Re[2]: Kannel and Kwtls

2002-01-29 Thread Oleg Taranov
Hello Stipe, Tuesday, January 29, 2002, 11:54:54 PM, you wrote: ST> Oleg Taranov wrote: >> Why do you need to use 9202? ST> keep in mind that some devices are only capable of connectionless ST> mode, so even for WTLS then. I don't know which ones, but I guess ST> there may be some. At least

Re: SMPP implementation in current CVS build

2002-01-29 Thread Stipe Tolj
Alex Judd wrote: > > Illogical and strange but thanks for looking at it (and the fix). > > We don't check for host as a default config value either so you get an > octstr error if you don't specify it. Quick diff fix for that. > > # cvs diff -u gw/smsc_smpp.c > Index: gw/smsc_smpp.c > =

Re: RV: [PATCH] smsc_smpp.c does not timestamp MO messages

2002-01-29 Thread Stipe Tolj
Angel Fradejas wrote: > > I noticed that MO messages do not get timestamped by SMPP driver. The fix is > trivial. You can confirm it using %t token on a get-url directive. > > Stipe, please, what about a commit for this? :-) Seriously, let be know if > I'm missing something. patch applied. Than

Re: EMI Large Account specific extensions VSMSC "d2 vodafone"

2002-01-29 Thread Stipe Tolj
Bjoern Buettner wrote: > > Has anybody experience with the Virtual SMSC from "d2 vodafone " ? > Does Kannel support the VSMSC ? at least we have no expicit support for it, due that there is no smsc driver module. Have you any specs about the protocoll? Stipe [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---

Re: Help with Connecting to Nokia SMSC (CIMD 2.0)

2002-01-29 Thread Stipe Tolj
Yochi Daniel wrote: > > I would like to connect to Nokia SMSC (CIMD 2.0), > does the Kannel needs x.25, tcp/ip or any other connection? have you check the user's guide for that information?! Stipe [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Wapme Syste

Re: kannel ACK wait

2002-01-29 Thread Stipe Tolj
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Is it possible to make ACK timeout for stop-and-wait? any comments from the emi2 developers, here? Stipe [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Wapme Systems AG Münsterstr. 248 40470 Düsseldorf Tel: +49-211-74845-0 F

Re: Kannel and Kwtls

2002-01-29 Thread Stipe Tolj
Oleg Taranov wrote: > Why do you need to use 9202? keep in mind that some devices are only capable of connectionless mode, so even for WTLS then. I don't know which ones, but I guess there may be some. At least followin the specs what Charles tries *should* be possible and reasonable. >

Re: [RFC] emi2 driver login behaviour

2002-01-29 Thread Stipe Tolj
Angel Fradejas wrote: > > My EMI2 provider from time to time leaves my connections in a zombie state: > althought I closed it, they see them as already open (they have problems > with their soft I guess). The result is that when I try to login again they > reject me with a "number of sessions exc

Re: sms content providers

2002-01-29 Thread Stipe Tolj
Patrick Mignott wrote: > > hello all, i hope i am not in the wrong discussion group, but i > would like to know if anyone knows of a SMS contact provider that > can delver sms news, sports, weather, ect. for the UK and is > compatible with kannel?. this is *definitly* off-topic. You may post

sms content providers

2002-01-29 Thread Patrick Mignott
hello all, i hope i am not in the wrong discussion group, but i would  like to know if anyone knows of a SMS contact provider that can delver sms news, sports, weather, ect. for the UK and is compatible with kannel?. thanks,

Re: SMPP TON

2002-01-29 Thread Alex Judd
I just had to do this for the carrier I'm connecting to here (had to force combinations that the autodetect didn't support) so the patch against cvs is attached. As per current behaviour, if you don't specify it it is automatically detected from the to number. Here's an example group for the c

Re: Kannel and Kwtls

2002-01-29 Thread Oleg Taranov
Hello Charles, Tuesday, January 29, 2002, 4:59:36 PM, you wrote: CP> Hello, CP> I know it's a bit outside kannel... CP> I'm using kannel 1.1.3 and kwtls 0.1.3. When i'm using kwtls on port 9203, CP> I have no problem, i can established a secure session even using CP> certificate. But, my prob

[RFC] emi2 driver login behaviour

2002-01-29 Thread Angel Fradejas
My EMI2 provider from time to time leaves my connections in a zombie state: althought I closed it, they see them as already open (they have problems with their soft I guess). The result is that when I try to login again they reject me with a "number of sessions exceeded" reason. When that happens

RE: global-sender on a smsc basis ?

