Re: Pending issue for 3.6.0

2019-12-23 Thread Enrico Olivelli
o, > > I would also like to request ZOOKEEPER-3342. I just cleaned up the > latest PR. > > On Mon, Dec 23, 2019 at 11:17 AM Enrico Olivelli > wrote: > > > Hi folks, > > I am keeping an eye on issues that the community tagged with fixVersion = > > 3.6.0 >

Pending issue for 3.6.0

2019-12-23 Thread Enrico Olivelli
Hi folks, I am keeping an eye on issues that the community tagged with fixVersion = 3.6.0 This is the JIRA filter: https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20ZooKeeper%20%20and%20fixVersion%20%20%3D%203.6.0%20and%20resolution%20is%20EMPTY%20 We have 3 pending works: 1) https://is

Messy releasenotes.md file on master and on website

2019-12-19 Thread Enrico Olivelli
Hi, I am preparing release notes for 3.6.0, as branch-3.6 has been cut from master branch I found that releasenotes.mdtalk about ZooKeeper 3.0.0 !! https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/blob/master/zookeeper-docs/src/main/resources/markdown/releasenotes.md I found also that when I wrote the release

Re: NettyServerCnxnFactoryTest is failing consistently on my laptop

2019-12-16 Thread Enrico Olivelli
t; > > I will create a Jira ticket and take a look. Or if someone is already > > working on it, then please let me know... > > > > Cheers, > > Mate > > > > On Sat, Dec 14, 2019 at 8:24 PM Enrico Olivelli > > wrote: > > > >> Hey guys, > &

Branch-3.6 created - please ping me if you want to add commits

2019-12-15 Thread Enrico Olivelli
HI, I have moved to fixversion=3.7.0 all of the issues with fixversion = 3.6.0 and resolution = empty. Please add the '3.6.0' label to the issues that should go into 3.6.0. Candidates are: - blocker issues (regressions) - build environment issues - flaky tests - patches that are really ready

NettyServerCnxnFactoryTest is failing consistently on my laptop

2019-12-14 Thread Enrico Olivelli
Hey guys, I was going to create branch-3.6 but I see that one test is failing consistently on my Linux laptop (Fedora 30) with JDK8 and JDK13. Maybe the problem is related to the fact that I only have 2 core (as I can see in /proc/cpuinfo). In the exact point that the test is failing there is a 3

Re: Hadoop logo

2019-12-12 Thread Enrico Olivelli
+1 Maybe we should also check if we have old pages about Bookkeeper project. It was a subproject of ZK but now it is a (great) top level independent project Enrico Il gio 12 dic 2019, 16:38 Flavio Junqueira ha scritto: > ZooKeeper was a subproject of Hadoop in the early Apache days, and we > s

Re: ZK makes apache 2019 "top 5" projects

2019-12-11 Thread Enrico Olivelli
Yes, great. Please also note that Kafka and Lucene/Solr that are still listed in that list are using Zookeeper :) Enrico Il gio 12 dic 2019, 05:46 tison ha scritto: > Kudos! > > Best, > tison. > > > Patrick Hunt 于2019年12月12日周四 上午11:32写道: > > > This is really awesome, check it out: > > https

Re: Creating branch-3.6

2019-12-09 Thread Enrico Olivelli
her patches can go to 3.6.0 Once we have a branch-3.6 we can focus on consolidation, manual testing... I we continue to add patches we can't be sure the branch is very good shape before the release I really would like to have the first RC before Christmas Enrico > > Andor > > >

Re: Creating branch-3.6

2019-12-09 Thread Enrico Olivelli
lan, so I would go with 3.7.0. Btw We can change it at any time. Let's make one step at a time Thanks for bringing up the topic Enrico I think it's time to decide whether we want to do it or not. > > Regards, Tamaas > > On Mon, Dec 9, 2019 at 8:53 AM Enrico Olivelli >

Creating branch-3.6

2019-12-08 Thread Enrico Olivelli
Hi folks, I think it is time to create branch-3.6 and bump master to 3.7.0-SNAPSHOT This does not mean to release 3.6.0, we can still cherry pick patches from master brach. But it is time to start consolidating the branch and pick only important changes If no one objects I will proceed with this

Testing new release procedure

2019-12-01 Thread Enrico Olivelli
Hello folks, I feel I am ready with the new release procedure this is the wiki page: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=135860428 This is a little change (still work in progress) I need on master that makes it automatic to change the version inside the C client: http

