Hello developers,
A couple months ago, Andreas Bovens and I scoured AMO and the Web looking
for extensions and articles that offered preferences tweaks in the name of
performance. Our hope was to put some of these tweaks through user testing
to see if they made any difference in Firefox performanc
On 12/6/14, 3:00 PM, Ankit ladhania wrote:
I was thinking of using building a desktop environment that was build using
HTML, CSS and JavaScript. I have read about Firefox OS and i know that Gecko is
used as a Windows Manager in it. So i want to use it to make DE for my desktop.
Does this kind
On 9/16/14, 12:45 PM, Steve Fink wrote:
GGC was enabled yesterday (2014-Sep-15) on b2g-inbound with bug 1020751.
It has not yet been merged into mozilla-central, but I expect it will be
soon. GGC is already on desktop Firefox, and in fact just shipped with
Firefox 32. Keep an eye out for regressi
How much simpler could our style code be if we followed this path? What
do the standards and other browser vendors say about this? Horrible
idea? Great idea? Mixed?
"This is in preparation for simplifying the Blink style
resolution code by removing the concept of user styles."
https://src.chro
On 10/12/2013 5:50 AM, Philip Chee wrote:
Um, what? libnotify was removed because the developer was too lazy to
google for the docs?
Phil, you've been in the community long enough to know that this isn't
appropriate participation. Insulting other contributors like this is
not acceptable and
On 8/5/2013 9:30 AM, Robert Kaiser wrote:
Justin Lebar schrieb:
It's a lot better than the page
a) playing audio,
b) spinning your cpu, or
a) pwning you.
True.
Still, if this is a problem (there /are/ a lot of websites which are
just one big flash object), I wonder if we could detect it.
On 8/2/2013 1:52 PM, Jeff Gilbert wrote:
It's certainly worrying given the number of security- and privacy-related
addons people rely on working. Seeing ads in thumbnails is relatively harmless
(if disconcerting), but if someone is relying on an addon for important
security or privacy reasons,
On 7/8/2013 8:18 PM, Cameron McCormack wrote:
I think it's time we considered having tests running on the build
machines in HiDPI mode so that we can catch regressions that only
manifest themselves in high resolution configurations. We have at least
three platforms we're targeting where this is
On 4/19/2013 4:04 PM, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 10:34 AM, Asa Dotzler wrote:
That would be great -- if we had a significantly larger Aurora population..
Right now, the only way to get anything close to decent "did we break the
web" testing is on our Bet
On 4/19/2013 3:17 PM, Daniel Holbert wrote:
Would this mean that Beta-channel users would see some features appear
on release-day, and then disappear a couple weeks later, and then those
same features (plus maybe some new ones) would suddenly reappear on the
next release day, and then potentially
On 4/13/2013 1:59 AM, Mike Hommey wrote:
On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 10:28:47AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
I think we need to start thinking how to make PGO opt-in instead of
opt-out, while keeping performance where it is now.
I have a really basic question. Is PGO's performance gains something
us
appening here. What I saw
happening was the out of hand dismissal of a feature based on no
consideration other than increased memory footprint. That cannot be how
we roll.
- A
On Feb 12, 2013, at 9:40 PM, Asa Dotzler wrote:
On 2/12/2013 3:08 PM, Ed Morley wrote:
On 12 February 2013 22:11:1
On 2/12/2013 3:08 PM, Ed Morley wrote:
On 12 February 2013 22:11:12, Stephen Pohl wrote:
I wanted to give a heads up that we're in the process of finalizing
the patch for bug 678392 which will give us history swipe animations
on Mac OSX 10.7+. Since we will be taking snapshots of the 20
most-rec
On 2/6/2013 12:01 PM, Jean-Marc Desperrier wrote:
On W3Schools, XP usage is significantly going down :
http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_os.asp
That's not a very good proxy for our users or our target users.
W3Schools is a web developer focused site so they're going to reflect
that
On 12/6/2012 6:25 PM, Norbert Lindenberg wrote:
Google Chrome is bundling ICU, so they're not limited by what's on the device.
How much does this bundling add to the Google Chrome download size.
Presumably someone can compile/package Chromium with and without or
compare the size of the build
On 12/3/2012 2:39 PM, Norbert Lindenberg wrote:
Well, the first question is what size increase would be acceptable
given the benefits that ICU provides.
I don't understand what benefits this actually provides. How are users'
online lives improved by this change, either today or in the future?
On 8/2/2012 6:32 AM, Gervase Markham wrote:
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ie/archive/2012/07/12/ie10-user-agent-string-update.aspx
IE10 has introduced the Touch token to the UA string, which overlaps in
intent with our Tablet token.
Dao suggests it would be nice to get cross-browser consistency here.
On 8/29/2012 5:00 PM, Matt Brubeck wrote:
* I don't like our reactive approach that focuses on trying to identify
regressions, and then decide whether to fix them in place, back them
out, or ignore them. Instead we should proactively set goals for what
our performance should be, and focus on th
On 8/21/2012 10:32 AM, L. David Baron wrote:
On Tuesday 2012-08-21 09:43 -0700, Asa Dotzler wrote:
On 8/21/2012 6:34 AM, Gervase Markham wrote:
On 20/08/12 18:25, Asa Dotzler wrote:
Can you say more about this? Are you saying it's Mozilla's
responsibility to put Mozilla resources in
On 8/21/2012 6:34 AM, Gervase Markham wrote:
On 20/08/12 18:25, Asa Dotzler wrote:
Can you say more about this? Are you saying it's Mozilla's
responsibility to put Mozilla resources into solving problems for Opera?
I'm not sure I understand this assertion.
I think he's a
On 8/19/2012 1:41 AM, Aryeh Gregor wrote:
Anyway, one major goal of an open web is that users should have as
many choices as possible for web browsers. That means we need to put
special effort into making things as easy as possible for smaller
browsers. So if Opera will definitely use our test
On 8/2/2012 12:07 AM, Gijs Kruitbosch wrote:
Which brings me to another question: how long do you expect to keep B2G
on Gecko 17? (eg. will v2 be off 17 or off the next ESR or off something
else still?) Fragmentation on eg. Android is well-documented, what's the
plan in that department?
Fragme
22 matches
Mail list logo