2002-01-29 Thread Angel Fradejas
Ok, obvious. I guess I need a rest -Mensaje original- De: Andreas Fink [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Enviado el: martes 29 de enero de 2002 16:47 Para: Angel Fradejas CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Asunto: RE: global-sender on a smsc basis ? >Ok, I could rework my patch to take this into accoun

RE: global-sender on a smsc basis ?

2002-01-29 Thread Andreas Fink
>Ok, I could rework my patch to take this into account. > >So we'd have > >smsbox global-sender >sms-service faked-sender >smsc default-sender >And of course an optional &from= in every message. > >And bearerbox behaviour would be > >&from=never overrideable by smsc defa

RE: global-sender on a smsc basis ?

2002-01-29 Thread Angel Fradejas
Ok, I could rework my patch to take this into account. So we'd have smsbox global-sender sms-service faked-sender smsc default-sender And of course an optional &from= in every message. And bearerbox behaviour would be &from=never overrideable by smsc default-sender g

Kannel and Kwtls

2002-01-29 Thread Charles Poitvin
Hello, I know it's a bit outside kannel... I'm using kannel 1.1.3 and kwtls 0.1.3. When i'm using kwtls on port 9203, I have no problem, i can established a secure session even using certificate. But, my problem is when I want use kwtls on port 9202, i've modified kwtls.c and udp.c but the conn

kannel ACK wait

2002-01-29 Thread GAksenov
Hello! Today kannel stops sending any messages to smsc. In the log file i saw: 2002-01-29 13:32:09 [7] INFO: emi2: closing idle connection. 2002-01-29 14:37:39 [9] DEBUG: boxc_receiver: sms received 2002-01-29 14:37:39 [7] DEBUG: clear_sent called 2002-01-29 14:38:39 [7] DEBUG: emi2 sending pack

Re: forced-smsc not working with concatenated.

2002-01-29 Thread Stefan Cars
It seems like it works although only if I set the preferred-smsc not if I use the forced-smsc. - Stefan Cars CTO Globalwire Communications Phone: +46 18 10 79 50 Mobile(UK): +44 788 061 36 69 Mobile(SE): +46 708 44 36 00 On Tue, 29 Jan 2002, Andreas Fink wrote: > >This is not r

Help with Connecting to Nokia SMSC (CIMD 2.0)

2002-01-29 Thread Yochi Daniel
Hi, I would like to connect to Nokia SMSC (CIMD 2.0), does the Kannel needs x.25, tcp/ip or any other connection? Thanks Daniel

Re: forced-smsc not working with concatenated.

2002-01-29 Thread Andreas Fink
>This is not really true. When sending concatenated it doesn't work. > this should be relatively easy to fix. the forced-smsc might only apply for the first message but no the second. So the forced-smsc information has to be copied over whe the message is being split. this is in smsbox.c. Vou

Re: forced-smsc not working with concatenated.

2002-01-29 Thread Stefan Cars
This is not really true. When sending concatenated it doesn't work. / Stefan - Stefan Cars CTO Globalwire Communications Phone: +46 18 10 79 50 Mobile(UK): +44 788 061 36 69 Mobile(SE): +46 708 44 36 00

RE: global-sender on a smsc basis ?

