RE: How to construct Flash SMS

2002-02-05 Thread Dedy Sutanto
Hi Nisan, I have patched the cvs version so it always send with TON=1 and NPI=1. (this TON and NPI work with kannel 1.0.3) But kannel-cvs still cannot submit_sm correctly. I think the problem because there is no terminating character (NULL) in smpp_pdu. I seen this NULL ("\0") in smpp_pdu for k

Re: How to construct Flash SMS

2002-02-05 Thread Nisan Bloch
Hi At 09:50 AM 2/5/02 +0100, Stipe Tolj wrote: >Andreas Fink wrote: > > > > Ok. well the question is why is it getting into trouble as TON=1 is > > definitively a valid setting. TON=2 (national) could be replaced for > > TON=0 (undefined). Maybe that fixes 99% of the cases. In my case > > TON=0 i

Compile error on gateway1.1.5

2002-02-05 Thread macky
i installed kannel1.0.3.rpm with libxml2-2.4.13-3.i386.rpm and it works but in kannel1.1.5 ./configure produces an error.. You MUST have the gnome-xml library installed i did install the libxml thingy thats why i was able to install 1.0.3... is there some env. variables i have to set f

kannel compile error

2002-02-05 Thread Patrick Mignott
Hi all i tried to compile kannel 1.1.5 today but i am getting the following message     run# make ar rc libgw.aranlib libgw.aar rc libwmlscript.aranlib libwmlscript.aar rc libwap.aranlib libwap.aar rc libgwlib.aranlib libgwlib.agcc -D_REENTRANT=1 -I

RE: REPOST : Problem with keepalive feature of emi2 and receive-port configuration

2002-02-05 Thread Gildas PERROT
Hi, I am trying to sum up what has been said about keepalive of emi2 when using receive-port. Here is my configuration, MT are sent on one connection to my broker and MO are received on another connection (receive-port defined). I want to maintain MT connection active since my broker needs it and

Re: WTP-SAR and Ericsson T68m

2002-02-05 Thread Aarno Syvänen
Hi, Stipe Tolj wrote: > > Andreas Fink wrote: > > > > >We have encountered a problem using the T68m with Kannel as WAP gw. > > > > > >The log shows the following entry: > > >2002-02-04 13:47:19 [6] DEBUG: WTP_RESP: no sar implemented,aborting > > >transaction > > > > > >which means the client ha

Re: Fwd: Release Status

2002-02-05 Thread Aarno Syvänen
Hi List, Andreas Fink wrote: > I dont think the size of the project would justify for a two branch > method. However I think we should definitively release 1.1.6 as a > "stable" release pretty soon. Its far more stable than 1.0.3 anyway > and lots of people try to use 1.0.3 and I'm kinda tired t

Re: How to construct Flash SMS

2002-02-05 Thread Alex Judd
Stipe/Andreas Can we not just apply the patch I submitted to do this last week? This allows for manual override or automatic fall back if not used. Alex On Tue, 5 Feb 2002, Stipe Tolj wrote: > Andreas Fink wrote: > > > > You got to send the numbers to kannel in international format (+...) >

Re: WTP-SAR and Ericsson T68m

2002-02-05 Thread Stipe Tolj
Andreas Fink wrote: > > >We have encountered a problem using the T68m with Kannel as WAP gw. > > > >The log shows the following entry: > >2002-02-04 13:47:19 [6] DEBUG: WTP_RESP: no sar implemented,aborting > >transaction > > > >which means the client has requested SAR processing and Kannel refus

Re: WTP-SAR and Ericsson T68m

2002-02-05 Thread Andreas Fink
>We have encountered a problem using the T68m with Kannel as WAP gw. > >The log shows the following entry: >2002-02-04 13:47:19 [6] DEBUG: WTP_RESP: no sar implemented,aborting >transaction > >which means the client has requested SAR processing and Kannel refused >that. By protocoll the client SHO

Re: How to construct Flash SMS

2002-02-05 Thread Stipe Tolj
Andreas Fink wrote: > > Ok. well the question is why is it getting into trouble as TON=1 is > definitively a valid setting. TON=2 (national) could be replaced for > TON=0 (undefined). Maybe that fixes 99% of the cases. In my case > TON=0 is not accepted by the SMSC (which I consider a valid respo

WTP-SAR and Ericsson T68m

2002-02-05 Thread Stipe Tolj
We have encountered a problem using the T68m with Kannel as WAP gw. The log shows the following entry: 2002-02-04 13:47:19 [6] DEBUG: WTP_RESP: no sar implemented,aborting transaction which means the client has requested SAR processing and Kannel refused that. By protocoll the client SHOULD fall

Re: Fwd: Release Status

2002-02-05 Thread Andreas Fink
>Jaap Bouma wrote: >> >> The site still stays 1.0.3 is production and 1.1.5 is definitely NOT >> production. >> >> What's the official status on this, and perhaps it would be nice to say >> something more specific on the website. > >it's hard to tell what the "official" status is, IMHO. > >I d

Re: How to construct Flash SMS

2002-02-05 Thread Andreas Fink
>Andreas Fink wrote: >> >> You got to send the numbers to kannel in international format (+...) >> to get TON to be set to 1. If you send them in national format >> without the +, TON is set to 2 (national), not 0 (unspecified) >> >> Or you might simply patch that part to set TON always to zer

Re: Fwd: Release Status

2002-02-05 Thread Stipe Tolj
Jaap Bouma wrote: > > The site still stays 1.0.3 is production and 1.1.5 is definitely NOT > production. > > What's the official status on this, and perhaps it would be nice to say > something more specific on the website. it's hard to tell what the "official" status is, IMHO. I don't know if

Fwd: Release Status

2002-02-05 Thread Jaap Bouma
Hi all, I've been playing around with kannel (v1.0.3) and I _like_ it :) However, there's a lot of references on the mailing lists to 1.0.3 being more or less deprecated ("nobody really bothers to do bugfixes on 1.0.3"), 1.1.5 being a lot better, and very stable, and even CVS being the preferr

Re: SIM buffering (was: I can not receive sms messages)

2002-02-05 Thread Oded Arbel
On Tue, 2002-02-05 at 03:06, Matthew Flax wrote: > > > > The main problem with Matthew's solution is the short life span of SIM > > memory: using Flash technology, SIM memory cards are limited to 10,000 > > writes to each bit of memory. when usage exceeds this bound, the card > > will become usel

RE: How to construct Flash SMS

2002-02-05 Thread Dedy Sutanto
Here the result of SMPP dump 2002-02-05 08:07:00 [8] DEBUG: boxc_receiver: sms received 2002-02-05 08:07:00 [5] DEBUG: SMPP: Sending PDU: 2002-02-05 08:07:00 [5] DEBUG: SMPP PDU 0x8222da8 dump: 2002-02-05 08:07:00 [5] DEBUG: type_name: submit_sm 2002-02-05 08:07:00 [5] DEBUG: command_id: 4 =