Re: Planned release date for 7.6.0

not available. kind regards Tobias > Am 27.12.2016 um 09:56 schrieb Andrea Del Bene : > > I'm afraid I wasn't aware of this module. Is there something specific to do > for the release? > > >> On 27/12/2016 09:33, Tobias Soloschenko wrote: >> Hi Andrea,

Re: Planned release date for 7.6.0

has 4-SNAPSHOT as version. Staging repository (https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachewicket-1081/) does not contain wicket-eclipse-settings module. On 27/12/2016 12:10, Tobias Soloschenko wrote: Hi Andrea, no I just saw that in master the version was 4-SNAPSHOT. There a

Re: Planned release date for 7.6.0

Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 2:04 PM, Tobias Soloschenko < tobiassolosche...@googlemail.com> wrote: Hi Andrea, is the release version also staged with 4-SNAPSHOT? I think this can't be, because maven does not allow to release versions with -SNAPSHOT. So is the staged version released wit

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 8.0.0-M3

+1 to release kind regards Tobias Am 28.12.16 um 14:02 schrieb Martin Grigorov: [ X ] Yes, release Apache Wicket 8.0.0-M3 Tested: - local build - random Wicket Examples - our main application Martin Grigorov Wicket Training and Consulting https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov On Mon, Dec 26, 2016

Re: Planned release date for 7.6.0

Ok let's call it Creative Moments :-D kind regards Tobias > Am 28.12.2016 um 18:17 schrieb Andrea Del Bene : > > > >> On 28/12/2016 14:12, Tobias Soloschenko wrote: >> Hi Martin, >> >> doh! Yees you are absolutley right. My fault. It is only

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 6.26.0

+1 to release kind regards Tobias > Am 28.12.2016 um 18:20 schrieb Andrea Del Bene : > > This is a vote to release Apache Wicket 6.26.0 > > Please download the source distributions found in our staging area > linked below. > > I have included the signatures for both the source archives. This

Re: [1/2] wicket git commit: Added CHANGELOG for release 6.26.0

Nope - I think we did not change the fix versions before release -!that's the reason why it appears in the notes kind regards Tobias > Am 03.01.2017 um 08:57 schrieb Martin Grigorov : > > Hi, > > [WICKET-6287] - Switch from json.org to open-json > > This is not true (yet) for 6.26.0 and 7.6.

Re: [1/2] wicket git commit: Added CHANGELOG for release 6.26.0

gorov > Wicket Training and Consulting > https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov > > On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 9:17 AM, Tobias Soloschenko < > tobiassolosche...@googlemail.com> wrote: > >> Nope - I think we did not change the fix versions before release -!that's >> the

Re: [1/2] wicket git commit: Added CHANGELOG for release 6.26.0

On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 10:22 AM, Tobias Soloschenko < tobiassolosche...@googlemail.com> wrote: What about 8.x? kind regards Tobias Am 03.01.2017 um 09:47 schrieb Martin Grigorov : Right! I think it is a good idea to remove this entry from the site at least. Please merge the Op

Re: [GitHub] wicket issue #195: WICKET-6287 Switch from json.org to open-json - 7.x

I edited the message on github. See the updated one there. kind regards Tobias > Am 10.01.2017 um 08:02 schrieb klopfdreh : > > Github user klopfdreh commented on the issue: > >https://github.com/apache/wicket/pull/195 > >Hi @bitstorm , >I saw that JSONObject throws a JSONExceptio

Re: What else do we want to do before 8.0.0 final ?

