Re: [VOTE] Release of Trinidad 2.0.0 Beta 2 (Try 2)
+1 On 02/16/2011 07:48 AM, Scott O'Bryan wrote: Hey Everyone, Okay, I have checked in code to address TRINIDAD-2037 which was the issue raised by Matthias in the previous vote[1]. The artifacts have been regenerated and Matthias has tested the fix and it works. This is still a beta release so there are still a few open bugs, but all of the unit tests pass and this beta has undergone some considerable testing since the last release. Therefore I would like to ask for a re-vote on this release. All of the following should be ready for review: * The generated repository and assembly artifacts[2] * The generated source archive[3] * The updated svn repository[4] Please review the artifacts and vote according to the following: [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits [ ] +0 [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released, and why.. This vote will remain open for at least 72 hours. Thanks, Scott O'Bryan [1]http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@myfaces.apache.org/msg51466.html [2] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemyfaces-015/ [3] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemyfaces-015/org/apache/myfaces/trinidad/trinidad/2.0.0-beta-2/trinidad-2.0.0-beta-2-source-release.zip [4] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/trinidad/tags/trinidad-2.0.0-beta-2
Re: [VOTE] Release of Trinidad 2.0.0 Beta 2 (Try 2)
+1 On 2/16/2011 9:48 AM, Scott O'Bryan wrote: Hey Everyone, Okay, I have checked in code to address TRINIDAD-2037 which was the issue raised by Matthias in the previous vote[1]. The artifacts have been regenerated and Matthias has tested the fix and it works. This is still a beta release so there are still a few open bugs, but all of the unit tests pass and this beta has undergone some considerable testing since the last release. Therefore I would like to ask for a re-vote on this release. All of the following should be ready for review: * The generated repository and assembly artifacts[2] * The generated source archive[3] * The updated svn repository[4] Please review the artifacts and vote according to the following: [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits [ ] +0 [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released, and why.. This vote will remain open for at least 72 hours. Thanks, Scott O'Bryan [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@myfaces.apache.org/msg51466.html [2] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemyfaces-015/ [3] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemyfaces-015/org/apache/myfaces/trinidad/trinidad/2.0.0-beta-2/trinidad-2.0.0-beta-2-source-release.zip [4] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/trinidad/tags/trinidad-2.0.0-beta-2
Re: [VOTE] Release of Trinidad 2.0.0 Beta 2 (Try 2)
+1 On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 3:50 PM, MAX STARETS max.star...@oracle.com wrote: +1 On 2/16/2011 9:48 AM, Scott O'Bryan wrote: Hey Everyone, Okay, I have checked in code to address TRINIDAD-2037 which was the issue raised by Matthias in the previous vote[1]. The artifacts have been regenerated and Matthias has tested the fix and it works. This is still a beta release so there are still a few open bugs, but all of the unit tests pass and this beta has undergone some considerable testing since the last release. Therefore I would like to ask for a re-vote on this release. All of the following should be ready for review: * The generated repository and assembly artifacts[2] * The generated source archive[3] * The updated svn repository[4] Please review the artifacts and vote according to the following: [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits [ ] +0 [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released, and why.. This vote will remain open for at least 72 hours. Thanks, Scott O'Bryan [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@myfaces.apache.org/msg51466.html [2] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemyfaces-015/ [3] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemyfaces-015/org/apache/myfaces/trinidad/trinidad/2.0.0-beta-2/trinidad-2.0.0-beta-2-source-release.zip [4] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/trinidad/tags/trinidad-2.0.0-beta-2 -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
Re: [VOTE] Release of Trinidad 2.0.0 Beta 2 (Try 2)
+1 On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 8:20 AM, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.orgwrote: +1 On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 3:50 PM, MAX STARETS max.star...@oracle.com wrote: +1 On 2/16/2011 9:48 AM, Scott O'Bryan wrote: Hey Everyone, Okay, I have checked in code to address TRINIDAD-2037 which was the issue raised by Matthias in the previous vote[1]. The artifacts have been regenerated and Matthias has tested the fix and it works. This is still a beta release so there are still a few open bugs, but all of the unit tests pass and this beta has undergone some considerable testing since the last release. Therefore I would like to ask for a re-vote on this release. All of the following should be ready for review: * The generated repository and assembly artifacts[2] * The generated source archive[3] * The updated svn repository[4] Please review the artifacts and vote according to the following: [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits [ ] +0 [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released, and why.. This vote will remain open for at least 72 hours. Thanks, Scott O'Bryan [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@myfaces.apache.org/msg51466.html [2] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemyfaces-015/ [3] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemyfaces-015/org/apache/myfaces/trinidad/trinidad/2.0.0-beta-2/trinidad-2.0.0-beta-2-source-release.zip [4] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/trinidad/tags/trinidad-2.0.0-beta-2 -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
Re: [VOTE] Release of Trinidad 2.0.0 Beta 2 (Try 2)
+1
Re: [VOTE] Release of Trinidad 2.0.0 Beta 2 (Try 2)
