IRequestCycleSettings#getResponseRequestEncoding() for the
charset but if there is no XML prolog or it has no encoding attr then
the test fails.
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 11:53 PM, Juergen Donnerstag
juergen.donners...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Martin,
XmlReader reads the markup file, interprets ?xml encoding
, HERE) - this is in XmlReader
- (the XML prolog maybe be ignored totally)
I think this should work.
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 10:14 AM, Juergen Donnerstag
juergen.donners...@gmail.com wrote:
And there is no stable solution, except we create an artificial one
(via XML prolog and encoding parameter
I'll have a look later today.
Juergen
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 3:37 PM, Martin Grigorov
martin.grigo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm not quite sure but I think there is a bug in
org.apache.wicket.markup.parser.XmlPullParser#parse(CharSequence)
because it uses
string.toString().getBytes() to
might need change.
make sense?
Juergen
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 9:54 AM, Juergen Donnerstag
juergen.donners...@gmail.com wrote:
I'll have a look later today.
Juergen
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 3:37 PM, Martin Grigorov
martin.grigo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm not quite sure but I think
When I built the wicket gradle files I found most aspects quite
intuitive. Unfortunately I didn't have much time to improve them and
since no one else showed interest, I agreed to remove them again.
Gradle has a learning curve and like all frameworks, it requires some
reading and research to
me too
Juergen
On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 12:38 PM, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org wrote:
I'm OK to remove them.
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 3:48 PM, Martijn Dashorst
martijn.dasho...@gmail.com wrote:
It looks like we are not going to use the gradle build files. Does
anyone object to removing
identified.
Sven
On 03/29/2012 09:44 PM, Juergen Donnerstag wrote:
Hi Sven
I double checked with how other filters/resolvers are doing it and I
found
AutoLabelTextResolver to leave the tag id untouched too.
which is a fault as well. Same risk.
May be a Component's flag bit can be used
to understand the problem you've
identified.
Sven
On 03/29/2012 09:44 PM, Juergen Donnerstag wrote:
Hi Sven
I double checked with how other filters/resolvers are doing it and I
found
AutoLabelTextResolver to leave the tag id untouched too.
which is a fault as well. Same risk.
May
Meier s...@meiers.net wrote:
Javascript ids are session unique anyway - just prefixed with the component
id in non-deployment config.
Sven
On 03/30/2012 04:11 PM, Juergen Donnerstag wrote:
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 3:57 PM, Sven Meiers...@meiers.net wrote:
Hi Juergen and Jesse,
I've
Hi Sven,
the change introduces a theoretical risk of duplicate ids. I don't
know how likely it is and I know we have no tests for it. But Filters
are created per markup file and modify the markup upon loading, prior
to caching. Which also means that the Page is not available. In case
of
not tried it but I don't expect it to be too difficult. Knowing
there is a potential risk which will be very hard to find by a normal
user, makes me belief we should fix it properly, To me the applied
patch leaves us with a bigger problem than it fixes.
Juergen
Sven
On 03/29/2012 08:42 PM, Juergen
+1
Juergen
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 11:57 AM, Emond Papegaaij
emond.papega...@topicus.nl wrote:
+1 for release, +1 for beta
On Tuesday 20 March 2012 12:21:38 Igor Vaynberg wrote:
+1 for release, +0 for beta vs milestone.
-igor
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Martin Grigorov
Hi,
no specific reason I think. So far nobody ask for it with a good use
case. I think it's ok to change the order.
-Juergen
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 9:13 AM, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
What is the reason the (more static, auto) ComponentTag's behaviors to
be executed
+1
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 6:49 PM, Sven Meier s...@meiers.net wrote:
+1
On 01/19/2012 06:04 PM, Jeremy Thomerson wrote:
+1
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 11:47 AM, Igor
Vaynbergigor.vaynb...@gmail.comwrote:
+1
-igor
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 8:34 PM, Igor Vaynbergigor.vaynb...@gmail.com
There are working examples in our test suite. Please have a look
their. They exist since the first days of Wicket.
