FYI: Emergency TCW this Saturday, February 20, 0600-1000 PT

tl;dr: this will be a "Soft Close" to deal with glibc updates As most of you know, upgrading glibc requires a reboot of each Linux host. With so many hosts needing to be rebooted, there will be impacts on the build and test machinery. We fully expect the system to self-recover, but jobs in

Re: APNG and Accept-Encoding

On 18/02/16 07:45, Jeff Muizelaar wrote: > Is there a response to the criticism of Accept outlined here: > https://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/Why_not_conneg#Negotiating_by_format As Guardian of the Accept Header, that would be my question too. Using Accept to detect APNG support will never be reliable

Re: Generic Task Cluster Tasks / File Based Task Scheduling

On 17/02/16 01:59 PM, Gregory Szorc wrote: * You can now only run tasks if certain files changed. This opens the door for drastic reduction in automation load via more intelligent scheduling of tasks via in-tree configurations. (For the curious, relevant commits/files are determined from a

Re: APNG and Accept-Encoding

Is there a response to the criticism of Accept outlined here: https://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/Why_not_conneg#Negotiating_by_format -Jeff On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 6:08 PM, Mike Lawther wrote: > Hi Mozilla developers! > > tl,dr; can Firefox send an Accept-Encoding heading

Re: Generic Task Cluster Tasks / File Based Task Scheduling

On 2016-02-17 01:59 PM, Gregory Szorc wrote: > * You can now only run tasks if certain files changed. This is *awesome*. Thank you! ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

Re: APNG and Accept-Encoding

On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 12:08 AM, Mike Lawther wrote: > Is this something we can coordinate on? Do you mean the Accept header? Not sure how Accept-Encoding makes sense here. As for the MIME type to mention there, as I said in the bug I think we should just ship