+1 -- Blake On 2/16/11 7:20 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: +1 On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 3:50 PM, MAX STARETSmax.star...@oracle.com wrote: +1 On 2/16/2011 9:48 AM, Scott O'Bryan wrote: Hey Everyone, Okay, I have checked in code to address TRINIDAD-2037 which was the issue raised by Matthias in the previous vote[1]. The artifacts have been regenerated and Matthias has tested the fix and it works. This is still a beta release so there are still a few open bugs, but all of the unit tests pass and this beta has undergone some considerable testing since the last release. Therefore I would like to ask for a re-vote on this release. All of the following should be ready for review: * The generated repository and assembly artifacts[2] * The generated source archive[3] * The updated svn repository[4] Please review the artifacts and vote according to the following: [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits [ ] +0 [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released, and why.. This vote will remain open for at least 72 hours. Thanks, Scott O'Bryan [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@myfaces.apache.org/msg51466.html [2] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemyfaces-015/ [3] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemyfaces-015/org/apache/myfaces/trinidad/trinidad/2.0.0-beta-2/trinidad-2.0.0-beta-2-source-release.zip [4] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/trinidad/tags/trinidad-2.0.0-beta-2
Re: [VOTE] Release for Trinidad 2.0.0-beta-2
Okay, so my first hickup. I forgot to include the voting part. :D [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits [ ] +0 [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released, and why.. Thanks, Scott On 02/15/2011 01:59 AM, Scott O'Bryan wrote: Hey all, I was running the tasks needed to get the Trinidad 2.0.0-beta-2 release out and now I need a vote as to whether everything looks good or not. This is still a beta release so there are still a few open bugs, but all of the unit tests pass and this beta has undergone some considerable testing. I have deployed the artifacts to the Nexus Repository [1] for review. The release notes for the Trinidad 2.0.0-beta-2 release are on the JIRA site [2] for review as well. This vote will remain open for at least 72 hours. Thanks, Scott O'Bryan PS- This is my first release of Trinidad since moving over to NEXUS, so a lot of scrutiny and your suggestions would be much appreciated. [1] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemyfaces-005/ [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310661version=12316092 https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310661version=12316092
Re: [VOTE] Release for Trinidad 2.0.0-beta-2
+1 On 02/15/2011 02:09 AM, Scott O'Bryan wrote: Okay, so my first hickup. I forgot to include the voting part. :D [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits [ ] +0 [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released, and why.. Thanks, Scott On 02/15/2011 01:59 AM, Scott O'Bryan wrote: Hey all, I was running the tasks needed to get the Trinidad 2.0.0-beta-2 release out and now I need a vote as to whether everything looks good or not. This is still a beta release so there are still a few open bugs, but all of the unit tests pass and this beta has undergone some considerable testing. I have deployed the artifacts to the Nexus Repository [1] for review. The release notes for the Trinidad 2.0.0-beta-2 release are on the JIRA site [2] for review as well. This vote will remain open for at least 72 hours. Thanks, Scott O'Bryan PS- This is my first release of Trinidad since moving over to NEXUS, so a lot of scrutiny and your suggestions would be much appreciated. [1] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemyfaces-005/ [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310661version=12316092 https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310661version=12316092
Re: [VOTE] Release for Trinidad 2.0.0-beta-2
Downloaded the source:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemyfaces-005/org/apache/myfaces/trinidad/trinidad/2.0.0-beta-2/trinidad-2.0.0-beta-2-source-release.zip
did an unzip and mvn clean install
I am getting this error:
[INFO] [buildnumber:create {execution: default}]
[INFO] Checking for local modifications: skipped.
[INFO] Updating project files from SCM: skipped.
[INFO] Executing: /bin/sh -c cd
/home/matzew/work/source/SCOTT/trinidad-2.0.0-beta-2/trinidad-api
svn --non-interactive info
[INFO] Working directory:
/home/matzew/work/source/SCOTT/trinidad-2.0.0-beta-2/trinidad-api
Provider message:
The svn command failed.
Command output:
svn: '.' is not a working copy
[INFO]
[ERROR] BUILD ERROR
[INFO]
[INFO] Cannot get the revision information from the scm repository :
Error!
This is due to the buildnumber-maven-plugin, not sure if that should
be really _always_ enabled...
Looks like I can't download the soruce and build it, since the target
folder (of my unzip) is (of course)
not SVN folder.
Any hints?
-Matthias
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 10:09 AM, Scott O'Bryan darkar...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
On 02/15/2011 02:09 AM, Scott O'Bryan wrote:
Okay, so my first hickup. I forgot to include the voting part. :D
[ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
[ ] +0
[ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released,
and why..
Thanks,
Scott
On 02/15/2011 01:59 AM, Scott O'Bryan wrote:
Hey all,
I was running the tasks needed to get the Trinidad 2.0.0-beta-2 release
out and now I need a vote as to whether everything looks good or not. This
is still a beta release so there are still a few open bugs, but all of the
unit tests pass and this beta has undergone some considerable testing.
I have deployed the artifacts to the Nexus Repository [1] for review.
The release notes for the Trinidad 2.0.0-beta-2 release are on the JIRA
site [2] for review as well.
This vote will remain open for at least 72 hours.
Thanks,
Scott O'Bryan
PS- This is my first release of Trinidad since moving over to NEXUS, so a
lot of scrutiny and your suggestions would be much appreciated.
