Igor Vaynberg wrote:
i think that wicket trunk has been production-ready for a really long
time without a release. i also think that the next rc build has a very
good chance of becoming wicket-1.4.0.
i say we should build the rc now. it will take about a week to become
1.4.0 if all goes well, at
I agree. I'll plan on cutting the rc4 release as soon as possible.
It won't likely be today - I've been battling the cable company with
internet outages all day. Very unproductive day overall.
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 2:45 PM, Igor Vaynberg
i think that wicket trunk has been production-ready for a really long
time without a release. i also think that the next rc build has a very
good chance of becoming wicket-1.4.0.
i say we should build the rc now. it will take about a week to become
1.4.0 if all goes well, at which point Ate should
If you are up to RC releases, there shouldn't be any new features
getting in, only bugfixes on the existing release. There will always
be another thing that someone wants in. Cut the tag and make more
point releases. If the feature is warranted for 1.4 then get it into
1.4.1.
cheers,
Ste
That's up to everyone else. I could do it on Monday. Igor, Martijn,
others - what do you think?
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 2:26 PM, Ate Douma wrote:
> Jeremy Thomerson wrote:
>>
>> Okay - I'll work on building an rc4 soon. Possibly tonight. I
Jeremy Thomerson wrote:
Okay - I'll work on building an rc4 soon. Possibly tonight. If not,
then it will probably be Friday afternoon.
If you have anything else that you want to get into 1.4 - commit it now :)
I do have some important improvements for Portlet header contributions support!
But
Okay - I'll work on building an rc4 soon. Possibly tonight. If not,
then it will probably be Friday afternoon.
If you have anything else that you want to get into 1.4 - commit it now :)
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 3:15 AM, Martijn Dashorst
wrot
Yep (typing this at ~200mph). The idea is that rolling multiple rc3's
will make testing them difficult: which version is being tested? Maven
also doesn't like multiple non-snapshot releases with the same
version. Therefore just rolling rcX's is easier, and might get us to a
final release sooner? Ve
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 07:59, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
> [x] Yes release 1.3.6
> [ ] No, don't release it
>
+1 Release.
Tested distribution with mvn install in src, tested a lot of the examples
and verified signatures.
Frank
