Oh, well.
Another two years to stay around.
+0
Martin Grigorov
Wicket Training and Consulting
https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 5:11 PM, Andrea Del Bene
wrote:
> Reading the comments from this discussion and considering that we are
> focused on releasing Wicket 7 as soon as
Reading the comments from this discussion and considering that we are
focused on releasing Wicket 7 as soon as possible, I suggest to postpone
the decommission to Wicket 8. Java 8 provides the means to keep the
useful part of datetime while moving away the yui stuff.
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 4
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 4:02 PM, Sven Meier wrote:
> > move -datetime to WicketStuff ... WDYT ?
>
> Only if we deprecate all classes in that module: wicketstuff isn't a waste
> bin for things we don't like/support any more.
>
The main problem is the usage of YUI 2.x for the impl.
I've suggested t
Sounds like a plan...
Martijn
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 2:55 PM, Martin Grigorov wrote:
> I'd suggest to move -datetime to WicketStuff and add a ticket to improve
> the DateConverter in -utils with timezone support for Wicket 8.
> Sooner 7.0.0 is released, sooner we can start working on Wicket 8 th
> move -datetime to WicketStuff ... WDYT ?
Only if we deprecate all classes in that module: wicketstuff isn't a
waste bin for things we don't like/support any more.
Regards
Sven
On 09.02.2015 14:55, Martin Grigorov wrote:
I'd suggest to move -datetime to WicketStuff and add a ticket to impr
I'd suggest to move -datetime to WicketStuff and add a ticket to improve
the DateConverter in -utils with timezone support for Wicket 8.
Sooner 7.0.0 is released, sooner we can start working on Wicket 8 that will
depend on JDK 8.
WDYT ?
Martin Grigorov
Wicket Training and Consulting
https://twitte
I'd rather upgrade to java 8 than depend on jodatime in core. Jodatime
is a stopgap until java 8 gains enough traction.
Martijn
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 2:18 PM, Andrea Del Bene wrote:
> Sorry, I was mistaken by another pair of namesake classes named
> DateConverter DateTextField from extensio
Sorry, I was mistaken by another pair of namesake classes named
DateConverter DateTextField from extensions module uses
DateConverter from utils module, not the one from datetime. So in short,
I agree to decommission datetime and move it as it is to wicketstuff.
The only minor thing I'm con
I was thinking:
a) move the module from Apache Wicket master branch to WicketStuff master
branch
b) explain in the migration guide that the Maven dependency and the package
names have changed from X to Y
But with all the suggestions to move and merge classes I am not so sure
that the migration pro
BTW, for which version should it be done? After Wicket 7 or before its
first official release?
Hi,
I think I have asked the same an year or two ago:
What do you think about moving wicket-datetime module to WicketStuff ?
The problem with it is that it uses YUI 2.x which is very old and not
sup
oing to rectify that
part of the merge?
Thanks,
Tom Burton
-Original Message-
From: Andrea Del Bene [mailto:an.delb...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, February 06, 2015 6:54 AM
To: dev@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Decommission of wicket-datetime
Yes of course :)
ssage-
From: Andrea Del Bene [mailto:an.delb...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, February 06, 2015 6:54 AM
To: dev@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Decommission of wicket-datetime
Yes of course :)
> ... and move the remaining YUI packages to wicketstuff-yui ?
>
> Sven
>
> On 06.02.2015 16
Yes of course :)
... and move the remaining YUI packages to wicketstuff-yui ?
Sven
On 06.02.2015 16:22, Andrea Del Bene wrote:
I see. Also the two DateTextField have no functional difference. This
is in short what I would do:
Remove:
/wicket-datetime/src/main/java/org/apache/wicket/datetime/
... and move the remaining YUI packages to wicketstuff-yui ?
Sven
On 06.02.2015 16:22, Andrea Del Bene wrote:
I see. Also the two DateTextField have no functional difference. This
is in short what I would do:
Remove:
/wicket-datetime/src/main/java/org/apache/wicket/datetime/DateConverter.java
I see. Also the two DateTextField have no functional difference. This is
in short what I would do:
Remove:
/wicket-datetime/src/main/java/org/apache/wicket/datetime/DateConverter.java
Move to wicket-utils:
/wicket-datetime/src/main/java/org/apache/wicket/datetime/PatternDateConverter.java
/wick
Hi devs,
Actually Wicket jQuery UI's DatePicker extends org.apache.wicket.
