Thanks. You just gave me a headache...
-Matej
On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 5:17 PM, Jonathan Locke
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> heh. brian (breadbox below) and i went to college together. besides his
> brainfuck page, brian also has written significant programs in "Intercal".
> i double dare
heh. brian (breadbox below) and i went to college together. besides his
brainfuck page, brian also has written significant programs in "Intercal".
i double dare you all to google that up. it makes my brain hurt just to
think about it.
Stefan Lindner wrote:
>
> Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazqu
I was listining to JavaPosse #178 the other day and they talked about this... Great joke ;)At 27:30.--- On Wed, 4/2/08, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:From: Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Subject: Re: planning for Wicket 3.0To: dev@wicket.apache.orgDate: Wednesday, April 2, 2008, 6:0
I fell for it too...
I figured... this is THE best web framework... I saw it grow and put my
confidence into it...
And when I saw that you were ALL moving in all the wrong way... I was so so
sooo disappointed no more Java sources, no more regular HTMLs for web
designers to do their job while
You really got me Eelco. I almost had a heart attack! I was really getting
worried while reading your post.
Keep Wicket the way it is, the best Java framework ever...
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
>
> In case you didn't get it: april fools'! :-)
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.n
> How about letting it extend from JCompagner instead?
that would be s coool!
On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 10:02 AM, Matej Knopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A joke?! I already made Component extends JComponent! Does it mean I
> won't get to commit that?
How about letting it extend from JCompagner instead? It'll be closer
to the creative source.
Eelco
A joke?! I already made Component extends JComponent! Does it mean I
won't get to commit that?
-Matej
On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 6:18 PM, Peter Ertl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What? This was a joke?! And I was so excited about Swing <--> Wicket
> interoperability *lol*
>
>
>
> Am 02.04.2008 um 18:
What? This was a joke?! And I was so excited about Swing <--> Wicket
interoperability *lol*
Am 02.04.2008 um 18:07 schrieb Eelco Hillenius:
I thought the move to Scala was a pretty intriguing idea. It
was the logic in markup and the integration with Swing that
had me worried.
Yeah, I like
> I thought the move to Scala was a pretty intriguing idea. It
> was the logic in markup and the integration with Swing that
> had me worried.
Yeah, I like Scala, or at least parts of it. And the joke had to be
somewhat believable :-)
Eelco
Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael wrote:
> I got it:) Although I think I heard a discussion once on the
> wicket irc channel about scala..
I thought the move to Scala was a pretty intriguing idea. It
was the logic in markup and the integration with Swing that
had me worried.
mcv.
I got it:) Although I think I heard a discussion once on the wicket irc
channel about scala..
I admit I can be a little naive sometimes.
regards Nino
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
In case you didn't get it: april fools'! :-)
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 11:15 AM, Eelco Hillenius
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
In case you didn't get it: april fools'! :-)
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 11:15 AM, Eelco Hillenius
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Now that half of the team is getting ready to work on Wicket 1.4,
> which is all about supporting the Java 5 features, I think it is time
> for the other half of th
I have already ported Wicket to WhiteSpace[0], so I can help you port
it to Brainfuck since I have the experience.
[0] http://compsoc.dur.ac.uk/whitespace/
-igor
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 12:28 PM, Stefan Lindner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael wrote:
>
> >Argh!
I vote for freemarker as the superior markup language (pure html feels
so 1992)
also the layout managers should be based on layout (using code
generation) to ensure maximum browser performance.
Am 01.04.2008 um 22:21 schrieb Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael:
Ahh, yes an then I'd like
Ahh, yes an then I'd like to suggest going for VB6, as I really liked
that. Especially their error handling and nice syntax. and use the
CPIP[1] to ensure more stability!
1=http://www.blug.linux.no/rfc1149/
Maurice Marrink wrote:
Excellent idea, but it might be hard to convince apache to mo
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 4:10 PM, Maurice Marrink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Excellent idea, but it might be hard to convince apache to move to git
> so maybe we should consider leaving apache.
>
Nah, just let everyone have their own repository. Then, right before
release time, everyone emails t
Excellent idea, but it might be hard to convince apache to move to git
so maybe we should consider leaving apache.
Maurice
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 10:06 PM, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> By the way,
> before we do all that
> i think we should really first deprecated subversion and
By the way,
before we do all that
i think we should really first deprecated subversion and go straight to GIT.
that will make all this development a lot easier
johan
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 8:15 PM, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Now that half of the team is getting ready t
Another neat feature would be if we could use MS Visual Studio to
develop Wicket apps. VS ROCKS!
And Drag and Drop!
Maurice
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 9:39 PM, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hmm
>
> we need a compiler that transforms wicket code directly to html and
> javascript so th
GWT!!!
(I hear that the W stands for Wicket... Google's Wicket Translator)
On 4/1/08, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hmm
>
> we need a compiler that transforms wicket code directly to html and
> javascript so that we can run completely in the browser
>
>
> johan
>
>
>
> On Tue,
hmm
we need a compiler that transforms wicket code directly to html and
javascript so that we can run completely in the browser
johan
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 8:15 PM, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Now that half of the team is getting ready to work on Wicket 1.4,
> which i
Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael wrote:
>Argh! I like java and I like wicket, what boundarys are you guys
reaching that java cant solve? And I then the future in short will be
all about alternative languages in jvm, like jruby scala python etc. Why
not keep it safe a little longer, but I guess
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
Hi,
Now that half of the team is getting ready to work on Wicket 1.4,
which is all about supporting the Java 5 features, I think it is time
for the other half of the team to start talking about Wicket 3.0 (we
skip 2.0 as we've used that for prototyping before), which is
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 8:15 PM, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> * Swing compatibility. We want our future components to be able to run
> directly in Swing, and Swing components to be run in Wicket apps. Just
> like some of our competitors.
>
We actually talked about this in ##wicket
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 11:15 AM, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Now that half of the team is getting ready to work on Wicket 1.4,
> which is all about supporting the Java 5 features, I think it is time
> for the other half of the team to start talking about Wicket 3.0 (we
> s
Also, instead of naming things like they are some web concept, we
should name them to what they can do. Link is not a very good concept.
Instead of a Link we would have a Clickable. But that name is lame...
so I suggest prefixing all our interfaces with ImA. this would make a
clickable component i
27 matches
Mail list logo
