5) In many test cases (dlrmasks
9,10,11,13,14,15,25,26, 27,29,30 or 31)
Kannel says DLR not deleted because we wait on more
reports but after
receiving a correct deliver_sm (DLR) it just didn't
find the mysql row,
telling no rows found and then got DLR but could
there are no other statuses possible to follow.
[Mauricio Ramos]Well not for me because I'm not a C programmer
and our Java programmers would take a long time to get the point. I'll still
be pleased to find bugs and test fixes... ;-)
2) The use of DLRMASK equal to
16 never inserts a DLR in databas
Hi Andreas and everybody interested in SMPP DLR correctness.
1) Kannel is not doing multiple DLR notifications per message
when requested
(e.g. sendms dlrmask=31)
Hmm. this is to be considered a BUG. only when a final state
has been reached the db entries should be removed. In a
, hope I didn't confuse anybody and also hope this
experience will further helps somebody.
Mauricio
-Original Message-
From: Mauricio Ramos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: segunda-feira, 13 de janeiro de 2003 11:42
To: 'Andreas Fink'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Extensive DLR
Hi All,
We spent a lot of time testing almost all possible DLR conditions with SMPP;
We did it using Kannel stable 1.2.1, 1.3.0 and also CURRENT CVS. So, this
behaviour is VERY OLD;
We are using external dlr storage with MySQL and SMPP interface-version
33;
The SMSC is a CMG one;
I will further
Do I have to care about these two warnings I got from today's CVS snapshot?
I think they are quite old...
-
gcc -D_REENTRANT=1 -I. -Igw -g -O2 -DBROKEN_PTHREADS=1
-I/usr/include/libxml2 -Wall -I/usr/include/openssl -I'/usr/include/mysql'
-o wmlscript/wsgram.o -c
Hi All,
I'm back again after few months and starting new tests and assessments.
I'm using Kannel 1.2.1 with external dlr (MySQL) and experiencing this error
when invoking the store-status url.
2002-12-26 11:57:04 [3] PANIC: gwlib/list.c:287: list_lock: Assertion `list
!= NULL' failed.
Any
dezembro de 2002 12:38
To: Mauricio Ramos
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Re: Kannel 1.2.1 PANIC when invoking store-status url
Hi Mauricio,
I'm back again after few months and starting new tests and
assessments.
great, welcome back :)
I'm using Kannel 1.2.1 with external dlr
Sorry about this late question.
I didn't undertand what this bind to a specified interface is for.
I also didn't find neither any messages related nor the usage of this in
CVS's Userguide.
Best regards,
Mauricio.
-Original Message-
From: Stipe Tolj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
How about killall -HUP bearerbox smsbox?
-Original Message-
From: Stipe Tolj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2002 8:42 AM
To: Shridhar Raju
Cc: Kannel Developers
Subject: Re: Reloading configuration
Shridhar Raju wrote:
Does it possible to reload
Hi All,
Does somebody know why it's happening?
I'm using one-month-ago CVS version on Linux 7.3 connnecting with SMPP3.4.
This sometimes happens when sending thousand of messages and the store file
increases up to 5 MB or greater.
Thanks in advance.
Mauricio.
. For
malformed phonenumbers I receive error 0x000b.
-Original Message-
From: Dima Milentiev [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: terça-feira, 3 de setembro de 2002 04:09
To: Mauricio Ramos; Oded Arbel
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [RFC] New temporary nack for Kannel SMPP module
such thing based on my environment.
I'll further try with a CMG's SMSC.
Cheers
-Original Message-
From: Dima Milentiev [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: domingo, 1 de setembro de 2002 08:01
To: Mauricio Ramos; Oded Arbel
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [RFC] New temporary nack
Hi Fellows,
I'm actually not aware of every change on current CVS but would like to know
your opinions wheter current CVS is stable as 1.2.0 or not.
Indeed, I'd rather to deploy version 1.2.0 but this still have a major bug
regarding DLR and resending of malformed messages (SMPP driver).
Is it
Message-
From: Oded Arbel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
-Original Message-
From: Mauricio Ramos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
but I
got a little bit confused how Kannel DOES behave CURRENTLY.
Please confirm
these statements:
1) Current Kannel CVS ALLWAYS removes message from
delivery_sm doesn't come fast enough.
Any suggestion?
Tnx.
-Original Message-
From: Andreas Fink [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: segunda-feira, 26 de agosto de 2002 18:53
To: Mauricio Ramos
Subject: Re: SMPP query message: Is Kannel able to do this?
Hi SMPPers,
My concern
Hi Oded,
A backoff alghorithm would be nice! It sounds like Postifx MTA.
But, is there a limit or Kannel would be backing off until forever?
Regards.
-Original Message-
From: Oded Arbel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: domingo, 25 de agosto de 2002 14:58
To: Oded Arbel; Damjan;
Agreed. I was just strict to an exponential backoff alghorithm.
-Original Message-
From: Oded Arbel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: terça-feira, 27 de agosto de 2002 12:58
To: Mauricio Ramos; Damjan; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [PATCH] Kannel resending old unsuccessful messges
Hi SMPPers,
My concern is regarding the delivery notification. Is Kannel able to query
the message state in SMSC in a time interval in case SMSC is too lazy to
notify de delivery through deliver_sm?
Tnx!