Juergen
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 10:05 PM, YK linux_2...@yahoo.fr wrote:
Hi,
sorry this does not work...
I suspect it's feasable now
thanks anyway
--
View this message in
Welcome Emond
-Juergen
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 3:57 AM, Jeremy Thomerson
jer...@wickettraining.com wrote:
Welcome aboard!
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 10:26 AM, Emond Papegaaij
emond.papega...@topicus.nl wrote:
Thank you all for the confidence you have in my work! I'm really proud to
be a
please see MarkupParserTest.java. The following is a partial copy:
@Test
public void tagParsing() throws Exception
{
final MarkupParser parser = new MarkupParser(
This is a test a componentName:id=\a\
href=\foo.html\ b
I don't think it has changed in 1.5 compared to 1.4, but feel free to
open a jira ticket and attach a quickstart
-Juergen
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 9:44 PM, YK linux_2...@yahoo.fr wrote:
hi,
I'm playing with wicket 1.5.3 and I discovered that overriding getNamespace
method does not work!
In
+1
Juergen
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 3:17 PM, Andrea Del Bene an.delb...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 to release
+1
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 6:34 PM, Igor Vaynbergigor.vaynb...@gmail.com
wrote:
This vote is to release wicket 1.5.2 (take 3)
Branch
+1
Juergen
I missed some of the discussions on mail list on this topic. To me it
sounds like what we were always after: separate (sub-)projects for
internal development purposes and a single wicket.jar in maven's
public repo. If finally somebody found a way to achieve this with
maven, the better.
Juergen
If I recall correctly than we split the sources into -core, -util and
-request for development reasons. To keep our internal architecture
clean and identify possibly unwanted dependencies between them early
and easy.
I thought because Maven does not support (internal) subprojects, we
ended up
url to the commit(s) so we can see the diffs ?
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 11:29 PM, Juergen Donnerstag
juergen.donners...@gmail.com wrote:
Just uploaded it to https://github.com/jdonnerstag/wicket/tree/autoadd
Juergen
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 9:48 AM, Juergen Donnerstag
juergen.donners
I gave the idea to resolve components after onInitalize() a try by
re-using ComponentResolvers to resolve the auto-components. They are
added (not queued) at the right place in the hierarchy. Component's
queued will be added to the auto-components as well, so that the
hierarchies (markup and
Components: wicket-core
Affects Versions: 1.5-RC5.1
Reporter: Robert McGuinness
Assignee: Juergen Donnerstag
Priority: Minor
Fix For: 1.5-RC6
Attachments: fix-WICKET-3878.patch, test-WICKET-3878.patch
Making updates to the base
:12 PM, Juergen Donnerstag wrote:
Hi,
though jenkins seems to be fine, maven build is failing on my (German)
laptop.
ValueMapTest:testGetAs():237:expected 1 Stunde but was null
DurationTest:operations:74:expected 1,5 minutes but was 1,5 Minuten
DurationTest:locale:108:expected 1 hour but was 1
this method outside Ajax response.
Now it is not safe.
I think the problem in this ticket is that until today a wrong way to
get the ART was used. Now it is better.
Otherwise the method's javadoc explains it: if this is not Ajax
request it is no-op.
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 5:37 PM, Juergen
+1
Juergen
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 8:48 AM, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org wrote:
+1
re-tested my application
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 1:29 AM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com
wrote:
This vote is to release wicket 1.5-RC5.1
Branch:
Hi Bruno,
please open a jira feature/improvement request. I'll have a look. Thanks.
-Juergen
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 10:20 PM, Bruno Borges bruno.bor...@gmail.com wrote:
I came once with this but I don't remember what happend.
Anyway, I want to share the idea with you again:
We are
By now I also tested eclipse 3.7 M7 and several more combinations of
jre's for eclipse and test itself. I also installed yourkit to dig a
bit deeper. The problem remains irrespective of the jvm or eclipse.