[1]
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemyfaces-005/
[2]
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310661version=12316092
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310661version=12316092
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
Re: [VOTE] Release for Trinidad 2.0.0-beta-2
Hello Matze,
good point. I think the revisionOnScmFailure parameter should be set
to 'unkown'.
Regards
Bernd
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org wrote:
Downloaded the source:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemyfaces-005/org/apache/myfaces/trinidad/trinidad/2.0.0-beta-2/trinidad-2.0.0-beta-2-source-release.zip
did an unzip and mvn clean install
I am getting this error:
[INFO] [buildnumber:create {execution: default}]
[INFO] Checking for local modifications: skipped.
[INFO] Updating project files from SCM: skipped.
[INFO] Executing: /bin/sh -c cd
/home/matzew/work/source/SCOTT/trinidad-2.0.0-beta-2/trinidad-api
svn --non-interactive info
[INFO] Working directory:
/home/matzew/work/source/SCOTT/trinidad-2.0.0-beta-2/trinidad-api
Provider message:
The svn command failed.
Command output:
svn: '.' is not a working copy
[INFO]
[ERROR] BUILD ERROR
[INFO]
[INFO] Cannot get the revision information from the scm repository :
Error!
This is due to the buildnumber-maven-plugin, not sure if that should
be really _always_ enabled...
Looks like I can't download the soruce and build it, since the target
folder (of my unzip) is (of course)
not SVN folder.
Any hints?
-Matthias
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 10:09 AM, Scott O'Bryan darkar...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
On 02/15/2011 02:09 AM, Scott O'Bryan wrote:
Okay, so my first hickup. I forgot to include the voting part. :D
[ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
[ ] +0
[ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released,
and why..
Thanks,
Scott
On 02/15/2011 01:59 AM, Scott O'Bryan wrote:
Hey all,
I was running the tasks needed to get the Trinidad 2.0.0-beta-2 release
out and now I need a vote as to whether everything looks good or not. This
is still a beta release so there are still a few open bugs, but all of the
unit tests pass and this beta has undergone some considerable testing.
I have deployed the artifacts to the Nexus Repository [1] for review.
The release notes for the Trinidad 2.0.0-beta-2 release are on the JIRA
site [2] for review as well.
This vote will remain open for at least 72 hours.
Thanks,
Scott O'Bryan
PS- This is my first release of Trinidad since moving over to NEXUS, so a
lot of scrutiny and your suggestions would be much appreciated.
[1]
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemyfaces-005/
[2]
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310661version=12316092
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310661version=12316092
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
Re: [VOTE] Release for Trinidad 2.0.0-beta-2
Matthias,
Can it be activated only for the release procedure? with the profile
apache-release?
It will also fail on computers that don't have a command line SVN client
installed. That is also the reason why we abandoned it in the company
projects.
regards
Rudy.
On 15 February 2011 11:07, Bernd Bohmann bernd.bohm...@googlemail.comwrote:
Hello Matze,
good point. I think the revisionOnScmFailure parameter should be set
to 'unkown'.
Regards
Bernd
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org
wrote:
Downloaded the source:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemyfaces-005/org/apache/myfaces/trinidad/trinidad/2.0.0-beta-2/trinidad-2.0.0-beta-2-source-release.zip
did an unzip and mvn clean install
I am getting this error:
[INFO] [buildnumber:create {execution: default}]
[INFO] Checking for local modifications: skipped.
[INFO] Updating project files from SCM: skipped.
[INFO] Executing: /bin/sh -c cd
/home/matzew/work/source/SCOTT/trinidad-2.0.0-beta-2/trinidad-api
svn --non-interactive info
[INFO] Working directory:
/home/matzew/work/source/SCOTT/trinidad-2.0.0-beta-2/trinidad-api
Provider message:
The svn command failed.
Command output:
svn: '.' is not a working copy
[INFO]
[ERROR] BUILD ERROR
[INFO]
[INFO] Cannot get the revision information from the scm repository :
Error!
This is due to the buildnumber-maven-plugin, not sure if that should
be really _always_ enabled...
Looks like I can't download the soruce and build it, since the target
folder (of my unzip) is (of course)
not SVN folder.
Any hints?
-Matthias
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 10:09 AM, Scott O'Bryan darkar...@gmail.com
wrote:
+1
On 02/15/2011 02:09 AM, Scott O'Bryan wrote:
Okay, so my first hickup. I forgot to include the voting part. :D
[ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
[ ] +0
[ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released,
and why..
Thanks,
Scott
On 02/15/2011 01:59 AM, Scott O'Bryan wrote:
Hey all,
I was running the tasks needed to get the Trinidad 2.0.0-beta-2
release
out and now I need a vote as to whether everything looks good or not.
This
is still a beta release so there are still a few open bugs, but all of
the
unit tests pass and this beta has undergone some considerable testing.
I have deployed the artifacts to the Nexus Repository [1] for review.
The release notes for the Trinidad 2.0.0-beta-2 release are on the
JIRA
site [2] for review as well.
This vote will remain open for at least 72 hours.