Hi, I think that there is also a change need to be done before release - see: https://github.com/apache/wicket/pull/195#issuecomment-271501638 For Wicket 8 this would require a release for open-json. Wicket 6+7 can be changed by code kind regards Tobias > Am 13.01.2017 um 00:08 schrieb Marti

Apache Wicket Quickstart

Hi, when I choose Wicket 7.6.0 in the QuickStart 7.5.0-Snapshot is used. Any ideas? kind regards Tobias

Re: Apache Wicket Quickstart

Well then - maybe it is a local issue. Thanks for rechecking this issue. :-) kind regards Tobias > Am 17.01.2017 um 16:25 schrieb Andrea Del Bene : > > No problem for me. Maybe you have some old cached value somewhere? > > >> On 17/01/2017 16:12, Tobias Soloschenko wrot

Re: buildbot success in on wicket-branch-7.x

Great! :-) kind regards Tobias > Am 25.01.2017 um 13:11 schrieb Andrea Del Bene : > > I've also changed links for user guide 7.x now that ci is back to life. > > Thank you Martin! > > >> On 25/01/2017 13:02, Martin Grigorov wrote: >> Yey! >> >> Martin Grigorov >> Wicket Training and Consul

Re: wicket git commit: arquillian integration test management port is now configurable

; Diff: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket/diff/f4d5ddc8 >> >> Branch: refs/heads/master >> Commit: f4d5ddc84a75aaa15f834c6ad38112008349dd11 >> Parents: 5b5e25c >> Author: Tobias Soloschenko

Re: wicket git commit: arquillian integration test management port is now configurable

Hi Martin, I am going to change this soon (Monday) - the build is working at the moment. kind regards Tobias > Am 28.01.2017 um 23:16 schrieb Martin Grigorov : > > On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 10:58 PM, Tobias Soloschenko < > tobiassolosche...@googlemail.com> wrote: > >

Re: wicket git commit: arquillian integration test management port is now configurable

kind regards Tobias Am 28.01.17 um 23:16 schrieb Martin Grigorov: On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 10:58 PM, Tobias Soloschenko < tobiassolosche...@googlemail.com> wrote: Hi Martin, Am 28.01.2017 um 21:55 schrieb Martin Grigorov : Hi Tobias, On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 12:31 PM, wrote: Reposit

Builders error

Hi, After my last commit there is a build error because of WebSockets Core https://ci.apache.org/builders/wicket-branch-7.x/builds/355/steps/compile/logs/stdio I didn't change anything to this module. Any idea why this happens? kind regards Tobias

Re: Builders error

(https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots): > repository.apache.org: No address associated with hostname -> [Help 1] > > I've re-run the build and it passed! > > Martin Grigorov > Wicket Training and Consulting > https://twitter.com/

Re: wicket git commit: Archetype version updated to 7.7.0-SNAPSHOT

Really great! I like those changes! :-) kind regards Tobias > Am 31.01.2017 um 21:24 schrieb Martin Grigorov : > > OK. I'll make the changes in the poms > > Martin Grigorov > Wicket Training and Consulting > https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov > > On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 9:13 PM, Andrea Del Bene

Re: [DISCUSSION] 8.0.0-M4 release

+1 kind regards Tobias > Am 03.02.2017 um 09:38 schrieb Sebastien : > > +1 too > > On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 9:11 AM, Martin Grigorov > wrote: > >> +1 for -M4 >> >> Martin Grigorov >> Wicket Training and Consulting >> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov >> >> On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 9:07 AM, Maxim

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 8.0.0-M4

+1 to release kind regards Tobias Am 03.02.17 um 22:56 schrieb Andrea Del Bene: This is a vote to release Apache Wicket 8.0.0-M4 Please download the source distributions found in our staging area linked below. I have included the signatures for both the source archives. This vote lasts for 7

Re: What else do we want to do before 8.0.0 final ?

Hi, great to hear and thanks for the feedback. :-) kind regards Tobias > Am 01.02.2017 um 09:00 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik : > > Hello All, > > JFYI I have moved Apache OpenMeetings to Wicket-8 without any issues > in ~30 minutes :)

Example Servlet 3.x and Spring Framework

Hi, I am going to provide an example with Servlet 3.x and Spring Framework without any XML definitions to the site this afternoon. Maybe we can link it on the Wicket's Twitter account, too. kind regards Tobias

Re: Example Servlet 3.x and Spring Framework

Hi all, it’s online, now. https://wicket.apache.org/learn/examples/servlet3x.html <https://wicket.apache.org/learn/examples/servlet3x.html> kind regards Tobias > Am 22.02.2017 um 10:57 schrieb Francois Meillet : > > nice ! > > François > > > >&

Re: Example Servlet 3.x and Spring Framework

gt; to get it in #init() > > Martin Grigorov > Wicket Training and Consulting > https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov > > On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 6:17 PM, Tobias Soloschenko < > tobiassolosche...@googlemail.com> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> it’s online, now.

