ant elder wrote:
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 12:34 PM, Simon Nash n...@apache.org wrote:
Florian MOGA wrote:
We have identified the need of having the following types of environments:
- a place where to keep new modules or samples (contrib/)
- a place where to move the new code in order to get
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3708?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sebastian Millies updated TUSCANY-3708:
---
Attachment: test.zip
Eclipse project containing an illustration of this problem,
SDO created with wrong type errors on deserialization
---
Key: TUSCANY-3708
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3708
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: Bug
Components:
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 4:43 AM, Luciano Resende luckbr1...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 2:05 AM, Simon Laws simonsl...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 5:50 PM, Simon Laws simonsl...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 7:48 AM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com
XSD defined in WSDL is leaking out into global scope
Key: TUSCANY-3709
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3709
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: Bug
Components: OASIS
After much messing about with compliance tests thinking that the reorg
had broken them (only to find that there's a real issue there
TUSCANY-3709) I've checked in the mods to demonstrate a structure
which I think has most of the things different people have said they
want in the distro. Here are
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 4:23 AM, Simon Laws simonsl...@googlemail.com wrote:
Well the informal rule I've tried to apply so far in these kinds of cases is
1 - if we mention things that aren't in the distro then it's not great
but I could live with it until the next distro
2 - if we don't
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 6:44 PM, Luciano Resende luckbr1...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 4:23 AM, Simon Laws simonsl...@googlemail.com wrote:
Well the informal rule I've tried to apply so far in these kinds of cases is
1 - if we mention things that aren't in the distro then it's not
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 10:49 AM, Simon Laws simonsl...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 6:44 PM, Luciano Resende luckbr1...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 4:23 AM, Simon Laws simonsl...@googlemail.com wrote:
Well the informal rule I've tried to apply so far in these kinds
Ok, I made some changes based on what I reported previously in this
thread. Please take a look as see if this is correct. The artifacts in
question are test only, shouldn't appear in the binary distro and
hence I don't believe the LICENSE/NOTICE files shipped with the maven
modules are affected.
10 matches
Mail list logo