Thanks,
Scott O'Bryan
PS- This is my first release of Trinidad since moving over to NEXUS,
so a
lot of scrutiny and your suggestions would be much appreciated.
[1]
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemyfaces-005/
[2]
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310661version=12316092
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310661version=12316092
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
Re: [VOTE] Release for Trinidad 2.0.0-beta-2
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 11:11 AM, Rudy De Busscher
rdebussc...@gmail.com wrote:
Matthias,
Can it be activated only for the release procedure? with the profile
apache-release?
it does not make sense to do it only on releases - as they are always
from a TAG,
hence the revision is known.
It will also fail on computers that don't have a command line SVN client
installed. That is also the reason why we abandoned it in the company
projects.
I think Bernd's suggestion is the right one.
-Matthias
regards
Rudy.
On 15 February 2011 11:07, Bernd Bohmann bernd.bohm...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Hello Matze,
good point. I think the revisionOnScmFailure parameter should be set
to 'unkown'.
Regards
Bernd
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org
wrote:
Downloaded the source:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemyfaces-005/org/apache/myfaces/trinidad/trinidad/2.0.0-beta-2/trinidad-2.0.0-beta-2-source-release.zip
did an unzip and mvn clean install
I am getting this error:
[INFO] [buildnumber:create {execution: default}]
[INFO] Checking for local modifications: skipped.
[INFO] Updating project files from SCM: skipped.
[INFO] Executing: /bin/sh -c cd
/home/matzew/work/source/SCOTT/trinidad-2.0.0-beta-2/trinidad-api
svn --non-interactive info
[INFO] Working directory:
/home/matzew/work/source/SCOTT/trinidad-2.0.0-beta-2/trinidad-api
Provider message:
The svn command failed.
Command output:
svn: '.' is not a working copy
[INFO]
[ERROR] BUILD ERROR
[INFO]
[INFO] Cannot get the revision information from the scm repository :
Error!
This is due to the buildnumber-maven-plugin, not sure if that should
be really _always_ enabled...
Looks like I can't download the soruce and build it, since the target
folder (of my unzip) is (of course)
not SVN folder.
Any hints?
-Matthias
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 10:09 AM, Scott O'Bryan darkar...@gmail.com
wrote:
+1
On 02/15/2011 02:09 AM, Scott O'Bryan wrote:
Okay, so my first hickup. I forgot to include the voting part. :D
[ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
[ ] +0
[ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be
released,
and why..
Thanks,
Scott
On 02/15/2011 01:59 AM, Scott O'Bryan wrote:
Hey all,
I was running the tasks needed to get the Trinidad 2.0.0-beta-2
release
out and now I need a vote as to whether everything looks good or not.
This
is still a beta release so there are still a few open bugs, but all
of the
unit tests pass and this beta has undergone some considerable
testing.
I have deployed the artifacts to the Nexus Repository [1] for review.
The release notes for the Trinidad 2.0.0-beta-2 release are on the
JIRA
site [2] for review as well.
This vote will remain open for at least 72 hours.
Thanks,
Scott O'Bryan
PS- This is my first release of Trinidad since moving over to NEXUS,
so a
lot of scrutiny and your suggestions would be much appreciated.
[1]
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemyfaces-005/
[2]
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310661version=12316092
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310661version=12316092
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
Re: [VOTE] Release for Trinidad 2.0.0-beta-2
This plugin actually kind of worries me if used on released code.
Unless we use a timestamp type build id, I think ANY revision of
tagged code should be unknown. It's not like people are going to
commit their changes to the tag, this allowing a unique number to be
calculated.
What do we use this for, debugging? If so, I'm wondering if we could
only allow this to be executed with snapshots and allow everything
else to be unknown..
Scott
On Feb 15, 2011, at 3:18 AM, Matthias Wessendorff mat...@apache.org wrote:
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 11:11 AM, Rudy De Busscher
rdebussc...@gmail.com wrote:
Matthias,
Can it be activated only for the release procedure? with the profile
apache-release?
it does not make sense to do it only on releases - as they are always
from a TAG,
hence the revision is known.
It will also fail on computers that don't have a command line SVN client
installed. That is also the reason why we abandoned it in the company
projects.
I think Bernd's suggestion is the right one.
-Matthias
regards
Rudy.
On 15 February 2011 11:07, Bernd Bohmann bernd.bohm...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Hello Matze,
good point. I think the revisionOnScmFailure parameter should be set
to 'unkown'.
Regards
Bernd
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org
wrote:
Downloaded the source:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemyfaces-005/org/apache/myfaces/trinidad/trinidad/2.0.0-beta-2/trinidad-2.0.0-beta-2-source-release.zip
did an unzip and mvn clean install
I am getting this error:
[INFO] [buildnumber:create {execution: default}]
[INFO] Checking for local modifications: skipped.
[INFO] Updating project files from SCM: skipped.
[INFO] Executing: /bin/sh -c cd
/home/matzew/work/source/SCOTT/trinidad-2.0.0-beta-2/trinidad-api
svn --non-interactive info
[INFO] Working directory:
/home/matzew/work/source/SCOTT/trinidad-2.0.0-beta-2/trinidad-api
Provider message:
The svn command failed.
