I wrote:
> I found the bug that is responsible for the fact that no error message
> is displayed, and we could fix it,
I filed bug 447563 about this.
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=447563
Pleas feel free to add yourself to the CC list of that bug if you're
interested in updates.
_
Wan-Teh Chang wrote:
> NSS doesn't allow importing or exporting of *unencrypted* secret
> or private keys in FIPS mode.
>
> This is not an issue for SSL because the incoming premaster secret
> from the *client* is encrypted with the server's RSA public key.
>
> If you really have to import an un
David Sadler wrote:
>
> I am trying to enable crypto hardware support on an IBM z/Series system
> running Linux.
Is this IBM linux? Red Hat Linux? or ?
(I ask because I know that Red Hat Linux supports mod_nss in Apache, but
I was not aware that it was also being used in any IBM Linux. That wo
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 1:22 PM, Dean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I've been reading around about key generation and key material
> manipulation and am hearing that key material manipulations is not
> allowed in FIPs mode. This seems to be confirmed by my code which
> works in non-FIPs mode but
Glen,
Thanks for the help. I was so sure I had the checksum files in the
right place I had them but only with the libraries I thought
I was running against, not the ones I was really running against.
Whoops.
I have to ask for a little more help though.
I've been reading around about k
> -Original Message-
> From:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> la.org] On Behalf Of Wan-Teh Chang
> Sent: Friday, July 18, 2008 12:04 AM
> To: mozilla's crypto code discussion list
> Subject: Re: 3rd party ECC module + NSS integration
> Since you need the bug fix in the
rainer_k wrote:
> If this is such a serious concern, why did Microsoft decicde to put
> this CA inside the Windows
> CA store and even distribute this via automatic update?
I don't think "but Microsoft did it" is, in general, a convincing
argument when it comes to good security practice.
> The
hi,
http://mxr.mozilla.org/security/source/security/jss/org/mozilla/jss/tests/
google: JSS java applet
http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/guide/deployment/deployment-guide/keystores.html
google: firefox java applet
http://kb.mozillazine.org/Java
-glen
joshuaaa wrote:
> On Jun 11, 10:04 am, jo
hello,
Can you ensure that your installation has the ".chk" files in the same
directory as
their corresponding "dlls". meaning libfreebl3.chk libsoftokn3.chk need
to be with libfreebl3.dll libsoftokn3.dll.
http://mxr.mozilla.org/security/source/security/jss/org/mozilla/jss/tests/
http://mxr.m
Thanks Wan-Teh! That helped.
-Ruchi
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Wan-Teh Chang
Sent: Monday, July 21, 2008 12:32 PM
To: mozilla's crypto code discussion list
Subject: Re: Firefox crash issue
2008/7/21 Ruchi Lohani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Eddy,
>
> we (T-Systems) appreciate your input, even if we don't agree with all
> of your statements. We strongly encourage you to give further feedback
> until the end of the first week. We know that you do this in your
> spare time to support Mozilla, but changing the CP and
rainer_k wrote:
> If this is such a serious concern, why did Microsoft decicde to put
> this CA inside the Windows
> CA store and even distribute this via automatic update?
> Installment of the Telekom CA into Firefox and putting more
> restrictive policies for CAs into action in general
> are two
Sorry to ask such a simple question, but I have been unable to
successfully run JSS in FIPs mode. I am using the binary distribution
for:
JSS 4.2.5
NSPR 4.6.4
NSS 3.11.4
The following (very) simple Java program
import org.mozilla.jss.CryptoManager;
public class SimpleTest4 {
public st
Eddy,
we (T-Systems) appreciate your input, even if we don't agree with all
of your statements. We strongly encourage you to give further feedback
until the end of the first week. We know that you do this in your
spare time to support Mozilla, but changing the CP and CPS is a
serious act and shoul
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Eddy, Frank,
>
> See the comments of T-Systems (WP as an Acronym of my Name Wolfgang
> Pietrus) in the text below.
Hallo Wolfgang,
Vielen Dank fuer Ihre Antwort :-)
>>
>> Nevertheless I read mostly the English version which is easier to
>> understand. Similar to Kathleen's
rainer_k:
> Eddy,
>
> If this is such a serious concern, why did Microsoft decicde to put
> this CA inside the Windows
> CA store and even distribute this via automatic update?
> Installment of the Telekom CA into Firefox and putting more
> restrictive policies for CAs into action in general
> are
Eddy,
If this is such a serious concern, why did Microsoft decicde to put
this CA inside the Windows
CA store and even distribute this via automatic update?
Installment of the Telekom CA into Firefox and putting more
restrictive policies for CAs into action in general
are two different topics and
Eddy, Frank,
See the comments of T-Systems (WP as an Acronym of my Name Wolfgang
Pietrus) in the text below.
On Jul 20, 1:37 am, Eddy Nigg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I started to review this inclusion request by reading parts of the
> German version of the CP and CPS, which I understand is the
18 matches
Mail list logo