Re: Example Servlet 3.x and Spring Framework

://twitter.com/mtgrigorov > > On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 6:17 PM, Tobias Soloschenko < > tobiassolosche...@googlemail.com> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> it’s online, now. >> >> https://wicket.apache.org/learn/examples/servlet3x.html < >> https://wi

Re: Example Servlet 3.x and Spring Framework

one where you can create an article and just > copy and past. > > Andrea. > > On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 10:10 AM, Tobias Soloschenko < > tobiassolosche...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > > Hi again, > > > > I sadly can't init the context within the constru

Re: Example Servlet 3.x and Spring Framework

ntext(ServletContext) > to get it in #init() > > Martin Grigorov > Wicket Training and Consulting > https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov > > On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 6:17 PM, Tobias Soloschenko < > tobiassolosche...@googlemail.com> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >>

Re: Example Servlet 3.x and Spring Framework

g to try to guess what imports are needed to be >> able >>> to use the snippets. >>> - instead of using static initalization for the Spring application >> context >>> you can initialize it in the constructor and >>> use org.springframework.web.context.s

Re: Example Servlet 3.x and Spring Framework

that. We can also remove any extra > configuration and just used built in spring user data configuration. If we > get a clear requirement of what we need then we can put something together > easily. > > Thanks > > David > > On 25 February 2017 at 19:26, Tobias Sol

Re: Example Servlet 3.x and Spring Framework

AnnotationConfigWebApplicationContext context = new > AnnotationConfigWebApplicationContext(); >context.scan("com.my.package"); >context.refresh(); >return context; > } > } > > > Martin Grigorov > Wicket Training and Consulting > https://twit

Re: [VOTE] WICKET-6322 lambda factories for behaviors

I would keep them but try to find good names so that it is clear what they do. But you know me - I often create to code intensive APIs ;-D kind regards Tobias > Am 28.02.2017 um 19:16 schrieb Sven Meier : > > Hi all, > > currently we have 15 behavior factory methods in > org.apache.wicket.la

Re: 8.0.0-M4: org.json has issue with List

Thanks a lot for those fixes - I didn't had the time to take care of them! I am happy that the issues are solved, now. kind regards Tobias > Am 13.03.2017 um 22:02 schrieb Sebastien : > > Hi Martin, > > Thanks a lot for the quick update! From what I can see it seems to be good! > :) > > Best

Re: Use jQuery 3.x by default in 8.x

+1 for 3.0 > Am 20.03.2017 um 14:51 schrieb Martin Grigorov : > > Hi Emond, > > On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 2:13 PM, Emond Papegaaij >> wrote: > >> Hi Martin, >> >> jQuery 3.x is not about dropping browser support, but changes in API. They >> were planning >> t

Re: wicket 8 m5?

+1 kind regards Tobias > Am 23.03.2017 um 09:55 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik : > > +1 :) > > WBR, Maxim > (from mobile, sorry for the typos) > >> On Mar 23, 2017 15:48, "Sebastien" wrote: >> >> +1 to release too >> >> On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 9:42 AM, Martin Grigorov >> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 8.0.0-M5

+1 kind regards Tobias > Am 25.03.2017 um 16:32 schrieb Andrea Del Bene : > > This is a vote to release Apache Wicket 8.0.0-M5 > > Please download the source distributions found in our staging area > linked below. > > I have included the signatures for both the source archives. This vote > l