Using yourkit for testing I became aware that at the moment mem
consumption increases, also
Hi,
on my (german) laptop testComponentAttributesNotDoubleEscaped is failing.
junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: One of the pound entity
representations is missing: pound; or #163;
at
I'd like to disable ModificationWatcher for WicketTester. Any objections?
-Juergen
is fine.
My Maven setup uses bg_BG and again all is fine. Just verified.
Igor mentioned that this test started to fail at his machine
yesterday, but I guess his setup completely is en_US.
On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 11:13 AM, Juergen Donnerstag
juergen.donners...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
on my (german
/ComponentTagAttributeEscapingTest.java?view=markup
On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 11:43 AM, Juergen Donnerstag
juergen.donners...@gmail.com wrote:
The *root* cause seems to be obvious. Instead of changing any eclipse
settings, the assert statement must be changed. Replace ££ with a
properly encoded
take a look?
-igor
On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 8:20 AM, Juergen Donnerstag
juergen.donners...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not a gradle expert which is why I had to try this and that. But
my initial tests to create the ueber jars have now been successful.
-Juergen
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011
I played a bit with gradle recently.
- Transfered Wicket's build process which was fairly straight forward;
compile, test, install. jetty:run etc.
- eclipse project files generated seem to be ok
- maven repositories to get artifacts
- successfully installed a new snapshot in my local repo
I
at 10:10 AM, Juergen Donnerstag
juergen.donners...@gmail.com wrote:
the setting/exception is to make sure that all markup files have
proper encoding. Think about moving markup files from your local latop
onto a production server. Who guarantees that in your markup are only
ascii chars? Who
the setting/exception is to make sure that all markup files have
proper encoding. Think about moving markup files from your local latop
onto a production server. Who guarantees that in your markup are only
ascii chars? Who guarantees the prod server has the same default
encoding than your devs
please see
http://wicket.apache.org/apidocs/1.4/org/apache/wicket/settings/IMarkupSettings.html#setStripWicketTags(boolean)
on how to remove all wicket:id attributes and wicket:xx tags from
output
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 6:21 PM, jcgarciam jcgarc...@gmail.com wrote:
When running the
+1
Juergen
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 6:40 PM, Jan Kriesten
kries...@mail.footprint.de wrote:
This vote is to release wicket 1.4.17. This is a bugfix release on the
1.4.x (stable) branch.
+1
Best regards, --- Jan.
+1
Juergen
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 6:41 PM, Jan Kriesten
kries...@mail.footprint.de wrote:
This vote is to release wicket 1.5-RC3
+1
Best regards, --- Jan.
I don't know. May be too long ago.
-Juergen
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 4:49 PM, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
In the context of https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-3497 I want
to ask other Wicket devs whether WicketFilter parses only one
filter-mapping and ignores
Hi,
I try to get rid of auto-components. The main reason why we introduced
it was that it should not be allowed to make changes to the hierarchy
during the render phase. I wonder if that assumption is still true.
Any idea?
-Juergen
+1
Juergen
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 5:01 PM, Peter Ertl pe...@gmx.org wrote:
+1
Am 21.02.2011 um 16:03 schrieb Francisco Diaz Trepat - gmail:
+1
Also some quick testing on wicket-examples
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 11:58 AM, Martin Grigorov
mgrigo...@apache.orgwrote:
+1 to release it
...@gmail.comwrote:
On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 2:20 PM, Juergen Donnerstag
juergen.donners...@gmail.com wrote:
A couple of comments on previous posts
- you can always assign your own wicket:id like wicket:enclosure
wicket:id=myEnclosure child=label1
- yes, wicket:enclosure creates an auto
said, just a thought.
-Juergen
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 5:16 PM, Juergen Donnerstag
juergen.donners...@gmail.com wrote:
I did a first review.
