On 5/3/2024 4:38 PM, Michael D Kinney wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Kinney, Michael D
Sent: Friday, May 3, 2024 1:13 PM
To: Pedro Falcato
Cc: r...@edk2.groups.io; devel@edk2.groups.io; Leif Lindholm
; Andrew Fish (af...@apple.com) ;
Kinney, Michael D
Subject: RE: [edk2-rfc]
Hi All,
A new release candidate is published after upstreaming Stuart's commits on
build cleanup.
https://github.com/tianocore/edk2-test/tree/edk2-test-rc2_202405
The updates since the old tag are the following commits in the patch series:
[PATCH v2 0/4] TCG2 protocol clean up
> -Original Message-
> From: Kinney, Michael D
> Sent: Friday, May 3, 2024 1:13 PM
> To: Pedro Falcato
> Cc: r...@edk2.groups.io; devel@edk2.groups.io; Leif Lindholm
> ; Andrew Fish (af...@apple.com) ;
> Kinney, Michael D
> Subject: RE: [edk2-rfc] [edk2-devel] Proposal to switch
> -Original Message-
> From: Pedro Falcato
> Sent: Friday, May 3, 2024 10:39 AM
> To: Kinney, Michael D
> Cc: r...@edk2.groups.io; devel@edk2.groups.io; Leif Lindholm
> ; Andrew Fish (af...@apple.com)
> Subject: Re: [edk2-rfc] [edk2-devel] Proposal to switch TianoCore Code
> Review
Pushed as 248aa15
> -Original Message-
> From: Duggapu, Chinni B
> Sent: Monday, April 22, 2024 9:03 PM
> To: devel@edk2.groups.io
> Cc: Chiu, Chasel ; Desimone, Nathaniel L
> ; Duggapu, Chinni B
> ; S, Ashraf Ali ; Kuo,
> Ted
> Subject: [PATCH] IntelFsp2Pkg/PatchFv.py: FIX for GCC
Yes. Many options on transition. I would suggest we consider the
following steps.
1) Define a manual process where Maintainers/Reviewers look for
new PRs and make sure all the required maintainers/reviewers
are invited to the review. Current process has many manual
steps. Having
On Thu, May 2, 2024 at 7:17 PM Kinney, Michael D
wrote:
>
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: r...@edk2.groups.io On Behalf Of Pedro Falcato
> > Sent: Thursday, May 2, 2024 10:51 AM
> > To: devel@edk2.groups.io; Kinney, Michael D
> > Cc: r...@edk2.groups.io; Leif Lindholm ; Andrew Fish
Hi Mike,
I've seen that repo in that past.
Are the steps defined for what's needed to move to CODEWONERS (and
REVIEWERS) in terms of technical and process changes needed?
For example, could we start with CODEOWNERS manually synced to
Maintainers.txt, Maintainers.txt dropped, and then add
On 5/2/2024 12:37 PM, Kinney, Michael D wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Leif Lindholm
Sent: Thursday, May 2, 2024 3:57 AM
To: devel@edk2.groups.io; mikub...@linux.microsoft.com; Kinney, Michael
D ; r...@edk2.groups.io
Cc: Andrew Fish (af...@apple.com)
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel]
On 5/2/2024 6:57 AM, Leif Lindholm wrote:
On 2024-05-02 04:08, Michael Kubacki wrote:
Thank you for this proposal. We've been anticipating this change for
years and are excited to help support it.
Here's some items we'd like to raise for feedback that we could help
implement. Many could
On 5/2/2024 7:28 PM, Nhi Pham via groups.io wrote:
On 5/2/2024 4:31 AM, Oliver Smith-Denny via groups.io wrote:
Hi folks, returning to this thread because I noticed that HOB
creation still exists in StandaloneMmCore for ARM:
Hi All,
Please find my response inline marked [SAMI].
Regards,
Sami Mujawar
On 02/05/2024, 17:36, "Pierre Gondois" mailto:pierre.gond...@arm.com>> wrote:
Hello Abdul,
I added some comments.
I think that:
a. patches related to HPET/WSMT should require little work
b. MADT patch needs to
12 matches
Mail list logo