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 7.7.0

+1 kind regards Tobias > Am 31.03.2017 um 22:21 schrieb Andrea Del Bene : > > This is a vote to release Apache Wicket 7.7.0 > > Please download the source distributions found in our staging area > linked below. > > I have included the signatures for both the source archives. This vote > last

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 6.27.0

+1 kind regards Tobias > Am 01.04.2017 um 13:57 schrieb Andrea Del Bene : > > This is a vote to release Apache Wicket 6.27.0 > > Please download the source distributions found in our staging area > linked below. > > I have included the signatures for both the source archives. This vote > last

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 7.7.0

Hi all, I just don't have any time currently to take care about the JSON issue. Can someone take over it? Thanks a lot for the investigation Sebastien! kind regards Tobias > Am 04.04.2017 um 11:12 schrieb Andrea Del Bene : > > My bad, dont worry :) > >> On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 11:09 AM, Seb

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 7.7.0

lting > https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov > > On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 11:05 AM, Tobias Soloschenko < > tobiassolosche...@googlemail.com> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I just don't have any time currently to take care about the JSON issue. >> Can someone t

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 7.7.0

+1 kind regards Tobias > Am 15.04.2017 um 22:38 schrieb Andrea Del Bene : > > This is a vote to release Apache Wicket 7.7.0 > > Please download the source distributions found in our staging area > linked below. > > I have included the signatures for both the source archives. This vote > last

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 7.7.0

Yes also a big thanks from me - and apologize that after the switch from json.org to openjson so many issues came up. kind regards Tobias > Am 22.04.2017 um 14:14 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik : > > Done: > https://github.com/openjson/openjson/commit/d2367f28cebd8f21c4a4e22faec4cab2f8a95982 > Thank

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 7.7.0 take 3

+1 kind regards Tobias > Am 10.05.2017 um 16:22 schrieb Andrea Del Bene : > > +1 to release. Tested with guide examples. > > On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 9:03 PM, Andrea Del Bene > wrote: > >> This is a vote to release Apache Wicket 7.7.0 >> >> Please download the source distributions found in ou

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 6.27.0

Hi, just one question: The open-json changes are also included in the 6.x branch of Wicket as well? If yes +1 to release. kind regards Tobias > Am 11.05.2017 um 22:33 schrieb Andrea Del Bene : > > This is a vote to release Apache Wicket 6.27.0 > > Please download the source distributions fo

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 6.27.0

Hi Martin, > Am 11.05.2017 um 23:34 schrieb Martin Grigorov : > > Hi Tobias, > > On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 11:05 PM, Tobias Soloschenko < > tobiassolosche...@googlemail.com> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> just one question: The open-json changes are also in

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 8.0.0-M6

+1 kind regards Tobias > Am 15.05.2017 um 21:35 schrieb Andrea Del Bene : > > +1 to release. Tested with guide examples. > > >> On 15/05/2017 18:58, Sebastien wrote: >> [x] Yes, release Apache Wicket 8.0.0-M6 >> >> Tested against wicket-jquery-ui, especially openjson-1.0.6 stuffs... Well >

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Wicket 7.7.0 released

Hi, see the migration guide for 8.x: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WICKET/Migration+to+Wicket+8.0#MigrationtoWicket8.0-Changestoorg.apache.wicket.ajax.json.*ASFJIRAkey,summary,type,created,updated,due,assignee,reporter,priority,status,resolution5aa69414-a9e9-3523-82ec-879b028fb15bWI

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 8.0.0-M6

+1 kind regards Tobias > Am 16.05.2017 um 05:37 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik : > > +1 to release > > Tested: > - sums, signature > - build from sources > - Main app (Apache OpenMeetings) > > >> On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 7:05 AM, Martin Grigorov >> wrote: >> +1 to release >> >> Tested: >> - loca

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 8.0.0-M6

Wooops sorry I already voted. Please for the next time start a different mail chain it is very confusing. :-) kind regards Tobias > Am 16.05.2017 um 05:37 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik : > > +1 to release > > Tested: > - sums, signature > - build from sources > - Main app (Apache OpenMeetings) >

