Re: Survey of (potentially noncompliant) Serial Number Lengths

2019-03-26 Thread Andrew Ayer via dev-security-policy
On Mon, 25 Mar 2019 22:16:27 + Rob Stradling via dev-security-policy wrote: > Even better than that (and many thanks to Andrew Ayer for suggesting > this idea)... > > To enable folks to do more thorough statistical analysis, I've > produced another, richer summary table (named >

Re: Survey of (potentially noncompliant) Serial Number Lengths

2019-03-26 Thread Wayne Thayer via dev-security-policy
> From: dev-security-policy > On > Behalf Of Rob Stradling via dev-security-policy > Sent: Monday, March 25, 2019 6:16 PM > To: Hector Martin 'marcan' ; > mozilla-dev-security-pol...@lists.mozilla.org > Cc: Kurt Roeckx > Subject: Re: Survey of (potentially noncomplian

RE: Survey of (potentially noncompliant) Serial Number Lengths

2019-03-26 Thread Doug Beattie via dev-security-policy
#gid=1093195185 -Original Message- From: dev-security-policy On Behalf Of Rob Stradling via dev-security-policy Sent: Monday, March 25, 2019 6:16 PM To: Hector Martin 'marcan' ; mozilla-dev-security-pol...@lists.mozilla.org Cc: Kurt Roeckx Subject: Re: Survey of (potentially noncompliant

Re: Survey of (potentially noncompliant) Serial Number Lengths

2019-03-25 Thread Rob Stradling via dev-security-policy
On 18/03/2019 21:11, Hector Martin 'marcan' wrote: > On 19/03/2019 02.17, Rob Stradling via dev-security-policy wrote: >> On 18/03/2019 17:05, Kurt Roeckx wrote: >>> On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 03:30:37PM +, Rob Stradling via >>> dev-security-policy wrote: When a value in column E is

Re: Survey of (potentially noncompliant) Serial Number Lengths

2019-03-18 Thread Hector Martin 'marcan' via dev-security-policy
On 19/03/2019 02.17, Rob Stradling via dev-security-policy wrote: > On 18/03/2019 17:05, Kurt Roeckx wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 03:30:37PM +, Rob Stradling via >> dev-security-policy wrote: >>> >>> When a value in column E is 100%, this is pretty solid evidence of >>> noncompliance

Re: Survey of (potentially noncompliant) Serial Number Lengths

2019-03-18 Thread Rob Stradling via dev-security-policy
On 18/03/2019 17:05, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 03:30:37PM +, Rob Stradling via > dev-security-policy wrote: >> >> When a value in column E is 100%, this is pretty solid evidence of >> noncompliance with BR 7.1. >> When the values in column E and G are both approximately

Re: Survey of (potentially noncompliant) Serial Number Lengths

2019-03-18 Thread Kurt Roeckx via dev-security-policy
On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 03:30:37PM +, Rob Stradling via dev-security-policy wrote: > > When a value in column E is 100%, this is pretty solid evidence of > noncompliance with BR 7.1. > When the values in column E and G are both approximately 50%, this > suggests (but does not prove) that

Re: Survey of (potentially noncompliant) Serial Number Lengths

2019-03-18 Thread Rob Stradling via dev-security-policy
On 18/03/2019 15:43, Rob Stradling via dev-security-policy wrote: > On 18/03/2019 15:30, Rob Stradling via dev-security-policy wrote: > >> On 14/03/2019 10:59, Rob Stradling via dev-security-policy wrote: >>> On 13/03/2019 22:28, Richard Moore via dev-security-policy wrote: >> If any other

Re: Survey of (potentially noncompliant) Serial Number Lengths

2019-03-18 Thread Rob Stradling via dev-security-policy
On 18/03/2019 15:30, Rob Stradling via dev-security-policy wrote: > On 14/03/2019 10:59, Rob Stradling via dev-security-policy wrote: >> On 13/03/2019 22:28, Richard Moore via dev-security-policy wrote: > >>> If any other CA wants to check theirs before someone else does, then now is >>> surely