Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Release velocity-master 2

2016-10-14 Thread Nathan Bubna
he asked to go emeritus. >> >> I just checked if I had enough karma to do it myself (editing of >> private/committers/board/committee-info.txt), and it worked. >> >> So no worry, Nathan, nothing to do for you :-) >> >> Claude >> >> &

Re: [VOTE] 2.0 Release Quality

2016-11-18 Thread Nathan Bubna
+1 GA On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 7:24 AM, Greg Huber wrote: > Thanks, works great for me. > > [x] General Availability (GA) > > +1 non binding. > > > On 16 November 2016 at 11:51, Claude Brisson wrote: > > > The Velocity Engine 2.0 RC3 test build has been

Re: [tools] Tools reeng

2016-11-17 Thread Nathan Bubna
+1 deprecate and refactor away. this all sounds good. On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 10:32 AM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote: > On 11/17/2016 12:58 PM, Claude Brisson wrote: > > There are several things I'd like to do for the tools before releasing > > them: > > > > 1) deprecate

Re: [VOTE] Release velocity-master 2

2016-10-11 Thread Nathan Bubna
+1 On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 5:11 AM, Claude Brisson wrote: > Hi. > > Before staging the release candidate for velocity-engine, I must first > release the version 2 of velocity-master. > > It only contains a pom.xml with the list of PMCs and devs, and enumerate > the mailing

Re: [tool] More tools reenginering

2016-12-05 Thread Nathan Bubna
On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 9:49 AM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote: > I agree with Michael here, this direction is against what "pure" > Velocity is about. The generic tools shouldn't be allowed to fetch > random resources off the internet. > I'm with Claude here. Making powerful

Re: svn commit: r1776916 [1/2] - in /velocity/tools/trunk: ./ src/changes/ velocity-tools-assembly/ velocity-tools-assembly/src/main/assembly/ velocity-tools-examples/velocity-tools-examples-showcase/

2017-01-02 Thread Nathan Bubna
Wow. Sounds great, Claude! On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 2:49 AM, wrote: > Author: cbrisson > Date: Mon Jan 2 10:49:55 2017 > New Revision: 1776916 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1776916=rev > Log: > [tools] ImportTool and XmlTool reenginering, along with the addition

Re: ApacheCon NA 2017

2017-01-04 Thread Nathan Bubna
On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 7:57 AM, Christopher Schultz < ch...@christopherschultz.net> wrote: > All, > > I'm going to be in Miami for this year's ApacheCon. In all the years > I've been going to ApacheCons, I've never seen a single presentation on > Velocity. That probably has something to do with

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Velocity Engine 2.0

2017-08-12 Thread Nathan Bubna
On Sat, Aug 12, 2017 at 8:50 AM, Michael Osipov wrote: > Am 2017-08-09 um 12:52 schrieb Claude Brisson: > >> The Apache Velocity community is pleased to announce the release of >> Apache Velocity Engine 2.0. The release is available for download at: >> >>

Re: [VOTE] Engine 2.0 RC9 Release quality

2017-07-28 Thread Nathan Bubna
[+1] GA On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 4:00 PM, Claude Brisson wrote: > The Velocity Engine 2.0 RC9 is available. > > Main change since the RC8 is a full review of the DataSourceResourceLoader. > > Release notes: > > * https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/velocity/velocity-eng >

Re: release is ready

2017-08-08 Thread Nathan Bubna
It's here: http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/velocity/velocity-engine-core/2.0/ But we should probably mention the new maven path in the upgrading docs. On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 12:52 PM, Alex Fedotov wrote: > Maven repo does not seem to show 2.0 for the overall velocity

Re: release is ready

2017-08-08 Thread Nathan Bubna
The links all look good to me, nor can i think of anything missing at this point. On Sun, Aug 6, 2017 at 11:01 AM, Claude Brisson wrote: > The maven artefact has been publish, the release is visible on apache > mirrors, and the website now shows engine 2.0 documentation. > >

Re: [VOTE] Engine 2.0 RC8 Release quality

2017-05-01 Thread Nathan Bubna
On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 9:50 AM, Claude Brisson wrote: > [ ] Leave at test build > [ ] Alpha > [ ] Beta > [X ] General Availability (GA) >

