cleaned up in trunk.
-igor
On Feb 13, 2008 2:57 PM, Ned Collyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> You are correct :).
>
> I would generally discount any overhead associated with a cache map lookup
> (because thats the cache, which is meant to be the quick bit, and its only
> going to happen the fir
You are correct :).
I would generally discount any overhead associated with a cache map lookup
(because thats the cache, which is meant to be the quick bit, and its only
going to happen the first time)
I brought it up specifically because of
PropertiesFactory.load
which has 3 places where it ca
And the downer: http://www.jira.com/faq/#bamboo
On 2/13/08, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://www.jira.com/faq/#opensource
>
> On 2/13/08, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 2/13/08, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > would they be willing to host us?
http://www.jira.com/faq/#opensource
On 2/13/08, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2/13/08, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > would they be willing to host us?
>
> They do that for hibernate (JIRA). And they already host fisheye for
> dozens of projects, including Wicket S
On 2/13/08, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> would they be willing to host us?
They do that for hibernate (JIRA). And they already host fisheye for
dozens of projects, including Wicket Stuff.
Perhaps we could apply for their JIRA studio beta program.
Martijn
--
Buy Wicket in Action:
would they be willing to host us?
-igor
On Feb 13, 2008 11:56 AM, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That said... Should we consider migrating our wicketstuff
> infrastructure (bamboo, jira, confluence) to the hosted variants of
> Atlassian?
>
> That would lighten the load on the wick
That said... Should we consider migrating our wicketstuff
infrastructure (bamboo, jira, confluence) to the hosted variants of
Atlassian?
That would lighten the load on the wicketstuff box, and open it for
more examples.
Martijn
On 2/13/08, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The wicket
The wicketstuff.org box could use a single sign on provider. Has
anyone got experience with Atlassian's crowd?
I know the machine is grinding to a halt with the bamboo, jira and
confluence installations on it, but I think adding crowd would be
beneficial.
http://www.atlassian.com/software/crowd/
a contract of the cache is that
if cache.put(k,v); then v.equals(cache.get(k)) or v is null
so if you just created v and put it into cache, why also introduce the
overhead of the lookup?
this style of code also has a single return point:
V v=cache.get(k);
if (v==null) {
v=new V();
cache.put(
Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael wrote:
Hmm, im wondering if we could get a solution that would be integratable
with wicket tester...? With rhino or jslint?
And yes I need to checkout your plugin! It seems to be cool:)
It's both css and js compression/obfuscation right?
right, both
/davi
Hmm, im wondering if we could get a solution that would be integratable
with wicket tester...? With rhino or jslint?
And yes I need to checkout your plugin! It seems to be cool:)
It's both css and js compression/obfuscation right?
regards Nino
David Bernard wrote:
Hi,
For functionnal test : I
Hi,
For functionnal test : I used jwebunit (no need to have a web browser, I like
the client (like WicketTester))
For testing validity of js : I use Rhino (check parsing) and jslint, there is
several maven plugin to do the job.
As the author of yuicompressor-maven-plugin (I used it for both, yo
Hi
I just wanted to hear if there a a good framework for testing javascript
out there? I know selenium thats probably the best, but is there
anything a little more light weight(something that could run with out
opening browsers and maybe just parse the js and see if it's okay)? I
dont know if
that would be even better
or make a Jira issue with the things discussed in this thread
then i will look at asap.
Currently to busy debugging those stupid browsers :(
johan
On Feb 13, 2008 11:31 AM, Serge! <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Are there any news or plans to implement it?
> Or m
Hi,
Are there any news or plans to implement it?
Or maybe you just need someone to contribute a patch?
Sergey.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/wicket%3Ainterface%2C-etc.-in-generated-URLs-tp11782012p15453486.html
Sent from the Wicket - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.
I've been digging around in some of the code and its great :) I really like
the design choices of wicket.
One thing that I've stumbled on a couple of times is the use of cache - Eg,
PropertiesFactory
I've previously used caching like this
if (!cache.containsKey(whateverKey)) {
cache.put(wha
Cool.
Frank
On Feb 13, 2008 9:15 AM, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Feb 12, 2008 11:19 PM, Frank Bille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Sounds like a good idea. Some thoughts:
> >
> > - How does this work with stateless pages? I haven't followed the
> discussion
> > on stateless very
On Feb 12, 2008 11:19 PM, Frank Bille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sounds like a good idea. Some thoughts:
>
> - How does this work with stateless pages? I haven't followed the discussion
> on stateless very closely, but I have the impressions that the statelessness
> is because we do not having a
18 matches
Mail list logo
