I’ve been aware of these proposals. Honestly, there’s not a lot of meat in the
performance timeline proposal and one of the editors doesn’t appear to be
actively involved anymore.
IMO, this is implementation detail for describing the data structures used by a
timeline “entry”. I’m not sure how
...@mit.edu, Axel Kratel akra...@mozilla.com,
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2013 8:51:32 AM
Subject: Re: W3C Proposed Recommendations: Performance Timeline, User Timing,
JSON-LD
I’ve been aware of these proposals. Honestly, there’s not a lot of meat
On 11/27/13 11:51 AM, Rob Campbell wrote:
IMO, this is implementation detail for describing the data structures used by a
timeline “entry”
There are specs that expose these entries too, so this is not
implementation detail but something we'll need to end up implementing
when Facebook and
I don't know how well (or if at all) the current push for performance
devtools is coordinated with these proposals, but it would certainly be
worth looking into that.
CCing Axel Kratel.
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 12:31 AM, Boris Zbarsky bzbar...@mit.edu wrote:
On 11/25/13 7:07 PM, L. David Baron
On 11/25/13 7:07 PM, L. David Baron wrote:
http://www.w3.org/TR/performance-timeline/
Performance Timeline
http://www.w3.org/TR/user-timing/
User Timing
Have we had anyone at all review these specs? My past experience with
that working group and set of editors doesn't make me
5 matches
Mail list logo