HTTP/2 Example Page

Hi all, I just wanted to add a http/2 push example to our Wicket examples. As I saw the project itself can be started with Jetty, but on openshift it is deployed within a tomcat. Because Wicket requires server dependent implementations (wicket-http2-tomcat / wicket-http2-jetty) I just wanted t

Re: HTTP/2 Example Page

ve updated Tomcat to 8.5.15 with > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6390. > Indeed the API has changed in Servlet 4.0. > > Martin Grigorov > Wicket Training and Consulting > https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov > > On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 1:44 PM, Tobias Soloschenko

Re: The day Wicket became Apache Wicket 10 years ago!

Hope that many years are going to be added. :-) kind regards Tobias > Am 19.06.2017 um 21:18 schrieb Martijn Dashorst : > > Today marks the date 10 years ago that the Wicket project graduated from > the Incubator to a fully fledged Apache project. > > The time flies when you're having fun! >

Re: wicket git commit: fix Sesssion invalidate method dose not work after deserialisation

Hi Martin, > Am 22.06.2017 um 21:38 schrieb Martin Grigorov : > >> On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 9:35 PM, wrote: >> >> Repository: wicket >> Updated Branches: >> refs/heads/wicket-6.x 75a4fdcba -> fe5573ee5 >> >> >> fix Sesssion invalidate method dose not work after deserialisation >> >> >> Proj

Re: wicket 8 - state of it?

Hi Martin, thanks for the hint. It was only a small change which has been resolved a week ago. I closed the issue. :-) kind regards Tobias > Am 30.06.2017 um 11:36 schrieb Martin Grigorov : > > Actually https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6406 is already > implemented. > @Tobias: ple

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 6.27.0 take 4

+1 kind regards Tobias > Am 03.07.2017 um 15:41 schrieb Martin Grigorov : > > [ X ] Yes, release Apache Wicket 6.27.0 > > Martin Grigorov > Wicket Training and Consulting > https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov > > On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 11:27 AM, Andrea Del Bene > wrote: > >> This is a vote to re

Re: examples8x.wicket.apache.org / 503

Hi, if this occurs during the restart it may has something to do with session restoring (only an assumption) - are the tomcat logs enabled to have a look there? kind regards Tobias > Am 05.07.2017 um 10:40 schrieb Sebastien : > > Hi Andrea, > > I'm also suffering this kind of issue with the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 6.27.0 take 4

Yes - that's true. All classes / methods which are not implemented by OpenJson throwing exceptions - they have to either be reimplemented or if the license is ok for someone covered by the original json lib. I just added stubs with the exception handling to not break the API within a bugfix rel

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 7.8.0

+1 kind regards Tobias > Am 09.07.2017 um 08:25 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik : > > +1 > > Tested: > 1) signatures > 2) build from sources > 3) build wicketstuff > 4) run wicketstuff app > >> On Sat, Jul 8, 2017 at 11:41 PM, Andrea Del Bene >> wrote: >> This is a vote to release Apache Wicket 7.

Re: Wicket 8 (M7) release

Hi, I am going to provide a patch to wicket-8.x with some changes regarding the push API, today. Maybe it is possible that it can be reviewed and merged first? kind regards Tobias > Am 31.07.2017 um 17:14 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik : > > Hello All, > > As I can see there are no issues against

Re: Wicket 8 (M7) release

Hi, > Am 31.07.2017 um 17:18 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik : > > Sure > Sorry Tobias, I wasn't aware there is something in progress :( Oh I didn’t mentioned it, yet. So it was my fault. :-) > > On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 10:16 PM, Tobias Soloschenko > wrote: >> Hi

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Distributed Release Audit Tool (DRAT)

Thanks for sharing! :-) Great to here that Wicket is used that way. > Am 02.08.2017 um 19:41 schrieb Martijn Dashorst : > > I interpreted Chris's mention of Wicket gurus to be an invite for wider > sharing > > Martijn > > -- Forwarded message - > Van: Chris Mattmann > Datum: wo

