Hi,
I would like to build an XUL desktop app which can be launched with firefox
-app option if firefox is installed. Else I would like to bundle a private copy
of xulrunner.
The problem is that windows shows the firefox icon instead of the application
specific icon for my app on the taskbar if
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 5:36 PM, wrote:
> We would like some feedback on build flags for the Web Speech API
> installation.
>
> More specifically, we are planning to land an initial version of the Web
> Speech API[1] into Geko. However, due to a number of factors, model size
> being one of them, w
We would like some feedback on build flags for the Web Speech API installation.
More specifically, we are planning to land an initial version of the Web Speech
API[1] into Geko. However, due to a number of factors, model size being one of
them, we plan to introduce various build flags which inst
On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 10:10 PM, Valentin Gosu
wrote:
> On 6 May 2015 at 04:58, Doug Turner wrote:
>
> >
> > > On May 5, 2015, at 12:55 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 3:34 PM, Valentin Gosu <
> valentin.g...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >> As some of you may know, Rus
On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 7:34 PM, Tantek Çelik wrote:
> On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 12:51 AM, Ehsan Akhgari
> wrote:
> > On 2015-05-05 6:31 PM, Daniel Holbert wrote:
> >>
> >> On 05/05/2015 02:51 PM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Sites such as Github currently use Flash in order to
> >>> allow peopl
On 5/5/15 9:58 PM, Doug Turner wrote:
Performance.
Note that performance has been a recurring problem in our current URI
code. It's a bit (10%) slower than Chrome's, but about 2x slower than
Safari's, and shows up a good bit in profiles. Some of this may be due
to XPCOM strings, of course,
On 6 May 2015 at 04:58, Doug Turner wrote:
>
> > On May 5, 2015, at 12:55 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 3:34 PM, Valentin Gosu
> wrote:
> >> As some of you may know, Rust is approaching its 1.0 release in a
> couple of
> >> weeks. One of the major goals for Rust is us
> On May 5, 2015, at 12:55 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 3:34 PM, Valentin Gosu
> wrote:
>> As some of you may know, Rust is approaching its 1.0 release in a couple of
>> weeks. One of the major goals for Rust is using a rust library in Gecko.
>> The specific one I'm wor
On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 05:10:42PM -0700, Bill McCloskey wrote:
> On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 4:34 PM, Nicholas Nethercote
> wrote:
>
> > "resident-unique" (only available on Linux, alas) is probably the most
> > interesting measurement in this case.
> >
>
> Usually I see resident-unique pretty consi
On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 4:34 PM, Nicholas Nethercote
wrote:
> "resident-unique" (only available on Linux, alas) is probably the most
> interesting measurement in this case.
>
Usually I see resident-unique pretty consistently about 15-20MB higher than
explicit for content processes.
I wonder if w
On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 4:34 PM, Nicholas Nethercote
wrote:
> On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 2:12 AM, Bill McCloskey wrote:
>>
>> Regarding process-per-core or process-per-domain or whatever, I just want
>> to point out that responsiveness will improve even beyond process-per-core.
>
> You're probably rig
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 12:51 AM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
> On 2015-05-05 6:31 PM, Daniel Holbert wrote:
>>
>> On 05/05/2015 02:51 PM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
>>>
>>> Sites such as Github currently use Flash in order to
>>> allow people to copy text to the clipboard by clicking a button in their
>>> UI.
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 2:12 AM, Bill McCloskey wrote:
>
> Regarding process-per-core or process-per-domain or whatever, I just want
> to point out that responsiveness will improve even beyond process-per-core.
You're probably right, but as you increase the number of processes the
responsiveness i
On 2015-05-05 6:31 PM, Daniel Holbert wrote:
On 05/05/2015 02:51 PM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
Sites such as Github currently use Flash in order to
allow people to copy text to the clipboard by clicking a button in their UI.
Bugzilla does this, too! [1] (If you enable "experimental user
interface"
On 05/05/2015 02:51 PM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
> Sites such as Github currently use Flash in order to
> allow people to copy text to the clipboard by clicking a button in their UI.
Bugzilla does this, too! [1] (If you enable "experimental user
interface" in your account's General Preferences.)
Look
\o/ Great to see this come through. Shumway was already using this but
needed chrome privilege to do so. It's nice to open it up.
--Jet
On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 2:51 PM, Ehsan Akhgari
wrote:
> Summary: We currently disallow programmatic copying and cutting from JS for
> Web content, which has rel
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 9:51 AM, Ehsan Akhgari
wrote:
> Summary: We currently disallow programmatic copying and cutting from JS for
> Web content, which has relied on web sites to rely on Flash in order to
> copy content to the clipboard. We are planning to relax this restriction
> to allow this
Summary: We currently disallow programmatic copying and cutting from JS for
Web content, which has relied on web sites to rely on Flash in order to
copy content to the clipboard. We are planning to relax this restriction
to allow this when execCommand is called in response to a user event. This
r
On 05/05/15 16:40, Mike Hommey wrote:
Last time I tried e10s, which was a while ago, tab switching did feel
weird with e10s *because* of that lack of the browser lock-up, because
now, the tab strip shows you've switched tabs, but the content is still
from before switching, until the spinner shows
On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 11:41:41AM -0400, Mike Conley wrote:
> With a content process, the UI remains responsive, but we get this
> bigass spinner. That's not an amazing trade-off - it's much uglier and
> louder, IMO, than the whole browser locking up. The big spinner was just
> an animation that w
Two cents: evolve is Good for You (tm).
