On Feb 12, 2008 11:19 PM, Frank Bille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sounds like a good idea. Some thoughts: > > - How does this work with stateless pages? I haven't followed the discussion > on stateless very closely, but I have the impressions that the statelessness > is because we do not having a session.
same exact way it is was handled before this change - stateless pages have a temporary session object... > - I have looked briefly over the commit for this and I think we can make the > auto index in the session rolling in the unlikely case that someone has a > looong session with maany pages containing maany compontents all having > markup id on it. (not important) we are ok, once they hit integer.max_value+1 it will rollover into negatives which still work fine for our needs - since we convert the int into a hex string... -igor > > Frank > > > > On Feb 13, 2008 7:11 AM, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > they will now. the counter lives in session and is thus replicated. so > > ids are unique within the scope of the session, which is ok. > > >