Command output:
svn: '.' is not a working copy
[INFO]
[ERROR] BUILD ERROR
[INFO]
[INFO] Cannot get the revision information from the scm repository :
Error!
This is due to the buildnumber-maven-plugin, not sure if that should
be really _always_ enabled...
Looks like I can't download the soruce and build it, since the target
folder (of my unzip) is (of course)
not SVN folder.
Any hints?
-Matthias
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 10:09 AM, Scott O'Bryan darkar...@gmail.com
wrote:
+1
On 02/15/2011 02:09 AM, Scott O'Bryan wrote:
Okay, so my first hickup. I forgot to include the voting part. :D
[ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
[ ] +0
[ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be
released,
and why..
Thanks,
Scott
On 02/15/2011 01:59 AM, Scott O'Bryan wrote:
Hey all,
I was running the tasks needed to get the Trinidad 2.0.0-beta-2
release
out and now I need a vote as to whether everything looks good or not.
This
is still a beta release so there are still a few open bugs, but all
of the
unit tests pass and this beta has undergone some considerable
testing.
I have deployed the artifacts to the Nexus Repository [1] for review.
The release notes for the Trinidad 2.0.0-beta-2 release are on the
JIRA
site [2] for review as well.
This vote will remain open for at least 72 hours.
Thanks,
Scott O'Bryan
PS- This is my first release of Trinidad since moving over to NEXUS,
so a
lot of scrutiny and your suggestions would be much appreciated.
[1]
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemyfaces-005/
[2]
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310661version=12316092
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310661version=12316092
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
Re: [VOTE] Release for Trinidad 2.0.0-beta-2
currently codi uses a profile for activating it for nightly builds (see
[1]).
regards,
gerhard
[1] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/extensions/cdi/trunk/pom.xml
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German
Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
2011/2/15 Scott O'Bryan darkar...@gmail.com
This plugin actually kind of worries me if used on released code.
Unless we use a timestamp type build id, I think ANY revision of
tagged code should be unknown. It's not like people are going to
commit their changes to the tag, this allowing a unique number to be
calculated.
What do we use this for, debugging? If so, I'm wondering if we could
only allow this to be executed with snapshots and allow everything
else to be unknown..
Scott
On Feb 15, 2011, at 3:18 AM, Matthias Wessendorff mat...@apache.org
wrote:
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 11:11 AM, Rudy De Busscher
rdebussc...@gmail.com wrote:
Matthias,
Can it be activated only for the release procedure? with the profile
apache-release?
it does not make sense to do it only on releases - as they are always
from a TAG,
hence the revision is known.
It will also fail on computers that don't have a command line SVN client
installed. That is also the reason why we abandoned it in the company
projects.
I think Bernd's suggestion is the right one.
-Matthias
regards
Rudy.
On 15 February 2011 11:07, Bernd Bohmann bernd.bohm...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Hello Matze,
good point. I think the revisionOnScmFailure parameter should be set
to 'unkown'.
Regards
Bernd
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Matthias Wessendorf
mat...@apache.org
wrote:
Downloaded the source:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemyfaces-005/org/apache/myfaces/trinidad/trinidad/2.0.0-beta-2/trinidad-2.0.0-beta-2-source-release.zip
did an unzip and mvn clean install
I am getting this error:
[INFO] [buildnumber:create {execution: default}]
[INFO] Checking for local modifications: skipped.
[INFO] Updating project files from SCM: skipped.
[INFO] Executing: /bin/sh -c cd
/home/matzew/work/source/SCOTT/trinidad-2.0.0-beta-2/trinidad-api
svn --non-interactive info
[INFO] Working directory:
/home/matzew/work/source/SCOTT/trinidad-2.0.0-beta-2/trinidad-api
Provider message:
The svn command failed.
Command output:
svn: '.' is not a working copy
[INFO]
[ERROR] BUILD ERROR
[INFO]
[INFO] Cannot get the revision information from the scm repository :
Error!
This is due to the buildnumber-maven-plugin, not sure if that should
be really _always_ enabled...
Looks like I can't download the soruce and build it, since the target
folder (of my unzip) is (of course)
not SVN folder.
Any hints?
-Matthias
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 10:09 AM, Scott O'Bryan darkar...@gmail.com
wrote:
+1
On 02/15/2011 02:09 AM, Scott O'Bryan wrote:
Okay, so my first hickup. I forgot to include the voting part. :D
[ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
[ ] +0
[ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be
released,
and why..
Thanks,
Scott
On 02/15/2011 01:59 AM, Scott O'Bryan wrote:
Hey all,
I was running the tasks needed to get the Trinidad 2.0.0-beta-2
release
out and now I need a vote as to whether everything looks good or
not.
This
is still a beta release so there are still a few open bugs, but all
of the
unit tests pass and this beta has undergone some considerable
testing.
I have deployed the artifacts to the Nexus Repository [1] for
review.
The release notes for the Trinidad 2.0.0-beta-2 release are on the
JIRA
site [2] for review as well.
This vote will remain open for at least 72 hours.
Thanks,
Scott O'Bryan
PS- This is my first release of Trinidad since moving over to
NEXUS,
so a
lot of scrutiny and your suggestions would be much appreciated.
