> >> Now:
> > >>
> > >> master
> > >> --
> > >> 3.7
> > >> 3.6
> > >> 3.5 LTS
> > >> --
> > >> 3.4 EoL
> > >>
> > >> Can be
at 10:29 AM Enrico Olivelli
wrote:
> Il Dom 30 Gen 2022, 17:51 Andrew Purtell ha
> scritto:
>
> > Previously in various contexts - specifically, I am thinking of a Hadoop
> > JIRA where we once had a conversation on this topic, but I believe there
> > have been oth
Previously in various contexts - specifically, I am thinking of a Hadoop JIRA
where we once had a conversation on this topic, but I believe there have been
others - you have declared 3.5 a long term stable (LTS) release.
A sudden EOL of an LTS is jarring and makes future promise of LTS
I assume remote viewers won't have to acknowledge a NDA digitally.
On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 11:27 AM Mohamed Jeelani wrote:
> Hello Ted, Sorry about the delayed response - there will be a standard NDA
> that all visitors sign to entire campus. I'll also follow-up offline with
> more information.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1000?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16844348#comment-16844348
]
Andrew Purtell commented on ZOOKEEPER-1000:
---
This is a dup of ZOOKEEPER-236 ? Should
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-3337?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrew Purtell updated ZOOKEEPER-3337:
--
Summary: Maven build failed with user or group id is too big (was: Maven
build
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-3337?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrew Purtell updated ZOOKEEPER-3337:
--
Description:
Maven assembly plugin configuration must specify tarLongFileMode
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-3337?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrew Purtell updated ZOOKEEPER-3337:
--
Description:
Maven assembly plugin configuration must specify tarLongFileMode
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-3337?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrew Purtell updated ZOOKEEPER-3337:
--
Attachment: ZOOKEEPER-3337-branch-3.4.patch
> Maven build failed with group
Andrew Purtell created ZOOKEEPER-3337:
-
Summary: Maven build failed with group id is too big
Key: ZOOKEEPER-3337
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-3337
Project: ZooKeeper
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2770?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16100852#comment-16100852
]
Andrew Purtell commented on ZOOKEEPER-2770:
---
>From the original patch the warning thresh
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2770?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16100706#comment-16100706
]
Andrew Purtell edited comment on ZOOKEEPER-2770 at 7/25/17 8:26 PM
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2770?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16100706#comment-16100706
]
Andrew Purtell edited comment on ZOOKEEPER-2770 at 7/25/17 8:23 PM
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2770?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16100706#comment-16100706
]
Andrew Purtell commented on ZOOKEEPER-2770:
---
The originally proposed change is hardly
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2770?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16081519#comment-16081519
]
Andrew Purtell commented on ZOOKEEPER-2770:
---
[~tdunning] It's pretty common in other
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2662?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15985094#comment-15985094
]
Andrew Purtell commented on ZOOKEEPER-2662:
---
The test looks good to me [~ckulkarni
ial crash bug described in the paper looks the same case as what's
> fixed by ZOOKEEPER-2247. The root cause is the same for both cases (quorum
> threads were not shutdown).
>
> On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 7:45 AM, Rakesh Radhakrishnan <rake...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > T
r has
partially crashed, it cannot propose any transactions, leading to an
indefinite write unavailability."
--
Best regards,
Andrew Purtell
apurt...@salesforce.com
apurt...@apache.org
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2662?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15858491#comment-15858491
]
Andrew Purtell commented on ZOOKEEPER-2662:
---
[~sanjeevln]
> Export a metric for txn
Andrew Purtell created ZOOKEEPER-2662:
-
Summary: Export a metric for txn log sync times
Key: ZOOKEEPER-2662
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2662
Project: ZooKeeper
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2642?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15740163#comment-15740163
]
Andrew Purtell commented on ZOOKEEPER-2642:
---
bq. although it is a bit odd to deprecate
m while the generated load is hitting the
quorum.
On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 7:15 AM, Rakesh Radhakrishnan <rake...@apache.org>
wrote:
> Thanks a lot Andrew Purtell for your time and comments.
>
> >>>>>I like how Hadoop programmatically builds the JAAS context from its
> &
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1045?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15627361#comment-15627361
]
Andrew Purtell commented on ZOOKEEPER-1045:
---
I posted details of a worked example to dev
I would like to relay a working example of a patched 3.4.9 ZK cluster
running on one host (without containers). I can confirm mutual SASL auth
among the quorum is required and enforced because when instances were
slightly misconfigured with incorrect principal strings they couldn't
participate in
Please
This looks really handy for implementing transient data structures.
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 5:53 AM, Jordan Zimmerman <
jor...@jordanzimmerman.com> wrote:
> Any chance of getting https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2169
> merged? It has:
>
> * A patch that’s been reviewed
> *
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2447?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15406347#comment-15406347
]
Andrew Purtell commented on ZOOKEEPER-2447:
---
Thanks [~vishk]. As Vishal is actively working
Do you have any sense of when a release post 3.4 will not be tagged alpha? We
really can't consider upgrading a production setting until this happens. What
are the gating factors?
> On Jul 1, 2016, at 5:23 AM, Flavio Junqueira wrote:
>
> Hi Luciano,
>
> The 3.4 branch is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2447?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15355708#comment-15355708
]
Andrew Purtell commented on ZOOKEEPER-2447:
---
bq. An alternative would be to roll out our own
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2447?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15355582#comment-15355582
]
Andrew Purtell commented on ZOOKEEPER-2447:
---
>From my point of view this is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2447?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrew Purtell updated ZOOKEEPER-2447:
--
Comment: was deleted
(was: This isn't an optimization, it's a fix for a multi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2424?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15281037#comment-15281037
]
Andrew Purtell commented on ZOOKEEPER-2424:
---
FWIW, HBase picked up Hadoop's JvmPauseMonitor
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1634?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15223419#comment-15223419
]
Andrew Purtell commented on ZOOKEEPER-1634:
---
*authenticaion enforcement
> A new feat
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1634?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15223418#comment-15223418
]
Andrew Purtell commented on ZOOKEEPER-1634:
---
You should read my comment as agreeing
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1634?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15223050#comment-15223050
]
Andrew Purtell commented on ZOOKEEPER-1634:
---
As much as I'd personally like to see a move
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1604?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15192495#comment-15192495
]
Andrew Purtell commented on ZOOKEEPER-1604:
---
You are not talking about anything to do
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1604?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15192465#comment-15192465
]
Andrew Purtell commented on ZOOKEEPER-1604:
---
[~eyang] your complaint seems to be with RedHat
Because different authentication mechanisms can be plugged in and are used on
demand when znodes are accessed according to whatever the ACL specifies, this
is why we opted to tunnel SASL auth within the zookeeper protocol instead of
wrap the entire connection when contributing this feature.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-832?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14136066#comment-14136066
]
Andrew Purtell commented on ZOOKEEPER-832:
--
If the zxid is not recognized
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1936?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrew Purtell reassigned ZOOKEEPER-1936:
-
Assignee: Andrew Purtell
Server exits when unable to create data directory
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1936?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrew Purtell updated ZOOKEEPER-1936:
--
Attachment: ZOOKEEPER-1936.patch
Attached patch applies to trunk and branch-3.4
ZOOKEEPER-1688
On Tuesday, April 22, 2014, Flavio Junqueira fpjunque...@yahoo.com wrote:
I've created ZK-1917 for this.
I think it is referring to the txn logs. If so, SSL encryption alone isn't
going to do it.
-Flavio
On 22 Apr 2014, at 18:55, Patrick Hunt ph...@apache.org javascript:;
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1917?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13978367#comment-13978367
]
Andrew Purtell commented on ZOOKEEPER-1917:
---
I took a stab at optionally
filesystem level permissions.
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 10:58 AM, Michi Mutsuzaki mi...@cs.stanford.eduwrote:
I'm all for encrypting txn logs/snapshots, but shouldn't we use some
existing file system encryption instead of implementing our own?
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 8:56 AM, Andrew Purtell apurt
!
--Michi
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 10:43 AM, Andrew Purtell apurt...@apache.org
wrote:
After ZOOKEEPER-1901, if building and testing with Java 1.8.0, then
branch-3.4 core Java tests are good:
java version 1.8.0
Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0-b132)
Java
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1901?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrew Purtell updated ZOOKEEPER-1901:
--
Attachment: ZOOKEEPER-1901-3.4.patch
Attached a patch for branch-3.4 also
Andrew Purtell created ZOOKEEPER-1901:
-
Summary: [JDK8] Sort children for comparison in AsyncOps tests
Key: ZOOKEEPER-1901
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1901
Project
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1901?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrew Purtell updated ZOOKEEPER-1901:
--
Attachment: ZOOKEEPER-1901.patch
[JDK8] Sort children for comparison in AsyncOps
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1901?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrew Purtell updated ZOOKEEPER-1901:
--
Priority: Minor (was: Major)
[JDK8] Sort children for comparison in AsyncOps
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1736?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13721330#comment-13721330
]
Andrew Purtell commented on ZOOKEEPER-1736:
---
Authentication
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1688?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrew Purtell updated ZOOKEEPER-1688:
--
Attachment: ZOOKEEPER-1688.patch
Attaching a patch that is suitable for review
Andrew Purtell created ZOOKEEPER-1688:
-
Summary: Transparent encryption of on-disk files
Key: ZOOKEEPER-1688
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1688
Project: ZooKeeper
(of HBase and from 3.4 branch), but because that timing
problem was latent only then.
On Wednesday, September 26, 2012, Patrick Hunt wrote:
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 8:44 AM, Andrew Purtell
apurt...@apache.orgjavascript:;
wrote:
Without ZOOKEEPER-1437 secure HBase is not functional in our
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1437?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13293835#comment-13293835
]
Andrew Purtell commented on ZOOKEEPER-1437:
---
review.cloudera.org
Andrew Purtell created ZOOKEEPER-1475:
-
Summary: Messages about missing JAAS configuration should not be
logged at WARN level
Key: ZOOKEEPER-1475
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1475
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1469?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13279818#comment-13279818
]
Andrew Purtell commented on ZOOKEEPER-1469:
---
I think this issue should
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1437?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13273580#comment-13273580
]
Andrew Purtell commented on ZOOKEEPER-1437:
---
I won't intrude on the design
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1437?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13273625#comment-13273625
]
Andrew Purtell commented on ZOOKEEPER-1437:
---
The RegionServers start
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1236?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13215994#comment-13215994
]
Andrew Purtell commented on ZOOKEEPER-1236:
---
Hadoop core also throws
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1159?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13106854#comment-13106854
]
Andrew Purtell commented on ZOOKEEPER-1159:
---
The patch provided
Components: java client
Affects Versions: 3.4.0
Reporter: Andrew Purtell
ClientCnxn does not always propagate session expiration indication up to
clients. If a reconnection attempt fails because the session has since expired,
the KeeperCode is still Disconnected, but shouldn't
Ya, I wondered about that too, esp given he mentions
(yes I'm aware that you can run Zookeeper in single server
mode from a single JAR file)
and Noah's stack requires (granted we require java):
Ruby
EventMachine/Sinatra/Ohm
Redis
Patrick
That was the dumbest thing I've read in a
, Andrew Purtell wrote:
Two ideas actually:
1) Do pretty straightforward log shipping from region master to read only
replicas.
I don't understand why you have to ship the log to the read only replicas.
Aren't you storing the log on HDFS currently? Can't they read from HDFS
directly?
2) Divide
62 matches
Mail list logo