Hello Stipe,
Tuesday, January 29, 2002, 11:54:54 PM, you wrote:
ST> Oleg Taranov wrote:
>> Why do you need to use 9202?
ST> keep in mind that some devices are only capable of connectionless
ST> mode, so even for WTLS then. I don't know which ones, but I guess
ST> there may be some. At least
Alex Judd wrote:
>
> Illogical and strange but thanks for looking at it (and the fix).
>
> We don't check for host as a default config value either so you get an
> octstr error if you don't specify it. Quick diff fix for that.
>
> # cvs diff -u gw/smsc_smpp.c
> Index: gw/smsc_smpp.c
> =
Angel Fradejas wrote:
>
> I noticed that MO messages do not get timestamped by SMPP driver. The fix is
> trivial. You can confirm it using %t token on a get-url directive.
>
> Stipe, please, what about a commit for this? :-) Seriously, let be know if
> I'm missing something.
patch applied. Than
Bjoern Buettner wrote:
>
> Has anybody experience with the Virtual SMSC from "d2 vodafone " ?
> Does Kannel support the VSMSC ?
at least we have no expicit support for it, due that there is no smsc
driver module.
Have you any specs about the protocoll?
Stipe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Yochi Daniel wrote:
>
> I would like to connect to Nokia SMSC (CIMD 2.0),
> does the Kannel needs x.25, tcp/ip or any other connection?
have you check the user's guide for that information?!
Stipe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Wapme Syste
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Is it possible to make ACK timeout for stop-and-wait?
any comments from the emi2 developers, here?
Stipe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Wapme Systems AG
Münsterstr. 248
40470 Düsseldorf
Tel: +49-211-74845-0
F
Oleg Taranov wrote:
> Why do you need to use 9202?
keep in mind that some devices are only capable of connectionless
mode, so even for WTLS then. I don't know which ones, but I guess
there may be some. At least followin the specs what Charles tries
*should* be possible and reasonable.
>
Angel Fradejas wrote:
>
> My EMI2 provider from time to time leaves my connections in a zombie state:
> althought I closed it, they see them as already open (they have problems
> with their soft I guess). The result is that when I try to login again they
> reject me with a "number of sessions exc
Patrick Mignott wrote:
>
> hello all, i hope i am not in the wrong discussion group, but i
> would like to know if anyone knows of a SMS contact provider that
> can delver sms news, sports, weather, ect. for the UK and is
> compatible with kannel?.
this is *definitly* off-topic.
You may post
hello all, i hope i am not in the wrong discussion
group, but i would like to know if anyone knows of a SMS contact provider
that can delver sms news, sports, weather, ect. for the UK and is compatible
with kannel?.
thanks,
I just had to do this for the carrier I'm connecting to here (had to force
combinations that the autodetect didn't support) so the patch against cvs
is attached. As per current behaviour, if you don't specify it it is
automatically detected from the to number.
Here's an example group for the c
Hello Charles,
Tuesday, January 29, 2002, 4:59:36 PM, you wrote:
CP> Hello,
CP> I know it's a bit outside kannel...
CP> I'm using kannel 1.1.3 and kwtls 0.1.3. When i'm using kwtls on port 9203,
CP> I have no problem, i can established a secure session even using
CP> certificate. But, my prob
My EMI2 provider from time to time leaves my connections in a zombie state:
althought I closed it, they see them as already open (they have problems
with their soft I guess). The result is that when I try to login again they
reject me with a "number of sessions exceeded" reason.
When that happens
Ok, obvious. I guess I need a rest
-Mensaje original-
De: Andreas Fink [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Enviado el: martes 29 de enero de 2002 16:47
Para: Angel Fradejas
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Asunto: RE: global-sender on a smsc basis ?
>Ok, I could rework my patch to take this into accoun
>Ok, I could rework my patch to take this into account.
>
>So we'd have
>
>smsbox global-sender
>sms-service faked-sender
>smsc default-sender
>And of course an optional &from= in every message.
>
>And bearerbox behaviour would be
>
>&from=never overrideable by smsc defa
Ok, I could rework my patch to take this into account.
So we'd have
smsbox global-sender
sms-service faked-sender
smsc default-sender
And of course an optional &from= in every message.
And bearerbox behaviour would be
&from=never overrideable by smsc default-sender
g
Hello,
I know it's a bit outside kannel...
I'm using kannel 1.1.3 and kwtls 0.1.3. When i'm using kwtls on port 9203,
I have no problem, i can established a secure session even using
certificate. But, my problem is when I want use kwtls on port 9202, i've
modified kwtls.c and udp.c but the conn
Hello!
Today kannel stops sending any messages to smsc. In the log file i saw:
2002-01-29 13:32:09 [7] INFO: emi2: closing idle connection.
