[jira] [Created] (ZOOKEEPER-3494) No need to depend on netty-all (SSL)

Norbert Kalmar created ZOOKEEPER-3494: - Summary: No need to depend on netty-all (SSL) Key: ZOOKEEPER-3494 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-3494 Project: ZooKeeper Issu

[Request For Review] ZOOKEEPER-3474 a.k.a GH-1028

Hi zookeepers, Recently I've sent a pr[1] on enable checkstyle configuration on zookeeper-promethus-metrics, Enrico(committer) and Dinesh（contributor) kindly reviewed it but we still need another look from committer as process required. Someone of you has spare time to have a look? Besides, as ZO

Jenkins build became unstable: zookeeper-master-maven-jdk11 #81

See

Re: [Request For Review] ZOOKEEPER-3474 a.k.a GH-1028

Il giorno lun 5 ago 2019 alle ore 14:03 Zili Chen ha scritto: > Hi zookeepers, > > Recently I've sent a pr[1] on enable checkstyle configuration on > zookeeper-promethus-metrics, Enrico(committer) and Dinesh（contributor) > kindly reviewed it but we still need another look from committer as > proc

Jenkins build is still unstable: zookeeper-master-maven-jdk11 #82

See

Jenkins build became unstable: PreCommit-ZOOKEEPER-github-pr-build-maven #1058

See

Jenkins build is still unstable: zookeeper-master-maven-jdk12 #79

See

Jenkins build is still unstable: zookeeper-master-maven #366

See

Jenkins build is back to stable : PreCommit-ZOOKEEPER-github-pr-build-maven #1059

See

Jenkins build is still unstable: zookeeper-master-maven-jdk12 #80

See

ZooKeeper-trunk - Build # 648 - Failure

See https://builds.apache.org/job/ZooKeeper-trunk/648/ ### ## LAST 60 LINES OF THE CONSOLE ### [...truncated 193.36 KB...] [junit] Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors:

ZooKeeper_branch35_jdk8 - Build # 1496 - Failure

See https://builds.apache.org/job/ZooKeeper_branch35_jdk8/1496/ ### ## LAST 60 LINES OF THE CONSOLE ### [...truncated 67.37 KB...] [junit] Tests run: 1, Failures: 0,

Jenkins build is still unstable: zookeeper-master-maven #367

See

Jenkins build is still unstable: zookeeper-master-maven-jdk12 #81

See

Jenkins build is back to stable : zookeeper-master-maven-jdk11 #83

See

Re: Two Apache Zookeeper security vulnerabilities

Dear Patrick Hunt: I opened two issues in the JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-3488 and https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-3489 I am very sorry that I cannot reply https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ea0f515bcb994bae54e62584c2c659b83efa4d22e741d4b688c447

Jenkins build is back to stable : zookeeper-master-maven #368

See

Re: [Request For Review] ZOOKEEPER-3474 a.k.a GH-1028

Hi Enrico, Thanks for your participant! Running after turn on checkstyle on zookeeper-server it reports about 9000 checkstyle failures(see failures.txt[1]) among 596 files(see files.txt[1]). Most of them are related to whitespace and import. I think I can handle it with one or two whole days but

Re: [Request For Review] ZOOKEEPER-3474 a.k.a GH-1028

Il giorno mar 6 ago 2019 alle ore 03:51 Zili Chen ha scritto: > Hi Enrico, > > Thanks for your participant! > > Running after turn on checkstyle on zookeeper-server > it reports about 9000 checkstyle failures(see failures.txt[1]) > among 596 files(see files.txt[1]). Most of them > are related to

Re: Two Apache Zookeeper security vulnerabilities

Xiaoqin Il giorno mar 6 ago 2019 alle ore 03:25 Xiaoqin Fu ha scritto: > Dear Patrick Hunt: > I opened two issues in the JIRA: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-3488 and > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-3489 > I am very sorry that I cannot reply > > htt

Re: Two Apache Zookeeper security vulnerabilities

On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 10:17 PM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > Xiaoqin > > Il giorno mar 6 ago 2019 alle ore 03:25 Xiaoqin Fu > ha scritto: > > > Dear Patrick Hunt: > > I opened two issues in the JIRA: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-3488 and > > https://issues.apache.org/jira

Re: [Request For Review] ZOOKEEPER-3474 a.k.a GH-1028

>I see some javadoc related issues in your gist, >didn't we disable that rule ? JavadocType The failures reported are "Missing javadoc", and what we disabled is "Empty javadoc". Fair enough to disable "Missing javadoc" for now and filed into ZOOKEEPER-3469 since a empty javadoc is also a placehold