We had a good conversation with Ramin last week in Tokyo. The topic of
interoperability was discussed at length, and we also talked about where
Mozilla's 2017 priorities align with KDDI's.
To summarize, Mozilla is prioritizing the Web-compatibility and Performance
of the interoperable subset of
Has there been any feedback from Google, Apple or Microsoft?
We've landed stuff preffed off before and had to remove it in the end as it's
just so much dead weight without any chance of being preffed on. Unless there's
an intent to implement this soon from other vendors we really shouldn't put
On 1/3/17 4:48 PM, ktecrami...@gmail.com wrote:
>> e.g. It seems like introductory notes example could just use a
>> separate SVG element that had fixed positioning instead of needing to build
>> fixed-position into SVG.
>
> By "introductory notes example" do you mean the example in following
Hi Jeff
> I'm concerned about the complexity this will add to the SVG implementation
> as we're looking to transition to WebRender.
if WebRender supports currently implemented "non-scaling-stroke",
new modifications must be nothing more than recalculating CTM for those new
effects.
> Can the
I'm concerned about the complexity this will add to the SVG implementation
as we're looking to transition to WebRender.
Can the desired effects be achieved by interleaving HTML and SVG content
today? e.g. It seems like introductory notes example could just use a
separate SVG element that had
Intent to Implement: adding vector effects non-scaling-size,
non-rotation and fixed-position to SVG
Contact emails
te-fuk...@kddi-tech.com, g-ra...@kddi-tech.com, sa-...@kddi-tech.com
Summary
To offer vector effects regarding special coordinate transformations and
graphic
> Does this change any invariants that we depend on in terms of how
> SVG images with a viewBox respond to size changes by scaling?
To be able to answer your question, please kindly write an example of what kind
of invariant or what kind of use-case concerns you. Also please refer to
following
> Is this a new SVG2 feature?
yes, to be more precise, it is an extension of existing "non-scaling-stroke",
which is already released in Gecko.
> How stable is the spec? Are there any tests to test interop?
"non-scaling-size" and "non-rotation" spec are fix and "fix-position" spec is
under
On Tuesday 2016-12-27 00:19 -0800, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
> On 12/26/16 11:54 PM, ktecrami...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Spec(Link to standard)
> >
> > https://svgwg.org/svg2-draft/coords.html#VectorEffects
>
> Is this a new SVG2 feature?
>
> How stable is the spec? Are there any tests to test
On 12/26/16 11:54 PM, ktecrami...@gmail.com wrote:
Spec(Link to standard)
https://svgwg.org/svg2-draft/coords.html#VectorEffects
Is this a new SVG2 feature?
How stable is the spec? Are there any tests to test interop?
Do we have any indications that any other browser plans to
Intent to Implement:
adding vector effects non-scaling-size, non-rotation and fixed-position to SVG
Summary
To offer vector effects regarding special coordinate transformations and
graphic drawings as described in following Spec link,
SVG Tiny 1.2 introduced the vector-effect
11 matches
Mail list logo