2002-01-29 14:37:39 [9] DEBUG: boxc_receiver: sms received
2002-01-29 14:37:39 [7] DEBUG: clear_sent called
2002-01-29 14:38:39 [7] DEBUG: emi2 sending pack
It seems like it works although only if I set the preferred-smsc not if I
use the forced-smsc.
-
Stefan Cars
CTO
Globalwire Communications
Phone: +46 18 10 79 50
Mobile(UK): +44 788 061 36 69
Mobile(SE): +46 708 44 36 00
On Tue, 29 Jan 2002, Andreas Fink wrote:
> >This is not r
Hi,
I would like to connect to Nokia SMSC (CIMD 2.0),
does the Kannel needs x.25, tcp/ip or any other connection?
Thanks
Daniel
>This is not really true. When sending concatenated it doesn't work.
>
this should be relatively easy to fix. the forced-smsc might only
apply for the first message but no the second. So the forced-smsc
information has to be copied over whe the message is being split.
this is in smsbox.c.
Vou
This is not really true. When sending concatenated it doesn't work.
/ Stefan
-
Stefan Cars
CTO
Globalwire Communications
Phone: +46 18 10 79 50
Mobile(UK): +44 788 061 36 69
Mobile(SE): +46 708 44 36 00
That sounds very good
-
Stefan Cars
CTO
Globalwire Communications
Phone: +46 18 10 79 50
Mobile(UK): +44 788 061 36 69
Mobile(SE): +46 708 44 36 00
On Tue, 29 Jan 2002, Andreas Fink wrote:
> how about this for global sender idea:
>
> We add another field to the message structure
Hi Stipe Tolj and list,
Can I use kannel to send ring tone and logo (via SMPP) ? I've found
that the Administrator page of kannel shows that:
Usage
Send a SMS Text message. (link to sendsms.php)
Send an OTA WAP configuration. (link to sendota.php)
Send a vCard. (link to sendvcard.php)
Send a
Illogical and strange but thanks for looking at it (and the fix).
We don't check for host as a default config value either so you get an
octstr error if you don't specify it. Quick diff fix for that.
# cvs diff -u gw/smsc_smpp.c
Index: gw/smsc_smpp.c
Oops, I missed something the patch itself.
Sorry.
-Mensaje original-
De: Angel Fradejas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Enviado el: martes 29 de enero de 2002 11:08
Para: Kannel Developers
Asunto: [PATCH] smsc_smpp.c does not timestamp MO messages
Hi list,
I noticed that MO message
Hi list,
I noticed that MO messages do not get timestamped by SMPP driver. The fix is
trivial. You can confirm it using %t token on a get-url directive.
Stipe, please, what about a commit for this? :-) Seriously, let be know if
I'm missing something.
Thanks for your time.
Angel Fradejas.
how about this for global sender idea:
We add another field to the message structure which is a flag
indicating that the number was set as a "default" number and it can
be replaced if there's another more specific default overriding it?
this will make a global default sender overrideable by a
>Peter Löfman wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> well I solved the problem by re-compiling with the ton set to 0.
>> It might be possible that 1 (international) will work also, I have
>>not tested yet.
>> But with 2 (national) it did not work.
>
>so, how about setting this ton variable by a configuration
Stipe Tolj wrote:
>
>Angel Fradejas wrote:
>>
>> The way sendsms requests get their way, I think this is not an easy thing
to
>> do. First, smsbox takes the request and if it has an empty sender, it
puts
>> "global-sender". smsbox does not know about smsc's. Then, bearerbox takes
>> the request, a
On 29 January 2002, Oded Arbel wrote:
> This is the DLR_SMSC_SUCCESS and DLR_SMSC_FAIL messages already
> implemented by Kannel. I've done some experiments on AT2 to get it to
> support DLRs, and currently I got it to do those two. getting
> DLR_SUCCESS to work should be relativly easy (save for M
This is the DLR_SMSC_SUCCESS and DLR_SMSC_FAIL messages already
implemented by Kannel. I've done some experiments on AT2 to get it to
support DLRs, and currently I got it to do those two. getting
DLR_SUCCESS to work should be relativly easy (save for Matthew Flex's
note about DLR SMs waste of band
Hello List
Has anybody experience with the Virtual SMSC from "d2 vodafone " ?
Does Kannel support the VSMSC ?
Thanks to all
kind regards
Vodafone TeleCommerce GmbH
Architecture & Engineering
Bjoern Buettner
Rehhecke 50
40885 Ratingen
Tel. +49 (0) 21 02 / 97 20 13
Fax +49 (0) 21 02 / 97 15 14
Good idea. I had to hack around a bit with the TON to be accepted by
Vodafone...
-Mensaje original-
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]En
nombre de Stipe Tolj
Enviado el: martes 29 de enero de 2002 9:00
Para: Peter Löfman
CC: Andreas Fink; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Asunto: Re: SMPP T
34 matches
Mail list logo