Hey Asa,
> Should we care that the connotations of tracking are bad? I don't
> think we should be striving for a neutral word. It is "tracking"
> we're talking about here. To pretty it up to make it something that
> people won't have a visceral reaction to would be to under-inform at
> best and m
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 8:01 PM, Matej Novak wrote:
> " [ ] I do not want advertisers to track my Web use
> " [ ] I want advertisers to track and retain my Web use across sites and
> provide targeted content"
If the pref was worded like this, wouldn't there be the risk that an
entity that implem
I think we are getting closer.
We might be able to shorten
I want advertisers to track and retain my Web use across sites and
provide targeted content"
to
I want advertisers to watch my Web use to provide targeted ads"
On 8/17/12 10:01 AM, Matej Novak wrote:
That works over all, but I stil
That works over all, but I still think that "I'm OK with" isn't strong enough a
message for DNT: 0. Feels like that needs to be a much more deliberate
statement of intent so it's clearly differentiated from the neutral state. I
also wish we could shorten the language of that middle state below,
> On 8/16/2012 12:42 PM, Sid Stamm wrote:
>> Hey all,
>>
>> Over in bug 765398 we've been discussing exposing a three-state DNT UI
>> to users so they have an opportunity to opt-out (as with the old UI) but
>> also opt-in to tracking.
>>
>> Problem is that the words we use are hard to pick. What d
On 8/16/12 3:45 PM, Sid Stamm wrote:
I commented in the bug, but I guess I should have commented here first.
Just because we have three states in the code doesn't nessisarily mean
we need three states in the UI.
I think the choices to the user remain the same.
Tell websites:
" * I do
> I commented in the bug, but I guess I should have commented here first.
>
> Just because we have three states in the code doesn't nessisarily mean
> we need three states in the UI.
>
> I think the choices to the user remain the same.
>
> Tell websites:
> " * I do not want to be tracke
On 8/16/12 12:51 PM, Asa Dotzler wrote:
On 8/16/2012 12:42 PM, Sid Stamm wrote:
Hey all,
Over in bug 765398 we've been discussing exposing a three-state DNT UI
to users so they have an opportunity to opt-out (as with the old UI) but
also opt-in to tracking.
Problem is that the words we use are
On 8/16/2012 12:42 PM, Sid Stamm wrote:
Hey all,
Over in bug 765398 we've been discussing exposing a three-state DNT UI
to users so they have an opportunity to opt-out (as with the old UI) but
also opt-in to tracking.
Problem is that the words we use are hard to pick. What do we represent
to u