*extensions*.markup.html.form.DateTextField
By the way, Wicket Utils already have
org.apache.wicket.*util*.convert.converter.DateConverter.
I did not check the differences..
DateLabel & PatternDateConverter are probably c
Hi Andrea,
IMHO the components belong into wicket-extensions. Note that we already
have a DateTextField there.
Regards
Sven
On 06.02.2015 13:56, Andrea Del Bene wrote:
Those who are not inside org.apache.wicket.extensions.yui :-). Five
classes:
/wicket-datetime/src/main/java/org/apache/wi
I agree
Additionally wicket-jquery-ui extends DateTextField to provide date picker
On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 6:56 PM, Andrea Del Bene
wrote:
> Those who are not inside org.apache.wicket.extensions.yui :-). Five
> classes:
>
> /wicket-datetime/src/main/java/org/apache/wicket/
> datetime/DateConverte
Those who are not inside org.apache.wicket.extensions.yui :-). Five classes:
/wicket-datetime/src/main/java/org/apache/wicket/datetime/DateConverter.java
/wicket-datetime/src/main/java/org/apache/wicket/datetime/PatternDateConverter.java
/wicket-datetime/src/main/java/org/apache/wicket/datetime/S
Please be more detailed when you have to say something.
Which classes ?
Why do you want to keep them around ?
Such minor useful things.
Thank you!
Martin Grigorov
Wicket Training and Consulting
https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 1:45 PM, Maxim Solodovnik
wrote:
> I'm OK with
I'm OK with that :)
On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 5:44 PM, Andrea Del Bene
wrote:
> I half agree with this. We should move yui to wicketstuff but I'd rather
> move the rest of datetime (few classes) under wicket-util.
>
>> One thing
>> Maybe it make sense to move org.apache.wicket.extensions.yui to
>>
I half agree with this. We should move yui to wicketstuff but I'd rather
move the rest of datetime (few classes) under wicket-util.
One thing
Maybe it make sense to move org.apache.wicket.extensions.yui to wicketstuff
but leave org.apache.wicket.datetime as is?
On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 1:21 PM, Em
One thing
Maybe it make sense to move org.apache.wicket.extensions.yui to wicketstuff
but leave org.apache.wicket.datetime as is?
On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 1:21 PM, Emond Papegaaij
wrote:
> +1
>
> On Thursday 05 February 2015 23:26:18 Martin Grigorov wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I think I have asked the
+1
On Thursday 05 February 2015 23:26:18 Martin Grigorov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think I have asked the same an year or two ago:
> What do you think about moving wicket-datetime module to WicketStuff ?
>
> The problem with it is that it uses YUI 2.x which is very old and not
> supported.
> Migration
+1 non binding
On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 11:49 AM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro <
reier...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 no binding
>
> On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 11:56 PM, Sven Meier wrote:
>
> > Hi Martin,
> >
> > someone with interest in YUI might pick up the module on wicketstuff and
> > upgrade it, so +1 on
+1 no binding
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 11:56 PM, Sven Meier wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
> someone with interest in YUI might pick up the module on wicketstuff and
> upgrade it, so +1 on relocating it.
>
> Regards
> Sven
>
>
> On 05.02.2015 22:26, Martin Grigorov wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I think I have aske
Hi Martin,
someone with interest in YUI might pick up the module on wicketstuff and
upgrade it, so +1 on relocating it.
Regards
Sven
On 05.02.2015 22:26, Martin Grigorov wrote:
Hi,
I think I have asked the same an year or two ago:
What do you think about moving wicket-datetime module to Wic
Hi,
I think I have asked the same an year or two ago:
What do you think about moving wicket-datetime module to WicketStuff ?
The problem with it is that it uses YUI 2.x which is very old and not
supported.
Migration to YUI 3.x will be hard. And even YUI 3.x is not maintained:
http://yahooeng.tumb
28 matches
Mail list logo