- EnclosureHandler: A variable to increment the id postfix will not
work. A fresh copy of MarkupParser and all its handlers is created for
every markup
A couple of comments on previous posts
- you can always assign your own wicket:id like wicket:enclosure
wicket:id=myEnclosure child=label1
- yes, wicket:enclosure creates an auto component (no java code
necessary) that is auto-added to the container which at that point in
time gets rendered, when
Findings (I can also create jira issues for all of them, just let me know):
1) based on Migration Guide 1.5, TabbedPanel improvement:
'ITab.getPanel() now returns WebMarkupContainerWithAssociatedMarkup instead
of Panel so it is now possible to create tabs using Fragments or Panels
rather then
An initial version went into rc1 though we are still discussing minor
changes. The API might change slighty.
-Juergen
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 11:49 AM, Martijn Dashorst
martijn.dasho...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 11:42 AM, Daniel Soneira
daniel.sone...@joyn-it.at wrote:
Since
could we please add testcases if applicable. thanks.
Juergen
2011/1/13 Major Péter majorpe...@sch.bme.hu:
Sadly I have a -1 for this, because of
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-3329
and
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-3330
3329 is almost a don't care, but 3330
-Juergen
I had that idea as well. My initial commit actually included such a
hook. But I removed it again. Though wrappers are registered with
filters/servlets in the servlet world, wicket already provides a very
very easy way by subclassung Application.newRequestxx().
IMO the problem is, and here I agree
Hi,
currently every component that requires the markup to be in an
associated file must be derived from Panel. Every component that want
it's markup inline must be derived from Fragment. I've changed that
and moved the respective source code into something I called markup
sourcing strategy. I'm
Cool. May I ask which tools (IDE) you've been using and what your
experience with these tools has been.
-Juergen
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 2:34 AM, Jeremy Thomerson
jer...@wickettraining.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 5:15 PM, richard emberson richard.ember...@gmail.com
wrote:
Dev Wicketers,
Juergen Donnerstag juergen.donners...@gmail.com
though you are right in what you are saying about joda caching the
timezone, I don't think it is the root cause.
Looking at the logs everything is fine until step 4 (actually 5) when
the hour is set based on the input provided. It is set to 0 which
we have several components which use
@Override
protected void onComponentTag(final ComponentTag tag)
{
if (tag.isOpenClose())
{
tag.setType(TagType.OPEN);
}
super.onComponentTag(tag);
good point. I took a look at DateConverter and actually the ctor has
an attribute applyTimeZoneDifference. DateTextField gets initialized
with a StyleDateConverter with applyTimeZoneDifference = true.
DateConverter#convertObject actually uses it, but I think - based on
what I learnt the last
through true, most components already do it anyway. There is almost no
effect on our test cases
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 11:27 PM, Jeremy Thomerson
jer...@wickettraining.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 9:46 AM, Juergen Donnerstag
juergen.donners...@gmail.com wrote:
we have several
.
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 5:51 PM, Juergen Donnerstag
juergen.donners...@gmail.com wrote:
through true, most components already do it anyway. There is almost no
effect on our test cases
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 11:27 PM, Jeremy Thomerson
jer...@wickettraining.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 9
In 1.5 trunk WebSession has a transient variable dirty which is set to
true when dirty() is called. But I don't see that the dirty variable
is used anywhere. Is that by purpose? How does it work?
-Juergen
has anybody an idea why date/time conversion on our hudson server
works different than on my windows box? Is there any know
incompatibility across different OSes?
-Juergen
though you are right in what you are saying about joda caching the
timezone, I don't think it is the root cause.
Looking at the logs everything is fine until step 4 (actually 5) when
the hour is set based on the input provided. It is set to 0 which is
what I provided. The problem is that the
maven 3.x complained about an error in pom.xml (did a clean checkout).
maven did nothing. Not even clean or eclipse:eclipse did work.
Juergen
On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 10:24 AM, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org wrote:
Hi Juergen,
What was the problem before this change ?
The build was OK
I'll try it again
-Juergen
On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 10:36 AM, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org wrote:
weird...
