Thanks for checking this out so it could get fixed. Always some risk
involved in sticking my neck out and saying, "Hey, this isn't working."
Now seems to work fine except that this group seems to top-post whereas
the previous security group bottom-posted.Doug Ludy
Mike Beltzner wrote:
I shou
Boris Zbarsky wrote:
It looks like this list might actually work for security discussion, so
here goes... ;)
At the moment, our expanded-capability architecture suffers from four
issues:
1) It's only possible to expand capabilities for a JS stack frame, not
for a web page in general, unle
Mike Beltzner wrote:
> I should learn to try things out before I ask silly questions. Changing
> my setup so that Thunderbird uses SSL seems to have resolved the issue.
> That said, it seems odd that *this* group needs SSL but others do not.
This group here works totally fine for me with SSL disab
