On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 5:36 PM, <kda...@mozilla.com> wrote: > We would like some feedback on build flags for the Web Speech API > installation. > > More specifically, we are planning to land an initial version of the Web > Speech API[1] into Geko. However, due to a number of factors, model size > being one of them, we plan to introduce various build flags which > install/do not install parts of the Web Speech API for various build > targets. > > Our current plan for B2G is as follows: > > 1. Introduce a flag to control installation of the Web Speech API > 2. Introduce a flag to control installation of Pocketsphinx[2], the > STT/TTS engine. > 3. Introduce a script to allow installation of models, allowing developers > to test the Web Speech API (They can test once they've made a build with > the previous two flags on) > > Our question is related to desktop and Fennec. Our current plan is to: > > 1. Introduce a flag to control installation of the Web Speech API + > Pocketsphinx + English model[3] > > The question is: Is this a good plan for desktop and Fennec? Should there > be more/less fine grade control for installation there? >
I think for desktop and fennec, some of the systems already provide APIs for TTS and STT. At least, Android has both of them [1][2], Mac also does [3]. Windows should have, but I'm not sure what form do they provide. I think for those systems, it's probably better to use their API, so that we provide the same experience as their native apps, and allow us not to include the engine ourselves. [1] https://developer.android.com/reference/android/speech/SpeechRecognizer.html [2] https://developer.android.com/reference/android/speech/tts/TextToSpeech.html [3] https://developer.apple.com/library/mac/documentation/Cocoa/Conceptual/Speech/Speech.html - Xidorn _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