[1]
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemyfaces-005/
[2]
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310661version=12316092
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310661version=12316092
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
Re: [VOTE] Release for Trinidad 2.0.0-beta-2
Yeah... This makes more sense to me. Only nightly builds really need this
info and it should be easy enough to add the custom profile to Hudson (or
whatever they're calling it these days).. :)
On Feb 15, 2011, at 6:31 AM, Gerhard gerhard.petra...@gmail.com wrote:
currently codi uses a profile for activating it for nightly builds (see
[1]).
regards,
gerhard
[1] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/extensions/cdi/trunk/pom.xml
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German
Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
2011/2/15 Scott O'Bryan darkar...@gmail.com
This plugin actually kind of worries me if used on released code.
Unless we use a timestamp type build id, I think ANY revision of
tagged code should be unknown. It's not like people are going to
commit their changes to the tag, this allowing a unique number to be
calculated.
What do we use this for, debugging? If so, I'm wondering if we could
only allow this to be executed with snapshots and allow everything
else to be unknown..
Scott
On Feb 15, 2011, at 3:18 AM, Matthias Wessendorff mat...@apache.org
wrote:
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 11:11 AM, Rudy De Busscher
rdebussc...@gmail.com wrote:
Matthias,
Can it be activated only for the release procedure? with the profile
apache-release?
it does not make sense to do it only on releases - as they are always
from a TAG,
hence the revision is known.
It will also fail on computers that don't have a command line SVN client
installed. That is also the reason why we abandoned it in the company
projects.
I think Bernd's suggestion is the right one.
-Matthias
regards
Rudy.
On 15 February 2011 11:07, Bernd Bohmann bernd.bohm...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Hello Matze,
good point. I think the revisionOnScmFailure parameter should be set
to 'unkown'.
Regards
Bernd
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Matthias Wessendorf
mat...@apache.org
wrote:
Downloaded the source:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemyfaces-005/org/apache/myfaces/trinidad/trinidad/2.0.0-beta-2/trinidad-2.0.0-beta-2-source-release.zip
did an unzip and mvn clean install
I am getting this error:
[INFO] [buildnumber:create {execution: default}]
[INFO] Checking for local modifications: skipped.
[INFO] Updating project files from SCM: skipped.
[INFO] Executing: /bin/sh -c cd
/home/matzew/work/source/SCOTT/trinidad-2.0.0-beta-2/trinidad-api
svn --non-interactive info
[INFO] Working directory:
/home/matzew/work/source/SCOTT/trinidad-2.0.0-beta-2/trinidad-api
Provider message:
The svn command failed.
Command output:
svn: '.' is not a working copy
[INFO]
[ERROR] BUILD ERROR
[INFO]
[INFO] Cannot get the revision information from the scm repository :
Error!
This is due to the buildnumber-maven-plugin, not sure if that should
be really _always_ enabled...
Looks like I can't download the soruce and build it, since the target
folder (of my unzip) is (of course)
not SVN folder.
Any hints?
-Matthias
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 10:09 AM, Scott O'Bryan darkar...@gmail.com
wrote:
+1
On 02/15/2011 02:09 AM, Scott O'Bryan wrote:
Okay, so my first hickup. I forgot to include the voting part. :D
[ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
[ ] +0
[ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be
released,
and why..
Thanks,
Scott
On 02/15/2011 01:59 AM, Scott O'Bryan wrote:
Hey all,
I was running the tasks needed to get the Trinidad 2.0.0-beta-2
release
out and now I need a vote as to whether everything looks good or
not.
This
is still a beta release so there are still a few open bugs, but all
of the
unit tests pass and this beta has undergone some considerable
testing.
I have deployed the artifacts to the Nexus Repository [1] for
review.
The release notes for the Trinidad 2.0.0-beta-2 release are on the
JIRA
site [2] for review as well.
This vote will remain open for at least 72 hours.
Thanks,
Scott O'Bryan
PS- This is my first release of Trinidad since moving over to
NEXUS,
so a
lot of scrutiny and your suggestions would be much appreciated.
[1]
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemyfaces-005/
[2]
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310661version=12316092
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310661version=12316092
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions:
Re: [VOTE] Release for Trinidad 2.0.0-beta-2
yes it's easy - you just have to add the profile.
e.g. in case of codi: clean deploy -Pextended-manifest
(at Goals und Optionen)
regards,
gerhard
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German
Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
2011/2/15 Scott O'Bryan darkar...@gmail.com
Yeah... This makes more sense to me. Only nightly builds really need this
info and it should be easy enough to add the custom profile to Hudson (or
whatever they're calling it these days).. :)
On Feb 15, 2011, at 6:31 AM, Gerhard gerhard.petra...@gmail.com wrote:
currently codi uses a profile for activating it for nightly builds (see
[1]).
regards,
gerhard
[1] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/extensions/cdi/trunk/pom.xml
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/extensions/cdi/trunk/pom.xml
http://www.irian.athttp://www.irian.at
Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German
Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
2011/2/15 Scott O'Bryan darkar...@gmail.comdarkar...@gmail.com
This plugin actually kind of worries me if used on released code.
