Github user AlexanderShoshin closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2206
---
Github user AlexanderShoshin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2206
@jongyoul it looks like I need to correct my unit tests due last changes in
master
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user AlexanderShoshin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2362
We also need to enable the `HeliumBundleFactoryTest` on CI by removing it
from `-Dtests.to.exclude` variable in `.travis.yml`
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user AlexanderShoshin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2300
I think we should revert this commit then. I won't be able to fix it fast.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user AlexanderShoshin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2300
According to @Leemoonsoo suggestion I have added a comment for the travis
job configuration about excluded tests.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
GitHub user AlexanderShoshin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2300
[ZEPPELIN-2467] Restoring second travis job functionality
### What is this PR for?
Second travis job didn't work correctly. It suppose to test all core unit
tests plus integr
Github user AlexanderShoshin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2206
Hi @jongyoul,
I've added a test for my changes but it won't run until we restore second
Travis job which should start all core tests.
I will write when the test will
Github user AlexanderShoshin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2233
This PR is ready for review.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
GitHub user AlexanderShoshin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2246
[ZEPPELIN-1828] Flaky Test: RemoteInterpreterTest hanged in
zeppelin-interpreter
### What is this PR for?
When `interpreter.close()` occurs in code it shuts down
Github user AlexanderShoshin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2233
Hi Felix,
thank you for looking through my PR.
Method name must correspond an action it performs. Methods with names like
`addSomething()` usually mean that we must pass this
GitHub user AlexanderShoshin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2233
[MINOR] Add paragraph to note
### What is this PR for?
We need to add an ability of adding custom _Paragraph_ to a _Note_. This
will make it easier to write _Note_ and _Paragraph_
Github user AlexanderShoshin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2206
Sure, I'll do it.
But first I need to make some refactoring of `Note.java` class in separate
PR. We need to be able to add a custom `Paragraph` to `Note`. This will allow
to
GitHub user AlexanderShoshin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2206
[ZEPPELIN-1856] Flaky Test:
InterpreterRestApiTest.testRestartInterpreterPerNote
### What is this PR for?
A _NullPointerException_ occurs occasionally in
GitHub user AlexanderShoshin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2188
[MINOR] Job parameters synchronization
### What is this PR for?
We need to synchronize setting up job result, exception, errorMessage and
dateFinished in the end of `Job.run
Github user AlexanderShoshin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1765
I had similar issue a week ago:
log - https://api.travis-ci.org/jobs/201058125/log.txt?deansi=true
config - https://travis-ci.org/apache/zeppelin/jobs/201058125/config
Github user AlexanderShoshin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2014
One travis job failed - looks like known bag
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1761
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user AlexanderShoshin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2014
I changed AtomicInteger to CountDownLatch to simplify the code.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AlexanderShoshin closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2014
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
GitHub user AlexanderShoshin reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2014
[ZEPPELIN-2065] Flaky test: NotebookTest.testSchedulePoolUsage
### What is this PR for?
`testSchedulePoolUsage()` test checks that jobs can be executed several
times in a row
GitHub user AlexanderShoshin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2014
[ZEPPELIN-2065] Flaky test: NotebookTest.testSchedulePoolUsage
### What is this PR for?
`testSchedulePoolUsage()` test checks that jobs can be executed several
times in a row
Github user AlexanderShoshin closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1954
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
GitHub user AlexanderShoshin reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1954
[ZEPPELIN-525] Test failing in zeppelin-interpreter
`RemoteSchedulerTest.test` was fall when CPU switched `RemoteScheduler`
execution (which executes a job in a separate thread) back
GitHub user AlexanderShoshin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1954
[ZEPPELIN-525] Test failing in zeppelin-interpreter
`RemoteSchedulerTest.test` was fall when CPU switched `RemoteScheduler`
execution (which executes a job in a separate thread) back to
Github user AlexanderShoshin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1758
@AhyoungRyu, thanks for the note. I've removed an url to the notebook.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as wel
Github user AlexanderShoshin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1758
I've added a new commit to convert the notebook to 0.7.0 format because I
found that
[9013620](https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1758/co
Github user AlexanderShoshin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1758
Sorry, I was not able to work on this issue during last weeks.
@AhyoungRyu, I will make the corrections soon.
Thanks
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user AlexanderShoshin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1758
@bzz, I am not sure. We already have a *Word Count* example there to
describe `Flink` usage. Where should we place the link to this example?
---
If your project is set up for it, you
Github user AlexanderShoshin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1758
I am confused a bit :)
@AhyoungRyu, do I need to drop my last commit or not?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user AlexanderShoshin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1758
I've converted notebook to 0.6.2 format. So it should be displayed
correctly now.
[ZeppelinHub
vew](https://www.zeppelinhub.com/viewer/note
Github user AlexanderShoshin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1758
Oh, it should not looks like this. It might be another problem of new
notebook json structure. I will correct this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user AlexanderShoshin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1758
@zjffdu, should we do this in current PR or make a new issue for the
documentation improving?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user AlexanderShoshin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1758
@tae-jun, I found that **ZeppelinHub** can't display new notebooks
correctly. It is because the note.json structure was changed after
[ZEPPELIN-212](https://issues.apache.org/jira/b
Github user AlexanderShoshin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1758
@AhyoungRyu, thank you for your notes!
* I've changed `wget` to `curl` as you suggested.
* As for the error message with "permission denied" I think it is because
`
Github user AlexanderShoshin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1758
Yes, but ZeppelinHub does not show all the paragraphs. I will try to find
out the reason.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
GitHub user AlexanderShoshin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1758
[ZEPPELIN-1787] Add an example of Flink Notebook
### What is this PR for?
This PR will add an example of batch processing with Flink to Zeppelin
tutorial notebooks. There are no any
35 matches
Mail list logo