Re: JIRA permissions

2017-12-08 Thread Nathan Bubna
Good idea. I'll see what i can do. On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 5:54 AM, Claude Brisson wrote: > I don't have enough karma, but we should hear from Nathan. > > Also, I wouldn't mind being a JIRA admin on those projects... > > Claude > > > > On 08/12/2017 14:03, Michael

Re: JIRA permissions

2017-12-08 Thread Nathan Bubna
Claude i think you should have the karma, if i'm reading things right; you were already in the Administrators role. Michael, you are now too. If i'm wrong, do let me know. We'll figure it out. On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 6:52 AM, Nathan Bubna <nbu...@gmail.com> wrote: > Good idea. I'll s

Re: Yet another issue cleanup

2017-12-08 Thread Nathan Bubna
On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 2:54 PM, Michael Osipov wrote: > Hi folks, > > I have noticed that good bunch of Velocity 0 tickets have been rejected > though fix version has been set. This is confusing for me and likely > others. Any reasoning behind this? Fix version implies that

Re: JIRA permissions

2017-12-08 Thread Nathan Bubna
I think i did add you to VELOCITY also. I'll double check. On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 12:21 PM, Michael Osipov <micha...@apache.org> wrote: > Am 2017-12-08 um 16:00 schrieb Nathan Bubna: > >> Claude i think you should have the karma, if i'm reading things right; y

Re: JIRA permissions

2017-12-08 Thread Nathan Bubna
Ah, seems there's two of you in JIRA (or at least two guys w/your name). I'd only put the [wrong] one. :) On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 12:27 PM, Nathan Bubna <nbu...@gmail.com> wrote: > I think i did add you to VELOCITY also. I'll double check. > > On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 12:21 PM,

Re: [tools] Running under a SecurityManager

2018-06-20 Thread Nathan Bubna
; BTW the SecurityManager is initialized at startup so one can easily > > initialize a static boolean in e.g. Velocity.java or whatever and just > > consult that rather than calling System.getSecurityManager() all the tim > > e. > > > >> I don't really understand e

Re: [tools] Running under a SecurityManager

2018-04-26 Thread Nathan Bubna
If you have some good pointers or suggestions... >> >> I don't really understand either why we're speaking of the CWD whereas >> all the VelocityView knows is the webapp root. But I may have missed >> something. >> >> >> Claude >> >> On 21/03/2018

Re: [tools] Running under a SecurityManager

2018-03-21 Thread Nathan Bubna
If we're talking 2.x, then adding a PrivilegedAction sounds better. If 3.0 (which, i think needs to happen anyway, right Claude?), then i'd agree with Michael. The auto config would be better off as something users need to explicitly turn on, not the default any longer. On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Velocity Tools 3.0 test build availble (RC1)

2018-10-02 Thread Nathan Bubna
Thanks to both of you! On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 12:54 PM Michael Osipov wrote: > Am 2018-10-01 um 22:35 schrieb Claude Brisson: > > The test build of Velocity Tools 3.0 is available. > > > > No determination as to the quality ('alpha,' 'beta,' or 'GA') of > > Velocity Tools 3.0 has been made, and

Re: [VOTE] Velocity Tools 3.0 Release Quality

2018-10-06 Thread Nathan Bubna
On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 8:43 AM Claude Brisson wrote: > The Velocity Tools 3.0 test build has been available since October 1st. > > Release notes: > > * > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/velocity/velocity-tools/3.0/release-notes.html > > Distribution: > > *

Re: [VOTE] Release Velocity Master version 3

2018-09-22 Thread Nathan Bubna
+1 On Sat, Sep 22, 2018 at 3:58 PM Michael Osipov wrote: > Hi, > > * reformatted the POM to a readible state > * Apache Parent upgraded to 21 > * added plugin management section for commonly used plugins > > Staging repo: >

Re: [VOTE] Release Velocity Master version 3

2018-09-23 Thread Nathan Bubna
g obvious. What exactly is this? > There doesn't seem to be anything here except a POM file. Is this a > released product or other artifact? > > Thanks, WILL > > On Sat, Sep 22, 2018 at 8:23 PM Nathan Bubna wrote: > > > +1 > > > > On Sat, Sep 22, 2018 at

