The W3C is proposing a revised charter for:
Second Screen Presentation Working Group
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-new-work/2014Jul/0001.html
http://www.w3.org/2014/secondscreen/charter-draft.html
deadline for comments: September 12 (this Friday!)
Mozilla has the opportunity
On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 8:13 PM, Eric Rescorla e...@rtfm.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 1:32 AM, Henri Sivonen hsivo...@hsivonen.fi wrote:
On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 6:06 PM, Eric Rescorla e...@rtfm.com wrote:
On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 11:45 PM, Henri Sivonen hsivo...@hsivonen.fi
wrote:
On Fri,
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 9:09 AM, L. David Baron dba...@dbaron.org wrote:
The W3C is proposing a revised charter for:
Second Screen Presentation Working Group
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-new-work/2014Jul/0001.html
http://www.w3.org/2014/secondscreen/charter-draft.html
(At
Hi Henri,
So different that I wonder if the cases belong in the same spec.
The answer is yes.
There are two cases to be covered by presentation API -
One UA:
1. (having another screen to push pixels to)
2. ex: Local UA can display the video via HDMI / WiFi Display / Air Play to
Remote
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 1:25 PM, Marco Chen mc...@mozilla.com wrote:
What's the relationship of the expected work of this new group to
DIAL? Has DIAL been abandoned? How is this work expected to improve on
DIAL?
Please refer to [1], one member from netflix suggested to extend DIAL for
two UA
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 2:09 AM, Henri Sivonen hsivo...@hsivonen.fi wrote:
On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 8:13 PM, Eric Rescorla e...@rtfm.com wrote:
Sure, I think there are some reasonable cases. Say that a site asks to
take your picture for the purpose of displaying an avatar. So you give it
Hi Henri,
Please refer to the 2.2 Out of Scope from [1].
It noted that This Working Group will not define or mandate network protocols
for sharing content between user agents and secondary displays.
Therefore the idea of leveraging and extending DIAL will not be the scope of
this WG.
And
On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 3:44 PM, James Graham ja...@hoppipolla.co.uk wrote:
Yes, I agree too. One option I had considered was making a suite
web-platform-tests-mozilla for things that we can't push upstream e.g.
because the APIs aren't (yet) undergoing meaningful standardisation.
Putting the
On 9/10/14 2:09 AM, Henri Sivonen wrote:
Chrome auto-decides whether the grant is persistent based on whether
the URL is http or https.
Whoa. That's non-obvious and creepy. As a user, I find it creepy for
an UI that looks like a one-time grant to actually do a persistent
grant.
Indeed. I
On 2014-09-10, at 16:38, Justin Dolske dol...@mozilla.com wrote:
It's particularly egregious on Google Maps... The maps.google.com site
redirects tohttps://google.com/maps, which means using geolocation on Google
Maps in Chrome will automatically allow geolocation for all of google.com. I
Summary: The 'object-fit' and 'object-position' properties allow web
developers to customize how a replaced element's content gets scaled and
positioned to fit the element's content-box. (i.e. how an image or a
video gets scaled/positioned inside of an img/video tag) The
'object-fit' property lets
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 5:03 PM, Daniel Holbert dholb...@mozilla.com wrote:
Summary: The 'object-fit' and 'object-position' properties allow web
developers to customize how a replaced element's content gets scaled and
positioned to fit the element's content-box. (i.e. how an image or a
video
On 09/10/2014 05:26 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
Yes!
Do we have a sense for how supportive other browser vendors are of
these properties?
Supportive! I haven't tested other browsers' implementations yet, but I
do know that it's been implemented in Blink, and it was apparently
undergoing
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 5:41 PM, Daniel Holbert dholb...@mozilla.com wrote:
On 09/10/2014 05:26 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
Yes!
Do we have a sense for how supportive other browser vendors are of
these properties?
Supportive!
Awesome. Let's do it!
/ Jonas
Le 11 sept. 2014 à 09:03, Daniel Holbert dholb...@mozilla.com a écrit :
Summary: The 'object-fit' and 'object-position' properties allow web
developers to customize how a replaced element's content gets scaled and
positioned to fit the element's content-box. (i.e. how an image or a
Please
Le 11 sept. 2014 à 10:21, Karl Dubost kdub...@mozilla.com a écrit :
Support for object-fit in iOS 8.
object-position on WebKit OPEN
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=122811
object-fit on WebKit RESOLVED FIXED
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52040
--
Karl Dubost, Mozilla
On 01/08/2014 13:18, Lukas Blakk wrote:
The user base can be generally distributed into three buckets: large
organizations with over 100K instances, 2-10K organizations, and then
ones under 1K. There are over 5500 members on the mailing list, and
in order to get details about use a query was
17 matches
Mail list logo