Re: Wicket 8 (M7) release

+1 for M7 kind regards Tobias > Am 04.08.2017 um 18:56 schrieb Korbinian Bachl > : > > Please a thousand +1 (non-binding) > > :) > > - Ursprüngliche Mail - >> Von: "Andrea Del Bene" >> An: dev@wicket.apache.org >> Gesendet: Freitag, 4. August 2017 17:12:43 >> Betreff: Re: Wicket 8 (

JEE in hands of ASF

Hi, oracle release the news that there are plans to hand over JEE to an open source org to speed up the development: * https://m.heise.de/developer/meldung/Oracle-will-Java-EE-an-die-Open-Source-Community-uebertragen-3806673.html (german) * https://blogs.oracle.com/theaquarium/opening-up-java-

Re: JEE in hands of ASF

Martin Grigorov > Wicket Training and Consulting > https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov > > On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 10:50 AM, Tobias Soloschenko < > tobiassolosche...@googlemail.com> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> oracle release the news that there are plans to hand over

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 7.8.1

-1 also because of the Behavior bug. Good catch @François! kind regards Tobias > Am 04.09.2017 um 21:18 schrieb Andrea Del Bene : > > Sorry to bother you, but Francois Meillet has discovered a bug that might be > serious: WICKET-6462. In short, due to this bug > AjaxFormSubmitBehavior#onSubm

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 6.27.1

+1 kind regards Tobias > Am 04.09.2017 um 21:56 schrieb Martin Grigorov : > > +1 to release! > > Martin Grigorov > Wicket Training and Consulting > https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov > > On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 10:43 PM, Andrea Del Bene > wrote: > >> +1 to release it >> >> >> >>> On 30/08/201

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 7.8.1 take 2

+1 kind regards Tobias > Am 05.09.2017 um 22:17 schrieb Andrea Del Bene : > > This is a vote to release Apache Wicket 7.8.1 > > Please download the source distributions found in our staging area > linked below. > > I have included the signatures for both the source archives. This vote > lasts

Apache Wicket push support question

Hi everyone, as usual I am just playing around a bit with HTTP/2 Push support and just wanted to ensure that the experimental push support of Apache Wicket is working like expected. :-) I basically followed the instructions on: https://ci.apache.org/projects/wicket/guide/8.x/single.html#_wicket_h

Re: Apache Wicket push support question

t; There are no attachments. > The mailing list strips them. > I'm not sure how some people attach files sometimes :-) > > Martin Grigorov > Wicket Training and Consulting > https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov > > On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 10:01 AM, Tobias Soloschenko < > tobiasso

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 7.9.0

+1 kind regards Tobias > Am 18.09.2017 um 12:57 schrieb Andrea Del Bene : > > +1 > > Tested user guide examples. > > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 8:58 AM, Maxim Solodovnik > wrote: > >> +1 >> >> Tested: >> 0) signatures >> 1) build from sources >> 2) build of wicketstuff >> 3) run couple wicket

Re: Apache headers checking

Good point. I just cloned a subproject / did my changes and it came with this. +1 to use maven if there is no special use case. kind regards Tobias > Am 24.09.2017 um 19:41 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik : > > Hello All, > > I'm wonder why "hand made" tools like ApacheLicenceHeaderTest.java > are b

Re: wicket 8.0.0 milestone tags in github?

Hi, the project is not using the github tags, nor the releases functionality. you can see the releases on maven central repository and the changes within the CHANGELOG-8.x: https://github.com/apache/wicket/blob/master/CHANGELOG-8.x

Re: wicket 8.0.0 milestone tags in github?

d76017 > which is what I was looking for :) > > -Rob > > > > On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 5:21 PM, Tobias Soloschenko < > tobiassolosche...@googlemail.com> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> the project is not using the github tags, nor the releases functionality. >>

Re: wicket 8.0.0 milestone tags in github?