Re: [engine] Configuration key names refactoring proposal

2019-03-06 Thread Nathan Bubna
Seems good. No objections here. :) On Wed, Mar 6, 2019 at 4:23 PM Claude Brisson wrote: > 2.1 RC1 is history, 2.1 RC2 is on its way. > > Here is a proposal for the configuration keys refactoring: > > > https://velocity.apache.org/engine/devel/configuration-property-changes-in-2.1.html > >

Re: Merging VELOCITY-892

2019-02-22 Thread Nathan Bubna
+1 Java 8 has been around plenty long On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 3:40 PM Claude Brisson wrote: > Hi all. > > The VELOCITY-892 branch contains a fix for the corresponding issue [1]. > > The purpose is to let the method arguments conversion handler manipulate > the formal arguments types as

Re: [engine] StringEscapeUtils

2019-03-07 Thread Nathan Bubna
Hmm. I may not be the best to weigh in on this, as i never used event handlers for escaping. I always preferred the direct, explicit control of escaping via tools, and trusted myself (YMMV) not to forget escaping anywhere important. I'll definitely agree that we shouldn't shade. I'm perfectly

Re: [VOTE] Engine 2.1 RC3 Release quality

2019-03-20 Thread Nathan Bubna
[+1] GA On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 5:43 PM Claude Brisson wrote: > The Velocity Engine 2.1 RC3 is available since March 15. > > Main changes: > > * Velocity Engine 2.1 now requires JDK 1.8+ > * Two more backward compatibility flags with 1.7: hyphens in > identifiers and macros literal

Re: Velocity + Spring MVC

2019-06-01 Thread Nathan Bubna
Yeah, adopting Spring support is unlikely to be much burden and seems well worthwhile. On Sat, Jun 1, 2019 at 1:48 AM Claude Brisson wrote: > Hi. > > We are aware of the situation, and we were more or less expecting > someone to make such a proposal. Yes, it will benefit both communities. > >

Re: Problems with commons-beanutils-1.9.4

2020-02-06 Thread Nathan Bubna
6 > > Nathan, > > (Apologies for the cross-post, but this is a very dev-y response. > After this message in the thread, I will reply only on the dev@ list). > > On 2/5/20 1:09 PM, Nathan Bubna wrote: > > Thanks for drilling into that, Chris! I was reading, but have no > &g

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Velocity Engine 2.2 RC6 test build available

2020-01-31 Thread Nathan Bubna
+1 Looks good to me. Thanks, Claude. Hope we can get this out before the next board report is due. :) On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 5:05 PM Claude Brisson wrote: > The test build of Velocity Engine 2.2 RC6 is available. > > No determination as to the quality ('alpha,' 'beta,' or 'GA') of > Velocity

Re: Problems with commons-beanutils-1.9.4

2020-02-07 Thread Nathan Bubna
er if just dropping the method is enough: anyone with an old > format configuration will have trouble identifying the cause of the > problem. Isn't there any way to tweak beanutils into binding class= to > setClassname() ? > > >Claude > > On 20-02-05 19 h 09, Nathan Bubna wr

Re: Problems with commons-beanutils-1.9.4

2020-02-07 Thread Nathan Bubna
Or maybe even just put a 3.x compatible version of the Struts tools up on github as an independent fork. Probably easier than talking the Struts devs into it. On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 11:10 PM Claude Brisson wrote: > On 20-02-06 16 h 15, Christopher Schultz wrote: > > > 3.0 completely dropped

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Velocity Engine 2.2 RC4 test build available

2020-01-15 Thread Nathan Bubna
a configuration like it was done > for other things in 2.1/2.2 ? I have to try :) > > On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 7:24 PM Nathan Bubna wrote: > > > > This is a planned change. Implicit local scope was deprecated in 1.7 for > > removal in 2.0 and was replaced

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Velocity Engine 2.2 RC4 test build available

2020-01-16 Thread Nathan Bubna
2020 at 5:31 PM Nathan Bubna wrote: > > > > I don't have any time for dev work on Velocity these days, so it doesn't > > much matter whether i consider it or not. :) If someone wants to put in > the > > work, i won't protest. > > > My inclination,

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Velocity Engine 2.2 RC4 test build available

2020-01-14 Thread Nathan Bubna
This is a planned change. Implicit local scope was deprecated in 1.7 for removal in 2.0 and was replaced with explicit scope control objects. https://velocity.apache.org/engine/devel/upgrading.html#upgrading-from-velocity-16x-to-velocity-17x On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 9:29 AM Thomas Mortagne wrote:

Re: Limiting VelocityLayoutServlet buffer size

2020-12-14 Thread Nathan Bubna
I'm pretty sure we don't have a setting like that. On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 8:01 AM Christopher Schultz < ch...@christopherschultz.net> wrote: > All, > > We recently suffered an OOME in production because we had a huge SQL > query return a log of data which, in turn, generated even more HTML >

Re: Limiting VelocityLayoutServlet buffer size

2020-12-16 Thread Nathan Bubna
and things are pretty stable, so i'm wary of taking on optimizations that increase our complexity. On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 8:38 AM Christopher Schultz < ch...@christopherschultz.net> wrote: > Nathan, > > On 12/14/20 11:15, Nathan Bubna wrote: > > I'm pretty sure we don'

Re: Resigning from Apache Velocity PMC

2021-03-11 Thread Nathan Bubna
Agreed. Thanks for your long work here, Will. If you're ever in Portland, drop me a line and i'll buy you a drink. :) On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 12:11 PM Henning Schmiedehausen < henn...@schmiedehausen.org> wrote: > Will, Thank you so much for your time and the part of the journey that we > walked

Re: [VOTE] Engine 2.3 RC1 Release quality

2021-03-01 Thread Nathan Bubna
+1 GA On Mon, Mar 1, 2021 at 8:06 AM Claude Brisson wrote: > The Velocity Engine 2.3 RC1 is available since February 27. > > Main changes in this release: > > + New spring-velocity-support module, containing Spring framework > Velocity Engine integration classes. > + Security fix: let

Re: [VOTE] Tools 3.1 RC1 Release quality

2021-03-01 Thread Nathan Bubna
+1 GA On Mon, Mar 1, 2021 at 12:26 PM Claude Brisson wrote: > The Velocity Tools 3.1 RC1 is available since February 27. > > Main changes in this release: > > + Added an optional 'factory' attribute to tools with the classname of a > factory for creating new tools instances > + Added a new

Re: [VOTE] Engine 2.3 RC2 Release quality

2021-03-03 Thread Nathan Bubna
+1 GA On Wed, Mar 3, 2021 at 4:29 AM Claude Brisson wrote: > The Velocity Engine 2.3 RC2 is available since February 27. > > Main changes in this release: > > + New spring-velocity-support module, containing Spring framework > Velocity Engine integration classes. > + Security fix: let

Re: [ANNOUCE] Apache Velocity Engine 2.3 Released

2021-03-08 Thread Nathan Bubna
Thank you, Claude!! I really appreciate all your work getting these releases out! On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 4:12 PM Claude Brisson wrote: > The Apache Velocity community is pleased to announce the release of > Apache Velocity Engine 2.3 The release is available for download at: > >

Re: [ANNOUCE] Velocity Engine 2.3 test build available

2021-02-27 Thread Nathan Bubna
Thank you, Claude! I really appreciate you getting this out. On Sat, Feb 27, 2021 at 5:14 AM Claude Brisson wrote: > The test build of Velocity Engine 2.3 RC1 is available. > > No determination as to the quality ('alpha,' 'beta,' or 'GA') of > Velocity Engine 2.3 RC1 has been made, and at this

Re: [VOTE] Release Velocity Master version 4

2021-02-27 Thread Nathan Bubna
+1 On Sat, Feb 27, 2021 at 2:15 AM Claude Brisson wrote: > Hi. > > Here's an RC for velocity-master-4, with the following changes: > > + set maven-enforcer-plugin and extra-enforcer-rules plugins versions > + removed Antonio as emeritus, as per his request > + switched scm URLs from svn to git

Fwd: [VOTE] Release Velocity Master version 4

2021-02-27 Thread Nathan Bubna
Henning errantly didn't send this to the list, forwarding it on his behalf. :) -- Forwarded message - From: Henning Schmiedehausen Date: Sat, Feb 27, 2021 at 8:07 PM Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Velocity Master version 4 To: Nathan Bubna Ok. Thanks. +1 to release. On Sat

Re: Broken: apache/velocity-engine#21 (master - 1a22c95)

2021-02-27 Thread Nathan Bubna
Agreed. Travis will get over it. :) On Sat, Feb 27, 2021 at 3:15 AM Claude Brisson wrote: > Of course, anticipating upon yet unreleased artifacts breaks CI. But if > we are to release master, engine and the tools in a raw ASAP to please > the security team, we should launch parallel release

