Re: [VOTE] Release Apache UIMA Ruta 2.2.0 RC1

2014-02-14 Thread Peter Klügl
Am 13.02.2014 23:30, schrieb Marshall Schor: > ... > Here's the reference: https://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html That's a very nice page that I missed so far. Thanks :-) Peter > Scroll down to the "Dependencies of Dependencies" section, where it says: > Dependencies of dependencies (i

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache UIMA Ruta 2.2.0 RC1

2014-02-13 Thread Marshall Schor
On 2/13/2014 2:22 PM, Peter Klügl wrote: > Am 13.02.2014 20:02, schrieb Marshall Schor: >> On 2/13/2014 8:12 AM, Peter Klügl wrote: >>> I still try to understand what needs to be mentioned in the notice file. >>> >>> Example: >>> >>> The notice file in the uimaFIT binary download contains a mentio

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache UIMA Ruta 2.2.0 RC1

2014-02-13 Thread Peter Klügl
Am 13.02.2014 20:02, schrieb Marshall Schor: > On 2/13/2014 8:12 AM, Peter Klügl wrote: >> I still try to understand what needs to be mentioned in the notice file. >> >> Example: >> >> The notice file in the uimaFIT binary download contains a mention of >> AnnotationLiteral.java because of uimafit-

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache UIMA Ruta 2.2.0 RC1

2014-02-13 Thread Marshall Schor
On 2/13/2014 8:12 AM, Peter Klügl wrote: > I still try to understand what needs to be mentioned in the notice file. > > Example: > > The notice file in the uimaFIT binary download contains a mention of > AnnotationLiteral.java because of uimafit-legacy-support-2.0.0, but > there is no mention of t

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache UIMA Ruta 2.2.0 RC1

2014-02-13 Thread Peter Klügl
I still try to understand what needs to be mentioned in the notice file. Example: The notice file in the uimaFIT binary download contains a mention of AnnotationLiteral.java because of uimafit-legacy-support-2.0.0, but there is no mention of the IBM UIMA License Agreement because of jVinci-2.4.2

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache UIMA Ruta 2.2.0 RC1

2014-02-13 Thread Peter Klügl
Am 13.02.2014 12:53, schrieb Peter Klügl: >> more testing will follow >> maven artifacts: ruta-ep-engine-2.2.0-source: we could probably remove the mention of university of würzburg here since the artifact does not contains the sources of the fetched implementations. -> optionally, not a bloc

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache UIMA Ruta 2.2.0 RC1

2014-02-13 Thread Peter Klügl
> more testing will follow > Nicolas problem and a small issue I noticed when reproducing it will be fixed in the next rc. Peter

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache UIMA Ruta 2.2.0 RC1

2014-02-12 Thread Marshall Schor
On 2/12/2014 8:02 AM, Martin Toepfer wrote: > Hi Marshall, > > to comply with uimaFIT's NOTICE file, I will add > > This product contains uimaFIT - Core: > Copyright 2009-2012 Regents of the University of Colorado. > All rights reserved, > Copyright 2009-2012 Ubiquitous Knowledge Processing (UKP)

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache UIMA Ruta 2.2.0 RC1

2014-02-12 Thread Martin Toepfer
There seems to be an extra line end in the signature files that causes md5sum not to find the target file. I will have a look at it. Martin Am 12.02.2014 14:21, schrieb Peter Klügl: there are some problems verifying the signatures, but maybe only on my machine more testing will follow

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache UIMA Ruta 2.2.0 RC1

2014-02-12 Thread Peter Klügl
review so far: compared svn-tag with source release - OK (the usual additional files/folders) mvn clean install svn-tag - OK mvn clean install source-release - OK (antlr and maven-bundle-plugin warnings will be fixed in next rc) downloaded kepler sr1 installed UIMA Runtime and Tools 2.5.0 features

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache UIMA Ruta 2.2.0 RC1

2014-02-12 Thread Martin Toepfer
Hi Marshall, to comply with uimaFIT's NOTICE file, I will add This product contains uimaFIT - Core: Copyright 2009-2012 Regents of the University of Colorado. All rights reserved, Copyright 2009-2012 Ubiquitous Knowledge Processing (UKP) Lab. Technische Universität Darmstadt. All rights reserved

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache UIMA Ruta 2.2.0 RC1

2014-02-12 Thread Peter Klügl
Hi, Am 11.02.2014 20:50, schrieb Marshall Schor: > (These are probably not release blockers) - When building from the sources, I > observed: > > ruta-ep-engine bundle gives these warnings, probably needs a pom update? > > [INFO] --- maven-bundle-plugin:2.3.7:manifest (uima-bundle) @ ruta-ep-engine

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache UIMA Ruta 2.2.0 RC1

2014-02-11 Thread Marshall Schor
(These are probably not release blockers) - When building from the sources, I observed: ruta-ep-engine bundle gives these warnings, probably needs a pom update? [INFO] --- maven-bundle-plugin:2.3.7:manifest (uima-bundle) @ ruta-ep-engine --- [WARNING] Manifest org.apache.uima:ruta-ep-engine:jar:2

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache UIMA Ruta 2.2.0 RC1

2014-02-11 Thread Marshall Schor
The rc looks remarkably good and clean! I did notice one thing (so far): Some of the Jars (e.g. ruta-ep-engine) contain the uimaFIT Jar, which has Notices that are missing from the containing Jar's NOTICE file. See https://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#alv2-dep, where it says: If t

[VOTE] Release Apache UIMA Ruta 2.2.0 RC1

2014-02-11 Thread Martin Toepfer
Hi, the first release candidate of Apache UIMA Ruta v2.2.0 is ready for voting. Staging repository: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-1007/ SVN tag: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/ruta/tags/ruta-2.2.0-rc1 Update site: http://people.apache.org/~mtoepfer/uim