Cheers,
David
On 05/05/15 22:12, Gregory Szorc wrote:
> Mercurial 3.4 was released on May 1.
>
> If you are an evolve user, I highly recommend upgrading for performance
> reasons. Everyone else should consider upgrading. But you may want to
> wait for 3.4
Mercurial 3.4 was released on May 1.
If you are an evolve user, I highly recommend upgrading for performance
reasons. Everyone else should consider upgrading. But you may want to wait
for 3.4.1 in case there are any regressions.
More details with a link to the changelog and Mozilla-tailored upgra
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 3:34 PM, Valentin Gosu wrote:
> As some of you may know, Rust is approaching its 1.0 release in a couple of
> weeks. One of the major goals for Rust is using a rust library in Gecko.
> The specific one I'm working at the moment is adding rust-url as a safer
> alternative to
On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 12:42 AM, Nicholas Nethercote
wrote:
> On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 11:53 PM, Leman Bennett (Omega X)
> wrote:
>>
>> I heard that there was rumor of a plan to limit process count spawn to
>> per-domain. But I've not seen offhand of a bug filed for it or anything else
>> that rela
Seeing this a touch late, commenting on things not noted yet.
On 04/27/2015 12:48 PM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
> I think we should change it to require the usage of exactly one of these
> keywords per *overridden* function: virtual, override, and final. Here
> are the advantages:
>
> * It is a more
>> My question is: after a decent period of time picking the low-hanging>
>> fruit, if there is still non-trivial spinner time for processCount=1,> would
>> the team consider shifting efforts to getting processCount>1> ship-worthy
>> instead of resorting to heroics to get processCount=1> ship-wo
On 5/4/2015 6:53 PM, Philipp Kewisch wrote:
So to be clear, this is just removed/disabled for Firefox? Other
projects like Thunderbird are not affected?
Followups to dev-extensions please!
That is incorrect. This is currently disabled for all gecko applications.
B2G has asked that binary c
The only issues I'm aware of with dom.ipc.processCount > 1 are:
1. The devtools "Browser Content Toolbox" doesn't work.
2. Some printing related stuff doesn't work.
3. There's a theoretical issue where plugins can hang when processCount > 1
and when more than one plugin is running.
The first two sh
It definitely makes sense to start your performance investigation with
processCount=1 since that will likely highlight the low-hanging fruit which
should be fixed regardless of processCount.
My question is: after a decent period of time picking the low-hanging
fruit, if there is still non-trivial
On 05/05/2015 12:42 AM, Nicholas Nethercote wrote:
On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 11:53 PM, Leman Bennett (Omega X)
wrote:
I heard that there was rumor of a plan to limit process count spawn to
per-domain. But I've not seen offhand of a bug filed for it or anything else
that relates to achieving more t
>> Is there a more detailed description of what the issues with multiple>
>> content processes are that e10s itself doesn't suffer from?
I'm interpreting this as, "What are the problems with multiple content
processes that single process does not have, from the user's perspective?"
This is mostl
Great question Brian!
I believe you are asking if we would generate alerts based on individual
tests instead of the summary of tests. The short answer is no. In looking
at reporting the subtest results as new alerts, we found there was a lot of
noise (especially in svgx, tp5o, dromaeo, v8) as co
On 2015-05-05 10:30 AM, Mike Conley wrote:
The e10s team is currently only focused on getting things to work with a
single content process at this time. We eventually want to work with
multiple content processes (as others have pointed out, the exact number
to work with is not clear), but we're f
Funny folks should bring this up - I recently wrote a blog post about this:
http://mikeconley.ca/blog/2015/05/04/electrolysis-and-the-big-tab-spinner-of-doom/
Funny how things cluster. :) I suggest reading that top to bottom before
you continue reading this post.
...
Welcome back! :D
The e10s
On 2015-05-05 4:59 AM, sn...@arbor.net wrote:
Encryption should be activated only after BOTH parties have mutually
authenticated.
Why establish an encrypted transport to an unknown attacker?
A web you have to uniquely identify yourself to participate in is really
not open or free for an awful l
On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 12:03 AM, Daniel Holbert
wrote:
> Without getting too deep into the exact details about animation /
> notifications / permissions, it sounds like Florian's concern RE
> "browsers want to disable fullscreen if you are not serving the website
> over HTTPS" may be unfounded, t
On Tue, May 5, 2015, at 02:53 AM, Leman Bennett (Omega X) wrote:
> On 5/5/2015 12:23 AM, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
> > On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 10:29 AM, Leman Bennett (Omega X) <
> > Redacted.For.Spam@request.contact> wrote:
> >
> >> Inquiring minds would like to know.
> >>
> >> At the moment, e10s t
The additional expense of HTTPS arises from the significantly higher cost to
the service owner of protecting it against attack, to maintain service
Availability (that third side of the security CIA triangle that gets
forgotten).
Encryption should be activated only after BOTH parties have mutua
On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 11:53 PM, Leman Bennett (Omega X)
wrote:
>
> I heard that there was rumor of a plan to limit process count spawn to
> per-domain. But I've not seen offhand of a bug filed for it or anything else
> that relates to achieving more than one content process instance.
There are m
39 matches
Mail list logo