I just reverted your change locally and both Maven 2.2.1 and Maven 3.0.1
work without problems
On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 10:27 AM, Juergen Donnerstag
juergen.donners
my mistake. Don't know what happend, but it's working now (with your
original version). I'll revert.
Juergen
On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 10:38 AM, Juergen Donnerstag
juergen.donners...@gmail.com wrote:
I'll try it again
-Juergen
On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 10:36 AM, Martin Grigorov mgrigo
Hi,
quick question. I have an 1.4 app which uses
setResponsePage(getApplication().getHomePage()); in a Component's
contructor and it works even if the Component is not yet fully
configured (not all children created and added). In 1.5 the same page
throws a MarkupException. In 1.5 Pages obviously
+1
Juergen
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 11:59 AM, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org wrote:
+1 to rename current wicket to wicket-core
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 5:58 PM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.comwrote:
+1 to rename current wicket into wicket-core
-igor
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at
I understand that IHeaderResponse is no longer accurate, but
IResourceResponse IMO would simply be wrong: it's not a response to a
resource. It contributes to a specific section of a response such as
Header or Footer
Juergen
On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 6:56 AM, Jeremy Thomerson
() returned the page's markup, i.e. all html,
and its markupstream had 'null' doctype.
I'll investigate further but you can also take a look at the application.
It is in wicketstuff's SVN repo (link below).
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 5:41 PM, Juergen Donnerstag
juergen.donners...@gmail.com wrote
Interesting. I thought I had a testcase with exactly that DOCTYPE. In
any case it returns the DOCTYPE of the page only, irrespective of
Panel or Border etc.
getMarkup() returning null means no markup found which would explain
the NPE as well. You are sure about your source code and markup?
what shall we do with http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-715?
If we want to change it / make it consistent, we should change it
anytime soon
-Juergen
+1
Juergen
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 3:54 PM, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org wrote:
+1
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 3:52 PM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.comwrote:
i think 1.5.x branch is stable enough to release RCs. this vote is to
make the next release RC1.
vote ends Wednesday 5pm
://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-3197have fun ;-)
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 4:58 PM, Juergen Donnerstag
juergen.donners...@gmail.com wrote:
This means .addOrReplace() cannot be used in Page constructor, even
indirectly.
Please provide a test case and I'll have a look.
Can we add some check
I'm curious. Which ideas would you steal from SiteBricks and JaxRS?
Juergen
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 5:51 AM, Eelco Hillenius
eelco.hillen...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 7:45 PM, richard emberson
richard.ember...@gmail.com wrote:
If wicket was going to be coded over again, would
done
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 6:37 PM, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org wrote:
I think this one deserves an entry in the migration page.
It will break some tests in the users' applications.
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 3:47 PM, Juergen Donnerstag (JIRA)
j...@apache.orgwrote:
[
https
is it just me were several tests on trunk are failing?
Juergen
Excepted is:
- if a component provides its own markup either via subclassing
getMarkup() or is expected to have associated markup (e.g. Panel) =
markup available in ctor
- Component.onMarkupAttached() is invoked as soon as the markup is
available. E.g. a child to a Panel. child.onMarkupAttached()
I don't think it's necessary to provide users the option to change the
warning if a key was not found. If you really want to, use a
property. IMO that would be overkill.
Juergen
));
so it will become the correct one:
[Warning: Property for 'any key name' not found];
What do you think ?
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 9:56 AM, Juergen Donnerstag
juergen.donners...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't think it's necessary to provide users the option to change the
warning if a key
Does it work for HTML files as well? Might be even more files are
included in the test.
-Juergen
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 3:44 PM, James Carman
ja...@carmanconsulting.com wrote:
+1 to the maven plugin. And, yes IDEA does it too.