Re: Limiting VelocityLayoutServlet buffer size

2021-02-19 Thread Nathan Bubna
On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 3:01 PM Christopher Schultz < ch...@christopherschultz.net> wrote: > Nathan, > > On 12/16/20 12:43, Nathan Bubna wrote: > > In general, i think the overhead from StringWriter is probably pretty > minimal. > > > > Before worrying abou

Re: Default github branches

2021-02-22 Thread Nathan Bubna
On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 12:13 AM Claude Brisson wrote: > From what I understood, it's github which is asking for the change, not > enforcing it. > > For the record, I am supposed to come back to infra with a link to a > mail thread -aka this one- to act our decision. So +1s needed. > > Since

Re: [VOTE] Release Velocity Master version 5

2023-03-25 Thread Nathan Bubna
+1 On Sat, Mar 25, 2023 at 4:59 AM Claude Brisson wrote: > Hello. > > Please vote for the release of the velocity-master release 5. > > Changes: > > + upgraded parent apache pom to version 29 > + upgraded maven plugins to latest version > + list Will Glass-Husain as Emeritus (I still wonder why

Re: Releasing Velocity Tools 3.2

2023-03-22 Thread Nathan Bubna
The javax->jakarta migration is unbelievably wasteful. So much stupid. But yes, we probably have to make that a major version change. Which is also very dumb. And unfortunately, i have zero time to help. :( On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 3:24 AM Claude Brisson wrote: > And it should be better to

Re: [VOTE] Release Velocity Master version 6

2024-02-04 Thread Nathan Bubna
+1 On Sat, Feb 3, 2024 at 10:07 AM Michael Osipov wrote: > Hi, > > Changelog: > * Upgrade to Apache Parent 31 > * Explicitly require Maven 3.2.5+ at build time > > Staging repo: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachevelocity-1040/ > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Velocity Tools version 3.2

2024-02-10 Thread Nathan Bubna
+1 On Sat, Feb 10, 2024 at 11:42 AM Michael Osipov wrote: > Hi, > > IMPORTANT: This requires the following staging repo: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachevelocity-1041/ > > Release notes: > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Velocity Engine version 2.4

2024-02-11 Thread Nathan Bubna
+1 On Sat, Feb 10, 2024 at 11:33 AM Michael Osipov wrote: > Hi, > > Release notes: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310104=12352138 > > Staging repo: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachevelocity-1041/ > >

Re: Versioning

2024-04-16 Thread Nathan Bubna
Sorry for the late reply. I sadly have very limited time for Apache work these days. The commit log is incidental. It would ideally have no repeated versions, but it's hardly a transgression if it does. Likewise, it's not a requirement of the ASF that our releases never skip version numbers. It

[jira] Commented: (VELTOOLS-67) Patch implementing path-scoped tools

2006-11-11 Thread Nathan Bubna (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELTOOLS-67?page=comments#action_12449034 ] Nathan Bubna commented on VELTOOLS-67: -- Looks good. i have a few refinements, but i'll try and get this in on Monday. As for supporting this with session

[jira] Commented: (VELTOOLS-69) ValueParserSub generic getter never worked

2006-11-15 Thread Nathan Bubna (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELTOOLS-69?page=comments#action_12450118 ] Nathan Bubna commented on VELTOOLS-69: -- Hmm. Breaking #if($query.foo) compatibility isn't ok, if we can't find a reasonable way to keep that and the sub

[jira] Resolved: (VELTOOLS-69) ValueParserSub generic getter never worked

2006-11-15 Thread Nathan Bubna (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELTOOLS-69?page=all ] Nathan Bubna resolved VELTOOLS-69. -- Fix Version/s: 1.3 Resolution: Fixed Ok, the sub is gone as of revision 475480. ValueParserSub generic getter never worked

[jira] Commented: (VELTOOLS-71) Adapt Velocity Engine's dependency download scripts to work for our build process.

2006-11-21 Thread Nathan Bubna (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELTOOLS-71?page=comments#action_12451827 ] Nathan Bubna commented on VELTOOLS-71: -- It's in the changelog now, but i don't think it matters since the building with jdk 1.3 feature doesn't/didn't work

[jira] Commented: (VELTOOLS-72) skip jar verification by default and add force.jar.loading

2006-11-28 Thread Nathan Bubna (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELTOOLS-72?page=comments#action_12454119 ] Nathan Bubna commented on VELTOOLS-72: -- heh. i just realized i made myself a hypocrite by rashly assuming you meant the commit-then-review comment to say

[jira] Resolved: (VELTOOLS-70) Upgrade to Struts 1.3.x and update related dependencies

2006-12-14 Thread Nathan Bubna (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELTOOLS-70?page=all ] Nathan Bubna resolved VELTOOLS-70. -- Resolution: Fixed Ok. So far as i can tell, we are fully Struts 1.3.x compatible now. All has been upgraded. Upgrade to Struts 1.3.x and update

[jira] Resolved: (VELTOOLS-9) Adding velocity-osgi to the tools build

2006-12-14 Thread Nathan Bubna (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELTOOLS-9?page=all ] Nathan Bubna resolved VELTOOLS-9. - Fix Version/s: (was: 1.3) Resolution: Won't Fix I don't know how to do this, have interest in it myself, or care to wait any longer for folks

[jira] Commented: (VELOCITY-502) Skip jar verification unless force.jar.loading is true

2006-12-23 Thread Nathan Bubna (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELOCITY-502?page=comments#action_12460669 ] Nathan Bubna commented on VELOCITY-502: --- I don't really care. Both have advantages, both will work fine. If you're going to do the work, i say you

[jira] Commented: (VELOCITY-504) Call to evaluate inside of macro fails with 1.5 beta2

2007-01-02 Thread Nathan Bubna (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELOCITY-504?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12461798 ] Nathan Bubna commented on VELOCITY-504: --- So, in order to trigger the issue, you have to be using a tool

[jira] Commented: (VELOCITY-504) Call to evaluate inside of macro fails with 1.5 beta2

2007-01-02 Thread Nathan Bubna (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELOCITY-504?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12461821 ] Nathan Bubna commented on VELOCITY-504: --- what?! but that's CRAZY! ;-) ok, seriously, someone needs

[jira] Commented: (VELOCITY-504) Call to evaluate inside of macro fails with 1.5 beta2

2007-01-02 Thread Nathan Bubna (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELOCITY-504?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12461862 ] Nathan Bubna commented on VELOCITY-504: --- oops. i didn't finish that. it should've read as a corollary

[jira] Commented: (VELTOOLS-64) Geronimo 1.1.1 with Tomcat install fails to render links correctly

2007-01-13 Thread Nathan Bubna (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELTOOLS-64?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12464547 ] Nathan Bubna commented on VELTOOLS-64: -- John (or others), Were you ever able to make any headway

[jira] Resolved: (VELTOOLS-58) ValidatorTool does not respect 'bundle' property for message elements when generating client-side validation code.

2007-01-18 Thread Nathan Bubna (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELTOOLS-58?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Nathan Bubna resolved VELTOOLS-58. -- Resolution: Fixed ValidatorTool does not respect 'bundle' property for message elements when

[jira] Commented: (VELTOOLS-60) VelocityTools in Maven Repository

2007-01-24 Thread Nathan Bubna (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELTOOLS-60?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12467249 ] Nathan Bubna commented on VELTOOLS-60: -- We now have a very simple POM for VelocityTools, but it isn't

[jira] Resolved: (VELTOOLS-66) Velocity Tools gives access exception with $request reference under Tomcat security manager

2007-01-24 Thread Nathan Bubna (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELTOOLS-66?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Nathan Bubna resolved VELTOOLS-66. -- Resolution: Won't Fix Ok, i'm not really sure how to resolve this, since a change in Tomcat

[jira] Resolved: (VELOCITY-515) how to handlae velosity projects for open source step by step

2007-02-14 Thread Nathan Bubna (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELOCITY-515?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Nathan Bubna resolved VELOCITY-515. --- Resolution: Invalid Please ask questions about how to use Velocity on the [EMAIL PROTECTED

[jira] Closed: (VELOCITY-515) how to handlae velosity projects for open source step by step

2007-02-14 Thread Nathan Bubna (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELOCITY-515?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Nathan Bubna closed VELOCITY-515. - how to handlae velosity projects for open source step by step

[jira] Commented: (VELTOOLS-77) Inconsistency between display in javascript and non-javascript error messages containing HTML

2007-02-14 Thread Nathan Bubna (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELTOOLS-77?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12473261 ] Nathan Bubna commented on VELTOOLS-77: -- I have mixed feelings on this. On the one hand, i'm not aware

[jira] Commented: (VELOCITY-518) Veloctiy poms should have a licenses section

2007-02-21 Thread Nathan Bubna (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELOCITY-518?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12474864 ] Nathan Bubna commented on VELOCITY-518: --- To my knowledge, Velocity has never released a POM

[jira] Commented: (VELOCITY-519) Java escape sequences should work in Velocity macros

2007-02-23 Thread Nathan Bubna (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELOCITY-519?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12475585 ] Nathan Bubna commented on VELOCITY-519: --- Thanks, i'll let Will take responsibility for the unicode escapes

[jira] Commented: (VELOCITY-519) Java escape sequences should work in Velocity macros

2007-02-26 Thread Nathan Bubna (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELOCITY-519?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12475897 ] Nathan Bubna commented on VELOCITY-519: --- The only consensus here is that we should fix the lexer error when

[jira] Resolved: (VELOCITY-523) http://velocity.apache.org/engine/releases/velocity-1.4/index.html is actually 3.1.1 documentation

2007-03-05 Thread Nathan Bubna (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELOCITY-523?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Nathan Bubna resolved VELOCITY-523. --- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 1.5 Unfortunately, i believe

[jira] Commented: (VELOCITY-527) Name of template truncated in error messages

2007-03-09 Thread Nathan Bubna (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELOCITY-527?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12479726 ] Nathan Bubna commented on VELOCITY-527: --- If you are using VelocityEngine.evaluate(...), then you should look

[jira] Commented: (VELOCITY-527) Name of template truncated in error messages

2007-03-09 Thread Nathan Bubna (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELOCITY-527?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12479733 ] Nathan Bubna commented on VELOCITY-527: --- cool. find out anything more about the line column numbers? i'm

[jira] Resolved: (VELTOOLS-79) Source distribution archives don't unzip into their own directories

2007-03-14 Thread Nathan Bubna (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELTOOLS-79?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Nathan Bubna resolved VELTOOLS-79. -- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 2.0 1.x 1.4

[jira] Resolved: (VELOCITY-499) Default Velocity LogChute implementations blabber too much

2007-03-26 Thread Nathan Bubna (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELOCITY-499?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Nathan Bubna resolved VELOCITY-499. --- Resolution: Fixed Default Velocity LogChute implementations blabber too much

[jira] Created: (VELOCITY-534) Support varargs in method calls

2007-03-26 Thread Nathan Bubna (JIRA)
Support varargs in method calls --- Key: VELOCITY-534 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELOCITY-534 Project: Velocity Issue Type: Improvement Affects Versions: 1.5 Reporter: Nathan Bubna

[jira] Resolved: (VELTOOLS-80) Link name typo on Generic tools page

2007-03-29 Thread Nathan Bubna (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELTOOLS-80?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Nathan Bubna resolved VELTOOLS-80. -- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: (was: 1.3) 1.4 I've fixed

[jira] Commented: (VELOCITY-536) Velocity Engine throws NullPointer Exception when two people click on the same page at the same time for the first time

2007-04-02 Thread Nathan Bubna (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELOCITY-536?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12486096 ] Nathan Bubna commented on VELOCITY-536: --- Looking more carefully at this, rather than trusting my first look

[jira] Commented: (VELTOOLS-81) Patch to add escaping for property values and property keys in java properties files.

2007-04-03 Thread Nathan Bubna (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELTOOLS-81?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12486374 ] Nathan Bubna commented on VELTOOLS-81: -- So, you just copied the saveConvert() method out of the JDK source

[jira] Resolved: (VELOCITY-519) Java escape sequences should work in Velocity macros

2007-04-03 Thread Nathan Bubna (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELOCITY-519?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Nathan Bubna resolved VELOCITY-519. --- Resolution: Later Fix Version/s: (was: 1.6) 2.0 Since

[jira] Commented: (VELOCITY-533) Treat arrays like fixed-length lists

2007-04-04 Thread Nathan Bubna (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELOCITY-533?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12486850 ] Nathan Bubna commented on VELOCITY-533: --- Ok, i've implemented support for size(), isEmpty(), get(int

[jira] Commented: (VELTOOLS-81) Patch to add escaping for property values and property keys in java properties files.

