Cool. Frank On Feb 13, 2008 9:15 AM, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Feb 12, 2008 11:19 PM, Frank Bille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Sounds like a good idea. Some thoughts: > > > > - How does this work with stateless pages? I haven't followed the > discussion > > on stateless very closely, but I have the impressions that the > statelessness > > is because we do not having a session. > > same exact way it is was handled before this change - stateless pages > have a temporary session object... > > > - I have looked briefly over the commit for this and I think we can make > the > > auto index in the session rolling in the unlikely case that someone has > a > > looong session with maany pages containing maany compontents all having > > markup id on it. (not important) > > we are ok, once they hit integer.max_value+1 it will rollover into > negatives which still work fine for our needs - since we convert the > int into a hex string... > > -igor > > > > > Frank > > > > > > > > On Feb 13, 2008 7:11 AM, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > they will now. the counter lives in session and is thus replicated. so > > > ids are unique within the scope of the session, which is ok. > > > > > >