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 8:15 AM, Martin Grigorov
Just stumbled upon
link
href=../resource/org.apache.wicket.markup.html.link.AutolinkPage_1/test2.css?-myStyle/
link
href=../resource/org.apache.wicket.markup.html.link.AutolinkPage_1/test3.css?de_DE/
in AutolinkPageExpectedResult_1.html (wicket 1.5). Are these URLs
really correct?
Juergen
may be that is of help as well:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-2713
regards
Juergen
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 1:14 PM, Clint Checketts checke...@gmail.com wrote:
Jeremy,
If possible you may try color coding the different sections of the file
name:
The javadoc for Component.getMarkup() and
MarkupContainer.getMarkup(Component child) might give you a hint.
Unfortunately I have very little time this weekend. In general,
instead of setting the markup, components shall subclass getMarkup()
or getMarkup(Component) and provide the markup. Compared
I do
-Juergen
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 11:34 AM, Peter Ertl pe...@gmx.org wrote:
Hi wicket devs,
in 1.5...
I would to remove AbstractResource#isCacheable() and give
AbstractResource#getCacheDuration() the meaning
0 = no caching
0 = duration in milliseconds for caching
This would
+1
Juergen
Hi,
I think I recently saw a change to image maps. On my machine the junit
testRenderClientSideImageMapPage_1() fails. Compared to before the
change, the locale is added to URL.
was: img wicket:id=image
src=../resource/org.apache.wicket.markup.html.image.ImageTest/Beer.gif
usemap=#map1/
now:
I know, but is that change by purpose? What if the locale changes
before the next request. With the current implementation the German
image is retrieved, ignoring a possible locale change.
-Juergen
ClientInfo and newBrowserInfoPage have been added to Session though
they are web related. IMO they belong into WebSession.
-Juergen
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 5:57 PM, mgrigo...@apache.org wrote:
Author: mgrigorov
Date: Sun Aug 15 15:57:41 2010
New Revision: 985696
URL:
+1 - release
Juergen
+1 - release
Juergen
fixed it and added a test case. Tested it against a quickstart. It
should now be ok. Could you please check. Thanks
Juergen
On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 3:37 PM, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org wrote:
Still there is something wrong with WicketFilter.
I have a simple application with mapping to
/testCheckRedirect_1/
On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 6:36 PM, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.orgwrote:
The regression is fixed.
Thanks
On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 6:24 PM, Juergen Donnerstag
juergen.donners...@gmail.com wrote:
fixed it and added a test case. Tested it against a quickstart. It
should now be ok
In 1.5 (which is trunk) everything can be changed/improved. 1.4 is a
drop-in replacement for 1.3 - no changes to the API - except for
adding generics. 1.4 is recommended for production.
Juergen
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 11:08 AM, Erich W Schreiner
eschrei...@yahoo.com wrote:
Dear Wicket team,
I'll do. I'd also like to add a testcase. Could you please provide one. Thanks.
Juergen
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 9:19 PM, Erik van Oosten e.vanoos...@grons.nl wrote:
Hello,
Could anyone apply the patch in WICKET-1974?
Even though its been there for some time, it is still relevant.
Thanks
please see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1292
Juergen
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 4:41 PM, rball2 roger.b...@creoss.com wrote:
Does this fix the issue in thread JIRA WICKET-1292 fix ?
igor.vaynberg wrote:
Wicket 1.4.6 is released!
This is the sixths maintenance release of
I understand the explanation why it is like it is, but I can imagine
this question will be raised again, since at first the request returns
an error, that is reported by various dev tools and that triggers some
uncertainties in every developers mind. In order to give devs the
correct feeling
+1 - release
Juergen
Hi,
it seems as if devutils is write protected. Any idea why? Anyone able
to remove that protection?
-Juergen
Hi Marat,
1. org.apache.wicket.util.upload looks like a copypasted contents of
commons-fileupload. Why not just depend on commons-fileupload?
Because it is just a little bit of source code we decided for copying
it and against adding a dependency to wicket core. We tried to keep
the number of
+1
Juergen
1 - 100 of 184 matches
Mail list logo
