> On Apr 2, 2018, at 2:11 PM, David Neuman wrote:
>
> Dear Traffic Control community members:
>
> I would like to call a vote on the resolution for Traffic Control to
> graduate from to an Apache TLP. We have already voted on whether or not we
> should start the
+1
— Leif
> On Mar 1, 2018, at 08:41, Dave Neuman wrote:
>
> Hey All,
>
> After a great discussion amongst the Apache Traffic Control PPMC, reviewing
> the graduation checklist[1], updating the podling status page[2], and
> updating the project website to ensure the whimsy
> On Jan 9, 2018, at 10:22 AM, Dave Neuman wrote:
>
> Looks like this thread died over the holidays. Let me try to bring it back
> up before we cut a 2.2 branch.
> Can you please respond with *just* the following:
>
> [X] +1 to adding a changelog.MD file
> [] -1 to adding
> On Nov 21, 2017, at 9:45 PM, Mark Torluemke wrote:
>
> I agree -- supporting 3 ATS major versions is likely more work than it's
> worth. Traffic Ops core should continue to move towards being cache
> software agnostic.
>
> Having said that, we have some logic today
> On Aug 29, 2017, at 4:47 PM, Leif Hedstrom <zw...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>
>> On Aug 28, 2017, at 10:38 AM, Eric Friedrich (efriedri) <efrie...@cisco.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> We currently use JIRA Issues to track all of the Traffic Control bugs.
>&
> On Aug 28, 2017, at 10:38 AM, Eric Friedrich (efriedri)
> wrote:
>
> We currently use JIRA Issues to track all of the Traffic Control bugs.
>
> Now that we have write access to Github, we can move back to GH Issues for
> bug tracking.
>
> This will be a better
and we get 95% of the benefit without solving any of
> the actually hard problems.
>
> We'd need a host, though.
>
> On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 5:06 PM Leif Hedstrom <zw...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>>
>>> On Mar 13, 2017, at 8:44 AM, Chris Lemmons <alfic...@gm
> On Mar 13, 2017, at 8:44 AM, Chris Lemmons wrote:
>
> To me, the key features of CI are that a) it builds each branch
> automatically, b) notifies affected parties when all is not well, and c)
> manages the artefacts in a reasonable way. Additionally, we're a lot more
>
> On Feb 21, 2017, at 9:06 AM, Dan Kirkwood wrote:
>
> Hello Incubator PMC,
>
+1 (binding)
— Leif
> On Feb 16, 2017, at 12:39 PM, Dan Kirkwood wrote:
>
> We have 4 +1 already, so I'm declaring RC10 as passed!
Fwiw, that’s not generally how things work. You had stated that the vote was
very short (“end of the day”), so at a minimum you need to let that time pass.
> On Feb 1, 2017, at 3:21 PM, Leif Hedstrom <zw...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I’ve enabled the Clang analyzer builds for the CI. I’d highly recommend that
> if it fails, you look into why, at least for PRs on master. Unfortunately, I
> haven’t figur
Hi all,
I’ve enabled the Clang analyzer builds for the CI. I’d highly recommend that if
it fails, you look into why, at least for PRs on master. Unfortunately, I
haven’t figured out a good way to expose the actual details in some meaningful
way, I’m still working on that. In the mean time, if
> On Jan 27, 2017, at 9:46 AM, Dan Kirkwood wrote:
>
> +1
>
> -- was assuming as release manager I didn't get a vote, but not true?
Everyone gets to vote :). If you are a PPMC member, your vote is binding. We
should encourage non-PPMC members to vote as well, some of the
> On Jan 6, 2017, at 2:15 PM, Dan Kirkwood wrote:
>
> Hello All,
>
> I've prepared another release for v1.8.0 (RC6)
>
> Changes since 1.7.0:
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-trafficcontrol/compare/RELEASE-1.7.0...RELEASE-1.8.0-RC6
>
>
> On Dec 13, 2016, at 7:47 AM, Dan Kirkwood wrote:
>
> So that makes us +1 overall, since you're the only vote :-)
Eeep. Where are the mentor votes? :)
I’m traveling and in meetings this week, but if you are extending the vote
deadling, I can try to take a look tomorrow
> On Dec 8, 2016, at 12:29 PM, Eric Friedrich (efriedri)
> wrote:
>
> Any chance we could start running RAT as part of our CICD builds?
>
> I could probably set something up in our private Jenkins if theres not a
> better option.
+1 as well.
Fwiw, we do this nightly
> On Dec 5, 2016, at 3:48 PM, Dan Kirkwood wrote:
>
> Hi all.. We haven't really established a process for this, but to
> keep in compliance with Apache license guidelines, each source file
> should have the Apache license comment -- normally at the head of the
> file,
> On Dec 2, 2016, at 5:57 PM, Dan Kirkwood wrote:
>
> Thanks again for the feedback, Leif..There is a .rat_excludes
> file at the top level, but it looks like we didn't get it fully
> populated. The .json files should certainly be excluded..
Oh, but it was not in
> On Dec 1, 2016, at 4:02 PM, Dan Kirkwood wrote:
>
> Hello All,
>
> I've prepared another release for v1.8.0 (RC3)
>
> Changes since 1.7.0:
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-trafficcontrol/compare/RELEASE-1.7.0...RELEASE-1.8.0-RC3
>
> This corresponds to git:
> Hash:
> On Dec 1, 2016, at 12:46 PM, Phil Sorber wrote:
>
> http://www.apache.org/dev/release-signing.html#basic-facts
>
> Missing checksums for the artifacts.
>
> And for the record, I am still not liking the RPM's as release artifacts,
> but I'll let the IPMC weigh in on that.
> On Nov 11, 2016, at 1:28 PM, David Neuman wrote:
>
> I actually don't think we can do milestones, labels, or assignees in github
> anymore. We lost that when we moved to the incubator github. :(
> But we should mark Jiras accordingly and open a Jira for a PR
Please make an effort to mark GitHub PRs (and Jiras) with relevant information.
In Github, you have Milestones (versions), Labels (components etc.) as well as
assignee you can use. You can also add PRs to the projects, to help with back
ports etc.
Same with Jira, at a minimum add the
> On Nov 8, 2016, at 6:46 PM, Eric Friedrich (efriedri)
> wrote:
>
> Hey Dan-
> I haven’t looked at the RPMs yet, but I think we also need to put up a
> package for astats.
>
> A few other things:
> - Package name should have “incubating” in it
> - Need signatures
> On Nov 8, 2016, at 3:27 PM, Dan Kirkwood wrote:
>
> Hello All,
>
> I've prepared a release for v1.8.0 (RC1)
>
> Changes since 1.7.0:
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-trafficcontrol/compare/RELEASE-1.7.0...RELEASE-1.8.0-RC1
>
>
> On Nov 8, 2016, at 3:27 PM, Dan Kirkwood wrote:
>
> Hello All,
>
> I've prepared a release for v1.8.0 (RC1)
>
> Changes since 1.7.0:
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-trafficcontrol/compare/RELEASE-1.7.0...RELEASE-1.8.0-RC1
>
> This corresponds to git:
> Hash:
25 matches
Mail list logo