2002-01-29 Thread Stefan Cars
That sounds very good - Stefan Cars CTO Globalwire Communications Phone: +46 18 10 79 50 Mobile(UK): +44 788 061 36 69 Mobile(SE): +46 708 44 36 00 On Tue, 29 Jan 2002, Andreas Fink wrote: > how about this for global sender idea: > > We add another field to the message structure

Ringtone and logos with Kannel via SMPP

2002-01-29 Thread Le Nhu Hai
Hi Stipe Tolj and list, Can I use kannel to send ring tone and logo (via SMPP) ? I've found that the Administrator page of kannel shows that: Usage Send a SMS Text message. (link to sendsms.php) Send an OTA WAP configuration. (link to sendota.php) Send a vCard. (link to sendvcard.php) Send a

Re: SMPP implementation in current CVS build

2002-01-29 Thread Alex Judd
Illogical and strange but thanks for looking at it (and the fix). We don't check for host as a default config value either so you get an octstr error if you don't specify it. Quick diff fix for that. # cvs diff -u gw/smsc_smpp.c Index: gw/smsc_smpp.c

RV: [PATCH] smsc_smpp.c does not timestamp MO messages

2002-01-29 Thread Angel Fradejas
Oops, I missed something the patch itself. Sorry. -Mensaje original- De: Angel Fradejas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Enviado el: martes 29 de enero de 2002 11:08 Para: Kannel Developers Asunto: [PATCH] smsc_smpp.c does not timestamp MO messages Hi list, I noticed that MO message

[PATCH] smsc_smpp.c does not timestamp MO messages

2002-01-29 Thread Angel Fradejas
Hi list, I noticed that MO messages do not get timestamped by SMPP driver. The fix is trivial. You can confirm it using %t token on a get-url directive. Stipe, please, what about a commit for this? :-) Seriously, let be know if I'm missing something. Thanks for your time. Angel Fradejas.

RE: global-sender on a smsc basis ?

2002-01-29 Thread Andreas Fink
how about this for global sender idea: We add another field to the message structure which is a flag indicating that the number was set as a "default" number and it can be replaced if there's another more specific default overriding it? this will make a global default sender overrideable by a

Re: SMPP TON

2002-01-29 Thread Andreas Fink
>Peter Löfman wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> well I solved the problem by re-compiling with the ton set to 0. >> It might be possible that 1 (international) will work also, I have >>not tested yet. >> But with 2 (national) it did not work. > >so, how about setting this ton variable by a configuration

RE: global-sender on a smsc basis ?

2002-01-29 Thread Angel Fradejas
Stipe Tolj wrote: > >Angel Fradejas wrote: >> >> The way sendsms requests get their way, I think this is not an easy thing to >> do. First, smsbox takes the request and if it has an empty sender, it puts >> "global-sender". smsbox does not know about smsc's. Then, bearerbox takes >> the request, a

Re: DLR on AT

2002-01-29 Thread Matthew Flax
On 29 January 2002, Oded Arbel wrote: > This is the DLR_SMSC_SUCCESS and DLR_SMSC_FAIL messages already > implemented by Kannel. I've done some experiments on AT2 to get it to > support DLRs, and currently I got it to do those two. getting > DLR_SUCCESS to work should be relativly easy (save for M

RE: DLR on AT

2002-01-29 Thread Oded Arbel
This is the DLR_SMSC_SUCCESS and DLR_SMSC_FAIL messages already implemented by Kannel. I've done some experiments on AT2 to get it to support DLRs, and currently I got it to do those two. getting DLR_SUCCESS to work should be relativly easy (save for Matthew Flex's note about DLR SMs waste of band

EMI Large Account specific extensions VSMSC "d2 vodafone"

2002-01-29 Thread Bjoern Buettner
Hello List Has anybody experience with the Virtual SMSC from "d2 vodafone " ? Does Kannel support the VSMSC ? Thanks to all kind regards Vodafone TeleCommerce GmbH Architecture & Engineering Bjoern Buettner Rehhecke 50 40885 Ratingen Tel. +49 (0) 21 02 / 97 20 13 Fax +49 (0) 21 02 / 97 15 14

RE: SMPP TON

2002-01-29 Thread Angel Fradejas
Good idea. I had to hack around a bit with the TON to be accepted by Vodafone... -Mensaje original- De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]En nombre de Stipe Tolj Enviado el: martes 29 de enero de 2002 9:00 Para: Peter Löfman CC: Andreas Fink; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Asunto: Re: SMPP T