Not sure how this [1] relates to, but the tone of your note reminded
me of this discussion.
## Making User Stories Obvious in Bugzilla
[1] https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/mozilla.dev.gaia/jjtzHnck4XQ
m
On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 11:40 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> At Mozlando we discussed
only code? Long time ago I found a PSD file in the Netscape source.
About 1MB with a few layers.
m
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 4:52 PM, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 1:32 AM, Nicholas Nethercote > wrote:
>
>> I was wondering what people think is the worst piece of code in the
>>
I am not following this thread as I should; however a contributor from
the Brazil community list was talking/planning a talk to the major
conference in Brazil - about MathML. Since he is a 'mozillian, I have
asked him to go through this whole thread and try to distill.
And he did digging work base
> I'm coming late to this thread but I have to say that the misunderstanding
> present in the original post is huge. The author can take refuge in that he's
> made a common category mistake. MathML is a computer representation for math,
> TeX is a human input language.
>
> MathML was never inten
I am able to execute some pieces of a XULRunner-based app fine with
B2G. I simply took B2G work binary that Romaxa did for the Raspberry
PI. Do you need XUL widgets or you just want to call your Chrome URL
from B2G Gecko app?
m
On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 1:06 PM, Emmanuel Engelhart wrote:
> Le 08/0
I am not anymore within Mozilla (assuming that "at Mozilla" refers to be
under contract) but have been working with Gecko in walls (
https://hacks.mozilla.org/2013/04/a-social-aware-dashboard-experience-with-gecko-in-walls/)
since 2009 with a general architecture not much different of B2G from a
hi
AFAIK the drawWindow function fails to draw from plugin areas for pages
that are not visible [1]. It always worked for me for visible pages.
[1] https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=742767
m
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 9:15 AM, David Rajchenbach-Teller <
dtel...@mozilla.com> wrote:
> On 12/
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 10:41 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 8:37 AM, wrote:
> > On Tuesday, November 13, 2012 2:49:14 AM UTC-8, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> >> Websites generally send dramatically different content for touch-based
> >> UIs. Different enough that they'd want to se
Touch++, again. Same points I said in September.
Gerv, do you have an online place that captures the discussion? The reason
I ask this is my interest to really understand what is the current
assumption nowadays on what UA stands for and the complexities involved in
this discussion. Plus I wanted t
Try this and let me know.
https://github.com/taboca/TelaSocial/tree/master/xulrunner/example-simple-app
I am not sure if this is the right list for this — someone want to pitch
the right list please let us know. I still keeping my product/open project
with XULRunner so if someone believes XULRunn
I want to pitch a related thread I stumbled about a year ago —
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=485941 Stack overflow
using overly-deep XML tree (DoS).
I was concerned about JS generating deep nodes which still crashes my
recent Firefox — silently, no questions asked.
This seems to b
@Paul,
What is your use case BTW? when you say "update views" based on mutations,
is the goal is to let the user know what is going on? Or you actually
performing other mutations back to the DOM or logging things or creating
reports?
m
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 4:27 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
>
Hi Paul, so this means we do not have anymore DOMnodeRemoved from the
mutation events?
I find your use case sort of important specially now that I believe
pages will suffer more changes based in template operations in the
client. So "detecting context" is key for client apps to know where
they wer
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 12:54 PM, wrote:
> On Thursday, August 2, 2012 6:32:30 AM UTC-7, Gervase Markham wrote:
>> http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ie/archive/2012/07/12/ie10-user-agent-string-update.aspx
>>
>> IE10 has introduced the Touch token to the UA string, which overlaps in
>> intent with our Table
I want to just kick a parenthesis here. This thread called my
attention because yesterday I just went through the passage
"Kinect’s remarkable gestural interface, for example, makes clear that
Microsoft no longer insists its customers master multimedia,
multiplayer complexity. Microsoft instead as
15 matches
Mail list logo