Hang on! :-) The message wasn't mal-formed, was it? I've just
intentionally sent a sms with and invalid number whose prefix is not
configured to be accepted by Logica's SMSC, so I got the
0x000b. The
same problem seems to happen when I got errors like
0x0001, 0x0014
2) Why did kannel do it if it had been notified to My
Application which is
responsible to do that?
DLR notification using URL triggers are only for informing an
external entitfy (from the point of view of Kannel itself). bearerbox
relies on it's own facilities to resend failed
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: quarta-feira, 21 de agosto de 2002 04:16
To: Mauricio Ramos
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Kannel resending old unsuccessful messges after a box
restart. BUG?
-Original Message-
From: Stipe Tolj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Questions:
1) Why
-Original Message-
From: Oded Arbel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
AFAIK - Kannel does not have a mechanism to expire messages
that have past their validity period. the problem is much
worse, I'm afraid - the decision of whether to retry a
message or fail it completly (sending an
I'll reproduce the situation now using the stable and give you my feedback.
Regards.
Did you mean to update to the latest CVS (1.1.6) or there is
a new 1.2.x
version?
Are we talking about the same problem? Seems to be but I did
what you've
suggested.
I could refresh
Hi Folks,
I would like to ask for your help in this problem. I'm using Kannel 1.2 on
Red Hat 7.3 connecting to a Logica's SMSC through SMPP 3.4. But I've seen
this problem for a logn time.
Firstly I'll describe exactly what I've done and after I'll print the log
lines before restarting Kannel
Hello All,
Could somebody tell what is the actual status of Kannel WTLS for version 1.2
and mainly for current 1.1.6?
Thank you guys.
Hi,
I'd appreciate if somebody says what the following error means while
connecting to a Nokia 3320 (TDMA). I'm using latest CVS on Win2000.
2002-08-15 14:59:17 [6] DEBUG: AT2[/dev/ttyS5]: -- AT+CPIN?^M
2002-08-15 14:59:17 [6] DEBUG: AT2[/dev/ttyS5]: -- ERROR
What's this command AT+CPIN?
AT Hayes? Seems not...
Many thanks.
-Original Message-
From: Oded Arbel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: quinta-feira, 15 de agosto de 2002 15:36
To: Mauricio Ramos; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: TDMA phone-as-smsc
The last time I tried to use a TDMA phone (Nokia 7610
Hi all
I'm using the latest CYGWIN on Windows 2000 to compile the latest version
(I'm know how crazy I'm)
Even NOT using the configure with --enable-start-stop-daemon, the make
depend spits:
utils/start-stop-daemon.c:37: #error Unknown architecture - cannot
build start-stop-daemon
Hi Kannelers,
I'm testing Kannel 1.1.6 cvs (June, 6) with Red Hat 7.3. The SMSC protocol
in use is SMPP 3.4.
I realized that every time Kannel successfuly notify my Application that
messages hadn't been delivery to SMSC (escape %d = 16) it write a new line
in store-file, so every notification
, 1 de agosto de 2002 08:20
To: Mauricio Ramos; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: PROBLEM: Successful failure notification making messages to
be resended
re
I realized that every time Kannel successfuly notify my Application that
messages hadn't been delivery to SMSC (escape %d = 16) it write
Hi Kannelers,
I'm testing Kannel 1.1.6 cvs (June, 6) with Red Hat 7.3. The SMSC protocol
in use is SMPP 3.4.
I realized that every time Kannel successfuly notify my Application that
messages hadn't been delivery to SMSC (escape %d = 16) it write a new line
in store-file, so every notification
Thanks for your sincerity!
I'm sorry if we'll beat you on FIFA's World Cup.
-Original Message-
From: Jörg Pommnitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: segunda-feira, 24 de junho de 2002 16:07
To: 'Mauricio Ramos'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: AW: XSL Stylesheet for Kannel's status.xml
That looks fine, I didn't know about those PHP stuff. I used to be very
restricted to what the userguide says and now I see there is good
undocumented stuff.
Regards.
-Original Message-
From: Oded Arbel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: terça-feira, 25 de junho de 2002 07:10
To: Paul
Hi All,
I would like to know how and by the way suggest you to have a configurable
XSL stylesheet to be used when acessing status.xml.
It's just a simple idea which would be easy to implement.
Regards.
Hi,
I'm a witness that Kannel works with TDMA because this is the network I've
been testing on and as far as I know, this has no much thing to do with a
SMS Gateway.
It's important to me to know if Kannel works well on TDMA, CDMA, CDMA1XRTT
and iDEN, because in my Country we have all of these
Hi All,
I'm experiencing errors compiling Kannel CVS Snapshot related to the
documentation. I compiled with enabledocs.
I attached the compiling errors. Anybody can help?
Thanks.
sed s/#FIGTYPE#/.png/;s/#VERSION#/cvs-/;s/#DATE#/`date
+%Y.%m.%d`/;s/#DRAFTS#/IGNORE/ doc/alligata/alligata.xml
Hi Everybody
I'm curious to know when Kannel 1.2 is likely to be release. Accordingly to
the Roadmap, it should be released within April or early May of 2002.
Is there a new roadmap?
Thanks.
Hi Folks,
I apologize still not to have a better understanding of Kannel Architecture
and to have sent this message to both lists. I don't know if it proceeds.
My concern is in regards of the persistence of three SMS Gateway events:
1) The submission of a SMS-MT request from an application
39 matches
Mail list logo