apache/wicket/releases/tag/rel%2Fwicket-8.0.0-M7 > which links to this commit: > https://github.com/apache/wicket/commit/768dfe7501aab93de3b78e23a7f99a58dad76017 > which is what I was looking for :) > > -Rob > > > > On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 5:21 PM, Tobias Soloschenko

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 6.28.0

+1 Good to see the page store fix in there, too. Thank you Andrea! kind regards Tobias > Am 27.09.2017 um 20:25 schrieb Andrea Del Bene : > > This is a vote to release Apache Wicket 6.28.0 > > Please download the source distributions found in our staging area > linked below. > > I have inclu

Re: JDK 9

Hi, thanks for the information! As an experimental project we are using the http/2 push builder API of the servlet 4.0 spec already. If you have any feedback or just want to try it out and need help - let me know! :-) kind regards Tobias > Am 04.10.2017 um 15:05 schrieb Sebastien : > > https

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 8.0.0-M8

+1 for release kind regards Tobias > Am 22.10.2017 um 11:42 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik : > > +1 > Tested > 1) signatures > 2) build from sources > 3) build wicketstuff > 4) our main application > > > On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 10:08 PM, Andrea Del Bene > wrote: > >> This is a vote to release Apa

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 8.0.0-M8

Hi Andrea, what do you think to mention that the http/2 push API which is experimental is supporting the final servlet 4.0 API, now. This way more people out there are going to try our API and I hope we can integrate it within the core functionality if proven. kind regards Tobias > Am 25.10.

Re: Examples style

Hi Andrea, there are some linking issues if you deploy the app not within the root context. logo-apachewicket-examples-white.svg for example is using a fix /img/... I think we should use the Image class so that this is resolved also if the filter is pointing to http://localhost:8080/wicket-e

Re: Examples style

Hi again, I created a PR to your branch Andrea. This way resources get managed by Wicket. I didn‘t had the time to test everything. kind regards Tobias > Am 02.11.2017 um 12:43 schrieb Andrea Del Bene : > > Hi, > > one of the thing I'd like to do before releasing Wicket 8 is to refresh the >

Re: Analyze Wicket builds with Sonar

+1 :-) kind regards Tobias > Am 10.11.2017 um 06:21 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik : > > Hello All, > > Maybe it worth to add Sonar analysis to Wicket builds? > It is available at Apache build servers: https://builds.apache.org/analysis/ > > > -- > WBR > Maxim aka solomax

Wicket Site took too long to respond

Hi all, I currently get that message rather often when accessing https://wicket.apache.org. kind regards Tobias

Re: Git team workflow

Hi, if you don‘t be sure if everything is right you can also push your changes into a separate branch at your repo and create a PR to the target branch at your own repo (with the github ui) This way you can review your changes before pushing them to the wickstuff or even provide a PR there. ki

Re: [GitHub] wicket pull request #253: WICKET-6498 deferred javascript

Hi, I just reviewed it and added some notes. kind regards Tobias > Am 02.01.2018 um 11:28 schrieb svenmeier : > > GitHub user svenmeier opened a pull request: > >https://github.com/apache/wicket/pull/253 > >WICKET-6498 deferred javascript > >If addEventListener is used instead o

Re: 8.0.0 blockers

>>> push builder support :-) kind regards Tobias > Am 10.01.2018 um 14:39 schrieb Martijn Dashorst : > >> On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 2:35 PM, Andrea Del Bene >> wrote: >> On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 1:26 PM, Martijn Dashorst < >> martijn.dasho...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> No technical blockers AFAIK

Re: [GitHub] wicket pull request #257: [WICKET-6518] Log4j is replaced with logback

I would also not enforce user to take a LGPL dependency. For Log4j you can use SLF4J adapter and also logback if you finally want to but you don’t have to. +1 to revert. kind regards Tobias > Am 14.01.2018 um 04:45 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik : > > Actually it is not being distributed :) > It is

Re: [GitHub] wicket pull request #257: [WICKET-6518] Log4j is replaced with logback

to generated project, not sure if this is required . > > On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 11:30 AM, Tobias Soloschenko > wrote: >> I would also not enforce user to take a LGPL dependency. For Log4j you can >> use SLF4J adapter and also logback if you finally want to but you

