...@apple.com
> Cc: Wang, Jian J ; Wu, Hao A ;
> Gao, Zhichao ;
> Kinney, Michael D ; Wang, Sunny (HPS SW)
>
> Subject: RE: [edk2-discuss] [edk2-devel] [PATCH] Support skipping automatic
> BM enumeration
>
> Sorry for the delay. Somehow I didn't catch the follow-up emai
Ni, Ray ; devel@edk2.groups.io; Laszlo Ersek
; af...@apple.com; disc...@edk2.groups.io
Cc: Ashish Singhal ; Wang, Jian J
; Wu, Hao A ; Gao, Zhichao
; Kinney, Michael D
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH] Support skipping automatic BM enumeration
Can we discuss this at the design meeting this wee
, December 12, 2019 10:52 AM
To: Ni, Ray ; devel@edk2.groups.io ;
Laszlo Ersek ; af...@apple.com ;
disc...@edk2.groups.io
Cc: Ashish Singhal ; Wang, Jian J
; Wu, Hao A ; Gao, Zhichao
; Kinney, Michael D
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH] Support skipping automatic BM enumeration
Thanks
.groups.io; Laszlo Ersek
; af...@apple.com; disc...@edk2.groups.io
Cc: Ashish Singhal ; Wang, Jian J
; Wu, Hao A ; Gao, Zhichao
; Kinney, Michael D
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH] Support skipping automatic BM enumeration
Can we discuss this at the design meeting this week (12/12)?
Thanks,
Jeff
J
; Wu, Hao A ; Gao, Zhichao
; Kinney, Michael D
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH] Support skipping automatic BM enumeration
Can we discuss this at the design meeting this week (12/12)?
Thanks,
Jeff
From: Jeff Brasen
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2019 10:04 AM
To
A ; Gao, Zhichao
; Kinney, Michael D
Subject: RE: [edk2-devel] [PATCH] Support skipping automatic BM enumeration
Yes, I think that would be good.
Summarizing everything in this thread
Problem: Platform needs to customize the boot options, this can be done for
normal boot but the UiApp calls
, Zhichao
; Kinney, Michael D
Subject: RE: [edk2-devel] [PATCH] Support skipping automatic BM enumeration
Yes, I think that would be good.
Summarizing everything in this thread
Problem: Platform needs to customize the boot options, this can be done for
normal boot but the UiApp calls
: Wednesday, November 13, 2019 7:09 PM
To: devel@edk2.groups.io; Jeff Brasen ; Laszlo Ersek
; af...@apple.com
Cc: Ashish Singhal ; Wang, Jian J
; Wu, Hao A ; Gao, Zhichao
; Kinney, Michael D
Subject: RE: [edk2-devel] [PATCH] Support skipping automatic BM enumeration
Jeff,
I think it's a good topic
On Behalf Of Jeff Brasen
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2019 2:43 AM
To: Ni, Ray ; devel@edk2.groups.io; Laszlo Ersek
; af...@apple.com
Cc: Ashish Singhal ; Wang, Jian J
; Wu, Hao A ; Gao, Zhichao
; Kinney, Michael D
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH] Support skipping automatic BM enumeration
Thinking
; Kinney, Michael D
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH] Support skipping automatic BM enumeration
I am not sure a PCD would work (unless I am missing something) We do want to do
a connect all and re-enumerate in UiApp but we need the platform code to be
involved in that process.
Than
@edk2.groups.io ; Jeff Brasen
; Laszlo Ersek ; af...@apple.com
Cc: Ashish Singhal ; Wang, Jian J
; Wu, Hao A ; Gao, Zhichao
; Kinney, Michael D
Subject: RE: [edk2-devel] [PATCH] Support skipping automatic BM enumeration
Jeff,
If adding a PCD to control UiApp can meet the real needs, I
.groups.io; af...@apple.com
Cc: Ashish Singhal ; Wang, Jian J
; Wu, Hao A ; Gao, Zhichao
; Kinney, Michael D
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH] Support skipping automatic BM enumeration
If we are concerned about deploying this and breaking builds we could do this
via a new protocol instead
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH] Support skipping automatic BM enumeration
On 11/07/19 18:46, Jeff Brasen wrote:
> Fixing UiApp seems reasonable, I do think we would want a hook to the
> platform library in here as the enumeration that occurs in the UiApp is
> intended to do a full en
@apple.com
> Cc: Ashish Singhal ; Laszlo Ersek
> ; Wang, Jian J ; Wu, Hao A
> ; Gao, Zhichao ; Kinney, Michael D
>
> Subject: RE: [edk2-devel] [PATCH] Support skipping automatic BM enumeration
>
> I treat the issue in this way:
>
> 1. Platform Boot Manager lib
, November 7, 2019 12:21 AM
To: devel@edk2.groups.io; Jeff Brasen ; af...@apple.com
Cc: Ashish Singhal ; Laszlo Ersek ;
Wang, Jian J ; Wu, Hao A ; Gao,
Zhichao ; Kinney, Michael D
Subject: RE: [edk2-devel] [PATCH] Support skipping automatic BM enumeration
I treat the issue in this way:
1
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH] Support skipping automatic BM enumeration
The issue is there are some auto created options we do not want on our platform.