[jira] [Created] (ZOOKEEPER-3635) Use Docker and Maven Release Plugin to prepare ZooKeeper releases

2019-11-29 Thread Enrico Olivelli (Jira)
Enrico Olivelli created ZOOKEEPER-3635: -- Summary: Use Docker and Maven Release Plugin to prepare ZooKeeper releases Key: ZOOKEEPER-3635 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-3635

Re: Releasing 3.6.0 - Pending Patches

2019-11-29 Thread Enrico Olivelli
nd extended his last PR). > > Please review this PR for ZOOKEEPER-2122: > > https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/1107 > > > > Cheers, > > Mate > > > > On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 12:22 AM Enrico Olivelli > > wrote: > > > > > I am taking a look to t

Re: Ant precommit job

2019-11-22 Thread Enrico Olivelli
Il giorno ven 22 nov 2019 alle ore 12:02 Enrico Olivelli < eolive...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > Hi, > We are seeing a weird behaviour of the GitHub Pull Request Builder on ASF > Jenkins: > > I am changing the "Commit Status Context" for the ANT based precommit

Re: Drop ANT build pull request

2019-11-22 Thread Enrico Olivelli
- not sure if needed) > Leaving the word to Micheal H Thank you Andor for helping with this housekeeping work Enrico > > Would you please confirm? > I’ll open new Jira tickets to cover these and also another one for the > crash-not-reported issue. > > Thanks, > Andor

Ant precommit job

2019-11-22 Thread Enrico Olivelli
Hi, We are seeing a weird behaviour of the GitHub Pull Request Builder on ASF Jenkins: I am changing the "Commit Status Context" for the ANT based precommit from "Jenkins" to "JenkinsAnt". Long story: we have two jobs: - one for ANT: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-ZOOKEEPER-github-pr-b

Re: Drop ANT build pull request

2019-11-21 Thread Enrico Olivelli
till reports as a green build: > >> > >> > https://builds.apache.org/view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/zookeeper-master-maven/521/ > >> > >> Andor > >> > >> > >> > >> > >>> On 2019. Nov 15., at 16:01, Enrico

Re: Java Modules

2019-11-20 Thread Enrico Olivelli
Mike, Il mer 20 nov 2019, 22:20 Mike Miller ha scritto: > Opening up a discussion about Zookeeper using Java Modules (JPMS) > introduced in Java 9. I noticed there was no Automatic-Module-Name set in > the Jar so I opened up a ticket: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-3625 > The

[jira] [Created] (ZOOKEEPER-3620) Do not use System.exit in server side code

2019-11-15 Thread Enrico Olivelli (Jira)
Enrico Olivelli created ZOOKEEPER-3620: -- Summary: Do not use System.exit in server side code Key: ZOOKEEPER-3620 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-3620 Project: ZooKeeper

Re: Drop ANT build pull request

2019-11-15 Thread Enrico Olivelli
One annoying problem is that I am not able to disable the ANT "precommit" for master branch https://builds.apache.org/view/ZK%20All/job/PreCommit-ZOOKEEPER-github-pr-build/ ideally it should run only for 3.4, maybe 3.5. Enrico Il giorno ven 15 nov 2019 alle ore 16:01 Enrico Olivell

Re: Drop ANT build pull request

2019-11-15 Thread Enrico Olivelli
cut the first version of > 3.6.0. > >> > >> Btw I noticed that the trunk build is completely broken since > >> > https://builds.apache.org/view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper-trunk/769/ > >> > >> It’s failing on Java versions since we intro

Release procedure for 3.6.0 - new ideas with maven release plugin

2019-11-11 Thread Enrico Olivelli
Hello, in 3.5 we did a great work (in particular Andor and Norbert) in order to mavenize our repository and current we are performing releases from 3.5 branch with Maven. For 3.6.0 I would like to try to enhance the procedure a bit and make it simpler, by using the Maven Release Plugin [1]. I am

Drop ANT build pull request

2019-11-11 Thread Enrico Olivelli
Hi community, I have just sent a PR to drop ANT from main build (not from recipes/contrib) and keep only Maven build. We are already releasing 3.5 branch with Maven, this is only the final step of this long story. Once we have only Maven it will be super easy to refactor the layout of the codebase

Re:

2019-10-28 Thread Enrico Olivelli
Il lun 28 ott 2019, 11:25 Andor Molnar ha scritto: > Nice work Fangmin, great detailed analysis. > Yep, great work. Can you link the jira about jdk11 and SO_LINGER ? > > > 2. Using OpenJDK version higher than 10, which has fixed the issue in > JDK-8207746 > > Java 9 & 10 are both non-LTS versio

Re: String inconsistency issue when running ZK with OpenJDK 10 on SKL machines

2019-10-28 Thread Enrico Olivelli
Fangmin, Il lun 28 ott 2019, 02:23 Fangmin Lv ha scritto: > Hey everyone, > > (Forgot to add subject in the previous email, resent with clear subject.) > > I'd like to share some weird inconsistency bugs we saw recently on prod, > the root cause and potential fixes of it. It took us around a mon

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: zookeeper-master-maven-owasp #202

2019-10-27 Thread Enrico Olivelli
Jackson again reported by OWASP jackson-databind-2.9.10.jar (pkg:maven/com.fasterxml.jacks on.core/jackson-databind@2.9.10, cpe:2.3:a:fasterxml:jackson:2.9.10:*:*:*:*:*:*:*, cpe:2.3:a:fasterxml:jackson-databind:2.9.10:*:*:*:*:*:*:*) : CVE-2019-16942, CVE-2019-16943, CVE-2019-17531 Enrico Il

Re: It is necessary to backport ZOOKEEPER-3104 to branch-3.4

2019-10-22 Thread Enrico Olivelli
Il mer 23 ott 2019, 04:53 殷芳玺 ha scritto: > Hi,Norbert > > > Great ! > > !n my personal opinion, ZOOKEEPER-3104 backport should be necessary before > 3.4 EOL. > > Zookeeper 3.4 is widely used in industry. Any known critical issues > should be fixed before its EOL. > Sure > > Data consistency i

[RELEASE] Apache ZooKeeper 3.5.6 released

2019-10-19 Thread Enrico Olivelli
The Apache ZooKeeper team is proud to announce Apache ZooKeeper version 3.5.6 ZooKeeper is a high-performance coordination service for distributed applications. It exposes common services - such as naming, configuration management, synchronization, and group services - in a simple interface so you

[RESULT] [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.5.6 candidate 4

2019-10-15 Thread Enrico Olivelli
will finish the release procedure, artifacts will be available in the next few hours. Enrico Olivelli Il giorno mar 15 ott 2019 alle ore 23:53 Flavio Junqueira ha scritto: > +1 > > - Built from sources > - Validated digest and signature for sources tar.gz > - Verified that

Re: CI jobs broken - newd upgrade to Maven 3.6.2

2019-10-15 Thread Enrico Olivelli
newd upgrade to Maven 3.6.2 > Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2019 09:28:18 -0700 > > I went to look but it looks like it's already updated? Any reason why > we > aren't just using "maven 3 (latest)"? > > Patrick > > On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 3:21 AM Enrico Olivel

CI jobs broken - newd upgrade to Maven 3.6.2

2019-10-15 Thread Enrico Olivelli
Hello, Infra dropped Maven 3.6.0 from jenkins slaves. We should switch to 3.6.2. I will do it this afternoon (within 3-4 hours). Anyone with write access to the config can change it anf unblock pulp requests validation Enrico

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.5.6 candidate 4

2019-10-13 Thread Enrico Olivelli
e just fine with java 8. > > > > >> > > > > >> Note dep check is failing again however: > > > > >> > > > > >> jackson-databind-2.9.10.jar > > > > >> (pkg:maven/com.fasterxml.jackson.core/jackson-databind@2.9.10, > >

Re: New feature in 3.5: Audit logging

2019-10-12 Thread Enrico Olivelli
Il ven 11 ott 2019, 23:48 Patrick Hunt ha scritto: > Per recent discussions we should really push for 3.6+, esp given lessons > learned from 3.5 and the plan to get 3.6stable out there quickly. > > Is there a strong reason for 3.5? What are the implications of 3.5, ie does > it break b/w compat o

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.5.6 candidate 4

2019-10-09 Thread Enrico Olivelli
ays I think we should get this one next time > around vs re-re... spinning the rc. What do you think? > Agreed. And as we are doing a very limited use of Jackson we can look for a replacement Enrico > > Patrick > > > On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 1:46 PM Enrico Olivelli > wrote:

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.5.6 candidate 4

2019-10-09 Thread Enrico Olivelli
Il mer 9 ott 2019, 18:09 Andor Molnar ha scritto: > I hope we don’t have to create another RC because of this… > I can simply delete those files if needed Enrico > > Andor > > > > > On 2019. Oct 9., at 18:08, Enrico Olivelli wrote: > > > > Il mer 9

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.5.6 candidate 4

2019-10-09 Thread Enrico Olivelli
> > Why do we generated SHA512 sums for the gpg signatures? > > Is that intentional? > Good catch. The build generated those files and I uploaded all of them to the staging area. It happens when you run mvn deploy -Papache-release I felt they are desirable. I will start another ema

[VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.5.6 candidate 4

2019-10-08 Thread Enrico Olivelli
e release this candidate? Enrico Olivelli

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.5.6 candidate 3

2019-10-07 Thread Enrico Olivelli
ime an RC is cancelled because of the License files. > > Norbert > > > On Mon, Oct 7, 2019 at 3:13 PM Enrico Olivelli > wrote: > > > Andor, Norbert, > > I have fixed the tag > > https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/commits/release-3.5.6-rc3 > > > >

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.5.6 candidate 3

2019-10-07 Thread Enrico Olivelli
ch is a master-only commit with Jira id: > > ZOOKEEPER-3532 (docker stuff). > > > > It should point to the latest commit on branch-3.5.6 instead: 3433841c > > > > (I’ll change my vote to +1 once the tag is fixed.) > > > > Andor > > > > > > > &

[VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.5.6 candidate 3

2019-10-05 Thread Enrico Olivelli
e release this candidate? Enrico Olivelli

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.5.6 candidate 2

2019-10-05 Thread Enrico Olivelli
tory and > > > > > ClientCnxnSocketNetty) > > > > > > > > available > > > > > OR remove these classes from the codebase? > > > > > > > > > > The latter means we’ll drop client SSL feature too. > > > > > > > >

Re: Removing Netty support from branch-3.4

2019-10-04 Thread Enrico Olivelli
The release branch 3.4 is frozen and we should cut new releases only for important security reasons or other important issues for users that cannot upgrade to 3.5. Given that 3.5 is now the suggested version and the upgrade path is simple I think there is no need to put effort into this activity.

Re: Releasing 3.6.0 - Pending Patches

2019-10-02 Thread Enrico Olivelli
I am taking a look to those patches. I feel we are not in hurry in adding other stuff, 3.6.0 is already a greate feature release. I hope we will start to cut release more often so if a feature can't be delivered it only has to wait for the next train Enrico Il mer 2 ott 2019, 16:00 David Mollito

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New ZooKeeper committer: Brian Nixon

2019-10-02 Thread Enrico Olivelli
Yeah, congrats Brian, welcome aboard ! Enrico Il giorno mer 2 ott 2019 alle ore 11:15 Zili Chen ha scritto: > Congratulations Brian! > > Best, > tison. > > > Andor Molnar 于2019年10月2日周三 下午5:11写道: > > > The Apache ZooKeeper PMC recently extended committer karma to Brian and > he > > has accepted

Re: Releasing 3.6.0 - ALPHA or not ?

2019-10-02 Thread Enrico Olivelli
> > >> > > >> > > >>> I don't know any change that would justify an "alpha" version, so > > maybe a > > >>> beta would be better? But I'm also just fine releasing just "3.6.0". > > >> Bugfix > &g

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.5.6 candidate 2

2019-10-01 Thread Enrico Olivelli
ta" modifiers is > > not a bad thing alone, as long as it doesn't take years to get to the > > stable release. > > > > Andor > > > > > > On Tue, 1 Oct 2019, Enrico Olivelli wrote: > > > > > Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2019 10:54:24 +0200 >

Releasing 3.6.0 - ALPHA or not ?

2019-10-01 Thread Enrico Olivelli
Hi, We are close to a release for 3.6.0, currently master branch is full of important features and important refactors. On the VOTE thread for 3.5.6 it came out that we could release 3.6.0 as "ALPHA", here are my thoughts. I think we have at least these kind of "users": - Companies that run the S

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.5.6 candidate 2

2019-10-01 Thread Enrico Olivelli
to 3.4 afaict. > > > > Patrick > > > > On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 1:08 PM Patrick Hunt wrote: > > > >> I'll work on it today. > >> > >> Patrick > >> > >> On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 11:59 AM Enrico Olivelli > >> wrote: &

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.5.6 candidate 2

2019-09-30 Thread Enrico Olivelli
; failing with: > >> > >> [ERROR] netty-transport-4.1.29.Final.jar: CVE-2019-16869 > >> > >> I ran this on trunk and it's passing, as such it must be an issue with > the > >> the 3.5.6 netty version specifically. It's listed as a high, we s

[VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.5.6 candidate 2

2019-09-29 Thread Enrico Olivelli
candidate? Enrico Olivelli

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.5.6 candidate 1

2019-09-29 Thread Enrico Olivelli
; Github just bought semmle and is offering "automated security fixes" - > > should we turn this github feature on and give it a try? > > > > https://help.github.com/en/articles/configuring-automated-security-fixes > > > > Patrick > > > >

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.5.6 candidate 1

2019-09-26 Thread Enrico Olivelli
t would be to upgrade Jackson libs again? > > Sorry about that. > > Andor > > > > > > On 2019. Sep 26., at 17:38, Patrick Hunt wrote: > > > > On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 3:50 AM Enrico Olivelli > wrote: > > > >> Hi folks, > >> all th

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.5.6 candidate 1

2019-09-26 Thread Enrico Olivelli
Hi folks, all the community is invited to test this release candidate and we need at least three binding VOTEs Best regards Enrico Il giorno lun 23 set 2019 alle ore 11:22 Enrico Olivelli < eolive...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > Links to the details: > https://github.com/FasterXML/jack

Re: issue from ZooKeeper 3.5.0

2019-09-25 Thread Enrico Olivelli
Hi Wei Gao, The configuration file is expected to change only with an explicit operation/client request. You can have a fully working cluster of 5 servers with only 3 servers up and running, you must not change the configuration files. Can you tell more about your use case? Enrico Il mer 25 set

Re: PoweredBy Zookeeper

2019-09-24 Thread Enrico Olivelli
public and > free. welcome scrutiny. 1.2 The documentation has a declaration about > intellectual property rights and privacy.2 If you have a use case, please > do not hesitate, submit a pull request or write an email to ** > dev@zookeeper.apache.org** > > - Original

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.5.6 candidate 1

2019-09-23 Thread Enrico Olivelli
2.9.9.3: > > > > > > > https://builds.apache.org/view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper-trunk-owasp/493/artifact/build/test/owasp/dependency-check-report.html > > > > If I’m not mistaken. > > > > Andor > > > > > > > > > On 201

Re: maven command to run a specific test in a test case.

2019-09-20 Thread Enrico Olivelli
Il ven 20 set 2019, 23:54 Patrick Hunt ha scritto: > fwiw you can also address that by cd'ing into "zookeeper-server" directory > (the one with the test) and just run: > > mvn test -Dtest=UnifiedServerSocketTest > This is usually the best option. Btw aren't you using an IDE ? With ant it was

[VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.5.6 candidate 1

2019-09-20 Thread Enrico Olivelli
candidate? Enrico Olivelli

[jira] [Created] (ZOOKEEPER-3552) Source tarbal for branch-3.5 does not set execution permissions to "configure" file

2019-09-19 Thread Enrico Olivelli (Jira)
Enrico Olivelli created ZOOKEEPER-3552: -- Summary: Source tarbal for branch-3.5 does not set execution permissions to "configure" file Key: ZOOKEEPER-3552 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.5.6 candidate 0

2019-09-19 Thread Enrico Olivelli
I am cancelling this vote now. I am not sure I have time to send the fix today neither tomorrow. Stay tuned Enrico Il mer 18 set 2019, 10:56 Enrico Olivelli ha scritto: > > > Il mer 18 set 2019, 00:09 Patrick Hunt ha scritto: > >> -1 - I'm afraid the source

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.5.6 candidate 0

2019-09-18 Thread Enrico Olivelli
eper-3.5.6] $ ls -la > zookeeper-client/zookeeper-client-c/configure > -rw-r--r-- 1 phunt staff 655375 Sep 16 13:18 > zookeeper-client/zookeeper-client-c/configure > > this fixed it in the sense I could build successfully: > chmod a+x zookeeper-client/zookeeper-client-c/configure &

[VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.5.6 candidate 0

2019-09-16 Thread Enrico Olivelli
candidate? Enrico Olivelli

Re: Cutting Zookeeper 3.5.6

2019-09-16 Thread Enrico Olivelli
due to that BookKeeper > issue, although I’d love to see BookKeeper working nicely with ZK 3.5. > > This is true, I will try to send the VOTE email tonight. Please experiment with branch-3.5.6 if you have time Thank you for checking Enrico > Regards, > Andor > > > &g

Re: Cutting Zookeeper 3.5.6

2019-09-16 Thread Enrico Olivelli
3.5 > Thanks Enrico! > > On Sat, Sep 14, 2019 at 5:49 PM Enrico Olivelli > wrote: > > > Too quick: > > I see we have a "LICENSES" files issue, we changed netty dependency from > > netty-all to separate bundles. > > > > I think we must have sep

Ant precommit sometimes kicks in for PRs against master branch

2019-09-14 Thread Enrico Olivelli
Hello, I can't find a reason why the precommit job with Ant sometimes starts checking pull requests against "master" branch. It is explicitly blacklisted https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-ZOOKEEPER-github-pr-build @Committers anyhow do not consider failures for ant based builds on master, w

[jira] [Created] (ZOOKEEPER-3545) Fix LICENSE files for netty dependency

2019-09-14 Thread Enrico Olivelli (Jira)
Enrico Olivelli created ZOOKEEPER-3545: -- Summary: Fix LICENSE files for netty dependency Key: ZOOKEEPER-3545 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-3545 Project: ZooKeeper

Re: Cutting Zookeeper 3.5.6

2019-09-14 Thread Enrico Olivelli
9.44 netty-transport-native-epoll-4.1.29.Final.jar -rw-r--r--. 1 eolivelli eolivelli 31171 30 ago 19.44 netty-transport-native-unix-common-4.1.29.Final.jar Il giorno sab 14 set 2019 alle ore 16:42 Enrico Olivelli < eolive...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > branch-3.5.6 is good to go now. &

Re: Cutting Zookeeper 3.5.6

2019-09-14 Thread Enrico Olivelli
branch-3.5.6 is good to go now. I am preparing the release artifacts now. I hope I won't find any other show stopper on my way Enrico Il giorno ven 6 set 2019 alle ore 17:45 Enrico Olivelli ha scritto: > Hi, > I have moved all of the pending issue for 3.5.6 to 3.5.7. > > I

PoweredBy Zookeeper

2019-09-13 Thread Enrico Olivelli
Hi, Maoling started this initiative to have a great Zookeeper use cases page: https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/1073 I think this is a good idea, but before 'approving' that change I feel we must discuss more about it. The major point for me is whether we should ask for consent for publish

Re: [RFR] ZOOKEEPER-3290: Throw detailed KeeperException when multi-op failed

2019-09-12 Thread Enrico Olivelli
Zili, Thank you for driving this. We must ensure that that change does not break 100% compatibility with 3.4 client. The best way to prove it is to setup some integration test that tests a compatibility matrix, it will be an huge work. In absence of that facility we need some Jute expert to revi

Re: Flaky test X509UtilTest.testClientRenegotiationFails ?

2019-09-11 Thread Enrico Olivelli
fter those commits I am close to sending the VOTE email for 3.5.6 Cheers Enrico Il giorno mer 11 set 2019 alle ore 17:56 Enrico Olivelli < eolive...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > I have re run again the tests with jdk8 + MacOs without problem. > > The Linux box in which I have problems has

[jira] [Created] (ZOOKEEPER-3542) X509UtilTest#testClientRenegotiationFails is flay on JDK8 + linux on machines with 2 cores

2019-09-11 Thread Enrico Olivelli (Jira)
Enrico Olivelli created ZOOKEEPER-3542: -- Summary: X509UtilTest#testClientRenegotiationFails is flay on JDK8 + linux on machines with 2 cores Key: ZOOKEEPER-3542 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse

Re: Flaky test X509UtilTest.testClientRenegotiationFails ?

2019-09-11 Thread Enrico Olivelli
I have re run again the tests with jdk8 + MacOs without problem. The Linux box in which I have problems has only 2 cores, maybe such problem is only with machines with a small number of cores Enrico Il giorno mer 11 set 2019 alle ore 15:27 Enrico Olivelli < eolive...@gmail.com> ha scritto

Re: Flaky test X509UtilTest.testClientRenegotiationFails ?

2019-09-11 Thread Enrico Olivelli
t (build 1.8.0_222-b10) > Eclipse OpenJ9 VM (build openj9-0.15.1, JRE 1.8.0 Mac OS X amd64-64-Bit > Compressed References 20190717_298 (JIT enabled, AOT enabled) > OpenJ9 - 0f66c6431 > OMR - ec782f26 > JCL - f147086df1 based on jdk8u222-b10) > > Andor > > > &g

Re: Start 3.5.6 release procedure

2019-09-10 Thread Enrico Olivelli
gt; > Awesome! > > > > > > > On 2019. Sep 9., at 19:03, Enrico Olivelli > wrote: > > > > > > Hi folks, > > > I am creating the branch for 3.5.6 release. > > > > > > I am also enhancing the script of the procedure > > >

Re: Flaky test X509UtilTest.testClientRenegotiationFails ?

2019-09-10 Thread Enrico Olivelli
8.40.0.25- > CA-linux64) (build 1.8.0_222-b10)OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (Zulu > 8.40.0.25-CA-linux64) (build 25.222-b10, mixed mode) > I run X509UtilTest multiple times, but never failed. > Andor > > -Original Message-From: Enrico Olivelli Re > ply-To: dev@zookeep

Re: Flaky test X509UtilTest.testClientRenegotiationFails ?

2019-09-10 Thread Enrico Olivelli
Keeper-Find-Flaky-Tests/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/report.html > > Andor > > > > > On 2019. Sep 9., at 21:54, Enrico Olivelli wrote: > > > > Hi, > > I am testing on branch-3.5.6, I see that this test is very flaky on JDK8 > > (1.8.0_222 on Linux) >

Flaky test X509UtilTest.testClientRenegotiationFails ?

2019-09-09 Thread Enrico Olivelli
Hi, I am testing on branch-3.5.6, I see that this test is very flaky on JDK8 (1.8.0_222 on Linux) X509UtilTest.testClientRenegotiationFails I see the test passing consistently on JDK12 does anyone ever see this kind of problem ? I am investigating, but any help will be very appreciated Enrico

Start 3.5.6 release procedure

2019-09-09 Thread Enrico Olivelli
Hi folks, I am creating the branch for 3.5.6 release. I am also enhancing the script of the procedure https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ZOOKEEPER/HowToRelease+using+maven I would like to make practice this time for this release and prepare our way to do most of the work using scripts fo

Re: Fixing 3.5 CI jobs

2019-09-08 Thread Enrico Olivelli
wanted to keep compatibility I feel I can cut the 3.5.6 branch as soon as CI is back to green (blue for Jenkins :-) ) Enrico Il giorno dom 8 set 2019 alle ore 09:36 Enrico Olivelli ha scritto: > Hello, > CI for 3.5 is broken. > Findbugs is no more supported on ASF jenkins, and the C cl

[jira] [Created] (ZOOKEEPER-3539) Fix branch-3.5 after upgrade on ASF CI

2019-09-08 Thread Enrico Olivelli (Jira)
Enrico Olivelli created ZOOKEEPER-3539: -- Summary: Fix branch-3.5 after upgrade on ASF CI Key: ZOOKEEPER-3539 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-3539 Project: ZooKeeper

Fixing 3.5 CI jobs

2019-09-08 Thread Enrico Olivelli
Hello, CI for 3.5 is broken. Findbugs is no more supported on ASF jenkins, and the C client does not build anymore due to an upgrade of gcc (or whatever else) I will send a PR soon. I want to see CI in good shape before cutting 3.5.6 Enrico

Re: Cutting Zookeeper 3.5.6

2019-09-06 Thread Enrico Olivelli
on in JIRA to > facilitate. LMK if there's more that you need. > > Patrick > > On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 10:59 AM Enrico Olivelli > wrote: > > > Can any PMC create the 3.5.7 version on JIRA please ? > > > > I have to move all of the issues targeted 3.5.6

[jira] [Created] (ZOOKEEPER-3532) Provide a docker-based environment to work on a known OS

2019-09-03 Thread Enrico Olivelli (Jira)
Enrico Olivelli created ZOOKEEPER-3532: -- Summary: Provide a docker-based environment to work on a known OS Key: ZOOKEEPER-3532 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-3532 Project

Re: ZooKeeper swag on RedBubble available

2019-09-03 Thread Enrico Olivelli
Super ! Enrico Il mar 3 set 2019, 10:57 Andor Molnar ha scritto: > Hi ZooKeeper fans, > > Get your favourite ZooKeeper swag today! :) > > > https://www.redbubble.com/people/comdev/works/40935715-apache-zookeeper?asc=u > > Best, > Andor > > >

Re: Problems with CI and branch-3.5

2019-09-02 Thread Enrico Olivelli
I have sent an email to bui...@apache.org in order to understand why findbugs it missing. If Infra doesn't support findbugs executable anymore I will send a PR to drop findbugs from ant based builds Enrico Il giorno lun 2 set 2019 alle ore 16:42 Enrico Olivelli ha scritto: > I did

