[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1985?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
desmondhe updated ZOOKEEPER-1985:
-
Description:
in the file zookeeper.c, most function call of "close_buffer_oarchive(&oa, 0)"
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1985?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
desmondhe updated ZOOKEEPER-1985:
-
Description:
in the file zookeeper.c, most function call of "close_buffer_oarchive(&oa, 0)"
desmondhe created ZOOKEEPER-1985:
Summary: Memory leak in C client
Key: ZOOKEEPER-1985
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1985
Project: ZooKeeper
Issue Type: Bug
C
Jira: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1984
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-ZOOKEEPER-Build/2216/
###
## LAST 60 LINES OF THE CONSOLE
###
[
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1984?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14071057#comment-14071057
]
Hadoop QA commented on ZOOKEEPER-1984:
--
-1 overall. Here are the results of test
Jira: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1982
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-ZOOKEEPER-Build/2215/
###
## LAST 60 LINES OF THE CONSOLE
###
[
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1982?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14071005#comment-14071005
]
Hadoop QA commented on ZOOKEEPER-1982:
--
-1 overall. Here are the results of test
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1984?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Alexander Shraer updated ZOOKEEPER-1984:
Attachment: small_fix.patch
removing the part of the test that fails since its
Thanks Alex. I've created a jira for this:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1984 Let's discuss
further there.
I will try the patch on my jenkins box later today.
Thanks!
Patrick
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 2:07 PM, Alexander Shraer wrote:
> Actually if servers 1 and 3 are talking an
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1984?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14070951#comment-14070951
]
Patrick Hunt commented on ZOOKEEPER-1984:
-
bq. Is it possible that writing the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1984?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Patrick Hunt reassigned ZOOKEEPER-1984:
---
Assignee: Alexander Shraer
Alex would you mind attaching your proposed patch here
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1984?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14070949#comment-14070949
]
Patrick Hunt commented on ZOOKEEPER-1984:
-
Alex mentioned:
yep, I think what
Patrick Hunt created ZOOKEEPER-1984:
---
Summary: testLeaderTimesoutOnNewQuorum is a flakey test
Key: ZOOKEEPER-1984
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1984
Project: ZooKeeper
Thanks Giri! Unfortunately though it seems to not have taken effect, I
just kicked off a precommit build and I see
core file size (blocks, -c) 0
data seg size (kbytes, -d) unlimited
scheduling priority (-e) 0
file size (blocks, -f) unlimited
pending sig
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1983?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shyamal Prasad updated ZOOKEEPER-1983:
--
Attachment: ZK1983.patch
Simple patch (to trunk) demonstrating a fix that works at
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1983?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shyamal Prasad updated ZOOKEEPER-1983:
--
Description:
Currently zkServer.sh will redirect output to zookeeper.out using a si
Shyamal Prasad created ZOOKEEPER-1983:
-
Summary: Append to zookeeper.out (not overwrite) to support
logrotation
Key: ZOOKEEPER-1983
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1983
Projec
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1982?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14070876#comment-14070876
]
Hadoop QA commented on ZOOKEEPER-1982:
--
-1 overall. Here are the results of test
Jira: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1982
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-ZOOKEEPER-Build/2214/
###
## LAST 60 LINES OF THE CONSOLE
###
[
jenkins@asf901:~$ ulimit -a
core file size (blocks, -c) 0
data seg size (kbytes, -d) unlimited
scheduling priority (-e) 0
file size (blocks, -f) unlimited
pending signals (-i) 386178
max locked memory (kbytes, -l) 64
max memory size
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1982?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hongchao Deng updated ZOOKEEPER-1982:
-
Attachment: ZOOKEEPER-1982.patch
> Refactor (touch|add)Session in SessionTrackerImpl.
Hongchao Deng created ZOOKEEPER-1982:
Summary: Refactor (touch|add)Session in SessionTrackerImpl.java
Key: ZOOKEEPER-1982
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1982
Project: ZooKeepe
yep, I think what happens is that server 3 is becoming leader and not
server 1, so its not completing the reconfig. Let me think about how to
solve this...
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 12:21 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
> Also if you want to submit a patch that provides more insight (logs)
> for that ope
Also if you want to submit a patch that provides more insight (logs)
for that operation/test lmk and I'll be happy to review/commit it.
Should help with debugging the issue and debugging in the field.
Thanks!
Patrick
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 12:17 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
> Here's the logs (attac
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1978?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14070738#comment-14070738
]
Patrick Hunt commented on ZOOKEEPER-1978:
-
Sounds reasonable. Can we update th
Unfortunately doesn't look like we have enough logging going on there.
For example would be nice to know what's the committed config and last seen
config
of the leader when it comes up (leader.lead()). and what configuration is
sent in the NEWLEADER message
sent out in LeaderHandler:
Giri any chance can you take a look at the ulimit issue on the H#
machines? All the ZK precommit builds are failing as a result.
I updated the precommit build last night to output "ulimit -a" and it
says the current limit is 4096, can we bump that up or set the default
to unlimited?
Thanks!
Patr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1978?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14070692#comment-14070692
]
Hongchao Deng commented on ZOOKEEPER-1978:
--
[~rakeshr][~phunt]
Here is my con
Let me know if you see issues with ant
-giri
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 3:44 PM, Andrew Bayer
wrote:
> I think that was a transient thing - I think Giri fixed the tools
> paths, but I could be wrong.
>
> A.
>
> On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 1:32 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
> > Ok, that's good to know.
> >
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 11:29 AM, Alexander Shraer wrote:
> Hmm. It doesn't really make sense to me - the reconfig should be completed
> before
> the servers come up and process new ops. We submitted the reconfig to
> server 1, it timed out
> on new quorum, but when 1 becomes leader again after 2
Hmm. It doesn't really make sense to me - the reconfig should be completed
before
the servers come up and process new ops. We submitted the reconfig to
server 1, it timed out
on new quorum, but when 1 becomes leader again after 2 restarts 1 should
complete the reconfig.
is 1 becoming leader after 2
Hm. I'm a bit concerned by something related to reconfig.
I see that "getConfig" and "reconfig" APIs were added to the ZooKeeper
client object. It seems that these should not be exposed to regular
users, rather just to administrators. What security controls have we
put in place around these apis?
Looks like 3 hasn't been removed (unfortunately the assertion doesn't
include any msg detail, but that's the way it looks to me like the
test is setup):
if (leavingServers != null) {
for (String leaving : leavingServers)
Assert.assertFalse(configStr.contains("server.".concat(l
Looks like 3 hasn't been removed (unfortunately the assertion doesn't
include any msg detail, but that's the way it looks to me like the
test is setup):
if (leavingServers != null) {
for (String leaving : leavingServers)
Assert.assertFalse(configStr.contains("server.".concat(l
Hi Patrick, I'm not sure why you're seeing this - it consistently passes on
my machine. In case you'd like to take a look, the test has tons of
comments explaining the scenario. Let me know how I can help.
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 9:53 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
> Hi Alex, I've also seen the test "
Hi Alex, I've also seen the test "testLeaderTimesoutOnNewQuorum" fail
multiple times (not every time, but ~50%, so flakey) in the last few
days. It's failing both on jdk6 and jdk7. (this is my personal
jenkins, I haven't see any other failures than this during the past
few days).
junit.framework.A
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1978?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14070479#comment-14070479
]
Patrick Hunt commented on ZOOKEEPER-1978:
-
Hi [~rakeshr], yes, your idea makes
Hi Rakesh,
Thanks for looking at this. In general even if we find the bug since we
should test it before committing a fix, it seems better to remove the test
for now and debug this on a build machine. I'm trying to get access to it.
Looking at this log:
https://builds.apache.org/view/S-Z/view/Zoo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1907?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14070381#comment-14070381
]
Hongchao Deng commented on ZOOKEEPER-1907:
--
SessionTrackerImpl.java still con
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1907?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14070328#comment-14070328
]
Hongchao Deng commented on ZOOKEEPER-1907:
--
[~rakeshr]
My jenkins job reporte
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1981?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14070143#comment-14070143
]
Hudson commented on ZOOKEEPER-1981:
---
FAILURE: Integrated in ZooKeeper-trunk #2382 (S
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1979?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14070142#comment-14070142
]
Hudson commented on ZOOKEEPER-1979:
---
FAILURE: Integrated in ZooKeeper-trunk #2382 (S
See https://builds.apache.org/job/ZooKeeper-trunk/2382/
###
## LAST 60 LINES OF THE CONSOLE
###
[...truncated 316691 lines...]
[junit] 2014-07-22 11:31:25,140 [myid:
See https://builds.apache.org/job/ZooKeeper-trunk-jdk8/85/
###
## LAST 60 LINES OF THE CONSOLE
###
[...truncated 325565 lines...]
[junit] 2014-07-22 11:07:01,056 [my
Hi Alex,
Yeah it is consistently passing in my machine also.
I have quickly gone through the testCurrentObserverIsParticipantInNewConfig
failure logs in PreCommit-ZOOKEEPER-Build. It looks like 2 (n.config
version) has not taken and still leader election is seeing 1 (n.config
See https://builds.apache.org/job/ZooKeeper-trunk-WinVS2008_java/782/
###
## LAST 60 LINES OF THE CONSOLE
###
[...truncated 300286 lines...]
[junit] 2014-07-22 11:28
See https://builds.apache.org/job/ZooKeeper-trunk-jdk7/922/
###
## LAST 60 LINES OF THE CONSOLE
###
[...truncated 326757 lines...]
[junit] 2014-07-22 10:27:42,615 [m
See https://builds.apache.org/job/ZooKeeper_branch33/1359/
###
## LAST 60 LINES OF THE CONSOLE
###
[...truncated 104605 lines...]
[junit] 2014-07-22 10:04:36,386 - I
See https://builds.apache.org/job/ZooKeeper-trunk-WinVS2008/1449/
###
## LAST 60 LINES OF THE CONSOLE
###
[...truncated 170 lines...]
.\src\zookeeper.c(2505): warning C4
See https://builds.apache.org/job/ZooKeeper-3.4-WinVS2008_java/537/
###
## LAST 60 LINES OF THE CONSOLE
###
[...truncated 173424 lines...]
[junit] 2014-07-22 10:11:3
See https://builds.apache.org/job/ZooKeeper_branch34/1025/
###
## LAST 60 LINES OF THE CONSOLE
###
[...truncated 211405 lines...]
[junit] 2014-07-22 08:55:11,854 [my
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1907?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14069914#comment-14069914
]
Hadoop QA commented on ZOOKEEPER-1907:
--
-1 overall. Here are the results of test
Jira: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1907
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-ZOOKEEPER-Build/2213/
###
## LAST 60 LINES OF THE CONSOLE
###
[
53 matches
Mail list logo