Get Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36>
From: Ni, Ray mailto:ray...@intel.com>>
Sen
Ashish Singhal
; Laszlo Ersek ; Wang, Jian J
; Wu, Hao A ; Gao, Zhichao
; Kinney, Michael D
Subject: RE: [edk2-devel] [PATCH] Support skipping automatic BM enumeration
Jeff,
RefreshAllBootOption() only modifies/creates the auto-created boot options. For
the boot options created by platform boot m
lto:hao.a...@intel.com>>; Gao, Zhichao
mailto:zhichao@intel.com>>; Kinney, Michael D
mailto:michael.d.kin...@intel.com>>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH] Support skipping automatic BM enumeration
On Nov 5, 2019, at 7:34 PM, Jeff Brasen
mailto:jbra...@nvidia.com>> w
Sent: Thursday, November 7, 2019 12:13 PM
To: af...@apple.com; Ni, Ray
Cc: devel@edk2.groups.io; Ashish Singhal ; Laszlo
Ersek ; Wang, Jian J ; Wu, Hao A
; Gao, Zhichao ; Kinney, Michael D
Subject: RE: [edk2-devel] [PATCH] Support skipping automatic BM enumeration
As the suggestions below made
On 11/06/19 17:15, Andrew Fish wrote:
>
>
>> On Nov 6, 2019, at 3:56 AM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>>
>> On 11/06/19 00:19, Jeff Brasen wrote:
>>> Wouldn't having a variable that we create and delete on every boot put
>>> unnecessary stress on the SPI-NOR that the variable store lives on?
>>
>> Yes,
hal ; Laszlo Ersek
> ; Ni, Ray ; Wang, Jian J
> ; Wu, Hao A ; Gao, Zhichao
> ; Kinney, Michael D
> Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH] Support skipping automatic BM enumeration
>
>
>
>
> On Nov 5, 2019, at 7:34 PM, Jeff Brasen <mailto:jbra...@nvidia.com>
> On Nov 6, 2019, at 3:56 AM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>
> On 11/06/19 00:19, Jeff Brasen wrote:
>> Wouldn't having a variable that we create and delete on every boot put
>> unnecessary stress on the SPI-NOR that the variable store lives on?
>
> Yes, it most likely would.
Should we write a BZ
On 11/06/19 00:19, Jeff Brasen wrote:
> Wouldn't having a variable that we create and delete on every boot put
> unnecessary stress on the SPI-NOR that the variable store lives on?
Yes, it most likely would.
[...]
Thanks
Laszlo
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all
, Ray ; Wang, Jian J ; Wu, Hao A
; Gao, Zhichao ; Kinney, Michael D
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH] Support skipping automatic BM enumeration
On Nov 5, 2019, at 7:34 PM, Jeff Brasen
mailto:jbra...@nvidia.com>> wrote:
Wouldn't having a variable that we create and delete on every bo
> On Nov 5, 2019, at 7:34 PM, Jeff Brasen wrote:
>
>
> Wouldn't having a variable that we create and delete on every boot put
> unnecessary stress on the SPI-NOR that the variable store lives on?
> What about the alternative approach where we allow the platform code to
> modify the
Wouldn't having a variable that we create and delete on every boot put
unnecessary stress on the SPI-NOR that the variable store lives on?
What about the alternative approach where we allow the platform code to modify
the attributes of the auto created variable to disable it with hidden/!active
; Wu, Hao A ; Gao, Zhichao
; Mike Kinney
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH] Support skipping automatic BM enumeration
On 11/05/19 19:00, Ashish Singhal wrote:
> I agree that I can use the platform boot manager protocol to modify
> the boot variable and give the custom optional data
On 11/05/19 19:00, Ashish Singhal wrote:
> I agree that I can use the platform boot manager protocol to modify
> the boot variable and give the custom optional data I need, but that
> would not stop UefiBootManagerLib from creating another boot option
> with mBmAutoCreateBootOptionGuid as the
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH] Support skipping automatic BM enumeration
> On Nov 5, 2019, at 3:54 AM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>
> On 11/05/19 07:15, Andrew Fish via Groups.Io wrote:
>
>> You could also edit any existing variables that point to your Load File to
>&g
> On Nov 5, 2019, at 3:54 AM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>
> On 11/05/19 07:15, Andrew Fish via Groups.Io wrote:
>
>> You could also edit any existing variables that point to your Load File to
>> make sure they follow the rules you care about?
>>
>> It is legal from an UEFI spec point of view
On 11/05/19 07:15, Andrew Fish via Groups.Io wrote:
> You could also edit any existing variables that point to your Load File to
> make sure they follow the rules you care about?
>
> It is legal from an UEFI spec point of view for a platform to edit the nvram
> boot variables based on
On 11/05/19 04:24, Ashish Singhal wrote:
> Hi Ray,
>
> I did not see any example with which one can tell BDS not to
> enumerate a boot option. Can you please point me to an example where
> a protocol (Block IO, Simple FS or Load File) does not get enumerated
> as a boot option?
(I'm going to
szlo Ersek
> ; Wang, Jian J ; Wu, Hao A
> ; Gao, Zhichao ; Mike Kinney
>
> Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH] Support skipping automatic BM enumeration
>
> Ashish,
>
> Just to be clear on your definition of enumerate. In this case it means the
> Boot Manager lib that is just one
J ; Wu, Hao A
; Gao, Zhichao ; Mike Kinney
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH] Support skipping automatic BM enumeration
Ashish,
Just to be clear on your definition of enumerate. In this case it means the
Boot Manager lib that is just one of may implementations a platform could use
to manage
om>>;
> devel@edk2.groups.io <mailto:devel@edk2.groups.io>; Ashish Singhal
> mailto:ashishsin...@nvidia.com>>; Wang, Jian J
> mailto:jian.j.w...@intel.com>>; Wu, Hao A
> mailto:hao.a...@intel.com>>; Gao, Zhichao
> mailto:zhichao@intel.com>&g
; Wu, Hao A ; Gao, Zhichao
; Mike Kinney
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH] Support skipping automatic BM enumeration
On Nov 4, 2019, at 9:24 PM, Ashish Singhal
mailto:ashishsin...@nvidia.com>> wrote:
Hi Ray,
I did not see any example with which one can tell BDS not to enumerate a boot
...@intel.com>>; Gao, Zhichao
> mailto:zhichao....@intel.com>>
> Cc: Kinney, Michael D <mailto:michael.d.kin...@intel.com>>
> Subject: RE: [edk2-devel] [PATCH] Support skipping automatic BM enumeration
>
> + Mike
>
> With the UEFI driver model, if a d
nt: Friday, November 1, 2019 3:42 PM
> To: Ashish Singhal ; devel@edk2.groups.io;
> jian.j.w...@intel.com; hao.a...@intel.com; Ray Ni ;
> Zhichao Gao
> Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH] Support skipping automatic BM
> enumeration
>
> On 10/31/19 13:42, Ashish Singhal wro
sh Singhal ; devel@edk2.groups.io;
> jian.j.w...@intel.com; hao.a...@intel.com; Ray Ni ; Zhichao
> Gao
> Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH] Support skipping automatic BM enumeration
>
> On 10/31/19 13:42, Ashish Singhal wrote:
>> Hello Laszlo,
>>
>> This is the cov
: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH] Support skipping automatic BM enumeration
On 10/31/19 13:42, Ashish Singhal wrote:
> Hello Laszlo,
>
> This is the cover letter. The patch was also submitted.
Can you please state the groups.io permalink for the posted patch, and/or the
Message-Id header for t
On 10/31/19 13:42, Ashish Singhal wrote:
> Hello Laszlo,
>
> This is the cover letter. The patch was also submitted.
Can you please state the groups.io permalink for the posted patch,
and/or the Message-Id header for the posted patch?
> Please let me know if you are unable to find it and I'll
+Ray, +Zhichao
(although, the actual patch seems to be missing from the posting)
Thanks
Laszlo
On 10/30/19 04:47, Ashish Singhal wrote:
> Right now, any and every handle with a BlockIO or SimpleFileSystem or
> LoadFile protocol installed on the system is used to enumerate BM
> automatically.
Right now, any and every handle with a BlockIO or SimpleFileSystem or
LoadFile protocol installed on the system is used to enumerate BM
automatically. There may be cases where on a platform, some of these
are not desirable to be enumerated automatically. This patch adds
support for skipping this
43 matches
Mail list logo