Unless we use a timestamp type build id, I think ANY revision of
tagged code should be unknown. It's not like people are going to
commit their changes to the tag, this allowing a unique number to be
calculated.
What do we use this for, debugging? If so, I'm wondering if we could
only allow this to be executed with snapshots and allow everything
else to be unknown..
Scott
On Feb 15, 2011, at 3:18 AM, Matthias Wessendorff mat...@apache.org
mat...@apache.org wrote:
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 11:11 AM, Rudy De Busscher
rdebussc...@gmail.comrdebussc...@gmail.com wrote:
Matthias,
Can it be activated only for the release procedure? with the profile
apache-release?
it does not make sense to do it only on releases - as they are always
from a TAG,
hence the revision is known.
It will also fail on computers that don't have a command line SVN
client
installed. That is also the reason why we abandoned it in the company
projects.
I think Bernd's suggestion is the right one.
-Matthias
regards
Rudy.
On 15 February 2011 11:07, Bernd Bohmann bernd.bohm...@googlemail.com
bernd.bohm...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Hello Matze,
good point. I think the revisionOnScmFailure parameter should be set
to 'unkown'.
Regards
Bernd
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Matthias Wessendorf
mat...@apache.org
mat...@apache.org
wrote:
Downloaded the source:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemyfaces-005/org/apache/myfaces/trinidad/trinidad/2.0.0-beta-2/trinidad-2.0.0-beta-2-source-release.zip
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemyfaces-005/org/apache/myfaces/trinidad/trinidad/2.0.0-beta-2/trinidad-2.0.0-beta-2-source-release.zip
did an unzip and mvn clean install
I am getting this error:
[INFO] [buildnumber:create {execution: default}]
[INFO] Checking for local modifications: skipped.
[INFO] Updating project files from SCM: skipped.
[INFO] Executing: /bin/sh -c cd
/home/matzew/work/source/SCOTT/trinidad-2.0.0-beta-2/trinidad-api
svn --non-interactive info
[INFO] Working directory:
/home/matzew/work/source/SCOTT/trinidad-2.0.0-beta-2/trinidad-api
Provider message:
The svn command failed.
Command output:
svn: '.' is not a working copy
[INFO]
[ERROR] BUILD ERROR
[INFO]
[INFO] Cannot get the revision information from the scm repository :
Error!
This is due to the buildnumber-maven-plugin, not sure if that
should
be really _always_ enabled...
Looks like I can't download the soruce and build it, since the target
folder (of my unzip) is (of course)
not SVN folder.
Any hints?
-Matthias
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 10:09 AM, Scott O'Bryan darkar...@gmail.com
darkar...@gmail.com
wrote:
+1
On 02/15/2011 02:09 AM, Scott O'Bryan wrote:
Okay, so my first hickup. I forgot to include the voting part. :D
[ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
[ ] +0
[ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be
released,
and why..
Thanks,
Scott
On 02/15/2011 01:59 AM, Scott O'Bryan wrote:
Hey all,
I was running the tasks needed to get the Trinidad 2.0.0-beta-2
release
out and now I need a vote as to whether everything looks good or
not.
This
is still a beta release so there are still a few open bugs, but
all
of the
unit tests pass and this beta has undergone some considerable
testing.
I have deployed the artifacts to the Nexus Repository [1] for
Re: [VOTE] Release for Trinidad 2.0.0-beta-2
+1 On 2/15/2011 4:09 AM, Scott O'Bryan wrote: +1 On 02/15/2011 02:09 AM, Scott O'Bryan wrote: Okay, so my first hickup. I forgot to include the voting part. :D [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits [ ] +0 [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released, and why.. Thanks, Scott On 02/15/2011 01:59 AM, Scott O'Bryan wrote: Hey all, I was running the tasks needed to get the Trinidad 2.0.0-beta-2 release out and now I need a vote as to whether everything looks good or not. This is still a beta release so there are still a few open bugs, but all of the unit tests pass and this beta has undergone some considerable testing. I have deployed the artifacts to the Nexus Repository [1] for review. The release notes for the Trinidad 2.0.0-beta-2 release are on the JIRA site [2] for review as well. This vote will remain open for at least 72 hours. Thanks, Scott O'Bryan PS- This is my first release of Trinidad since moving over to NEXUS, so a lot of scrutiny and your suggestions would be much appreciated. [1] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemyfaces-005/ [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310661version=12316092 https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310661version=12316092
Re: [VOTE] Release for Trinidad 2.0.0-beta-2
-1 I am voting -1 because I am not able to build the source release. The source release is the most important part of an apache release -Matthias On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 4:16 PM, MAX STARETS max.star...@oracle.com wrote: +1 On 2/15/2011 4:09 AM, Scott O'Bryan wrote: +1 On 02/15/2011 02:09 AM, Scott O'Bryan wrote: Okay, so my first hickup. I forgot to include the voting part. :D [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits [ ] +0 [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released, and why.. Thanks, Scott On 02/15/2011 01:59 AM, Scott O'Bryan wrote: Hey all, I was running the tasks needed to get the Trinidad 2.0.0-beta-2 release out and now I need a vote as to whether everything looks good or not. This is still a beta release so there are still a few open bugs, but all of the unit tests pass and this beta has undergone some considerable testing. I have deployed the artifacts to the Nexus Repository [1] for review. The release notes for the Trinidad 2.0.0-beta-2 release are on the JIRA site [2] for review as well. This vote will remain open for at least 72 hours. Thanks, Scott O'Bryan PS- This is my first release of Trinidad since moving over to NEXUS, so a lot of scrutiny and your suggestions would be much appreciated. [1] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemyfaces-005/ [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310661version=12316092 https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310661version=12316092 -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