Re: [GitHub] wicket pull request #257: [WICKET-6518] Log4j is replaced with logback

t;> EPL is compatible with APLv2, just need to be added to NOTICE. >>> I mean the files we are distributing doesn't contain any binaries. >>> >>> Logback binaries appears only after compilation of generated >>> quick-start nothing illegal. >>> >>&g

Re: Wicket 8 & Eclipse

Yes, version 4 has to be released because plugins can’t work with snapshots. If the settings are set to Java 8 correctly I would suggest to release it. kind regards Tobias > Am 14.01.2018 um 12:21 schrieb Martijn Dashorst : > > All, > > I've imported Wicket sources into a new eclipse workspac

Re: [GitHub] wicket pull request #257: [WICKET-6518] Log4j is replaced with logback

f this is what you propose then it won't be a complete quickstart because > the users will have to add additional files to have a complete setup. > In the PR you can see that there is log4j.xml that is being replaced with > logback.xml. > > On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 1:09 PM,

Re: [GitHub] wicket pull request #257: [WICKET-6518] Log4j is replaced with logback

moting" JUL would be the worst we can do. >>> >>> On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 10:34 AM, Maxim Solodovnik >>> wrote: >>> >>>> EPL is compatible with APLv2, just need to be added to NOTICE. >>>> I mean the files we are distributing doesn't c

Re: [VOTE] Release wicket-eclipse-settings 4

+1 to release kind regards Tobias > Am 14.01.2018 um 19:12 schrieb Martijn Dashorst : > > Tag: > https://github.com/dashorst/wicket/releases/tag/rel%2Fwicket-eclipse-settings-4 > > Staging repo: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachewicket-1104/ > > Changes: > > - se

Re: [VOTE] Release wicket-eclipse-settings 4

via code review > > I was unable to import these settings using standard Eclipse > Import->Preferences dialog > What is the proper way of import? > >> On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 1:33 AM, Andrea Del Bene >> wrote: >> +1 to release >> >> On Jan 1

Re: 8.0.0 blockers

Hi, I also like REST in combination with type safe interfaces. So what to do: 1. Put the type safe interfaces and transfer objects into a shared project 2. Build a rest call within a dynamic proxy (https://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/technotes/guides/reflection/proxy.html) with all required

Re: 8.0.0 blockers

21:50 schrieb Martin Grigorov : > > On Feb 6, 2018 21:45, "Tobias Soloschenko" > wrote: > > Hi, > > I also like REST in combination with type safe interfaces. > > So what to do: > > 1. Put the type safe interfaces and transfer objects into a sha

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 8.0.0-M9

+1 kind regards Tobias > Am 11.02.2018 um 21:24 schrieb Sven Meier : > > Hi, > > JavaScriptDeferHeaderResponse is an *alternative* to > JavaScriptFilteredIntoFooterHeaderResponse, it doesn't break anything - but > even if you wanted to, you could use both simultaneously. > > Regarding WICKE

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 7.10.0

+1 kind regards Tobias > Am 11.02.2018 um 19:11 schrieb Andrea Del Bene : > > This is a vote to release Apache Wicket 7.10.0 > > Please download the source distributions found in our staging area > linked below. > > I have included the signatures for both the source archives. This vote > last

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 8.0.0-M9

Hi, as far as I understood this feature is optional and if you want to render the js defered you are able to do so, but also should be aware that this might cause issues under some circumstances. „... due to a known issues“ - either remove „a“ or the „s“ after issues. kind regards Tobias > A

Re: pullrequest sent

Hi, I am going to integrate it, now. kind regards Tobias > Am 17.02.2018 um 10:29 schrieb Ryo Tnd : > > Dear Wicket developers, > > My name is Ryo Tsunoda. I'm from Japan. > I sent a PullRequest 5 days ago. > https://github.com/apache/wicket/pull/267 > > I thought I sent you a message, but I

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >