Re: [b2g] App signing strategy: support developer signature

On 7 Aug 2014, at 2:52 am, Andy McKay wrote: > > On Aug 1, 2014, at 2:34 AM, Stéphanie Ouillon > wrote: >> For specific reasons detailed below [3], we need to support a signature >> model compatible with the Android model [4]. Until now, the Marketplace >> has been using the same tools/model.

Re: [b2g] Engineering Mode (aka "service menu")

So to summarise the security requirements &properties here: - Engineering mode will be disabled until the dialer (or other certified app) initiates the special web activity - Even with engineering mode enabled, only an app with the certified “engineering-mode” (or similar) permission can access

[b2g] 08/06/2014 Flame 319MB v2.1 Smoke Test Results - 60/63 tests passed, 1 new and 4 existing blockers

60 out of 63 tests passed for the 2014-08-06 Flame 319MB v2.1 Build. There is one new issue and four existing blockers that kept the smoketests from fully passing. Smoketest Results: Daily Smoke Test Logs: https://docs.google.com/a/qanalydocs.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AjRc6aVFoOW9dGZLdVdiWGZLbVd

Re: [b2g] qa-approval flag for indicating when QA signoff is needed before landing or uplift

> Does this require changing the various automatic uplift queries on the > B2G Landing page? It sounds to me like qa-approval?/- should equate to > NO_UPLIFT on the whiteboard, but unset or + are OK for business as usual? Yeah, we need to do that. The process you describe matches my understanding

Re: [b2g] Application scopes

On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 12:09 PM, James Burke wrote: > Then a bunch of product pages that are not really needed for use of the app > once it is installed: > > * pwm.com/features.html - in depth feature survey. > * pwm.com/help.html - could be a help forum/support that changes often . > * pwm.com/co

[b2g] 08/06/2014 Flame 319MB v2.0 Smoke Test Results - 61/63 tests passed, 1 new and 1 existing blocker

61 out of 63 tests passed for the 2014-08-06 Flame 319MB v2.0 Build. There is one new issue and one existing blocker that kept the smoketests from fully passing. Smoketest Results: Daily Smoke Test Logs: https://docs.google.com/a/qanalydocs.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AjRc6aVFoOW9dGZLdVdiWGZLbV

Re: [b2g] Flame phone documentation, running adb as root

Just FYI, in WebIDE, there are buttons to root the phone when it's possible. In Runtime > Runtime Info. We use run ADB for the user, and run scripts to root ADB server side. Asa Dotzler wrote: > On 8/6/14, 9:15 AM, Josh Aas wrote: > >I got a Flame phone and wanted to update it to 2.0 nightly so I

Re: [b2g] Flame phone documentation, running adb as root

I'm a little confused by some of your statments. Whether you flash the base image as the root user or as a regular user will have NO impact on how adbd runs on the phone. Running commands using sudo on the build machine only affects access to the devices on the build machine. "adb root" rel

Re: [b2g] Flame phone documentation, running adb as root

On 6 Aug 2014, at 20:32, Asa Dotzler wrote: > On 8/6/14, 9:15 AM, Josh Aas wrote: >> I got a Flame phone and wanted to update it to 2.0 nightly so I could >> test/dogfood. Last week I couldn't figure out how to do that via the >> Flame home page, but someone has since added instructions. Thanks

Re: [b2g] Flame phone documentation, running adb as root

On 8/6/14, 9:15 AM, Josh Aas wrote: I got a Flame phone and wanted to update it to 2.0 nightly so I could test/dogfood. Last week I couldn't figure out how to do that via the Flame home page, but someone has since added instructions. Thanks to whoever did that! https://developer.mozilla.org/en-U

Re: [b2g] Application scopes

On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 11:27 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote: > On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 7:51 PM, James Burke wrote: > > The use case is a site that has app-like functionality for offline, but > has > > product pages that are not tied to that app, and the app does not know > how > > to navigate to them on

Re: [b2g] Adding APN in Gaia

Hi, For adding the APN into the AOSP database, I have also raised an issue in AOSP(1). I hope Rabbi would work on the AOSP database also for submitting the patch. Regarding verification, I hope to add as much info I can at the comment of the bug. I would be glad if I have been added into the QA con

Re: [b2g] Adding APN in Gaia

Hi there, On 5 August 2014 17:53, Safwan Rahman wrote: > Thank you all for replying. Most of the fact is cleared by the Rabbi > Hossain. Regarding the verification, I can provide official source from the > operators' Website. So is it enough evidence to verify it? Also can provide > operators' cu

Re: [b2g] Adding APN in Gaia

Hi there, On 5 August 2014 17:42, Rabbi Hossain wrote: > Thanks Safwan for raising this issue and thanks Jaoo for explaining. As Jaoo > said that APN changes in AOSP needs to be confirmed by carriers, I believe > it will take ages to merge those changes. Actually it won't. We have made several c

Re: [b2g] App signing strategy: support developer signature

On Aug 1, 2014, at 2:34 AM, Stéphanie Ouillon wrote: > For specific reasons detailed below [3], we need to support a signature > model compatible with the Android model [4]. Until now, the Marketplace > has been using the same tools/model. > > If we're to support developer signing, we can imagin

[b2g] 08/06/2014 Flame Gaia-ui Automation v2.1 Mozilla RIL Build 38/39 smoketests, 80/84 non-smoketests

*Smoketests:* * Test failures - 0 replicable manually:* * test_settings_bluetooth.py - commit https://github.com/mozilla-b2g/gaia/commit/8ae2cd8e9310a6b55f18e091fe0a512ec307ce17 is not in the current build. It will pass in the next build, as I ran the test using a tinderbox build and i

Re: [b2g] Future of packaged apps

On Aug 6, 2014 1:07 AM, "Tobie Langel" wrote: > > On Aug 6, 2014, at 8:50, Jonas Sicking wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 4:12 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > >> On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 2:17 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > >>> On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 8:28 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote: > Howev

[b2g] Flame phone documentation, running adb as root

I got a Flame phone and wanted to update it to 2.0 nightly so I could test/dogfood. Last week I couldn't figure out how to do that via the Flame home page, but someone has since added instructions. Thanks to whoever did that! https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/Firefox_OS/Developer_phone_guide/Fla

[b2g] 08/06/2014 Flame Gaia-ui Automation v2.0 Mozilla RIL Build 38/38 smoketests, 80/82 non-smoketests

*Smoketests:* * Test failures - 0 replicable manually:* * None *Expected failures / disabled tests:* * [Disabled] test_setup_and_send_active_sync_email.py - *Bug 1028192* -Problems with ActiveSync accounts * [Disabled] test_receive

Re: [b2g] Flash Firefox OS on Tablet

Unfortunately, no. A good deal of 1.4 bugs are fixed in 2.0 or 2.1. - Josh On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 12:13 AM, KAMI911 KAMI911 wrote: > Hi, > > Is it worth to report bugs against version 1.4? > > > > Üdvözlettel / Best Regards: > > Kálmán (KAMI) Szalai > > > 2014-08-03 20:11 GMT+02:00 adit bhara

[b2g] 08/06/2014 Dolphin 1.4 Mozilla RIL Smoke Test Results - 48/48 tests passed, 0 blocker

48 out of 48 tests passed for the 2014-08-06 Dolphin V1.4 Mozilla RIL Build. Mozilla RIL Build Smoketest Results: Moztrap test result link: https://moztrap.mozilla.org/results/cases/?filter-run=4944 Moztrap test run link: https://moztrap.mozilla.org/runtests/run/4944/env/27895/ New Bugs B

Re: [b2g] New feature: Memory-mapped array buffer for XHR response

Thank you for mentioning this, and I hope to hear more thoughts from you(as well as other people), so we can update the wiki page to recommend how to make best use of this feature. As my understanding, the difference will be: 1. One time I/O(memory-allocated buffer) 2. Spreaded I/O(memory-ma

Re: [b2g] ZTE Open C: Can't see own phone number on FFOS 2.1 build, for sending to others.

Bug filed https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1049374 *-- Bitmessage me* *BM-2D97QV3Y4VRfjayrWahqE61XKuQw6dJvj6* On 6 August 2014 16:05, Rewarp wrote: > I will file one. Thanks for the clarification. > > > *--Bitmessage me* > *BM-2D97

Re: [b2g] Future of packaged apps

On Aug 6, 2014, at 8:50, Jonas Sicking wrote: > On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 4:12 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: >> On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 2:17 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: >>> On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 8:28 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote: However if we can enable developers to sign their own application

Re: [b2g] ZTE Open C: Can't see own phone number on FFOS 2.1 build, for sending to others.

I will file one. Thanks for the clarification. *--Bitmessage me* *BM-2D97QV3Y4VRfjayrWahqE61XKuQw6dJvj6* On 6 August 2014 15:44, Julien Wajsberg wrote: > > Le 06/08/2014 09:29, Rewarp a écrit : > > In Settings > Devices, it says number unknown. >> >> That said, how w

Re: [b2g] ZTE Open C: Can't see own phone number on FFOS 2.1 build, for sending to others.

Le 06/08/2014 09:29, Rewarp a écrit : In Settings > Devices, it says number unknown. That said, how would I go about sending my phone number and contact to another phone via FFOS? Knowing your own number depends on your SIM, looks like your SIM doesn't have this information. As far as I kno

[b2g] ZTE Open C: Can't see own phone number on FFOS 2.1 build, for sending to others.

In Settings > Devices, it says number unknown. That said, how would I go about sending my phone number and contact to another phone via FFOS? -- *--Bitmessage me* *BM-2D97QV3Y4VRfjayrWahqE61XKuQw6dJvj6* ___ dev-b2g mailing lis