On Fri, Oct 09, 2020 at 06:33:22AM -0700, Tim Callan via dev-security-policy
wrote:
> We anticipate no meaningful changes required to policies, operations, or
> personnel.
[...]
> In this case the required changes are virtually nothing.
These statements concern me somewhat, as reasonable
Hi Rob,
The e-mail you quote below seems to be inadvertently "confirming" some
suspicions that someone else posed as questions. I think the group as a
whole would love to have actual specific answers to those original
questions.
Remember to always add an extra layer of ">" indents for each
On 10/7/20 1:09 PM, Jakob Bohm wrote:
Please note that at least the first CSV download is not really a CSV
file, as there are line feeds within each "PEM" value, and only one
column. It would probably be more useful as a simple concatenated PEM
file, as used by various software packages as a
On 10/11/20 11:06 PM, Nikolaos Soumelidis wrote:
Dear Kathleen,
We have been informed by ACCREDIA that the accreditation pages have now been
updated to include ETSI EN 319 403. This removes any ambiguity.
URLs remain the same; for example, QMSCERT's accreditation:
On Saturday, October 3, 2020 at 5:16:41 PM UTC-4, Ryan Sleevi wrote:
> 1. Is it expected that there will be similar system and/or infrastructure
> migrations as part of this? Sectigo's foresight of "no effect on its
> operations" leaves it a bit ambiguous whether this is meant as "practical"
>
Hi Ryan. Tim Callan posted a reply to your questions last week, but his
message has not yet appeared on the list. Is it stuck in a moderation queue?
From: dev-security-policy on
behalf of Ryan Sleevi via dev-security-policy
Sent: 03 October 2020 22:16
To:
Dear Kathleen,
We have been informed by ACCREDIA that the accreditation pages have now been
updated to include ETSI EN 319 403. This removes any ambiguity.
URLs remain the same; for example, QMSCERT's accreditation:
7 matches
Mail list logo