2007-04-05 Thread Nathan Bubna (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELTOOLS-81?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12487043 ] Nathan Bubna commented on VELTOOLS-81: -- Actually, i just did a little investigating. It looks like

[jira] Commented: (VELTOOLS-81) Patch to add escaping for property values and property keys in java properties files.

2007-04-05 Thread Nathan Bubna (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELTOOLS-81?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12487053 ] Nathan Bubna commented on VELTOOLS-81: -- I found the Properties implementation for Harmony: https

[jira] Resolved: (VELTOOLS-81) Patch to add escaping for property values and property keys in java properties files.

2007-04-10 Thread Nathan Bubna (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELTOOLS-81?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Nathan Bubna resolved VELTOOLS-81. -- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 2.0 1.x 1.4

[jira] Commented: (VELOCITY-223) VMs that use a large number of directives and macros use excessive amounts of memory - over 4-6MB RAM per form

2007-04-17 Thread Nathan Bubna (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELOCITY-223?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12489435 ] Nathan Bubna commented on VELOCITY-223: --- Oh, and to finish out my conversation with Lei, he acknowledged

[jira] Commented: (VELOCITY-223) VMs that use a large number of directives and macros use excessive amounts of memory - over 4-6MB RAM per form

2007-04-17 Thread Nathan Bubna (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELOCITY-223?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12489434 ] Nathan Bubna commented on VELOCITY-223: --- Lei has tested and confirmed memory savings, and i see no reason

[jira] Commented: (VELOCITY-223) VMs that use a large number of directives and macros use excessive amounts of memory - over 4-6MB RAM per form

2007-04-17 Thread Nathan Bubna (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELOCITY-223?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12489437 ] Nathan Bubna commented on VELOCITY-223: --- So, all told. I think if we drop the static Map for a ReferenceMap

[jira] Created: (VELOCITY-541) only possible to use one StringResourceLoader per application

2007-04-25 Thread Nathan Bubna (JIRA)
Components: Engine Affects Versions: 1.5 Reporter: Nathan Bubna Assigned To: Nathan Bubna Fix For: 1.6 When multiple StringResourceLoaders are initialized, the later ones are blowing up. StringResourceLoader uses a static RepositoryFactory. Unfortunately

[jira] Commented: (VELOCITY-542) minus sign in #set requires spaces to surround it

2007-04-27 Thread Nathan Bubna (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELOCITY-542?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12492313 ] Nathan Bubna commented on VELOCITY-542: --- This is because '-' is a valid character in a reference. Try

[jira] Commented: (VELOCITY-542) minus sign in #set requires spaces to surround it

2007-04-30 Thread Nathan Bubna (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELOCITY-542?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12492680 ] Nathan Bubna commented on VELOCITY-542: --- I should note that i didn't suggest any course of action, because

[jira] Resolved: (VELTOOLS-82) StrutsLinkTool.setForward only sees global-forwards, not local-forwards

2007-05-08 Thread Nathan Bubna (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELTOOLS-82?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Nathan Bubna resolved VELTOOLS-82. -- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 2.0 1.4 Thanks, Christopher

[jira] Commented: (VELTOOLS-82) StrutsLinkTool.setForward only sees global-forwards, not local-forwards

2007-05-08 Thread Nathan Bubna (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELTOOLS-82?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12494406 ] Nathan Bubna commented on VELTOOLS-82: -- Oh yeah. Well, the javadoc for StrutsLinkTool.setForward() is a good

[jira] Commented: (VELTOOLS-82) StrutsLinkTool.setForward only sees global-forwards, not local-forwards

2007-05-08 Thread Nathan Bubna (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELTOOLS-82?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12494412 ] Nathan Bubna commented on VELTOOLS-82: -- Thanks again! StrutsLinkTool.setForward only sees global-forwards

[jira] Resolved: (VELOCITY-550) Velocimacros defined in a page are also access by other pages

2007-05-17 Thread Nathan Bubna (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELOCITY-550?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Nathan Bubna resolved VELOCITY-550. --- Resolution: Invalid Please don't ask questions in JIRA. It is a place to file bug reports

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >