I wonder if there is any interest (or demand) to support SSL
connections for the "internal" Kannel TCP connections?
Is there anyone using bearerbox on one machine and smsbox/wapbox on an
other machine which may be on a completely different network and would
like to use SSL connections between the
>I wonder if there is any interest (or demand) to support SSL
>connections for the "internal" Kannel TCP connections?
>
>Is there anyone using bearerbox on one machine and smsbox/wapbox on an
>other machine which may be on a completely different network and would
>like to use SSL connections betwe
> I dont think thats really useful. After all it would cost a lot of
> CPU power. If someone would need that for some reason he still can
> run two instances of Kannel and use the HTTPS interface among them to
> communicate.
The load of the CPU would be signifantly higher, that's true.
But what
> > I dont think thats really useful. After all it would cost a lot of
>> CPU power. If someone would need that for some reason he still can
>> run two instances of Kannel and use the HTTPS interface among them to
>> communicate.
>
>The load of the CPU would be signifantly higher, that's true.
> Thats what I mean. Most users run bearerbox and smsbox on the same machine.
> If they are separate the its usually on two boxes sitting next to
> each other and performance is a key issue in those situations (as
> otherwhise you wouldnt use two boxes). So adding SSL to a performance
> sensitive
> > Thats what I mean. Most users run bearerbox and smsbox on the same machine.
>> If they are separate the its usually on two boxes sitting next to
>> each other and performance is a key issue in those situations (as
>> otherwhise you wouldnt use two boxes). So adding SSL to a performance
>>
> Question to the list: who is in real life using this?
That's why I enforced the RFC :)))
We don't use this currently, but we may. Especially if you want to do
license based restrictions to bearerbox (like throughput limits or
something similar).
> You got a point here. For SMS you can do easi