Re: [VOTE] Release for Trinidad 2.0.0-beta-2
It built fine for me on my Mac. But +0 until we find out what is up with Matthias' build. -- Blake On 2/15/11 9:06 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: -1 I am voting -1 because I am not able to build the source release. The source release is the most important part of an apache release -Matthias On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 4:16 PM, MAX STARETSmax.star...@oracle.com wrote: +1 On 2/15/2011 4:09 AM, Scott O'Bryan wrote: +1 On 02/15/2011 02:09 AM, Scott O'Bryan wrote: Okay, so my first hickup. I forgot to include the voting part. :D [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits [ ] +0 [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released, and why.. Thanks, Scott On 02/15/2011 01:59 AM, Scott O'Bryan wrote: Hey all, I was running the tasks needed to get the Trinidad 2.0.0-beta-2 release out and now I need a vote as to whether everything looks good or not. This is still a beta release so there are still a few open bugs, but all of the unit tests pass and this beta has undergone some considerable testing. I have deployed the artifacts to the Nexus Repository [1] for review. The release notes for the Trinidad 2.0.0-beta-2 release are on the JIRA site [2] for review as well. This vote will remain open for at least 72 hours. Thanks, Scott O'Bryan PS- This is my first release of Trinidad since moving over to NEXUS, so a lot of scrutiny and your suggestions would be much appreciated. [1] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemyfaces-005/ [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310661version=12316092 https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310661version=12316092
Re: [VOTE] Release for Trinidad 2.0.0-beta-2
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 7:05 PM, Blake Sullivan blake.sulli...@oracle.com wrote: It built fine for me on my Mac. I know why I bought one :-) But +0 until we find out what is up with Matthias' build. -- Blake On 2/15/11 9:06 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: -1 I am voting -1 because I am not able to build the source release. The source release is the most important part of an apache release -Matthias On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 4:16 PM, MAX STARETSmax.star...@oracle.com wrote: +1 On 2/15/2011 4:09 AM, Scott O'Bryan wrote: +1 On 02/15/2011 02:09 AM, Scott O'Bryan wrote: Okay, so my first hickup. I forgot to include the voting part. :D [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits [ ] +0 [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released, and why.. Thanks, Scott On 02/15/2011 01:59 AM, Scott O'Bryan wrote: Hey all, I was running the tasks needed to get the Trinidad 2.0.0-beta-2 release out and now I need a vote as to whether everything looks good or not. This is still a beta release so there are still a few open bugs, but all of the unit tests pass and this beta has undergone some considerable testing. I have deployed the artifacts to the Nexus Repository [1] for review. The release notes for the Trinidad 2.0.0-beta-2 release are on the JIRA site [2] for review as well. This vote will remain open for at least 72 hours. Thanks, Scott O'Bryan PS- This is my first release of Trinidad since moving over to NEXUS, so a lot of scrutiny and your suggestions would be much appreciated. [1] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemyfaces-005/ [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310661version=12316092 https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310661version=12316092 -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
Re: [VOTE] Release for Trinidad 2.0.0-beta-2
Okay cool. Stopping the vote. I'll get a patch right in for this and regenerate the artifacts. Expect a vote today or tomorrow. Basically, I'm going to follow Gerhard's suggestion and add a profile which is disabled by default which would allow us to enable this functionality for nightly builds where it's important. Sound Good? Scott On 02/15/2011 10:06 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: -1 I am voting -1 because I am not able to build the source release. The source release is the most important part of an apache release -Matthias On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 4:16 PM, MAX STARETSmax.star...@oracle.com wrote: +1 On 2/15/2011 4:09 AM, Scott O'Bryan wrote: +1 On 02/15/2011 02:09 AM, Scott O'Bryan wrote: Okay, so my first hickup. I forgot to include the voting part. :D [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits [ ] +0 [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released, and why.. Thanks, Scott On 02/15/2011 01:59 AM, Scott O'Bryan wrote: Hey all, I was running the tasks needed to get the Trinidad 2.0.0-beta-2 release out and now I need a vote as to whether everything looks good or not. This is still a beta release so there are still a few open bugs, but all of the unit tests pass and this beta has undergone some considerable testing. I have deployed the artifacts to the Nexus Repository [1] for review. The release notes for the Trinidad 2.0.0-beta-2 release are on the JIRA site [2] for review as well. This vote will remain open for at least 72 hours. Thanks, Scott O'Bryan PS- This is my first release of Trinidad since moving over to NEXUS, so a lot of scrutiny and your suggestions would be much appreciated. [1] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemyfaces-005/ [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310661version=12316092 https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310661version=12316092
