Re: How would you like to spell check this?

On 2/09/2015 07:17, lalo.mart...@gmail.com wrote: To put it simply, if I select a language via the context menu, it should still be there next time I visit the same site; it's the intended behaviour for the current code, and even if I don't think it's ideal, it's currently broken, and I don't

Re: Intent to Implement and Ship: Permissions API

On Wed, 2 Sep 2015, at 03:50, Ehsan Akhgari wrote: > On 2015-09-01 9:57 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote: > > But I agree that we should make it clear that we do not intend to > > implement a request API. > > There is actually a valid use case for a request API. It has become > clear that we need to

Re: Intent to ship: RC4 disabled by default in Firefox 44

On 2015/09/02 1:56, Richard Barnes wrote: > * 42/ASAP: Disable whitelist in Nightly/Aurora; no change in Beta/Release > * 43: Disable unrestricted fallback in Beta/Release (thus allowing RC4 only > for whitelisted hosts) > * 44: Disable all RC4 prefs by default, in all releases The whitelist

Re: How would you like to spell check this?

On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 6:41 PM, Jörg Knobloch wrote: > I would like to hear a good argument why this confusing behaviour should > be maintained. I don't consider the following a good argument (quote): > "Believe me when I say that *every single time* we have tried to "fix" >

Re: How would you like to spell check this?

On 2/09/2015 12:24, Robert O'Callahan wrote: The patch in bug 717433 just seemed like an especially clear improvement. Agreed. This was the nastiest problem that affected the most users and had the most obvious fix. As detailed earlier in the thread, there is another puzzling issue that