Re: Problems with CI and branch-3.5

2019-09-02 Thread Enrico Olivelli
Andor > > > > > On 2019. Sep 2., at 14:54, Enrico Olivelli wrote: > > > > Hello folks, > > the road to 3.5.6 is harder than expected. > > We have CI problems on branch-3.5 that are blocking this PR from Micheal > to > > be merged. > > > &

Problems with CI and branch-3.5

2019-09-02 Thread Enrico Olivelli
Hello folks, the road to 3.5.6 is harder than expected. We have CI problems on branch-3.5 that are blocking this PR from Micheal to be merged. https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/1072 1) Maven: C client fails to compile, I guess it is due to an upgrade of gcc 2) Ant: the build fails, no "fin

Interesting article about recovery, citing Zookeeper

2019-08-31 Thread Enrico Olivelli
Hello, I found this article about fault recovery, it uses ZK as example https://twitter.com/heidiann360/status/1167137352780636160?s=19 Maybe you have already read it Cheers Enrico

Subscribing to security@

2019-08-30 Thread Enrico Olivelli
Hello, How can I subscribe to secur...@zookeeper.apache.org? There is no way to subscribe using committers self service app Enrico

Re: Cutting Zookeeper 3.5.6

2019-08-30 Thread Enrico Olivelli
intend to provide a patch, can you ? Enrico Il giorno ven 30 ago 2019 alle ore 19:11 Enrico Olivelli < eolive...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > I am preparing for the release. > It is the first time for me so I have to setup a bunch of things, like GPG > KEYS. > > The procedure

Re: Cutting Zookeeper 3.5.6

2019-08-30 Thread Enrico Olivelli
uring the weekend Enrico (1) https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ZOOKEEPER/HowToRelease+using+maven Il giorno ven 30 ago 2019 alle ore 13:43 Enrico Olivelli < eolive...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > > > Il ven 30 ago 2019, 02:56 Brian Nixon ha > scritto: > >> I ag

Re: Cutting Zookeeper 3.5.6

2019-08-30 Thread Enrico Olivelli
te, > > specifically, > > > to track all issues marked as "blocker" and to the target release. If > we > > > make use of that we can ensure no blockers before released. > > > > > > Best, > > > tison. > > > > > > >

Cutting Zookeeper 3.5.6

2019-08-29 Thread Enrico Olivelli
Hello, I am going to cut 3.5.6, if you have patches to cherry pick or you are aware of blocker issues for such release please tell me as soon as possible. I will start the procedure tomorrow Enrico

Re: ApacheCon'19 Berlin

2019-08-26 Thread Enrico Olivelli
Il lun 26 ago 2019, 13:53 Andor Molnar ha scritto: > Hey @dev folks, > > Who’s planning to attend the ApacheCon in Berlin, 22-24 October? > I will be there ! I hope we can meet Enrico > > Andor > > >

Re: ZK Jenkins not in good health

2019-08-25 Thread Enrico Olivelli
Patrick Il giorno dom 25 ago 2019 alle ore 04:16 Patrick Hunt ha scritto: > Hey folks. I reviewed the current jenkins ZK jobs and it's not looking very > good. Quite a number of failures across the board. Anyone committing > recently perhaps you could review? > > Flakey test in particular is fla

Re: [Request For Review] ZOOKEEPER-3474 a.k.a GH-1028

2019-08-17 Thread Enrico Olivelli
ly one invocation of the checkstyle plugin per module. Maybe we can just call the simple checkstyle.xml from the parent module of recipes and of contrib, but I did not try Enrico > Best, > tison. > > > Enrico Olivelli 于2019年8月18日周日 上午3:36写道: > > > We have merged this

Re: [Request For Review] ZOOKEEPER-3474 a.k.a GH-1028

2019-08-17 Thread Enrico Olivelli
e, as described above. > > Best, > tison. > > [1] https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/1049 > > > Enrico Olivelli 于2019年8月9日周五 下午11:13写道: > > > Il giorno ven 9 ago 2019 alle ore 16:45 Zili Chen > > ha > > scritto: > > > > > Hi Enrico, &g

Re: thoughts about extension to multi semantics

2019-08-17 Thread Enrico Olivelli
Il sab 17 ago 2019, 08:01 Ted Dunning ha scritto: > It definitely sounds like a nice feature. > > The important question is what is the actual importance after you multiply > it by the amount of usage it gets. > > For instance, I know that multi gets a bit of usage, but I would guess that > it ac

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >