNU make or
